logo
Ex-Sanders campaign advisor knocks former boss for catering to White liberals with AOC anti-oligarchy tour

Ex-Sanders campaign advisor knocks former boss for catering to White liberals with AOC anti-oligarchy tour

Fox News18-04-2025

Former Bernie Sanders campaign advisor ​Tezlyn Figaro called out the Democratic Party for failing to adapt its messaging beyond White liberals.
Since the Democratic Party's historic loss to President Donald Trump in November, the party has been struggling to find a new message or leader to rally around. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., have spoken at rallies across the country, but Figaro argued that they need to change their messaging strategy, particularly when it comes to Sanders' "Fighting Oligarchy" tour.
"Bernie Sanders' demographic, and I'm just going to be honest, the progressive demographic, the Rainbow Coalition, is White liberals, pretty much, White progressives," Figaro told host Charlamagne tha God on the Breakfast Club podcast. "There's still a lack of talking to those that have completely given up, completely disenfranchised."
Sanders had recently appeared at the Coachella music festival, a festival whose tickets, as Figaro observed, cost hundreds of dollars.
"He is talking to a very progressive, White-ran movement, to me," the former advisor to Sanders said. "Even if you're Hispanic, it's still White-adjacent."
"He struggles when dealing with race. I'm saying this as his formal racial justice director," Figaro added.
She also argued that the mega-wealthy are simply not top-of-mind for many people.
"Everybody ain't mad at rich people, Charlamagne," she said. "Like, people are really trying to get the bag."
Charlemagne argued that Sanders, all things considered, is a better vessel for this message than many Democrats.
"I think the 'Fighting Oligarchy' tour is a good message," Charlamagne said, arguing, "it's not a hypocritical message from Bernie Sanders and AOC, but for a majority of the Democratic Party it's a hypocritical message because they're all taking money from the billionaires and the corporate lobbyists."
Figaro argued that such messaging falls on deaf ears for different constituencies.
"Well, the hood don't know who the [oligarchy] is," she replied, mispronouncing the word.
"I don't even know what the hell you were talking about. I mean, they don't. You know, when people are talking about 'neo-liberal' – all of that, they don't know what you're talking about," Figaro argued. "So there's different messages people need to have to engage."
She also argued that the Democratic Party is simply "too big."
"It's too big. It needs to be broken down. Everybody is not going to relate to Bernie Sanders. Everybody is not going to relate to AOC. Everybody is not going to relate to Jasmine Crockett. Everybody is not going to relate to me."
Fox News Digital reached out to Sanders and did not receive an immediate reply.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Leaked Audio Reveals DNC Chair in Despair Over Dem Civil War: ‘No One Knows Who the Hell I Am'
Leaked Audio Reveals DNC Chair in Despair Over Dem Civil War: ‘No One Knows Who the Hell I Am'

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Leaked Audio Reveals DNC Chair in Despair Over Dem Civil War: ‘No One Knows Who the Hell I Am'

The Democratic National Committee's internal chaos shows no signs of slowing down—just ask the chair. DNC chair Ken Martin accused vice chair David Hogg of undercutting his leadership and confessed he'd considered quitting his position during a Zoom call with party leaders, a leaked recording has revealed. 'No one knows who the hell I am, right? I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to to put ourselves in a position to win,' Martin said in the recording, which was obtained by Politico. 'I don't think you intended this,' Martin told Hogg on the May 15 Zoom meeting, 'but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. So it's really frustrating.' Martin, 51, has been grappling with an intraparty feud ignited when Hogg, 25, announced that his organization, Leaders We Deserve, intends to spend $20 million backing primary challengers to what he called 'ineffective' Democratic incumbents in safe blue districts. Martin won a contested leadership election in February and has been tasked with getting the Democratic party back on its feet after crushing election defeats in November. But he admitted the challenges of his job have left him demoralized. 'I'll be very honest with you, for the first time in my 100 days on this job… the other night I said to myself for the first time, I don't know if I wanna do this anymore,' he said in the meeting, which was attended by approximately 10 DNC officers, according to Politico. In a statement to Politico, however, Martin said, 'I'm not going anywhere.' 'I took this job to fight Republicans, not Democrats,' he added. 'As I said when I was elected, our fight is not within the Democratic Party, our fight is and has to be solely focused on Donald Trump and the disastrous Republican agenda. That's the work that I will continue to do every day.' Malcom Kenyatta, a second vice chair who was also on the Zoom meeting, came to Martin's defense, as did other party officers who were on the call. 'Breaking news: a human being had a frustrating day at work. That's all Ken expressed on that call,' he said, according to Politico. In response to Hogg's divisive pledge to try to oust Democrats he believes are 'asleep at the wheel,' Martin has attempted to pressure him into signing a neutrality pledge. At the same time, a DNC panel has voted to advance a challenge to Hogg and Kenyatta's election over alleged rule violations and concerns about gender equity. After the vote, Hogg said it was 'impossible to ignore the broader context of my work to reform the party which loomed large over this vote' and that the 'DNC has pledged to remove me, and this vote has provided an avenue to fast-track that effort.'

South Korea President Lee's election law violation hearing postponed indefinitely, court says
South Korea President Lee's election law violation hearing postponed indefinitely, court says

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

South Korea President Lee's election law violation hearing postponed indefinitely, court says

SEOUL (Reuters) -A Seoul court said on Monday it will indefinitely postpone a trial of President Lee Jae-myung on charges of violating election law in 2022. South Korea's Supreme Court ruled in May, before Lee was elected, that Lee had violated election law by publicly making "false statements" during his 2022 presidential bid, and sent the case back to an appeals court. The Seoul High Court, which had scheduled a hearing for the case on June 18, said on Monday that it will postpone the hearing "to be decided later" without a date, a court spokesperson confirmed. Lee's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The court said its decision to postpone the hearing was due to "Constitution Article 84", without elaborating. South Korea's Constitution, Article 84, says a sitting president is "not subject to criminal prosecution while in office" for most crimes. However, legal experts are divided on whether that applies to ongoing trials that were already prosecuted before a president was elected. The National Court Administration under the Supreme Court gave as its opinion that judges of each court where Lee's trials are being held will have to decide whether to stop or proceed, according to its statement to a lawmaker in May. "The court in charge of hearing the case will determine whether Article 84 of the Constitution should be applied to a criminal defendant who was elected in the presidential election," the statement said. Lee's ruling Democratic Party, which controls parliament, is planning to pass a bill this week which suspends ongoing trials for the incumbent president, local broadcaster KBS reported on Monday. The Constitutional Court may be asked to rule whether the bill is unconstitutional, legal experts have said.

Bernie Sanders urges Democrats not to work with ‘right-wing extremist' Musk after Trump fallout
Bernie Sanders urges Democrats not to work with ‘right-wing extremist' Musk after Trump fallout

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Bernie Sanders urges Democrats not to work with ‘right-wing extremist' Musk after Trump fallout

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., ruled out the idea that Democrats should work with Elon Musk after his explosive falling out with President Donald Trump, labeling the Tesla CEO a "right-wing extremist." Musk said that he "strongly supported Obama" but felt that the modern Democratic Party had been "hijacked by extremists" in an April 2022 post on X. "Musk has evolved over the years. My understanding is he actually voted for Obama in 2008. But over the years, he has developed into a right-wing extremist," Sanders told CNN "State of the Union" host Dana Bash after she asked if Democrats should work with the tech billionaire after his "breakup" with Trump. Timeline: Inside The Evolving Relationship Between Trump And Musk From First Term To This Week's Fallout Sanders dismissed the idea out of hand and said Trump and Musk's drama was further proof that the United States was devolving into an oligarchic society. The self-proclaimed democratic socialist dismissed the episode as a fight among oligarchs, and slammed it as an "embarrassment" to people who believe in democracy and the rule of law. "Musk said to Trump, 'hey listen, I spent $270 million to get you elected. I bought you the presidency because we have a corrupt campaign finance system and billionaires can do that.' And Trump said, 'well, I gave you the right to run the government for three or four months, but I don't like the guy you want to run NASA, and we're going to get rid of him' and Musk got upset," Sanders said. Read On The Fox News App Musk endorsed Trump after he survived his assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, and subsequently served as one of his top surrogates and spent hundreds of millions of dollars to get him elected. Trump selected Musk to serve as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and tasked him with cutting waste, fraud and abuse from the federal bureaucracy. Musk's tenure at DOGE was tumultuous. Although he found billions of dollars in spending cuts, his reductions in federal outlays fell far short of the trillion dollars he promised. Backlash to Musk's work within the administration caused his businesses to suffer. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Trump and Musk's relationship took a turn for the worse after the president withdrew Musk-ally Jared Isaacman's nomination to lead NASA. Musk proceeded to trash the "big beautiful bill" Trump is trying to get through Congress, claiming Trump only won because he donated $270 million to aid his campaign and alleging, without proof, that the president is featured in the so-called Epstein files in an X post he subsequently deleted. Trump warned that Musk will have to face "very serious consequences" if he funds Democratic candidates as a result of their rupture. When asked by Bash if he feels that Musk is correct in claiming that Trump only won because of Musk's money, Sanders responded article source: Bernie Sanders urges Democrats not to work with 'right-wing extremist' Musk after Trump fallout

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store