logo
Labour council's LTN risks endangering people, engineers warned

Labour council's LTN risks endangering people, engineers warned

Telegraph19-04-2025

Britain's smallest low-traffic neighbourhood (LTN) risks putting cyclists and pedestrians in danger, engineers warned.
The London borough of Hammersmith and Fulham controversially banned out-of-town motorists from a popular cut-through, between the A4 and west London, to 'improve road safety'.
But a safety audit report commissioned by the Labour-led local authority shows that independent engineers were concerned that the closure of Rivercourt Road could end with pedestrians 'hit by vehicles' and cars 'colliding with cyclists'.
Last year, the council was criticised for creating a 'cash cow' by closing the 350ft-long road and imposing £130 fines for infractions. It was predicted that 3,200 motorists would be barred from the route each day as a result.
The safety audit – published in October, one month before the LTN turned the one-way road two-way – listed a series of concerns, some because the street was sandwiched between the busy A4 and Hammersmith's King Street and its cycle lane.
It said: 'Drivers on King Street may not see cyclists on the cycle track and [might] collide with them as they turn into the road.'
It warned that cyclists might be 'completely within drivers' blind spots', with motorists having to 'look over their shoulders' to try to spot bikes.
It added: 'Drivers turning through the cycle-track may therefore fail to give way to cyclists resulting in vehicle collisions with cycles.'
The audit claimed new 'quite sharp' angles at Rivercourt Road in the otherwise straight cycle lane might 'result in conflict between cyclists travelling in opposite directions' with bike riders 'coming close to one another'.
The council responded that the 'accentuated deflection and cycle lane narrowing' was intentional because it 'forced cyclists to slow down'.
Analysis of Transport for London (TfL) crash data has previously shown that the creation of the bi-directional cycle lane on King Street, a one-way street for cars, saw a marked increase in serious and slight injuries to cyclists.
The audit warned that making the road two-way could take pedestrians unawares. It said: 'Pedestrians walking along King Street may not realise they need to check for vehicles in both directions as they cross and may be hit by vehicles turning into Rivercourt Road.'
The council responded by claiming familiarity with the change would be 'acquired upon first use', adding that the 'absence of no entry signs' for motorists would help pedestrians realise the road was now two-way. It said that 'intentional friction' would also 'force' motorists to drive more slowly.
The audit also warned that the road would be blighted with a 'cacophony of road signs'.
Last year, Latymer Upper School, the £8,000-a-term private school with a campus on one side of Rivercourt Road, warned the council that the LTN could 'pose risks' to students.
The school – alumni of which include Hugh Grant, the actor – wrote to parents to say it had 'outlined their strong opposition' and had provided 'additional supervision' for pupils, after the street became two-way 'overnight'.
The audit warned that vehicles 'travelling at relatively high speeds and in close proximity' on the A4 were at risk of 'rear end shunts, or loss-of-control collisions' as their drivers swerve around cars turning into Rivercourt Road.
The reports shows that the council 'partially accepted' six and rejected three of the engineers' recommendations to make the design safer.
A council spokesman said: 'Residents in Rivercourt Road were faced with 4,000 cars a day needlessly cutting through and gridlocking their small street.
'They asked us to take action to reduce the congestion and increase safety for pedestrians and cyclists.
'We are really pleased to report that the neighbourhood improvement scheme has done just that. The street is significantly less congested. Residents tell us it is a quieter, safer and nicer place to live.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Use car industry fines to boost EV sales, says Polestar boss
Use car industry fines to boost EV sales, says Polestar boss

The Independent

time2 days ago

  • The Independent

Use car industry fines to boost EV sales, says Polestar boss

Polestar UK MD Galvin has been outspoken in his views on government support for electric vehicles, telling us last year that the UK is the ' worst in Europe ' for electric car incentives. Now his frustrations are boiling over on additional EV taxes and a lack of incentives for people to drive cleaner electric cars. 'I find it immensely frustrating that the government is slowly nibbling away at the few benefits that are left for retail buyers or any driver actually to consider an electric car,' Galvin told The Independent. Galvin also takes issue with the government's expensive car supplement, a levy on 'luxury' EVs costing more than £40,000. 'The supplement was [extended to EVs] in April with a value that was created back in 2017 and not adjusted for inflation. It's completely ridiculous. Even a Vauxhall Astra Electric is considered a luxury car with that price cap.' Also hindering the transition to EVs is a recent proposal by TfL to extend London's congestion charge to include electric vehicles, says Galvin. 'There wasn't going to be any preferential rate for EVs. Now there is a small discount, but the fact is as retail demand for electric cars is still sluggish, we need more carrot and less stick to attract as many people as possible to make that transition.' 'They should leave the congestion charge alone. The air quality in our towns and cities is widely reported as not being particularly good. And one of the ways to make that better is, of course, to encourage more people to drive an EV.' Galvin suggests a congestion charge exemption for EV drivers and preferable parking rates. 'We also need a fiscal incentive for retail customers to consider an EV. We keep talking about it, the government keep not listening.' Galvin also has a plan for how EV incentives could be introduced at no cost to taxpayers. 'I don't think the taxpayer should fund that incentive, but what we could do is use the fines that are going to be paid by [car makers] for not meeting the ZEV mandate to fund it. Then it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy with no taxpayer liability. It means those [car makers] that aren't compliant end up funding the incentive to attract more customers to electric cars.' The ZEV mandate was introduced to push car makers to increase the number of EVs they sell, with the 2025 target set at 28 per cent. Recent changes to the mandate allowed car makers greater flexibility in meeting those targets through the use of a credit system that includes relying on future sales of EVs. Galvin thinks it was the wrong move. 'What that has done is allow manufacturers to kick the can down the road in terms of accelerating the change to zero emission vehicles by mortgaging future underperformance further and further and further into the future. 'When we all get to 2029 and that can has been kicked down the road for the past four years, are we suddenly going to meet the target overnight? No, we're not. There needs to be a roadmap which gets people to that compliance level and that roadmap has been altered significantly.' However, industry mouthpiece SMMT (Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders) has been more positive, saying 'recent adjustments to the ZEV mandate were welcome'. Galvin is aware of the impression he gives as the boss of an electric car company criticising the government for not trying to boost electric car sales. However, he's confident that his proposals wouldn't be criticised by tax payers. 'The irony of me saying this as a boss of an electric car company isn't lost on me. But if you follow the method that I just described, which is to use the fine revenue from OEMs that miss the ZEV mandate to fund incentives, the revenues are coming from a fine mechanism that was never budgeted for in the first place.'

Engineering firm wins train contract with transport giant
Engineering firm wins train contract with transport giant

The Herald Scotland

time2 days ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Engineering firm wins train contract with transport giant

Gibson's Engineering, a train manufacturer and maintenance and repair business, has sealed a major new contract with Transport for London (TfL), the largest integrated transport company in the UK. The contract is described as a significant marker of Gibson's progress since opening its new engineering facility at the world-famous St Rollox rail depot in Springburn, Glasgow. The works include stripping back and overhauling 23 long vehicle wagons. (Image: Gibson's Engineering) The works, which include stripping back and fully overhauling 23 long vehicle wagons, will take two years and create significant employment opportunities in the local area, generating 40 new jobs. St Rollox reopened as a manufacturing, maintenance and repair rail depot last year. The company is led by father and son Dougie and Fraser Gibson. The firm said they and their team are 'dedicated to delivering superior quality products that not only enhance the global transportation landscape but reduce its environmental impact'. Tom Cunnington, left, of TfL and Fraser Gibson, Gibson's Engineering managing director. (Image: Gibson's Engineering) The directors and management team, 'with a combined experience of over 300 years in rail transport engineering, have a reputation for innovation, reliability and craftsmanship'. Fraser Gibson, managing director of Gibson's Engineering, said: 'This is fantastic news for Gibson's, as well as for the wider Scottish rail industry. Since reopening St Rollox, Dougie and I have worked to restore its position as a centre for engineering excellence. This contract shows that we are well on our way to seeing The Caley thrive again, with a rapidly expanding workforce and significant new projects.' READ MORE: 'Our extensive supply chain supports growth and opportunities right across the UK, with around two thirds of our suppliers based outside London, and nearly a third of our overall spend and resulting economic benefit therefore felt outside of London. By renewing vital transport infrastructure through sustained investment, we can drive economic growth, within London as well as across the UK.' Following the closure of the depot in 2019, David Moulsdale purchased the facility in 2021 with the aim of revitalising the landmark site as a train engineering depot. Over £10 million has already been invested by Mr Moulsdale including the purchase price of the facility, refurbishment and ongoing maintenance of the buildings. Mr Moulsdale, described by the firm as a businessman and philanthropist, said: 'I was always confident in our ambition to see significant employment of engineers, coachbuilders, project managers and apprentices at St Rollox, and this new agreement with TfL shows that we are breathing new life into 'The Caley', Glasgow and the Scottish economy.' Paul Sweeney, Glasgow Labour MSP, said: 'I am delighted to see St Rollox, 'The Caley' Railway Works and its new operator Gibson's Engineering go from strength to strength. The award of this major contract from Transport for London (TfL) demonstrates that 'The Caley' has a viable future after being written off when the works closed down in 2019, after 163 years of operation. "A century ago, Glasgow's Springburn district was the world's largest centre of locomotive production, with exports from its various railway works going to all parts of the world. I have campaigned relentlessly and have supported the effort of the new owners to restore railway engineering work to 'The Caley', so it is exciting to see Gibson's Engineering revive this legendary locomotive works with this latest contract milestone. 'I know the difference it is going to make to Springburn by providing skilled jobs for our young people and reviving local pride in skilled manufacturing work. "I look forward to being as helpful as possible as they continue to pursue more contracts, hire more engineers, and build on Glasgow's illustrious pedigree as a centre of engineering excellence.'

Readers' Letters: Potholes prevalence is problem caused by council choices
Readers' Letters: Potholes prevalence is problem caused by council choices

Scotsman

time3 days ago

  • Scotsman

Readers' Letters: Potholes prevalence is problem caused by council choices

Edinburgh Council's collection of potholes continues to frustrate and annoy Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The Scotsman published an article on Edinburgh City Council's £86 million backlog to fill in potholes (6 June). Transport Convenor Stephen Jenkinson said: 'We'll continue to do the best we can for the city with the resources we have available'. I take issue with this statement. This is a problem created entirely by the council – in recent years they have prioritised a range of vanity projects – the lowering of kerbs, the use of plastic bollards to create makeshift and largely unused cycle lanes, the closure of roads to create community spaces (again, largely unused), the replacement of pavements that had very little wrong with them in the first place, and the repainting of lines over obviously broken roads. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad These are either entirely wasteful or extremely niche priority calls effecting the few when the majority cannot use the roads for driving or cycling safety. The council shouldn't be allowed to start any new projects until they have sorted out the basics. Edinburgh City Council Transport Convener Stephen Jenkinson Gavin Neilson, Edinburgh Share bus lanes Harold Tobermann, Chair of Edinburgh Bus Users Group, is being disingenuous (Letters, 7 June). No one that I am aware of is objecting to the idea of bus lanes as a means of helping traffic flow in the rush hours. What is ridiculous is the proposal to extend the working of the bus lanes as a 24/7 proposition. The prospect of queues of cars crawling along the outside lane while the bus lanes lie largely empty for the whole day is simply stupid. It will create congestion and it will create pollution and it will certainly not 'go some way to reallocating the communal road space more fairly'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This experiment was tried several years ago and abandoned as a result of total unfairness to car users. Brian Bannatyne-Scott, Edinburgh Reform on track The most interesting thing about the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election for Holyrood is not who won, Labour, nor the fact that the voting was a three-way split between them, the SNP and Reform UK, but where Reform's votes came from. Compared to their vote share in the constituency in last Holyrood election four years ago, the SNP vote dropped by almost 17 per cent of the votes cast and the Tory vote by 11.5 per cent. Labour's vote-share actually went down by 2 per cent as well. This means that Reform UK's 26 per cent of the vote came more from parties of the Left than the Tories. Clearly Reform are not just a threat to the Conservatives. In the climate of dissatisfaction with the established parties, Reform is on track to be a force at Holyrood next year. Otto Inglis, Ansonhill, Fife Farage rejected Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Many valid and intelligent conclusions have been drawn from the result of the Hamilton by-election. However, there is one conclusion that doesn't seem to have been given much airing, ie that three-quarters of the voters in Hamilton want nothing to do with the pernicious, far-right poison preached by Reform. David Hamill, East Linton, East Lothian Apology needed? Why did Dawn French feel the need to apologise for calling out the genocide in Gaza? Why was Gary Lineker punished by the BBC for doing the same? Yes, the Holocaust should never be forgotten but it doesn't justify one against the Palestinian people. Gail Kirkland, Bowmore, Islay Remember heroes As the British Army was forced to retreat on 12 June 1940 the 51st Highland Division – mainly Black Watch, Seaforths, Argylls, left under the command of the French – were ordered to stand and defend to the end the perimeter of Dunkirk, against overwhelming odds, to allow the evacuation of around 331,000 soldiers. This they did. During the ten-day battle 20,000 were casualties and the remaining 10,000 were forced back to St Valery-en-caux, where they were trapped by high cliffs behind and the full weight of Panzer divisions in front. No ships could get near to take them off, there was no longer any ammunition, and two days later, on 12 June 1940, surrender was unavoidable. Nearly all men were captured and marched off to Stalag 344, in occupied and destroyed Poland. Those who survived the forced labour camps (only officers went to POW camps) were not released until May 1945. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This was all kept hidden so that the morale boosting 'miracle' of Dunkirk would not be undercut by the disaster of the 51st Division's sacrifice only ten days later. Relatives did not get news for years, some not until the war ended; the lives of many of the survivors were shortened; and the men whose actions had made Dunkirk possible were ignored. Every Highland village lost men, and yet little was made of St Valery – apart from those immediately connected – for the next 80 years. During their long imprisonment the 51st Division, with many pipers, produced much music, including the 'Reel of the 51st Division' and later 'The Heroes of St Valery', written by Pipe Major Donald MacLean (who died in 1964 aged just 56). In 2020 three Scottish Armed Forces charities organised a tribute, and pipers (and others players) all over the world brought the memory of these men, mostly long dead, to mind. Every year since 1940 much attention is rightly given to the courage of those involved in the Dunkirk rescue, including many who perished on the 'little' boats. Such commemoration should also be paid, every year, perhaps by playing 'their tune', to the men who fought on, to guaranteed disaster, with no rescue, in order that so many could be saved at Dunkirk – the heroes of St Valery-en-caux. Remember the Heroes of St Valery-en-Caux: The 51st Highland Division, on 12 June 1940. Susan FG Forde, Scotlandwell, Kinross-shire Write to The Scotsman Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store