logo
Satellite to 'weigh' Earth's forests successfully launched

Satellite to 'weigh' Earth's forests successfully launched

Yahoo29-04-2025
A first-of-its-kind satellite that will be able to see through clouds and leafy canopies to assess how the world's rainforests are protecting the planet from climate change, has successfully launched.
The Biomass satellite, from the European Space Agency, will "weigh" the Earth's forests, revealing how much planet-warming carbon is being stored within trees and therefore kept out of the atmosphere.
Until now the amount of carbon stored by the 1.5 trillion trees in the planet's rainforests has been impossible to calculate.
Led by European aerospace group Airbus, the project hopes to help scientists more accurately model climate change and track rates of deforestation.
World leaders promise to end deforestation by 2030
Deforestation surges in 2022 despite pledges
The satellite launched from ESA's Kourou station in French Guiana and you can watch live coverage here on the BBC iplayer.
It has been affectionately named "space brolly" for its giant 12m diameter antenna which expands outwards.
The antenna will use radar with a very long wavelength - allowing it to see deeper inside forests and reveal branches and trunks obscured by the canopy.
"Most radars that we have in space today take wonderful images of icebergs, but when they look at forests they see the tops of the forest, the little twigs, the little leaves, they don't penetrate down into the forests," explained Dr Ralph Cordey, head of geosciences at Airbus.
"But what we found was that by using a much longer radar wavelength, we could see down into the depths of trees and forests," he said.
The 1.2-tonne satellite will use an approach not dissimilar to that used in a CT scan, and analyse slices through the trees on repeat passes to build up a picture of how much woody material is present.
It is this material that can be used as a proxy for the amount of planet-warming carbon dioxide stored.
Currently scientists have been measuring individual trees and trying to extrapolate, but this presents a "huge challenge" said Prof Mat Disney, professor of remote sensing, at University College London.
"Our current understanding is really patchy, because it's really, really difficult to measure," he said. "Essentially, what we're talking about is trying to weigh the amount of carbon that's stored in one and a half trillion trees across the tropics.
"Satellites are really the only way you can do that consistently."
On the ground measurements will continue to take place after the satellite is launched to verify the data it is sending back.
Despite years of testing, the launch was challenging.
"Certain things on the satellite are big, that includes its big 12-metre, deployable antenna. It's a bit like deploying an umbrella in space, only a very big one, so we will be looking for that to happen smoothly," said Dr Cordey.
Airbus brought in engineers from the American company L3Harris Technologies to their site in Stevenage to oversee the construction of the antenna-reflector.
L3Harris are specialists in these large, unfurlable systems - expertise which is not currently possessed in Europe.
The team is hoping to produce the first maps within six months, and will then continue to gather data for the next five years.
These annual maps will not only show how much carbon is stored but how much is being lost through deforestation.
"The kind of observations that we've had for 50 years from [other] satellites like Landsat are affected very heavily by clouds. And in tropical regions, we have clouds a lot of the time, so you may not see a chunk of tropical forest," said Prof Disney.
Another advantage of the longer wavelength of the Biomass satellite is that it can penetrate clouds giving a consistent, comparable view of a forest from one year to the next.
It is this outcome which has motivated the scientists who have worked on the project for more than 20 years.
"It's exciting, because it's going to tell us about how something that we perhaps take for granted," said Dr Cordey. "Our forests, our trees, how they are contributing to the processes which govern our planet, and in particular, the processes behind climate change which are so important to us today and for the future."
A simple guide to climate change
Four ways climate change worsens extreme weather
What you can do to reduce carbon emissions
Sign up for our Future Earth newsletter to get exclusive insight on the latest climate and environment news from the BBC's Climate Editor Justin Rowlatt, delivered to your inbox every week. Outside the UK? Sign up to our international newsletter here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Was it a plane? Was it a UFO? Bright light over Quebec captivates stargazers
Was it a plane? Was it a UFO? Bright light over Quebec captivates stargazers

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Was it a plane? Was it a UFO? Bright light over Quebec captivates stargazers

With eyes turned to the skies, stargazers taking in the Perseid meteor shower on Tuesday night witnessed something out of this world. In a publication on Facebook, the Astrolab du parc national du Mont-Mégantic in Quebec's Eastern Townships described it as "a magnificent and luminous spiral streaking across the sky at around 10:40 p.m." Several people in the Montreal area also witnessed the strange phenomenon and reached out to CBC News describing a bright light enveloped by a fuzzy halo and warning of a UFO sighting. While it was certainly unusual, it wasn't really an unidentified flying object, but more likely the result of a rocket launch, according to the Astrolab. "It was in all likelihood the second stage of an Ariane 6 rocket which was igniting its engine in order to de-orbit itself after having released the European satellite Metop-SGA1 in a polar orbit," the Facebook post explained. The European Space Agency confirmed on its website that a weather satellite was launched Tuesday evening at 9:37 p.m. local time, from the European spaceport in Kourou, French Guiana — an overseas department of France located in South America. The new satellite is meant to usher in "a new era of weather and climate monitoring from polar orbit." WATCH | What was that bright object flying in the sky over Quebec: According to astrophysicist Robert Lamontagne, the rocket's orbit is what allowed for the spectacle to be visible in Quebec. Most of the time rocket launches are on an equatorial orbit and so will be visible near the equator, he said. In a polar orbit, the rocket has to go around the earth circling each pole of the planet. "So the the trajectory of that the rocket made it so that from our latitude it could be seen in Montreal or the south of Quebec," he said. But to witness the phenomena, other factors also need to align, according to Lamontagne, including the time of launch and the altitude reached by the rocket. "From our point of view, we were in the dark, the sun was low below the horizon, but the rocket itself was so high that it was still lit by the by the sun," he said. And as the second stage of the rocket re-entered the earth's atmosphere, he said, "it was spinning a little bit, there was exhaust gases coming out from it and that's what people saw in the sky." A spokesperson for the Canadian Space Agency told CBC News that many observers captured video of the event, with the agency confirming it was the ESA's Ariane 6 rocket.

The White House is launching a review of exhibits at eight Smithsonian museums. Here's what to know.
The White House is launching a review of exhibits at eight Smithsonian museums. Here's what to know.

Boston Globe

time39 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

The White House is launching a review of exhibits at eight Smithsonian museums. Here's what to know.

In response, the Smithsonian said in a statement on Tuesday that it remained committed to 'scholarly excellence, rigorous research, and the accurate, factual presentation of history.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'We are reviewing the letter with this commitment in mind and will continue to collaborate constructively with the White House, Congress, and our governing Board of Regents,' it said in a statement. Advertisement Here's what to know about the Smithsonian and the Trump administration's review of its museums. What is the Smithsonian Institution? A Smithsonian Institution sign is seen on the National Air and Space Museum on the National Mall on March 28, 2025 in Washington, D.C. Kevin Dietsch/Getty The Smithsonian Institution is the world's largest museum, education, and research complex, and includes 21 museums and the National Zoo, with 11 museums lining Washington's National Mall. It was founded with funds from British scientist James Smithson, who left his estate to the United States to create 'an establishment for the increase and diffusion of knowledge' in Washington. Which Smithsonian museums are under review? The review, first Advertisement 'This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions,' the letter said. The letter said additional museums would be reviewed in subsequent phases. How long will the review take and what will it entail? The review will take a look at all public-facing content, such as education materials, social media and digital content 'to assess tone, historical framing, and alignment with American ideals,' according to the letter. The review will also include curatorial processes and guidelines, exhibition planning and collection use. The White House is directing the museums to submit materials from exhibits and drafts for upcoming events within 30 days. Within 75 days, museums are asked to submit the 'remaining requested documentation including promotional literature, grant data, educational materials, and guided tour content.' Within 120 days, the letter said, museums will be expected to take corrective action, 'replacing divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions.' Earlier this month, its National Museum of American History had temporarily What's Trump's existing relationship with the Smithsonian? On March 27, Trump Advertisement The order placed Vice President JD Vance, a member of the Smithsonian Institution's Board of Regents, in charge of overseeing the effort to 'remove improper ideology' across the institution's museums, education and research centers, and the National Zoo. 'Museums in our Nation's capital should be places where individuals go to learn — not to be subjected to ideological indoctrination or divisive narratives that distort our shared history,' the Material from the Associated Press was used in this report. Alyssa Vega can be reached at

Using AI Made Doctors Worse at Spotting Cancer Without Assistance
Using AI Made Doctors Worse at Spotting Cancer Without Assistance

Time​ Magazine

time10 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Using AI Made Doctors Worse at Spotting Cancer Without Assistance

Health practitioners, companies, and others have for years hailed the potential benefits of AI in medicine, from improving medical imaging to outperforming doctors at diagnostic assessments. The transformative technology has even been predicted by AI enthusiasts to one day help find a 'cure to cancer.' But a new study has found that doctors who regularly used AI actually became less skilled within months. The study, which was published on Wednesday in the Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology journal, found that over the course of six months, clinicians became over-reliant on AI recommendations and became themselves 'less motivated, less focused, and less responsible when making cognitive decisions without AI assistance.' It's the latest study to demonstrate potential adverse outcomes on AI users. An earlier study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that ChatGPT eroded critical thinking skills. How the study was conducted Researchers across various European institutions conducted an observational study surveying four endoscopy centers in Poland that participated in the Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy for Cancer Prevention (ACCEPT) trial. The study was funded by the European Commission and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. As part of the trial, the centers had introduced AI tools for the detection of polyps—growths that can be benign or cancerous—in late 2021. The study looked at 1,443 non-AI-assisted colonoscopies out of a total 2,177 colonoscopies conducted between September 2021 and March 2022. The colonoscopies were performed by 19 experienced endoscopists. Researchers compared the quality of colonoscopy conducted three months before and three months after AI was implemented. Colonoscopies were conducted either with or without AI assistance, at random. Of those conducted without AI assistance, 795 were conducted before regular AI use was implemented and 648 were conducted after the AI tools were introduced. What the study found Three months before AI was introduced, the adenoma detection rate (ADR) was around 28%. Three months after AI was introduced, the rate dropped to 22% when clinicians were unassisted by AI. ADR is a commonly used quality indicator for colonoscopies and represents 'the proportion of screening colonoscopies performed by a physician that detect at least one histologically confirmed colorectal adenoma or adenocarcinoma.' Adenomas are precancerous growths, and a higher ADR is associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer. The study found that AI did help endoscopists with detection when used, but once the assistance was removed, clinicians were worse at detection. Researchers attributed it to 'the natural human tendency to over-rely' on the recommendations of decision support systems like AI. 'Imagine that you want to travel anywhere, and you're unable to use Google Maps,' Marcin Romańczyk, co-author of the study and an assistant professor at the Medical University of Silesia, told MedPage Today. 'We call it the Google Maps effect. We try to get somewhere, and it's impossible to use a regular map. It works very similarly.' Implications of the study Omer Ahmad, a consultant gastroenterologist at University College Hospital London who wrote an editorial alongside the study but was not involved in its research, tells TIME that it's likely that exposure to AI weakened doctors' visual search habits and alerting gaze patterns, which are critical for detecting polyps. 'In essence, dependence on AI detection could dull human pattern recognition,' Ahmad says. He adds that regular use of AI could also 'reduce diagnostic confidence' when AI assistance is withdrawn, or that the endoscopists' skill of manoeuvring the colonoscope could be reduced. In comments to the Science Media Center (SMC), Catherine Menon, principal lecturer at the University of Hertfordshire's Department of Computer Science, said: 'Although de-skilling resulting from AI use has been raised as a theoretical risk in previous studies, this study is the first to present real-world data that might potentially indicate de-skilling arising from the use of AI in diagnostic colonoscopies.' Menon raised concerns that overreliance on AI could leave health practitioners at risk to technological compromise. Other experts are more cautious about drawing conclusions from a single study. Venet Osmani, a professor of clinical AI and machine learning at Queen Mary University of London, noted to SMC that the total number of colonoscopies—including both AI-assisted and non-AI-assisted ones—increased over the course of the study. The increased workload, Osmani suggested, could have led to clinician fatigue and poorer detection rates. Allan Tucker, a professor of artificial intelligence at Brunel University of London, also noted that with AI assistance, clinician performance improved overall. Concerns about deskilling due to automation bias, added Tucker to SMC, 'is not unique to AI systems and is a risk with the introduction of any new technology.' 'The ethical question then is whether we trust AI over humans,' said Tucker. 'Often, we expect there to be a human overseeing all AI decision-making but if the human experts are putting less effort into their own decisions as a result of introducing AI systems this could be problematic.' 'This is not simply about monitoring technology,' says Ahmad. 'It's about navigating the complexities of a new human-AI clinical ecosystem.' Establishing safeguards is critical, he adds, suggesting that beyond this study, people may need to focus on 'preserving essential skills in a world where AI becomes ubiquitous.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store