DIRCO defends policy change that will enable Musk's Starlink to operate in SA as 'in the national interest
Elon Musk. Bringing billionaire Elon Musk's controversial satellite internet system, Starlink, into South Africa's airspace is in the country's national interest because it will help meet its developmental goals
Image: AFP
Bringing billionaire Elon Musk's controversial satellite internet system, Starlink, into South Africa's airspace is in the country's national interest because it will help meet its developmental goals, said Deputy Minister of the Department of International Relations and Cooperation, Alvin Botes.
During a conference on illicit financial flows, mobilising domestic resources, and financing for development, hosted at SGN Grant Thornton's offices at the end of last week, Botes said that any trade agreement would be subordinate to the Constitution and must facilitate development.
Botes also hinted at government's policy towards trade agreements with the United States following President Cyril Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump on May 21. He said that the county's policies are 'not subordinate to trade incentives'.
The Deputy Minister added: 'We can only speak about what our constitutional imperatives are.' He explained that it was important that public debates were held as government effects changes in law when public opinion focuses on certain issues.
However, Botes also said that the United States is South Africa's second largest trade partner as a country following China. 'It would be reckless to say we don't need the US,' he noted, speaking specifically about automotive exports.
During Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump, which was televised, the United States President seemingly blindsided Ramaphosa by screening videos in which then EFF leader Julius Malema chanted 'kill the boer, kill the farmer'.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
Trump has been targeting South Africa for what he sees as genocide, while Musk has publicly stated that the country has 'racist ownership laws,' which may deter him from investing here, including through Starlink.
Recent proposed changes by Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies, Solly Malatsi, that will amend current laws governing the telecoms space has caused controversy and have been viewed as paving the way for Musk, who was previously close with US President Donald Trump, to operate his satellites in South Africa.
Speaking to IOL on the sidelines of the SNG conference, Botes said trade agreements must be reconcilable with nation building. When specifically asked about Starlink, the Deputy Minister said government sought to get the best outcome for South Africans still suffering the consequences of the Apartheid era.
Malatsi has proposed that the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) to reconsider its regulations on ownership of licences. This would include making use of alternatives to requiring companies to be 30% owned by historically disadvantaged individuals before that entity can be awarded spectrum.
Botes pointed out that not all South Africans have access to the internet and Starlink will bridge these gaps in rural areas. A release from Statistics South Africa last week showed that the percentage of households who had access to the Internet through any other means increased from 28.0% in 2010 to 82.1% by 2024.
Malatsi was 'invited' by the Portfolio Committee on Communications and Digital Technologies to explain these directives, which would essentially allow international companies to implement skills development, enterprise development, socio-economic investment, and Equity Equivalent Investment Programmes instead of ownership.
The Committee said that these directives 'appear to be in contravention of the Electronic Communications Act and in favour of low earth orbit satellite provider SpaceX, which will be providing broadband services'. Space X operates Starlink.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
6 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
School's decision to change name from ‘disgraced' DF Malan to DF Akademie ‘undeniably rational'
The Supreme Court of Appeal has upheld a Bellville school's decision to change its name from DF Malan High School to DF Akademie to distance itself from its apartheid past, despite objections from some parents. A Full Bench of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has dismissed a review application by four parents and found the school governing body (SGB) of DF Malan High School in Bellville, Western Cape, acted within its powers to rename the school in line with its values of inclusivity and academic excellence. This means the Afrikaans-medium school's name can be changed to DF Akademie, as suggested in May 2021. The voting for a new name took place in October 2021. Of the 3,466 votes received, the overwhelming majority, namely 85%, proposed DF Akademie. The litigation stems from Barend Rautenbach, Johan Smit, Francois Malan and Barend de Klerk taking umbrage against the SGB's decision after a consultative process in May 2021, to change the name of the school. In essence, they requested that the SCA review and set aside the decision of Western Cape Division of the High Court Judge Robert Henney, who dismissed the appellants' application to maintain the name DF Malan, the prime minister from 1948 to 195, who is considered to be one of the architects of apartheid. In his ruling, Henney said, 'The glorification of his name by an insistence that a school be named after him in post-apartheid South Africa where young people have to embrace a culture based on the values of our Constitution is an insult not only to them, but to the millions of South Africans who suffered at the hands of the apartheid regime.' The SCA judgment, penned by acting Judge John Smith, found the SGB's consultation process was comprehensive, fair and rational. 'The name of Dr Malan harks back to the apartheid era, an association that is fundamentally at odds with the school's ethos of inclusivity and transformation. The governing body's decision to purge the school of this unfortunate association with a disgraced legacy is thus undeniably rational and in the best interest of the school and all its stakeholders,' he stated. The ruling further stated that, while the school took pride in its academic success culture and inclusive policies, its controversial name had been an albatross around its neck. Stigma of name and call for change The school was established in 1954. Shortly after its establishment, the school obtained the permission of the then prime minister to name the school after him. In 2018, an alumnus wrote to the governing body, describing the name as 'insensitive and inappropriate' and demanded that the school begin a process to change its name. In September 2019, the school received similar letters from a parent of two learners. The pressure on the SGB to reconsider the school's name intensified during June 2020 when a group of alumni calling themselves 'DF Malan Must Fall' joined the fray. Their stated objective was to agitate for a name change and to address the 'institutional racism' at the school. In June 2020, the SGB began a process that would allow it to determine if the school's symbols, including its anthem and name, should be changed, as well as the cost implications thereof. Since the Schools Act does not prescribe a procedure for the changing of a school's name, the governing body was at sea concerning the issue and had to do its best to devise a fair process to enable consultation with stakeholders. All it had to rely on were circulars from the Department of Education and the Federation of Governing Bodies for South African Schools (Fedsas). Significantly, both circulars presumed that the governing body had the authority to change the school's name. A departmental circular, while instructing governing bodies to submit names to the provincial education department to enable it to check whether other schools bore the same name, expressly stated that a governing body's authority to change a school's name was beyond question. The Fedsas circular reminded governing bodies that changing a school's name was a sensitive matter and cautioned that wide consultation with all stakeholders, including parents, teachers, learners and the broader community, had to inform any decisions regarding a school's symbols, including its name, motto or emblem. Varied responses It was then suggested that the governing body create an ad hoc steering committee to oversee the consultation process and advise on potential new names or symbols. On 22 June 2020, the governing body wrote to all parents, students, alumni, and school staff on its database, informing them of its decision to begin a process to reconsider the school's name and symbols. The letter elicited a variety of responses, with some expressing misgivings about a name change, others supporting it and some making suggestions about the process that should be followed. The SGB then appointed an independent facilitator, Dr Jan Frederick Marais, a theologian of the Ecumenical Board of Stellenbosch University's Theology Faculty, and a renowned mediation expert, and thereafter a steering committee. Chairperson of the governing body Andre Roux asserted that although the steering committee members were advised to focus discussions on the school's symbols and identity, they were not instructed to prohibit discussions on the school's name. A draft report was eventually compiled and while everybody agreed with the school's core values as formulated by Dr Marais, three steering committee members disagreed with the decision to change the school's name. They were Veronica van Zyl, Mette Warnich – who also filed affidavits in support of the appeal application – and Gert Visser. On Marais's advice, a new task team was thereafter formed to advise the governing body on the formulation of a consultative process with stakeholders; criteria against which proposed new names could be evaluated; and the financial implications of a name change. The task team decided that invitations should be sent to all persons on the school's database to propose new names. After the invitations to comment were sent in April 2021, 626 of the recipients responded – 301 proposing that the name DF Malan be retained and 325 suggesting new names. However, the SGB decided that only two of the four names submitted by the task team were acceptable, namely Protea Akademie and DF Akademie. In a vote, DF Akademie won 85%. The appellants in the case took issue with several points. They claimed SGBs did not have the authority to change a school's name, that the SGB departed from the procedure it originally shared with the school community, stifled debate and failed to properly consult on the name change. The SCA judgment dismissed the complaints. 'I find that in changing the school's name, the governing body was acting within the ambit of its implied powers in terms of the Schools Act; that the procedure it adopted to consult interested parties was comprehensive, fair and rational; and that the decision to change the school's name was taken with due regard to, and rationally connected to the information before it. The appeal must therefore fail,' it read. DM
The South African
13 minutes ago
- The South African
Elon Musk drops Donald Trump/Epstein files bomb
Elon Musk and Donald Trump had a rather public breakup on X today, and now it's gone even deeper. In a gobsmacking development on Thursday, Elon Musk has opened up an almighty can of worms involving the 45th and 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Tesla CEO Musk claims that Trump is in the Epstein files. The world's wealthiest and most powerful men are no longer besties, clearly. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk said on X. 'Such ingratitude.' Meanwhile, Tesla shares fell by 8% on Wall Street on Thursday following the spat. Tesla CEO Elon Musk listens as US President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on 30 May 2025 in Washington, DC. Musk, who served as an adviser to Trump and led the Department of Government Efficiency, announced he would leave his role in the Trump administration to refocus on his businesses. Image: AFP Let us know by leaving a comment below or sending a WhatsApp to 060 011 0211. Also, subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
44 minutes ago
- IOL News
Madleen aid ship under threat: Can it deliver vital supplies to Gaza?
Sign with the slogan All Eyes On Deck, depicting the humanitarian ship Madleen on its way to Gaza during a demonstration organized by political, trade union and community organizations in support of the Palestinian people in the face of Israel s blockade of the Gaza Strip in Toulouse, southwest France. Image: Pat Batard / Hans Lucas / Hans Lucas via AFP A humanitarian vessel that is on course for Gaza is under drone surveillance and facing threats of seizure from Israeli authorities, raising alarm among international observers and human rights organisations. The Madleen, operated by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC), set sail earlier this week carrying food, medical supplies, and 12 international activists, including Swedish climate advocate Greta Thunberg and French-Palestinian Member of the European Parliament Rima Hassan. While we associate Thunberg with climate change, she and her crew are on a new and crucial mission: to break Israel's more than 90-day-long total blockade of Gaza and deliver critical aid to a population facing catastrophic shortages. There are 12 activists on board the Madleen: Greta Thunberg – Swedish climate activist Rima Hassan – French-Palestinian Member of European Parliament Yasemin Acar – Germany Omar Faiad – France Pascal Maurieras – France Marco van Rennes – The Netherlands Reva Viard – France Yanis Mhamdi – France Suayb Ordu – Turkiye Sergio Toribio – Spain Baptiste Andre – France Thiago Avila – Brazil As the boat approached the eastern Mediterranean, the crew reported being repeatedly shadowed by a Heron UAV, which is a high-altitude, long-endurance surveillance drone manufactured by Israel Aerospace Industries. The drone is believed to be operated by the Greek coastguard under a bilateral agreement with Israel. According to Ávila, the drone passed directly above the boat. 'This is a critical threat, especially considering a Freedom Flotilla vessel was bombed under similar circumstances last month off the coast of Malta.' Tensions escalated further on Wednesday, when Israeli media reported that senior defence officials were preparing to intercept the Madleen and potentially arrest the crew. 'We are prepared,' said Israeli military spokesperson Effie Defrin in an interview with The Times, adding that they "will act accordingly.' Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz is expected to announce a formal decision regarding the ship's fate within days. The Jerusalem Post reported that the vessel will be barred from entering Gazan waters, regardless of its civilian and humanitarian nature. Where is the Madleen ship now? At the time of publishing, the Madleen is located south of Crete, where it made a temporary diversion to rescue four Sudanese asylum seekers from a distressed vessel. The ship's crew includes trained rescue personnel and is operating in communication with search-and-rescue NGOs. The rescued individuals, who fled violence in Sudan, are at risk of being returned to Libya — a move the FFC says would be illegal under international refugee protections. Human rights organisations, including Amnesty International and several UN special rapporteurs, have called for the Madleen's safe passage, warning that any attempt to sabotage or intercept the vessel could amount to a violation of international humanitarian law. 'This is a civilian-led mission delivering life-saving aid,' Amnesty International France stated. 'Any attack or interference would be a knowing and unlawful assault on civilians.' Humanitarian organisations are not the only ones speaking out. An online campaign organised by the FFC has generated nearly 500,000 letters demanding that Israel allow the ship to proceed unimpeded. Despite the growing threats, the crew insists the mission will continue. 'We are carrying food, not weapons,' said Ávila. 'But we are being tracked as if we are a military target. This is about saving lives — and we are being threatened for that.' IOL NEWS
