
Homelessness: Too many children in temporary housing say MPs
A group of MPs has described the number of children in temporary accommodation as "shameful".The Housing, Communities and Local Government (HCLG) Committee has produced a report 'England's Homeless Children: The crisis in temporary accommodation'.The group, made up of MPs from different political parties, highlighted some of the poor conditions children are living in and outlined what they want the government and councils to do to tackle it. Temporary accommodation is a form of homelessness.It is short-term accommodation for people who are waiting for a longer term place to live. It includes people living in hostels or bed and breakfasts, also known as B&Bs.A government spokesperson said "the government is investing nearly £1 billion in homelessness services this year", as well as "developing a long-term strategy to tackle homelessness".
Figures released last month showed there were just over 164,000 children living in temporary accommodation in England. The committee said many of these children are "living in appalling conditions, with significant impacts to their health and education".Florence Eshalomi, Chair of the Housing, Communities and Local Government (HCLG) Committee said: "It is utterly shameful that so many families are living in B&Bs, bedsits and hotels that are completely unsuitable to their needs; having to travel for hours simply to get to school or work."In the Newsround Special on homelessness, No Place to Call Home, released in May 2024 we heard from Alice, living in temporary accommodation, who had moved five times in less than a year. She described the conditions in one of the B&Bs where she had lived: "There was mould on the walls, the walls were damp. I would have to share a bed with my mum."Alice told Newsround she had panic attacks because she didn't have anywhere else to go.
The report gave a number of recommendations for the government and councils:Councils in England must inspect the conditions of temporary accommodation used to house families. Currently many councils do not carry out regular inspections of the conditions of temporary accommodation used to house families, which the report states is "unacceptable".The government to make a system that alert a child's school and their GP when they move into temporary accommodation. The committee said because schools and GPs often don't know what children in their care are going through, they are unable to give extra support and help. A council must try to give people in accommodation in their area, but due to the demand for temporary accommodation sometimes councils place people in other areas - away from their schools, friends and family.The Local Government Association, which represents most of the councils in England, said councils try to place homeless families in their home area."Sometimes the decision is made to do an out of area placement, due to availability of housing stock or other factors," it said.
Alice, who spoke to Newsround last year for the special programme on homelessness, said because her temporary accommodation is far from where she used to live she has to get up very early to get to school on time.She also said she missed out on some activities. "I can't do after school clubs at school because it would take too much time to go there and back".The committee heard of cases which included a family from North London being placed in North Manchester about 200 miles away, and a family from Oldham in Greater Manchester being placed in Hastings - a seaside town in East Sussex.The MPs also called on the government to require councils to inform the host council - where people are being moved to - before they make an 'out-of-area' placement. Currently the requirement is that the council informs the host council only after the placement is made.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Experts question Rachel Reeves' spending promises
Experts have questioned whether Rachel Reeves will be able to meet the spending promises she made on Wednesday, given how many of them require a sudden and unprecedented drop in the asylum backlog. The chancellor said on Wednesday she would save £1bn by drastically reducing the number of asylum seekers waiting for a decision on their claims and ending the use of hotels to house them. The policy is aimed both at winning over Reform voters, many of whom list the use of asylum hotels as a major concern, and at freeing up cash for other priorities such as affordable housing. But economists and aid experts warned that the savings would be difficult to achieve. Jonathan Thomas, a senior fellow at the Social Market Foundation thinktank, said: 'The political priority is to 'end the costly use of asylum hotels in this parliament', not by housing asylum claimants elsewhere, but by 'clearing the asylum backlog, increasing appeals capacity and continuing to return those with no right to be here'. 'All of these things are really hard to do and – assuming the investment in the Border Security Command is not sufficient to stop people arriving irregularly in the UK – hostage to fortune; of who, and how many, continue to arrive in the UK to claim asylum.' Gideon Rabinowitz, director of policy and advocacy at Bond, which represents aid organisations, said there was 'a lack of urgency within government to reduce these costs'. Labour promised before the election to end the use of hotels for asylum seekers, with a senior Home Office official confirming earlier this year the ambition would be to achieve this by the end of the parliament. On Wednesday however, Reeves put the expected savings from this policy into the government's budgets, meaning ministers now have to achieve them to be able to spend what they want to elsewhere. Her aides added that the reductions in the asylum backlog would enable the housing department to spend less on housing people in temporary accommodation – cash which will be used instead to pay for the £4bn a year affordable homes scheme. So far however, the Home Office has had little success in reducing hotel costs. Much of the department's hotel spending for asylum seekers qualifies as international aid. But documents released last week show it plans to spend £2.2bn on aid this year – only slightly below the £2.3bn it spent last year. Ministers say their plans over the next few years will enable them to rapidly reduce reliance on asylum hotels. The Home Office is planning, for example, to move more people into empty 'medium-sized' accommodation, with officials examining proposals from nearly 200 councils seeking to recondition disused tower blocks and student accommodation. Angela Eagle, the immigration minister, told MPs on Tuesday that the government had received 198 applications to convert unused housing which also includes former teaching colleges. Appearing before the home affairs select committee, the minister said the government was discussing proposals with local authorities to investigate 'medium-sized' accommodation options. These could replace the current use of hotels but operate on a smaller and more localised scale than disused military bases as suggested by the last government. 'The idea with medium-sized is things like old voided tower blocks or old teacher training colleges or old student accommodation that isn't being used where you could have numbers of rooms that are more than you would get with dispersed accommodation,' she said. 'The idea is you would move from hotels into that kind of thing rather than old military bases or Pontins holiday parks.' Karen Bradley, the Conservative chair of the committee, said on Wednesday however: 'If hotels disappear there will still need to be stock of short-term accommodation to deal with unpredictable levels of irregular migration. Targets on their own are not enough, they need to be delivered – and for that we need to have workable solutions.' 'Unless these savings are made there will be a knock-on effect on the ability of the Home Office to achieve its wider aims. Policing, immigration and counter-terror will all struggle to meet the ambitious targets the government has set itself.'


The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Spend every penny of increased cash on affordable housing, charity urges
Scottish ministers have been urged to fully pass on a funding increase caused by a boost in housing spend by the UK Government. Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced on Wednesday £39 billion would be spent over the next decade on housing. The cash will result in an increase in funding for Scotland, though the Treasury has as yet been unable to say how much extra cash will come north of the border. The announcement comes as the Scottish Government has been dealing with a housing emergency in the country for more than a year and as Mairi McAllan was appointed Housing Secretary on Wednesday. Shelter Scotland – a key housing charity north of the border – has urged ministers to ensure every penny provided to the Scottish Government as a result of the boost goes towards affordable homes. 'The UK Government has finally recognised the importance of social housing and placed it at the heart of the Chancellor's plans,' the charity's director, Alison Watson, said. 'If additional funding is made available, only the Scottish Government can decide how it is allocated. But if the First Minister is serious about tackling the housing emergency and ending child poverty, housing must be a priority. 'We demand that any consequentials arising from this investment in housing in England are passed directly to Scotland's affordable housing supply programme. 'This is already the case with NHS spending – housing should be no different. After all, home is everything. 'We know that building more social homes is the only way to tackle the housing emergency. 'It is the only way we can move the 10,360 children currently in temporary accommodation into secure, permanent homes.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'As part of his reshuffle, the First Minister has put tackling the housing emergency at the heart of his Cabinet by appointing Mairi McAllan as Cabinet Secretary for Housing. 'This financial year, we have increased the Affordable Housing Supply Programme budget by £200 million to £768 million, including £40m targeted towards acquisitions to support the local authorities with the most sustained homelessness and temporary accommodation pressures. 'The full implications of the UK spending review, which outlined spending on housing in the next 10 years, are still being considered.'


BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
UK will end use of asylum hotels by 2029, Reeves says
The government has set out plans to end the use of hotels to hold asylum seekers by 2029, a move Rachel Reeves says will save £1bn a her Spending Review on Wednesday, the chancellor pledged £200m to "cut the asylum backlog, hear more appeal cases and return people who have no right to be here".Ministers say hotels will be phased out by cutting small boat crossings and building new government-owned accommodation for asylum announcement comes after the National Audit Office (NAO) predicted asylum housing costs will hit £15.3bn over the next decade - triple the amount budgeted by the Home Office. Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp claimed the plans are "built on an assumption that the hotels magically empty themselves"."They still have no plan for where these people will go," he Tuesday, Home Office minister Dame Angela Eagle told a committee of MPs the government were looking to buy tower blocks and former student accommodation to house migrants as an alternative to asylum Angela Eagle said the government was exploring new ways to house asylum seekers ahead of break clauses in major accommodation contracts coming up next year. Labour promised in its manifesto to "end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds" but did not give a date when this would be Tuesday, Reeves told MPs the government now expects to hit its goal "in this Parliament"."Funding that I have provided today... will cut the asylum backlog, hear more appeal cases and return people who have no right to be here," she extra £150m will be spent to speed up planned reforms of the asylum system in 2026-27 and an additional £50 m in 2027-28, with the money to come from the £3.25bn Transformation Fund, aimed at modernising public estimates the reforms will reduce asylum costs by at least £1bn per year by 2028–29, compared to 2024–25 Follow the latest updatesSeven ways the Spending Review affects youWhat has the chancellor has announced? The key pointsWatch: Where the money is being spentAccording to the Home Office, hotels are "contingency accommodation" and only meant to be used for asylum seekers when other housing cannot be since 2020 there has been a surge in their use - fuelled by asylum backlogs, housing shortages, and rising rental prices, according to Oxford University's Migration government spent £1.3bn this year to house asylum seekers in hotels, according to the NAO - covering 76% of all accommodation costs. The most recent Home Office figures show there are about 32,000 asylum seekers in hotels in the UK. That is also 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Responding to the announcement, home affairs committee chairwoman Dame Karen Bradley said the cost of asylum hotels has risen to a "staggering extent".Dame Karen, the Conservative MP for Staffordshire Moorlands, said: "If hotels disappear there will still need to be stock of short-term accommodation to deal with unpredictable levels of irregular migration."Targets on their own are not enough, they need to be delivered - and for that we need to have workable solutions".Dame Karen warned that without savings, broader goals to improve policing, cut immigration and strengthen counter-terrorism will be her spending review, the chancellor also announced up tp £280m per year extra for the Border Security Command, which leads on the UK's strategy to crack down on people smuggling and small boat crossings. This follows an initial £150m to establish the unit last year. Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.