How the Meyers Manx Led to the Baja 1000
The Meyers Manx buggy launched in 1964 to remarkable effect. With its jaunty stance and adventure-ready moxie, the affordable off-roader eventually landed on no fewer than 45 magazine covers, capturing the imagination of enthusiasts and mainstream audiences alike.$64.00 at meyersmanx.com
Although early sales grew by word of mouth, the vehicle's long-term impact proved to be unlike that of any recreational product before it. Initial appeal could be attributed to the novelty and accessibility of its cheery design—elements that had been absent in virtually all rivals before it. But the Meyers Manx's off-road capabilities were vastly underappreciated by the general public.
As the fiberglass buggy slowly gained sales traction, Bruce Meyers wondered what it would take to leap to the next level of retail success. It didn't hurt when Ted Trevor finished in the winner's circle at the Pikes Peak Auto Hill Climb (later Pikes Peak International Hill Climb) in 1966. Or that a Corvair-powered Manx ran circles around Shelby Cobras and achieved a perfect score in Sports Car Club of America slalom events at the hands of Ted Trevor and Don Wilcox. But how could the Meyers Manx transcend the mainstream perception as a friendly runabout and legitimize its reputation for off-road aptitude? It turned out the answer lay south of the border.
Mexico's Baja California peninsula is the untamed counterpoint to the sanitized American Dream. Rugged and raw, Baja's dusty trails and rock-strewn stretches attract the hardiest of adventure seekers craving to push themselves and their vehicles to the limit and beyond. The natural kings of Baja were motorcyclists—off-road athletes whose derring-do drove them to ride hard, over and through challenging terrain for hours on end for the glory of claiming the quickest elapsed time between La Paz and Tijuana.
In 1962, Dave Ekins, brother of Bud—famed Hollywood stuntman and Steve McQueen pal—achieved the run aboard a Honda CL72 in a blistering 39 hours, 56 minutes. The Ekins brothers were world-class riders, and they would go on to serve as the first-ever U.S. team to compete in the International Six Days Trial with Steve McQueen and Cliff Coleman in 1964. When Dave returned to Baja in 1966, he was able to shave only around eight minutes from his previous record time. If one of the world's top riders had all but maxed out the route, it seemed there wasn't much room for improvement.
Although Meyers had explored Baja in a buggy more than once, he had yet to tackle the peninsula at full tilt. However, entrepreneur John Crean had achieved the distance in a Meyers Manx in 51 hours—a record for a four-wheeler, but nowhere close to the Ekins's two-wheeled time. Baja was already on Bruce's mind when the age-old topic of car vs. bike came up during a weekend party at Big Bear Lake. As Meyers recalls in his book Call to Baja, Cycle World publisher Joe Parkhurst and a group of "bike guys" were in one cabin, and "buggy guys" were in another, when Joe invited the four-wheeler clique over for drinks. The inevitable trash talking between the two tribes ensued, leaving Meyers no more convinced he could touch the bike record than before.
However, his friend Ted Mangels was galvanized by the exchange. Showing up at Meyers's door the next day with a copy of the Peter Gerhard and Howard E. Gulick Baja guidebook and a smirk, he pitched an idea: map out the route by breaking it down into segments using the guidebook, classify sections into categories and speeds based on their prior experience in buggies, and add up the averages in order to estimate a total travel time. They each calculated times based on their own estimates, then averaged those figures—which were surprisingly close—for a final duration.
The estimate, 30 to 31 hours, was low. But was it accurate? There were big differences between the buggies and bikes that had run Baja. A typical desert-racer bike could exceed 100 mph, while the 40-hp, Volkswagen-powered Manx barely pushed 65 mph. Mangels pointed out that, despite the middling top speed, the buggy held several critical advantages. For starters, it could carry more fuel, along with extra tanks that helped avoid the inevitable time sink of running out of gas that the bikes faced. Also beneficial was the presence of a navigator alongside the driver, saving further time that might be squandered by stopping and checking maps or, worse, getting lost. Finally, the fatigue factor was significantly reduced, since driving and navigating duties were divided by two.
Meyers was skeptical. After all, Mangels was an eternal optimist infamous for his so-called "Mangelonian Theories." But the two also reached common ground on the estimated drive time based on individual calculations. Was a record-busting run attainable? There was one way to find out: a feasibility run. The only logical way was to drive the route with a chase vehicle in tow, in case things broke or the adventure went south. Meyers and Mangels would pilot Old Red, chased by Neal Allen and James T. Crow, and Sanford and Jane Havens in another buggy. While Allen was along as a helping hand, Crow was a Baja virgin who offered a different kind of assistance: he was the editor of Road & Track magazine and could potentially write an editorial account of the experience. Showing up for the desert drive in office clothes didn't help his image in the rough-and-tumble world of off-road racing. But in this case, he would later prove that the pen was mightier than the garb.
The intent for the feasibility run was, in Meyers's words, to drive "... briskly but conservatively, to preserve the car." The distance was grueling—"like driving from Los Angeles to San Francisco on a dirt road," as Bruce later described it, emphasizing that these routes were far more rough, treacherous, and strewn with peril than any off-road stretch known by Americans. Strategizing on routes, Meyers calculated that a shorter but more navigationally challenging option would be worth the risk. He also noted that the timing of high tides prevented them from taking a beach route that could potentially save time. Figuring that minimizing refueling time was key, they clamped three oxygen bottles onto Old Red that served as auxiliary tanks, expanding fuel capacity to 65 gallons. The good news was that the tanks enabled the buggy to run longer before stopping for gas; the bad news was that they added weight and were each independently fitted with filler pipes, meaning they had to be individually detached and their fuel dumped into the main tank, rather than seamlessly feeding it. Meyers later called the tanks "dumb," because they were heavy and didn't hold much fuel. However, in retrospect he acknowledged the good intentions, as misguided as they might have been.
On April 16, 1967, the foursome set out in two buggies from Ensenada to La Paz, bouncing, scraping, and ripping their way through the unforgiving landscape with the enthusiasm of ambitious men with something to prove. After the dust settled, it turned out the Meyers Manx performed surprisingly well, suffering only a torn tire when Bruce drove through a rocky section too spiritedly. When they landed in La Paz and totaled their travel time, they rang in at 30 hours, 40 minutes—remarkably close to their highly promising estimates. The experience helped them shape the logistics of how to tackle a timed run. However, what they didn't expect were the intangible ways that Baja would change them, eventually shifting the course of their lives.
Allen, an engineer who worked for the Douglas Aircraft Company, became enamored with Mexico, and would later retire to Bahía de los Ángeles on the eastern shore of Baja. Road & Track editor Crow, who had reported for dirt duty dressed like a city slicker, came to enjoy off-roading so much that he bought a Ford Bronco upon returning home, and later revisited Baja numerous times. And, of course, Meyers and his eponymous buggies would eventually become inextricably linked to the peninsula.
Following the initial southbound run, Meyers and Mangels returned with routes, tactics, and a game plan in mind in order to tackle the northbound route to Tijuana in earnest. Although that 30-hour, 40-minute time stood as a baseline, the territory could be infamously cruel—anything could happen along these untamed stretches.
On their chosen date, April 19, they decided to set out at 10:00 pm sharp for several reasons. For starters, the time enabled all Mexican officials to be present, ensuring no question of the accuracy of their timing. The late-night departure also allowed them to go flat-out on the longest stretches of paved road and easier dirt sections, giving Meyers a chance to catch some sleep before hitting the rocky portion. Once they were underway, however, the scheduled slumber came to an abrupt end when the stragglers in a cattle herd forced Mangels to veer around the bovine roadblocks, sliding the buggy between the giant slabs of flesh. The jarring jolt shook Meyers awake, and he couldn't fall back asleep before his turn. Mangels had successfully avoided contact despite his high speeds and limited visibility—evidence of his quick reflexes and off-road skills.
The two continued into the night, until it was time to swap seats. It was these high-speed runs through the wilds of Mexico that inspired Meyers to marvel at his natural surroundings as he moved swiftly through space in a buggy, its trailing-arm suspension soaking up the ruts as it negotiated the jagged surfaces below.
He recalled the sensation in Call to Baja: "Like a slow-motion sprint car in a botanical dream world, through the Boojums and boulders, through the rocks, rills and ridges of the world's greatest cactus garden, Old Red carried us. The rhythm of this endless game of dodging what the trail presented to us became a recurring measure of time like the cadence of poetry or music. In this spirited state we drove."
At its best, Baja delivered the out-of-body experience of the buggy floating over the earth below it in a sort of transcendental, meditative way. But the equal and opposite side could just as quickly intercede: the brutal, merciless aspect of the peninsula. It was north of Rancho Santa Inés, beyond the smooth stretches that morphed into rugged stretches, where Baja bit back: a rock gashed the metal brake line at the left wheel, spilling vital fluid out of the buggy. Meyers and Mangels scurried to control the bleeding, clamping the brake line and smashing at it with a hammer and rock. A top-off of fluid sent them on their way, with three out of four brakes working, which required a countersteer to compensate every jab of the middle pedal. As if that wasn't enough of a challenge, the car started lurching and dying sporadically, which turned out to be a front transmission mount that had sheared off and was now interfering with the accelerator and clutch cables.
No amount of field work or baling wire could put Old Red right: the original Meyers Manx was limping ahead, down on its usually healthy pace. When all was said and done, even in its compromised state the buggy was able to complete the approximately 950-mile run in 34 hours and 45 minutes—four hours off its trial time, but a significant five hours, 11 minutes under the record motorcycle time.
The record-breaking Meyers Manx run in the spring of 1967 was a significant accomplishment. But it was difficult to overstate the subsequent swell of publicity that the achievement leveraged. Meyers' wife Shirley collaborated with her employers, John and Elaine Bond at Road & Track, to blast the media with news of the record. With a playful Buggy Beats Bikes in Baja press release penned, the world's automotive and media personalities became acutely aware of Meyers Manx in a matter of days.
The buggy was pictured on the April 1967 cover of Car and Driver magazine, whereupon phones began ringing off the hook, and 350 orders piled up virtually overnight. The Bonds, who had generously offered Meyers production space at their publishing facilities, were now fueling and laying witness to Manx madness. Meyers, who became the center of attention thanks to his buggy's record-breaking time, took a call from one Ed Pearlman, who expressed interest in starting an off-road racing organization with him. Meyers was too busy building buggies, but he did help Pearlman with contacts.
Pearlman eventually formed NORRA, the National Off-Road Racing Association, and on November 1, 1967, the group's first race kicked off: the NORRA Mexican 1000 Rally. Starting with a rally from Tijuana to La Paz, an eclectic crew of 68 vehicles including Ford Broncos, Jeeps, a Citroën, a Triumph, a Fiat, privately entered Manxes, and three factory-sponsored buggies assembled for the sprint from Ensenada to La Paz. Ted Mangels teamed up with Vic Wilson (no. 10), Bruce Meyers partnered with "Wheelo" Anderson in a gold metalflake buggy dubbed Goldi (no. 1), and George Haddock and Jimmy Smith paired up in the third Meyers Manx. Mangels and Wilson ended up crossing the finish line in a scant 27 hours and 38 minutes, earning a victory in the first annual event. Meyers and Mangels split the $13,775 purse.
As much as the first record-breaking run caused a stir, the overall NORRA Mexican 1000 Rally win made even bigger waves by effectively launching the modern movement of off-road racing. "The record is certainly what precipitated the race," says Meyers Manx historian Nelson Sparks, "and it exploded. It was huge. And everybody who missed it wanted to be at the next one." That sudden popularity cemented the buggy's legendary status, and would help transform Meyers Manx into a global phenomenon inextricably linked to Baja—a connection that persists to this day.
You Might Also Like
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Car and Driver Launches Marketplace, Powered by Autotrader, Connecting Visitors to Millions of New and Used Vehicle Listings
The Car and Driver Marketplace will enable the discovery of millions of available vehicles on with advanced search tools, detailed listings and the ability to connect directly with a dealership. The new marketplace, available on is a seamless research-to-retail experience powered by Autotrader listings technology and unmatched data. To celebrate the launch, current Autotrader subscribers will automatically have a vast majority of their listings syndicated to Car and Driver as part of their existing package. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The Insurance Savings You Expect ANN ARBOR, Mich., and ATLANTA, Aug. 18, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Car and Driver, the world's largest automotive media brand, and Autotrader, a Cox Automotive brand, today announced the launch of the Car and Driver Marketplace, a premium shopping experience that connects research and vehicle listings, powered by Autotrader, on With this exclusive partnership, shoppers can move seamlessly from discovery to purchase across millions of available vehicles for sale without leaving the Car and Driver experience. The new Car and Driver Marketplace combines the automotive media brand's deep editorial authority and journalism with the data, reach, and listings expertise of Autotrader to create a one-of-a-kind marketplace experience. The result is an intuitive, consistent journey for consumers, and greater visibility and shopper insights for dealers and OEMs. Unlike traditional listings platforms, Car and Driver brings a distinct automotive enthusiast and research-first audience. "Car and Driver has long been where shoppers come to discover, explore, and make confident car-buying decisions through our data-driven reviews, rankings, and vehicle-research pages," said Eddie Alterman, chief brand and content officer at Hearst Autos. "We know that 75% of our readers are planning to purchase a vehicle within the next year, and 65% actively engage with our research tools. With Autotrader's sophisticated technology, data, and leading position in the marketplace, the Car and Driver Marketplace meets them where they already are—bringing real-time inventory, dealer connections, and listings into the same environment where they're making purchase decisions. It's a natural extension of how our audience wants to shop, and it brings a real sense of joy and transparency to the process." The new Car and Driver Marketplace is a seamless, all-in-one experience on Shoppers browse more inventory, use smarter search tools, and connect directly with dealers without leaving the site. It is fast, easy to navigate, and backed by Autotrader's trusted tech and lead tools. "Car and Driver has spent decades earning the trust of automotive enthusiasts and in-market shoppers alike," said Erin Lomax, vice president of operations, consumer marketplace at Autotrader. "By integrating Autotrader's technology into that legacy and editorial environment, we're creating a uniquely powerful shopping experience—one that supports car buyers earlier in the journey and gives dealers access to a more engaged, research-driven audience. With this announcement, we're modernizing car shopping and reinforcing our market leadership through exclusive partnerships competitors can't match." To celebrate the launch, a vast majority of current Autotrader clients will automatically have their listings syndicated to the Car and Driver Marketplace and its 10 million unique monthly visitors. About Car and DriverFounded in 1955, Car and Driver is the definitive voice for car enthusiasts and the trusted guide to in-market car shoppers. With an online audience of 10 million unique visitors per month (ComScore) and an award-winning print magazine, Car and Driver is dedicated to delivering expert content and leading-edge insights on all things related to new, used and pre-owned vehicles. With the most comprehensive vehicle testing, research and reviews in the automotive category, Car and Driver provides the most trusted car-shopping experience for consumers and deep engagement for auto manufacturers and dealers. Follow Car and Driver on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook. Car and Driver is published by Hearst Magazines, the world's largest lifestyle media publisher with a portfolio of more than 30 powerful brands in the U.S. that inspire and entertain audiences across all media platforms. Hearst Magazines' print and digital assets reach 138 million readers and site visitors each month — 54% of all adults in the U.S., 52% of all Millennials and 49% of all Gen Z adults over the age of 18 (Source: 2025 comScore Multi-Platform© MRI-Simmons – 03/25/F24). The company publishes more than 200+ brand editions and 175 websites around the world. About AutotraderAutotrader is the most recognized third-party car listings brand, with the most engaged audience of in-market car shoppers. As the foremost authority on automotive consumer insights and expert in online and mobile marketing, Autotrader makes the car shopping experience easy and fun for today's empowered car shopper looking to find or sell the perfect new, used or Certified Pre-Owned car. Using technology, shopper insights and local market guidance, Autotrader's comprehensive marketing and retailing solutions allow consumers to build their deal online, and guide dealers to personalized digital marketing strategies that grow brand, drive traffic and connect the online and in-store shopping experience. Autotrader is a Cox Automotive™ brand. Cox Automotive is a subsidiary of Cox Enterprises. For more information, please visit About Cox AutomotiveCox Automotive is the world's largest automotive services and technology provider. Fueled by the largest breadth of first-party data fed by 2.3 billion online interactions a year, Cox Automotive tailors leading solutions for car shoppers, auto manufacturers, dealers, lenders and fleets. The company has 29,000+ employees on five continents and a portfolio of industry-leading brands that include Autotrader®, Kelley Blue Book®, Manheim®, vAuto®, Dealertrack®, NextGear Capital™, CentralDispatch® and FleetNet America®. Cox Automotive is a subsidiary of Cox Enterprises Inc., a privately owned, Atlanta-based company with $23 billion in annual revenue. Visit or connect via @CoxAutomotive on X, CoxAutoInc on Facebook or Cox-Automotive-Inc on LinkedIn. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Autotrader Sign in to access your portfolio


Car and Driver
3 days ago
- Car and Driver
A Stellar Hispano-Suiza Takes Best of Show at the 2025 Pebble Beach Concours d'Elegance
A 1924 Hispano-Suiza H6C Nieuport-Astra Torpedo was just deemed Best of Show, the top honor among the billions of dollars' worth of exclusive vintage vehicles displayed at the 2025 Pebble Beach Concours d'Elegance. The car is owned by Penny and Lee Anderson of Naples, Florida, who purchased it three years ago at the Sotheby's auction right in Pebble Beach. "The people who represented the sale of this car said it was a potential Pebble Beach winner, and they were right," Lee Anderson told Car and Driver from the judges' stand, moments after receiving the designation. Car and Driver The yacht-like, mahogany-bodied, aluminum-riveted, torpedo-shaped sporting cruiser just emerged from a two-year restoration less than a week ago—using vintage wood—and was shipped directly to the concours. "If you're into collecting classics, we all know these wood-bodied cars, and this one hasn't been shown before," Anderson says. "How many do you see?" Our Very Unofficial 2025 Picks Our Editors Choose Favorites at Monterey Car Week When asked what drew them to the car, Anderson says, "It's just a beautiful piece of furniture." This car demonstrates an ongoing commitment to honoring unique interwar classic cars at Pebble, which has long granted this prestigious award to meticulously restored coachbuilt vehicles created during the 1920s and 1930s. Marc Urbano | Car and Driver "This is just a very distinctive car with an extraordinary level of craftsmanship," said Ken Gross, a venerable author, curator, and concours judge who has worked for decades in the world of classic cars. "One couldn't even imagine building a car like that today." This adherence to form in the Best of Show selection signifies that "traditions here at Pebble Beach will continue," Gross says. "Cars like this remain the pinnacle of elegance, like Old Masters paintings." However much this selection perpetuates the status quo, special vehicles like this—especially ones that have not been readily seen in decades—can continue to inform our deeper understanding of the significance of the automobile in a world that has largely been shaped by it. But the larger narrative at the grand, if at times overwhelming, celebration of car culture that is the annual Monterey Car Week, is the way in which affection for the automobile's mechanical, technological, and sculptural achievements is one of the few things in our contentious world upon which we can all, perhaps, find common ground. Brett Berk Contributing Editor Brett Berk (he/him) is a former preschool teacher and early childhood center director who spent a decade as a youth and family researcher and now covers the topics of kids and the auto industry for publications including CNN, the New York Times, Popular Mechanics and more. He has published a parenting book, The Gay Uncle's Guide to Parenting, and since 2008 has driven and reviewed thousands of cars for Car and Driver and Road & Track, where he is contributing editor. He has also written for Architectural Digest, Billboard, ELLE Decor, Esquire, GQ, Travel + Leisure and Vanity Fair. Read full bio


Car and Driver
4 days ago
- Car and Driver
Unfair Fight? 2002 Subaru Impreza WRX vs. Audi S4 Quattro and BMW 330xi
From the October 2001 issue of Car and Driver. The Law of Diminishing Returns: A yield rate that, after a certain point, fails to increase proportionately to additional outlays of capital or investments of time and labor.* *American Heritage Dictionary, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1992. Relax, we're not about to launch into a sleep-inducing lecture on money supply, interest rates, and the effects of Alan Greenspan's bedtime rituals on the Gross Domestic Product. The definition is for those of you who are wondering how we could even think of comparing a car costing $25,000 with two that each cost 60 percent more. The question here is: If you spend that extra 60 percent—40 thousand bucks in all—do you get a car that is 60 percent better? In the 40-grand corner we have the Audi S4 Quattro and the BMW 330xi. In the other corner—actually, down in the bargain basement—lurks our underdog, the $24,520 samurai challenger, the Subaru Impreza WRX. Unfair comparison, you say? Duuuh! But wait—check the spec sheets. All three cars have full-time four-wheel drive, four doors, manual transmissions, engines with 225 or more horsepower, and interior and exterior dimensions that come within inches of one another. View Photos JEFFREY G. RUSSELL | Car and Driver Our glowing reviews of the WRX suggest it's a worthy opponent to two of our favorite sporting sedans. The snorty little Subaru sedan has rocked the sporting establishment by producing a remarkable combination of performance and character for the price. We only decided to send it to the wolves after we looked at other similarly priced sedans and realized that matching them against the WRX wouldn't be a comparo, it'd be a slaughter. So we called in the German sharks. Both the Audi and the Bimmer have been frequent honorees on our 10Best list (10 straight years for the 3-series and three years for the S4's less-powerful sibling, the A4). Audi's S4 is a pumped-up, twin-turbocharged version of the A4 and has the added distinction of being the first and only car to outperform the previous-generation M3 in a comparison test. While the M3 has moved up in price—to $46,000—and in performance, BMW has also upped the performance of the entire 3-series line. The model representing a step down from the new M3 is the 330i, offered in both two- and four-door bodies and available with a $1750 four-wheel-drive system that changes the model designation to 330xi. Ask any one of us to pick our favorite cars, and these three would be high on our list. View Photos JEFFREY G. RUSSELL | Car and Driver If you're thinking we've put ourselves in the unenviable position of having to choose a favorite child in this test, you would be right. We put the three through our usual battery of performance tests, lapped DaimlerChrysler's 1.7-mile road course, and tore up the curvy roads of northwestern Pennsylvania—a fitting locale since the discovery and eventual refinement of oil in these hills made fortunes for many and changed the country's path nearly 150 years ago. And, of course, without oil we wouldn't be writing this. Many of us have been quick to point out that there's no need to spend more than $25,000 on a car. Do the German cars deliver the goods to justify their major-league prices? Let's find out. 3rd Place: BMW 330xi View Photos JEFFREY G. RUSSELL | Car and Driver Let this comparo remind all the whiners out there that we don't automatically place the trophy in the trunk of the car bearing the whirling propeller badge before the test. In this one, the Bimmer finished last. What gives? Clearly, this BMW wasn't loaded to compete with the two others. Its 225-hp six-cylinder engine is the least powerful of the group, and it's pushing around the second-heaviest weight. At the drag strip, it lost the sprint to 60 and through the quarter-mile. Still, we love its engine. Neither of the other cars can match the throttle response of the Bimmer's six, which doesn't bear the burden of spooling up turbos. Comments such as "power oozes out in silky-smooth pulses" and "very smooth and strong and makes the best noise" filled the BMW's logbook. HIGHS: Supple ride, slick transmission, graceful moves, silky engine. LOWS: Flat seats, few features for a $40,000 car, underwhelming grip, revs too high on the highway. VERDICT: We expect more from a BMW, especially a $40,000 one. View Photos JEFFREY G. RUSSELL | Car and Driver View Photos JEFFREY G. RUSSELL | Car and Driver We also thought the five-speed was the best-shifting box of the bunch, with low effort and Teflon-coated detents. The transmission routes power to a planetary center differential that under no-slip conditions supplies the rear axle with 62 percent of the torque. Should one wheel slip, the electronic traction control of the Bimmer's Dynamic Stability Control system routes the power to the wheels with grip. The rearward torque bias preserves the rear-drive handling we've come to appreciate in BMWs, but sadly, BMW doesn't offer on four-wheel-drivers the optional stiffer suspension and larger wheels and tires of the 3-series Sport package. The setup of the base model is softly tuned and has weak tires. "Definitely the Cadillac of the group," complained one tester. The Cadillac of the group? A BMW? It was also the quietest. We're not above appreciating a good-riding car, but unfortunately for the BMW, neither of the other cars was unduly harsh, so the BMW came across as somewhat floppy. View Photos JEFFREY G. RUSSELL | Car and Driver And then there are the tires, which squeal at even modest cornering speeds. The tires and the soft suspension conspire to hurt the BMW in every test of grip. The Bimmer finished the poorest on the skidpad and in the lane-change maneuver. On the road course, the 330xi rolled in the turns and the tires howled in protest, limiting cornering speeds and putting it 3.4 seconds behind the Audi and 1.8 seconds back of the Subaru. BMW has heard complaints that the base 3-series is too soft and in response has made the Sport suspension—but not the tires—standard on all 3-series produced after last March. That change was too late for this roundup, and any egg that appeared on the BMW's grille from its performance on the road course quickly flew off when we hit the back roads. The soft suspension displayed a fluidity we hadn't anticipated after those disappointing track laps. We still don't endorse the trend to light steering, but the brakes had the best feel of the bunch, with a firm pedal and perfect linear action. If you're still incredulous over the BMW's third-place finish, consider the features content of the Bavarian car, which at nearly 40 large as tested came with lousy, nearly flat seats that are covered in "leatherette." Sounds like a covering better suited to a $25,000 car, doesn't it? 2nd Place: Subaru WRX View Photos JEFFREY G. RUSSELL | Car and Driver We're still arguing the Subaru's second-place finish. Two of the three voters put the Subaru in first place, with the Audi second. But one—and he'll remain nameless—put the Audi first and the Subaru last, so when we averaged the scores, the Subaru missed the top spot by just one point. So what's missing in the $25,000 car? Actually, it's not what's missing, it's what's there, and in the case of the Subaru, there's a lot of extra noise. The Subaru's sound levels were the loudest during all our decibel tests. The WRX does not qualify as a loud car compared with others in its price class, but it becomes one when the competition gets very expensive. Poke around the Subie's exterior and interior panels, and you see how the noise trickles through to the inside of the car. There's only a paper-thin mat on the trunk bottom and no covering for the underside of the trunklid or hood—items both the BMW and Audi have. HIGHS: Killer value, seats, handling, and turbo 00mph. LOWS: Freeway hum. VERDICT: If you can find a better $24,520 car, buy it. View Photos JEFFREY G. RUSSELL | Car and Driver So the Subaru has less sound-deadening material. The major parts of the interior—the sharp-looking metallic-ringed gauges, the Momo steering wheel, the center console— are all impressive, but the WRX's remaining plastic trim is much flimsier than that in the pricey cars, particularly the handsome Audi. The plus side to the frugal use of sound-deadening material is the WRX's light weight. The Subaru weighs 433 pounds less than the BMW and is 560 pounds lighter than the porky Audi. That said, two of the test drivers weren't annoyed at all by the noise levels. All of us loved the wonderfully designed and supportive cloth seats, the favorite chairs of the group. We also liked the Subaru's in-dash CD changer and cassette player, a combination unique in this zooty group. The Subaru also has no power seats, no stability control, no automatic climate control, and no sunroof. That nose-dived its features rating, but to us, many of those goodies fall under the "nice to have but you don't need them" category. View Photos JEFFREY G. RUSSELL | Car and Driver The rest of the car is pure joy. There's a touch more turbo lag than in the Audi, but we could get a better launch in the Subaru, which gave it a slight edge in the low-speed-acceleration tests. The trick is to do the unthinkable in a four-wheel-drive car: Hold the revs at five grand, and drop the clutch. The WRX's full-time four-wheel-drive system uses a viscous limited-slip center differential that routes power equally to the front and rear axles. The clutch drop breaks the tires loose for only an instant, and then the WRX leaps off the line, scooting to 60 mph in 5.4 seconds and through the quarter in 14.1 seconds at 96 mph—both the best of the bunch. Turbo lag, however, rears its head in the top-gear tests where the Subaru trails from 30 to 50 mph. Keep the engine rpm north of 3000, however, and you won't notice the lag. We also found the Subaru to be the most neutral-handling of the group. Midcorner throttle lifts cause the rear end to slide just enough to tighten your line without provoking fears of a major spin. "Subaru got the big stuff right—the motor, transmission, seats, and handling," wrote one tester in the logbook. That sums up how we feel about this car. One can only marvel at what Subaru could do with another 15 grand. 1st Place: Audi S4 Quattro View Photos JEFFREY G. RUSSELL | Car and Driver So, you say there's no mystery to the Audi's win. Why wouldn't the most expensive car in the test win? Its as-tested price is $1659 above the BMW's and a universe beyond the Subaru's sticker—exactly $16,262 more. Likewise, you get a ton of stuff—power, torque, valves, features, gears, grip, and pounds in this contest. But you don't get the quickest sprinter to 60 mph. Owing to its greater girth and tires that refuse to break loose at the moment of launch despite our best efforts, the Audi trailed the Subaru to 60 mph by a smidge, 0.1 second. By 100 mph, however, the Audi had picked up enough steam to be a half-second ahead of the two other cars, and it continued to widen the gap to its governed 142-mph top speed. But the Audi is the king of every other performance contest, posting significantly better numbers on the skidpad (Audi, 0.86 g; Subaru, 0.82 g; BMW, 0.78 g), through the lane change (67.8 mph versus 66.5 for the Subaru and 63.1 for the BMW), and around the road course, where it was nearly two seconds a lap quicker than the second-place finisher, the Subaru. HIGHS: First-class cabin appointments, potent turbo mill, tenacious chassis. LOWS: Touchy brakes, rubbery shifter. VERDICT: Feels like a $40,000 car. View Photos JEFFREY G. RUSSELL | Car and Driver The Audi is the amusement ride of this group—sit down, buckle up, and hit the button. It's the easiest to drive of the trio, with benign handling and nearly telepathic steering. "The most enjoyable and secure car to drive fast. The rubber really bites in the corners, and the engine pumps power like a fire hose," said one test driver. Which brings us to the wonderful twin-turbocharged 30-valve V-6 engine. There's noticeably less turbo lag in the Audi than in the Subaru. The S4's engine enjoys a considerable displacement edge over the Subaru, so it feels more powerful off-boost. Plus, it runs less boost pressure (10.2 versus 14.2) and employs two blowers, which spool up faster than the Subie's single unit. Unfortunately, the six-speed's action is best described as rubbery. The gearbox routes power to a four-wheel-drive system that uses a Torsen limited-slip center differential to send power to the axle with the most grip, so the traction control only has to limit slip from side to side. Like all the systems here, it's transparent under normal driving conditions. View Photos JEFFREY G. RUSSELL | Car and Driver In addition to the shifter, the powerful brakes drew disparaging comments as well, despite their ability to stop the car from 70 mph in only 164 feet. "There's lots of pedal to push through before the brakes retard, and then the binders are way too touchy," mused one tester. Yet those two niggles did not alter our appreciation of this car's great versatility. Not only is it swift, it's also plush and very serene on the highway. It's easy to drive fast, yet as comfy as a La-Z-Boy. And no one can dispute the attractiveness and quality of the Audi's interior—its subdued hues and materials would fit nicely in a car costing twice as much. And as much as we liked the S4 model, it still came achingly close to being beaten by a car that is hugely less expensive. Perhaps it's not right to say that the S4 is 60 percent better than the WRX. Maybe the best way to put it is that in this test, our collective minds simply liked the S4 60 percent more. Car and Driver Specifications Specifications 2001 Audi S4 Vehicle Type: front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan PRICE Base/As Tested: $40,782/$39,534 ENGINE twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 30-valve V-6, iron block and aluminum heads, port fuel injection Displacement: 163 in3, 2671 cm3 Power: 250 hp @ 5800 rpm Torque: 258 lb-ft @ 1850 rpm TRANSMISSION 6-speed manual CHASSIS Suspension, F/R: multilink/multilimk Brakes, F/R: vented disc/vented disc Tires: Pirelli P6000 225/45YR-17 DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 102.6 in Length: 176.7 in Width: 72.7 in Height: 54.9 in Curb Weight: 3652 lb C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 5.5 sec 1/4-Mile: 14.2 sec @ 97 mph 100 mph: 15.0 sec 120 mph: 23.1 sec Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 6.6 sec Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 8.7 sec Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 7.4 sec Top Speed (gov ltd): 142 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 164 ft Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.86 g C/D FUEL ECONOMY 950-Mile Trip: 21 mpg EPA FUEL ECONOMY City/Highway: 17/24 mpg -- 2001 BMW 330xi Vehicle Type: front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan PRICE Base/As Tested: $36,385/$39,123 ENGINE DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and head, port fuel injection Displacement: 182 in3, 2979 cm3 Power: 225 hp @ 5900 rpm Torque: 214 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm TRANSMISSION 5-speed manual CHASSIS Suspension, F/R: struts/multilink Brakes, F/R: vented disc/vented disc Tires: Continental ContiTouring Contact DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 107.3 in Length: 176.0 in Width: 68.5 in Height: 56.5 in Curb Weight: 3525 lb C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 5.7 sec 1/4-Mile: 14.4 sec @ 96 mph 100 mph: 15.5 sec 120 mph: 25.2 sec Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 6.6 sec Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 8.3 sec Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 8.2 sec Top Speed (gov ltd): 129 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 175 ft Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.78 g C/D FUEL ECONOMY 950-Mile Trip: 24 mpg EPA FUEL ECONOMY City/Highway: 20/27 mpg -- 2002 Subaru Impreza WRX Vehicle Type: front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan PRICE Base/As Tested: $24,520/$24,520 ENGINE turbocharged and intercooled flat-4, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection Displacement: 122 in3, 1994 cm3 Power: 227 hp @ 6000 rpm Torque: 217 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm TRANSMISSION 5-speed manual CHASSIS Suspension, F/R: struts/struts Brakes, F/R: vented disc/disc Tires: Bridgestone Potenza RE92 205/55VR-16 DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 99.4 in Length: 173.4 in Width: 68.1 in Height: 56.7 in Curb Weight: 3092 lb C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 5.4 sec 1/4-Mile: 14.1 sec @ 96 mph 100 mph: 15.5 sec 120 mph: 25.2 sec Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 6.6 sec Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 14.2 sec Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 10.0 sec Top Speed: 142 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 181 ft Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.82 g C/D FUEL ECONOMY 950-Mile Trip: 23 mpg EPA FUEL ECONOMY City/Highway: 20/27 mpg C/D TESTING EXPLAINED