Will County Board rejects solar facilities in near New Lenox, Wilmington
The Will County Board voted 16-5 vote Thursday to reject plans for a solar facility in New Lenox Township that was opposed by New Lenox village officials and nearby homeowners.
Soltage proposed two 5-megawatt commercial solar energy facilities on about 75 acres southeast of Haven Avenue and Gougar Road. The village of New Lenox abuts the property to the west and north and objected to the plan.
More than 80 residents of the nearby Fieldstone Subdivision signed a petition stating the commercial solar energy facility would negatively impact their property values. They also said the height of the vegetation and the minimal times it would be mowed would be an eyesore and create problems with mosquitoes and rodents.
'This proposed solar farm will be extraordinarily close to our homes,' Sandy Wheeler said. 'I was involved in preparing the signatures in opposition to this proposed solar farm. Not one resident that I asked to sign the petition denied it.'
Ray Stanford said residents in the Fieldstone Subdivision believed it would depreciate their property values, saying he researched the impact of property values next to solar farms in states that have had such facilities long before they became popular in Illinois. He said he learned the value of homes about a half mile from the solar farms go down in value.
That claim was denied by Soltage representatives.
New Lenox is recommending a medium density, single-family residential development as part of its comprehensive plan for that land, said Robin Ellis, the assistant village administrator and community development director.
The village has been very deliberate in its planning and has intentionally kept industrial development west of Gougar Road, Ellis said.
The county could generate more in property taxes from a future residential development than a solar plant, Ellis said in a letter to the county, noting the developer estimated the solar facility would generate about $73,000 annually in property taxes whereas a modest residential development could generate $1.6 million annually.
The land owner last talked to the village about building a residential development in 2008, Ellis said. Since then, the village has taken steps to encourage residential development east of Gougar Road by investing nearly $4.5 million in road improvements. The village is also investing in a new wastewater treatment facility to prep the area for residential development, she said.
Board member Frankie Pretzel, the chair of the County Board's Land Use and Development Committee, said this is the wrong location for a solar project.
'I drive by this property regularly,' Pretzel, a New Lenox Republican, said. 'It's just a matter of time that we see homes.'
He said the site is in a highly desired area in the heart of town.
New Lenox Mayor Tim Baldermann said homes are located to the west and north with Lincoln Way West High School to the south. If a solar facility is built, nearby vacant land would not be developed for homes, and an industrial use would likely be proposed.
'It doesn't fit the area,' Baldermann said. 'We are not anti-solar, it just doesn't make sense on this piece of property.'
Baldermann said he believed the solar project would be a tremendous loss of revenue for the area taxing bodies.
Union School District 81 would receive $660,000 a year in property tax revenue if the land were developed as homes as the village wants, said Baldermann, who is also the district's superintendent. As a solar facility, the district would receive $22,000 a year, he said.
The district is also highly sought after and would welcome more students, Baldermann said.
James Brown, fire marshal for the New Lenox Fire District, said he had concerns due to its proximity to schools and Silver Cross Hospital.
Stephanie Sienkowski, director of development at Soltage, said the project would bring about 60 to 75 union contractor jobs during construction, and the solar facility could provide solar energy to about 2,000 homes, helping meet a growing demand for electricity.
She said the company also planned to offer college scholarships to students and gift the New Lenox Fire District with an ATV. She tried to assuage concerns about fire hazards and said the company has an emergency response plan in place.
Andrew Lines, a real estate appraiser for Soltage, said data shows solar energy facilities don't have issues on property values throughout the country including in coveted and scenic areas of Hawaii, California or Colorado.
Soltage attorney Maria Bries said the property is located in unincorporated Will County, which should supersede New Lenox's planning authority. New Lenox's comprehensive plan is only advisory, she said.
Commercial solar facilities are allowed to be located on agricultural land, and the Soltage project meets the requirements for a special use permit, she said. The company has invested $1.6 million in the project thus far, she said.
Bries said the Will County Board cannot be more restrictive than state law in denying an application.
'Decisions by counties based on local resistance rather than objective standards … are yielding arbitrary outcomes detrimental to ComEd's future power supply and the state of Illinois' pressing energy needs,' she said.
State laws governing solar projects have frustrated many county lawmakers, who feel the state is taking the control over local projects out of their hands.
'I strongly believe that the state legislature got this wrong and shame on them for putting us in this position month after month after month,' Pretzel said, adding he would like to put a halt on solar cases.
'The only reason they are called solar farms is because we are putting them on farm land,' said Republican Leader Jim Richmond, of Mokena. 'Really, they are solar utility plants, and we are putting them in close proximity to houses not because this board wants them there but because Springfield has pushed this upon us.'
Democrat Sherry Newquist of Steger, who voted against the project, said she was on the fence. She said on one hand it was a textbook case of a municipality using its future planning area to decide how it wants to grow. But she conceded denying the project would ultimately lead to a lawsuit.
'And how well is that serving the taxpayers,' she said.
The County Board also voted 16-5 to reject a commercial solar energy facility proposed by Nexamp Solar LLC that would have been located on about 34 acres on Wilmington-Peotone Road in Wilmington.
County Board Speaker Joe VanDuyne, a Democrat from Wilmington, said the planned location is next to the community's welcome sign and would be a bad location for a solar farm.
The city of Wilmington objected to the request because it was too close to existing residents and could be annexed to the city for a future residential use. City officials said the solar energy facility would be an eyesore and potentially create glare or contamination concerns, county documents said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
40 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Hegseth faces sharp questions from Congress on deploying troops to Los Angeles
WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was met with sharp questions and criticism Tuesday by lawmakers who demanded details on his move to deploy troops to Los Angeles, and they expressed bipartisan frustration that Congress has not yet gotten a full defense budget from the Trump administration. 'Your tenure as secretary has been marked by endless chaos,' Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., told Hegseth. Others, including Republican leaders, warned that massive spending projects such as President Trump's desire for a $175 billion Golden Dome missile defense system will get broad congressional scrutiny. The troop deployment triggered several fiery exchanges that at times devolved into shouting matches as committee members and Hegseth yelled over one another. After persistent questioning about the cost of sending National Guard members and Marines to Los Angeles, Hegseth turned to his acting comptroller, Bryn Woollacott MacDonnell, who said it would cost $134 million. Hegseth defended Trump's decision to send the troops, saying they are needed to protect federal agents as they do their jobs. And he suggested that the use of troops in the United States will continue to expand. 'I think we're entering another phase, especially under President Trump with his focus on the homeland, where the National Guard and Reserves become a critical component of how we secure that homeland,' he said. The House Appropriations defense subcommittee hearing was the first time lawmakers have been able to challenge Trump's defense chief since he was confirmed. It is the first of three congressional hearings he will face this week. Lawmakers complained widely that Congress hasn't yet gotten details of the administration's first proposed defense budget, which Trump has said would total $1 trillion, a significant increase over the current spending level of more than $800 billion. And they said they are unhappy with the administration's efforts to go around Congress to push through changes. Key spending issues that have raised questions in recent weeks include plans to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on security upgrades to turn a Qatari jet into Air Force One and to pour as much as $45 million into a parade recently added to the Army's 250th birthday bash, which coincides with Trump's birthday Saturday. Rep. Betty McCollum, D-Minn., quizzed Hegseth on deploying about 700 active duty Marines to assist more than 4,100 National Guard troops in protecting federal buildings and personnel during immigration raid protests in Los Angeles. She got into a testy back-and-forth with him over the costs of the operation. He evaded the questions but later turned to MacDonnell, who provided the estimate and said it covers the costs of travel, housing and food. Hegseth said the 60-day deployment of troops is needed 'because we want to ensure that those rioters, looters and thugs on the other side assaulting our police officers know that we're not going anywhere.' Under the Posse Comitatus Act, troops are prohibited from policing U.S. citizens on American soil. Invoking the Insurrection Act, which allows troops to do that, is incredibly rare, and it's not clear if Trump plans to do it. The commandant of the Marine Corps, Gen. Eric Smith, told lawmakers at a separate budget hearing Tuesday that the Marines who have arrived in Los Angeles have not yet been called on to respond. He said they have no arrest authority and are only there to protect federal property and federal personnel. When asked by Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat, about the danger Marines would use lethal force that could result in injuries and deaths, Smith said he is not concerned. 'I have great faith in my Marines and their junior leaders and their more senior leaders to execute the lawful tasks that they are given.' Committee members pressed Hegseth on Ukraine's surprise drone attack in early June that destroyed a large number of Russian bomber aircraft. And they questioned the administration's future funding for Kyiv. Hegseth said the strikes caught the U.S. off guard and represented significant advances in drone warfare. The attack has the Pentagon rethinking drone defenses 'so we are not vulnerable to a threat and an attack like that,' he said, adding that the department is learning from Ukraine and is focused on how to better defend its own military airfields. He acknowledged, however, that funding for Ukraine military assistance, which has been robust for the past two years, will be reduced in the upcoming defense budget. That cut means that Kyiv will receive fewer of the weapons systems that have been key to countering Russia's onslaught. 'This administration takes a very different view of that conflict,' he said. 'We believe that a negotiated peaceful settlement is in the best interest of both parties and our nation's interests.' The U.S. to date has provided Ukraine more than $66 billion in military aid since Russia invaded in February 2022. The panel zeroed in on funding issues, with only a few mentions of other entanglements that have marked Hegseth's early months. They touched only briefly on his moves to fire key military leaders and purge diversity programs. And there was no discussion of his use of the Signal messaging app to discuss operational details of strikes in Yemen. Hegseth has spent vast amounts of time during his first five months in office promoting the social changes he's making at the Pentagon. He's been far less visible in the administration's more critical international security crises and negotiations involving Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Gaza and Iran. Hegseth has posted numerous videos of his morning workouts with troops or of himself signing directives to purge diversity and equity programs and online content from the military. He has boasted of removing transgender service members from the force and firing so-called woke generals, many of whom were women. He was on the international stage about a week ago, addressing an annual national security conference in Asia about threats from China. But a trip to NATO headquarters last week was quick and quiet, and he deliberately skipped a gathering of about 50 allies and partners where they discussed support for Ukraine. Baldor and Copp write for the Associated Press. Adriana Gomez Licon in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., contributed reporting.
an hour ago
Trump's tax bill could raise taxes on foreign companies
WASHINGTON -- WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump likes to say he's bringing in trillions of dollars in investments from foreign countries, but a provision in his tax cuts bill could cause international companies to avoid expanding into the United States. The House-passed version of the legislation would allow the federal government to impose taxes on foreign-parented companies and investors from countries judged as charging 'unfair foreign taxes' on U.S. companies. Known as Section 899, the measure could cause companies to avoid investing in the the U.S. out of concern they could face steep taxes. The fate of the measure rests with the Senate — setting off a debate about its prospects and impact. A new analysis by the Global Business Alliance, a trade group representing international companies such as Toyota and Nestlé, estimates that the provision would cost the U.S. 360,000 jobs and $55 billion annually over 10 years in lost gross domestic product. The analysis estimates that the tax could cut a third off the economic growth anticipated from the overall tax cuts by Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation. "While proponents say this punitive tax hike is intended as a retaliatory measure against foreign governments, this report confirms that the real victims are American workers in states like North Carolina, South Carolina, Indiana, Tennessee and Texas," said Jonathan Samford, president and CEO of the Global Business Alliance. Republican Rep. Jason Smith of Missouri, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, has defended the provision as protecting U.S. interests by giving the president a tool that can be used against countries with tax codes that, in the federal government's opinion, put American companies at a disadvantage. 'If these countries withdraw these taxes and decide to behave, we will have achieved our goal," Smith said in a statement last week. "It's just common sense. I urge my colleagues in the Senate to move quickly to pass this bill and protect Americans from economic bad actors around the world.' The tax gets at a fundamental tension within Trump's policy agenda: a contradiction in the broad strokes of Trump simultaneously trying to tax imports and foreign profits at higher rates while also seeking investments from companies headquartered abroad. In late May, Trump defended his approach by saying that his tariffs were causing more countries to invest in the U.S. to avoid imports getting taxed. While some countries and companies have made announcements, there is not evidence of the investments pushing up spending on new factories as measured in the government's monthly report on construction spending. The Republican president said his tendency to impose steep tariffs, then retreat to lower rates, had succeeded. 'We have $14 trillion now invested, committed to investing,' Trump said then. 'You know we have the hottest country anywhere in the world. I went to Saudi Arabia, the king told me, he said, you got the hottest -- we have the hottest country in the world right now.' The Global Business Alliance was among the groups that signed a letter on Monday warning of the consequences of Section 899 to Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo of Idaho, both Republicans. The Investment Company Institute, representing financial firms, said the provision 'could limit foreign investment to the U.S. — a key driver of growth in American capital markets that ultimately benefits American families saving for their futures.' The analysis performed by EY Quantitative Economics and Statistics notes there is a degree of uncertainty in how the taxes under Section 899 could be implemented. But they could be charged against companies based in countries that tax digital services, as is the case in parts of Europe. If the U.S. judged the taxes unfair, there would be a 30% tax rate on foreign companies' profits and income. People working in the U.S. for the companies who are not citizens could also be taxed, among other provisions. The possibility of the taxes and seemingly arbitrary nature by which they could be imposed is also a challenge, said Chye-Ching Huang, executive director of New York University's Tax Law Center. 'Section 899 creates a game of political chicken with trade partners that risks harming businesses, consumers, and workers in the hopes of securing US multinationals the ability to shift more of their profits out of the US to tax havens," Huang said in an email. 'It's a high-risk strategy that could expand the damage of the failed tariff war.' There could also be political repercussions if key states in Trump's political coalition from 2024 suffer layoffs or simply find job growth slowing. The Global Business Alliance finds job losses could amount to 44,200 in Florida, 27,700 in Pennsylvania, 24,500 in North Carolina and 23,500 in Michigan.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
House GOP effort to lock in DOGE cuts faces Republican resistance
The GOP's effort to eliminate billions of dollars in federal funding faces an uphill battle in the House this week, as a handful of Republicans balk at various provisions in the legislation. Some of those Republicans are voicing doubts about specific portions of the White House's request to claw back $9.4 billion — known as a recissions package — which would lock in cuts made by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) targeting the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Others are expressing concerns that the recissions process would undermine Congress' authority to allocate funding. One House Republican, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter, estimated around 10 lawmakers have voiced concerns with the bill, but 'there's more concerns than people who have whipped 'no.'' 'And I think it's a broader concern about the rescissions process itself,' the lawmaker added. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) — under heavy pressure from hardline conservatives eager to codify the DOGE cuts — is aiming to approve the bill in the coming days, setting the stage for another complicated week for GOP leaders. One of the largest concerns Republicans have with the package is the $1.1 billion in rescissions to the Corporation for Public Broadcast, which helps to fund NPR and PBS. Republicans have panned the outlets as biased, and Trump signed an executive order in May to cease federal funding for both companies. But a handful of Republicans are worried about the impact the slashes will have in their districts. Rep. Mark Amodei (R-Nev.) — an appropriations cardinal and the co-chair of the Public Broadcasting Caucus — released a statement with Rep. Dan Goldman (R-N.Y.), his counterpart in the group, encouraging the Trump administration to re-think its claw back of funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. 'From coast to coast, Americans rely on public broadcasting for lifesaving emergency alerts, trusted news, and coverage on key issues that connects communities across our nation,' the pair wrote. 'Our local stations are dedicated to serving their communities, but their ability to continue offering free, high-quality programming would be eliminated if the federal funding is rescinded,' they added. 'Rescinding this funding also would isolate rural communities, jeopardizing their access to vital resources they depend on.' Other Republicans are investigating the cuts to USAID, which was one of DOGE's first targets. The package would slash $8.3 billion in foreign aid, with much of that including dollars approved for USAID. 'Those are the areas we want to make sure we're doing the right things,' Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.) said when asked about cuts to public broadcasting and USAID. 'That's where we're getting more information.' The House Republican granted anonymity told The Hill that some lawmakers are also concerned that the recissions package undermines Congress's authority since the funding has already been approved by both chambers. 'I think there's two major concerns: One is that this is toplines and not specifics so it is undermining Congress's authority, and two, there's concerns about some the potential cuts that people have, and that's what we're working through,' the lawmaker said. The Speaker did receive one piece of good news this week: Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) appeared closer to voting for the bill after expressing reservations with the measure. The congressman warned last week that he would not vote for the bill if it completely gutted the United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which the package targets. But on Tuesday, he said the slashes were satisfactory. 'I enjoyed the discussion we had about PEPFAR: They're cutting about 8 percent and they're not cutting the medical side of it, the medicine side, so I feel better than what I was hearing last week that it was gonna be a total cut,' he told reporters. The moderate Republican, however, would not disclose how he plans to vote, saying he was keeping his cards close to the vest. '[I] feel better about that,' Bacon said, referring to the clarifications he got on the PEPFAR cuts, 'but I'm gonna work with come of my colleagues on the PBS, NPR stuff, and I'll leave it at that for the time being.' Despite those qualms, House GOP leaders are plowing ahead with the effort. The House Rules Committee is scheduled to meet on the bill Tuesday afternoon, teeing up a vote for later in the week. With Democrats expected to oppose the package in unison, Republicans can only afford to lose three votes and still nudge the measure over the finish line — meaning Johnson will need near-unanimity in his ranks. 'These are common sense cuts, and I think every member of this body should support it,' Johnson said at a press conference Tuesday morning. 'It's a critical step in restoring fiscal sanity and beginning to turn the tides of removing waste, fraud and abuse from our governments.' The rescissions bill is the first in what Johnson is forecasting will be a string of packages codifying the cuts made by DOGE. The initial effort comes just days after the heated blowup between Trump and Elon Musk, whose brainchild was DOGE. House GOP leaders, meanwhile, are openly recognizing the unfamiliar terrain they are traversing. Both chambers of Congress have not approved a rescissions package in decades, leaving little precedent to call on for the current moment. 'We haven't done anything like this in a while, so this is probably, in some ways, a test run,' House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) told reporters last week. As the vote nears, several Republicans are keeping their opinions quiet, weary to come out publicly against the package that the White House has proposed and conservatives are itching to pass. 'The public broadcasting [provisions] for sure [give me pause],' Rep. Rob Bresnahan (R-Pa.), who flipped a blue district red in November, said Tuesday. 'But again, I haven't seen the actual numerical percentage value of what would actually decrease funding in which capacities, so I haven't really made a decision yet.'
