logo
Florida child welfare agency calls ICE on teen migrant in foster care, sparking criticism

Florida child welfare agency calls ICE on teen migrant in foster care, sparking criticism

Miami Heralda day ago

Florida child welfare authorities turned over a 17-year-old foster child to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, sparking intense criticism that the action could hinder efforts to protect children in the state's large immigrant communities.
The Honduran teen, named Henry, was removed from his Pensacola foster home Monday morning — in handcuffs and shackles – and transferred immediately into ICE custody. The boy and his mother had crossed the southwest border into the U.S. without permission, sources familiar with the case told the Miami Herald.
After being separated from his mother, who was later deported, Henry traveled from Texas to Pensacola, where he sought work. He entered foster care after he was found living in a shed with no source of food, shelter or income, records show. He also may have been a victim of labor trafficking. The Herald is not fully naming him to protect his privacy.
The decision to alert immigration authorities to Henry's status as an undocumented migrant is at odds with decades of child welfare practice in Florida – and it appears to violate a 30-year-old state Department of Children and Families rule that prohibits workers from acting upon a child's status.
Fran Allegra, a children's attorney who ran Miami-Dade's private foster care agency from 2004 until 2014, said if DCF's action in Henry's case represents a formal change in policy, it 'puts Florida children at risk, and introduces a new chilling effect on reports to the [state's] child abuse hotline. Reports about undocumented families are already low. This shift makes the chance for reporting, and, therefore, rescuing kids, less likely.'
State Sen. Ileana Garcia, a Miami Republican who has been openly critical of the Trump administration's immigration policies after previously supporting them, spoke Monday about Henry's plight after working behind the scenes to keep him within state care.
While declining to name the child, she told the Herald she is concerned his case may be part of a larger pattern in which children in the state's foster care system could be picked up at the homes of their foster parents by federal immigration authorities. Lawyers told the Herald it's been years since they heard about state child welfare agencies, like DCF, notifying ICE about children in their custody.
'Somehow they are collecting these records because they are going to their houses,' said Garcia, a co-founder of Latinas for Trump. 'What really bothers me is that these are victims of human trafficking. You would think they would have more protections.'
In a post on social media, Garcia said the effort to target minors in foster care is a 'desperate' attempt to meet a 'quota of deportations.'
Typically, unaccompanied children who are detained at the border are placed in the custody of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Refuge Resettlement, which locates available relatives and suitable sponsors or places children in shelters. But Henry was detained by local authorities in Escambia County and placed in state care, instead.
Historically, ORR has been reluctant to take children who had been released from their care – or had never been in their custody – if they were already placed with a local or state agency. But experts told the Herald that has changed under the Trump administration, which they say has been apprehending kids already in the U.S. and putting them into ORR custody. As part of its crackdown, the administration also has cut funds for lawyers in kids' immigration cases – and provided ICE access to a database about unaccompanied children.
Henry's journey to the U.S.
Henry, whose father was deceased, crossed the border with his mother at age 13, both as undocumented migrants. The details of his first years in the U.S. are not completely clear but a source told the Herald he was initially released into the custody of an uncle. Multiple sources said both Henry and his mother had endured enormous trauma during the journey.
At some point, Henry moved in with his mother, but he did not remain there long. It appears Henry's mother was arrested and jailed somewhere in Texas, and then deported back to Honduras. The teen found his way to Pensacola, where his brother lives, seeking employment. He found it, working for $10-per day. He 'realized he was being overworked, and ran away,' records show. Henry may also have been 'labor trafficked.'
By the winter of 2024, Henry had been in Pensacola for several months. A report was made to DCF's child welfare hotline in November alleging the teen, who was not yet 17, was homeless, and 'did not have a caregiver available.' Henry was then placed with a local family, where he remained for 11 days before leaving after disagreements over a visitor and when he was supposed to sleep, records say.
Another hotline report followed on April 21: The month before, Henry had run away from Lutheran Services Florida Currie House, and he was not 'welcome' to return, records say.
On March 28, DCF was told Henry was 'staying in a shed and was homeless and may be a runaway and possibly labor trafficked.'
On April 24, DCF filed what's called a 'shelter petition,' asking an Escambia County child welfare judge to designate the teen a dependent of the state. Henry was placed in foster care, where he remained until this summer. On June 6, sources told the Herald, a DCF administrator reported Henry to ICE.
Three days later, Henry was taken from his foster home – in handcuffs and leg irons – by ICE agents, a source said.
The boy is now in the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement, which handles cases of unaccompanied kids. ICE does not detain unaccompanied minors in its own facilities; they are generally housed by ORR. A source told the Miami Herald the teenager does not have a deportation order.
A policy shift?
DCF administrators did not respond to queries from the Herald about the decision to report Henry to ICE, which appears to run counter to previous state policy.
In response to litigation, DCF passed a governing procedure in 1995 called the Undocumented Child Rule. The lawsuit had been filed in federal court by 'Jane Doe,' a 14-year-old migrant from Haiti who had entered the U.S. in 1985 without permission. Collateral damage in a tug of war between Florida and federal immigration authorities, the girl was about to be tossed out of foster care.
Among other things, the rule requires the agency to screen and respond to child abuse hotline calls 'without regard to the immigration status' of the child or family at the center of the report.
The rule states, in part: 'No such status check or other contact shall be made for the purpose of seeking the child's or the family's detention by [immigration authorities] or the initiation or resumption of deportation or exclusion proceedings against the child or the child's family, irrespective of the outcome of the dependency proceeding. No Department of Children and Family Services staff member may attempt to place any alien child in [immigration] custody.'
Robert Latham, associate director of the Children & Youth Law Clinic at the University of Miami School of Law, said DCF appears to have violated that rule by reporting Henry to ICE.
'Every administration since then has followed' the rule, he said. 'If this is a policy decision, it is a huge deal.'
Latham said DCF keeps records of which children in state care are undocumented, partly because Medicaid, the state's insurer of disabled and impoverished Floridians, will not pay for their healthcare. Most foster children are insured by Medicaid.
'It's unconscionable of DCF to cooperate in a way that puts children at risk of harm,' Latham said Monday. 'They are entrusted with caring for these children and should do everything they can to protect them.'
Fear of suppressed reports
One of Latham's greatest fears – and that of other children's advocates – is that immigrant communities will decline to report suspected child abuse or neglect for fear that child protection authorities will report a youngster's immigration status to ICE. People who become aware of maltreatment may fear deportation more than they fear abuse.
'If people don't report, DCF can't respond, and children and families will be left at higher risk of harm.' Latham added: 'I suspect that's the point. The whole push over the past few months has been to destabilize immigrant communities. This seems like another way to do that.'
DCF's action could discourage relatives, neighbors and others from seeking help from the state when they fear a child is in danger, said Ron Davidson, former director of Mental Health Policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago who consulted with that state's Department of Children and Family Services for more than 20 years.
'Florida and every other state must rely on the implicit trust of private citizens to come forward and report harm to children in the community. Whenever that basic trust is violated — as it appears in this case — then the risks of harm to children are dramatically increased,' Davidson said.
Florida has one of the largest populations of undocumented immigrants among the 50 states, according to Department of Homeland Security Data. Estimates of Florida's undocumented residents range from 590,000 to 1.02 million people. That includes nearly 165,000 undocumented children under 18, according to the Center for Migration Studies of New York.
'If DCF's public policy changes from refugee care and resettlement… to deportation, our vulnerable migrant communities across the state will no longer look to DCF for help for abused, abandoned and neglected children,' said Allegra, who headed the Our Kids foster care agency for a decade.
She added: 'These children will suffer more harm under this policy shift and abuse will go unreported.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary

time38 minutes ago

Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary

WASHINGTON -- WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to acknowledge that the Pentagon has developed plans to take over Greenland and Panama by force if necessary but refused to answer repeated questions during a hotly combative congressional hearing Thursday about his use of Signal chats to discuss military operations. Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee repeatedly got into heated exchanges with Hegseth, with some of the toughest lines of questioning coming from military veterans as many demanded yes or no answers and he tried to avoid direct responses about his actions as Pentagon chief. In one back-and-forth, Hegseth did provide an eyebrow-raising answer. Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., asked whether the Pentagon has plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary. 'Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any contingency,' Hegseth said several times. It is not unusual for the Pentagon to draw up contingency plans for conflicts that have not arisen, but his handling of the questions prompted a Republican lawmaker to step in a few minutes later. 'It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?' said Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio. As Hegseth started to repeat his answer about contingency plans, Turner added emphatically, 'I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.' 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats,' Hegseth responded. Time and again, lawmakers pressed Hegseth to answer questions he has avoided for months, including during the two previous days of hearings on Capitol Hill. And frustration boiled over. "You're an embarrassment to this country. You're unfit to lead," Rep. Salud Carbajal snapped, the California Democrat's voice rising. 'You should just get the hell out.' Hegseth's use of two Signal chats to discuss plans for U.S. strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen with other U.S. leaders as well as members of his family prompted dizzying exchanges with lawmakers. He was pressed multiple times over whether or not he shared classified information and if he should face accountability if he did. Hegseth argued that the classification markings of any information about those military operations could not be discussed with lawmakers. That became a quick trap, as Hegseth has asserted that nothing he posted — on strike times and munitions dropped in March — was classified. His questioner, Rep. Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat and Marine veteran, jumped on the disparity. 'You can very well disclose whether or not it was classified,' Moulton said. 'What's not classified is that it was an incredible, successful mission,' Hegseth responded. A Pentagon watchdog report on his Signal use is expected soon. Moulton asked Hegseth whether he would hold himself accountable if the inspector general finds that he placed classified information on Signal, a commercially available app. Hegseth would not directly say, only noting that he serves 'at the pleasure of the president.' President Donald Trump has said multiple times that he wants to take control of the strategic, mineral-rich island nation of Greenland, long a U.S. ally. Those remarks have been met with flat rejections from Greenland's leaders. 'Greenland is not for sale,' Jacob Isbosethsen, Greenland's representative to the U.S, said Thursday at a forum in Washington sponsored by the Arctic Institute. In an effort not to show the Pentagon's hand on its routine effort to have plans for everything, Hegseth danced around the direct question from Smith, leading to the confusion. 'Speaking on behalf of the American people, I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland," Smith said.

Gov. Abbott deploys over 5,000 Texas National Guard troops ahead of planned ‘No Kings' protests
Gov. Abbott deploys over 5,000 Texas National Guard troops ahead of planned ‘No Kings' protests

Los Angeles Times

time39 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Gov. Abbott deploys over 5,000 Texas National Guard troops ahead of planned ‘No Kings' protests

AUSTIN, Texas — Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said Thursday he has ordered the deployment of more than 5,000 Texas National Guard troops, along with more than 2,000 state police, to help local law enforcement manage protests against President Donald Trump and the ongoing federal immigration raids. Abbott's announcement did not detail where the troops were sent, but some were seen at a protest Wednesday night in downtown San Antonio near the Alamo. That protest drew hundreds of demonstrators but did not erupt into violence. More protests are planned on Saturday in San Antonio and across Texas in cities such as Houston, Austin and Dallas as part of the national 'No Kings' movement. Protests earlier this week in Austin and Dallas led to brief clashes with police who used chemical irritants to disperse the crowds. About a dozen were arrested. 'Peaceful protests are part of the fabric of our nation, but Texas will not tolerate the lawlessness we have seen in Los Angeles in response to President Donald Trump's enforcement of immigration law,' Abbott said. 'Anyone engaging in acts of violence or damaging property will be arrested and held accountable to the full extent of the law.' The Republican Texas governor's move stands in sharp contrast to California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, who has publicly clashed with Trump over his decision to deploy National Guard and Marine personnel in Los Angeles. Mayors in San Antonio and Austin have said they did not ask for Abbott to mobilize the National Guard to their cities. Abbott, who has been governor since 2014, has been aggressive in deploying the Guard in the past, particularly for immigration enforcement on the border. Since 2021, the Texas Guard has played a prominent role in Abbott's Operation Lone Star, and thousands of troops have been deployed to help clamp down on border crossings. An agreement with the Trump administration in February gave Texas National Guard soldiers the authority to arrest and detain people for entering the U.S. illegally from Mexico. Texas also has established a permanent border base for Guard troops, an 80-acre (30-hectare) installation that will house up to 1,800 troops when completed. Vertuno writes for the Associated Press.

Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary
Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary

Hamilton Spectator

time43 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary

WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to acknowledge that the Pentagon has developed plans to take over Greenland and Panama by force if necessary but refused to answer repeated questions during a hotly combative congressional hearing Thursday about his use of Signal chats to discuss military operations. Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee repeatedly got into heated exchanges with Hegseth, with some of the toughest lines of questioning coming from military veterans as many demanded yes or no answers and he tried to avoid direct responses about his actions as Pentagon chief . In one back-and-forth, Hegseth did provide an eyebrow-raising answer. Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., asked whether the Pentagon has plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary. 'Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any contingency,' Hegseth said several times. It is not unusual for the Pentagon to draw up contingency plans for conflicts that have not arisen, but his handling of the questions prompted a Republican lawmaker to step in a few minutes later. 'It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?' said Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio. As Hegseth started to repeat his answer about contingency plans, Turner added emphatically, 'I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.' 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats,' Hegseth responded. Time and again, lawmakers pressed Hegseth to answer questions he has avoided for months, including during the two previous days of hearings on Capitol Hill. And frustration boiled over. 'You're an embarrassment to this country. You're unfit to lead,' Rep. Salud Carbajal snapped, the California Democrat's voice rising. 'You should just get the hell out.' Questions emerge on Signal chats and if details Hegseth shared were classified Hegseth's use of two Signal chats to discuss plans for U.S. strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen with other U.S. leaders as well as members of his family prompted dizzying exchanges with lawmakers. He was pressed multiple times over whether or not he shared classified information and if he should face accountability if he did. Hegseth argued that the classification markings of any information about those military operations could not be discussed with lawmakers. That became a quick trap, as Hegseth has asserted that nothing he posted — on strike times and munitions dropped in March — was classified. His questioner, Rep. Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat and Marine veteran, jumped on the disparity. 'You can very well disclose whether or not it was classified,' Moulton said. 'What's not classified is that it was an incredible, successful mission,' Hegseth responded. A Pentagon watchdog report on his Signal use is expected soon. Moulton asked Hegseth whether he would hold himself accountable if the inspector general finds that he placed classified information on Signal, a commercially available app. Hegseth would not directly say, only noting that he serves 'at the pleasure of the president.' Democrats ask about plans for action against Greenland and Panama President Donald Trump has said multiple times that he wants to take control of the strategic, mineral-rich island nation of Greenland, long a U.S. ally. Those remarks have been met with flat rejections from Greenland's leaders. 'Greenland is not for sale,' Jacob Isbosethsen, Greenland's representative to the U.S, said Thursday at a forum in Washington sponsored by the Arctic Institute. In an effort not to show the Pentagon's hand on its routine effort to have plans for everything, Hegseth danced around the direct question from Smith, leading to the confusion. 'Speaking on behalf of the American people, I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,' Smith said. ___ AP writer David Klepper in Washington contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store