Income Eco Run raises S$70,000 for WWF-Singapore
[SINGAPORE] The inclement weather in the wee hours of Sunday (Jun 8) morning did not deter close to 5,500 people from turning up for the annual Income Eco Run at Marina Barrage to run for a good cause.
The carbon-neutral event featured five distances – 3 km, 5 km, 10 km, 15 km and the 21.1 km half-marathon – as well as a kids' run and a new pets category. A group of 20 athletes with special needs from Special Olympics Singapore also took part, running alongside volunteer pacers.
Speaker of Parliament Seah Kian Peng flagged off the 5 km and 10 km runs at 8 am, about an hour later than scheduled due to the rain. He also took part in the 5 km event.
This year's Eco Run was held in conjunction with Income Insurance's 55th anniversary celebrations. On Saturday night, nine runners took part in an invitation-only 55 km ultra-marathon.
Income Insurance once again matched S$1 for every kilometre clocked, bringing the total contribution to S$70,000 – the largest amount raised so far. The money will go towards supporting the World Wide Fund for Nature Singapore's (WWF-Singapore) pilot programme to reduce single-use food and beverage packaging.
This programme, supported by WWF-Singapore's partnership with Income Insurance, aligns with the Singapore Green Plan's target to reduce the amount of waste sent to the landfill each day by 30 per cent by 2030.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 2 pm Lifestyle
Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself.
Sign Up
Sign Up
After a rain-induced delay, the runners were raring to go at the starting line at Marina Barrage. PHOTO: INCOME INSURANCE
Income Insurance's chief executive officer Andrew Yeo said: 'We are proud to champion zero waste not just in principle but in practice – from how we manage logistics, materials and waste, to how we rally and engage the public on sustainable choices.'
At the hydration points along the route, for instance, a total of 73,000 compostable, plastic-free cups were used. Instead of being sent to the landfill, these cups will be composted along with banana peels that were collected as part of broader waste-segregation efforts.
The organisers also avoided further waste by encouraging participants to run in their own or past Eco Run shirts. Those who completed their runs received e-certificates instead of physical medals, and the run bibs they wore were about 65 per cent smaller than standard bibs.
At last year's Eco Run, 60 per cent more recyclables were recycled including metal cans, paper cartons and plastic bottles, and general waste generated per person dropped by 25 per cent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
6 hours ago
- Business Times
Income Eco Run raises S$70,000 for WWF-Singapore
[SINGAPORE] The inclement weather in the wee hours of Sunday (Jun 8) morning did not deter close to 5,500 people from turning up for the annual Income Eco Run at Marina Barrage to run for a good cause. The carbon-neutral event featured five distances – 3 km, 5 km, 10 km, 15 km and the 21.1 km half-marathon – as well as a kids' run and a new pets category. A group of 20 athletes with special needs from Special Olympics Singapore also took part, running alongside volunteer pacers. Speaker of Parliament Seah Kian Peng flagged off the 5 km and 10 km runs at 8 am, about an hour later than scheduled due to the rain. He also took part in the 5 km event. This year's Eco Run was held in conjunction with Income Insurance's 55th anniversary celebrations. On Saturday night, nine runners took part in an invitation-only 55 km ultra-marathon. Income Insurance once again matched S$1 for every kilometre clocked, bringing the total contribution to S$70,000 – the largest amount raised so far. The money will go towards supporting the World Wide Fund for Nature Singapore's (WWF-Singapore) pilot programme to reduce single-use food and beverage packaging. This programme, supported by WWF-Singapore's partnership with Income Insurance, aligns with the Singapore Green Plan's target to reduce the amount of waste sent to the landfill each day by 30 per cent by 2030. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 2 pm Lifestyle Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself. Sign Up Sign Up After a rain-induced delay, the runners were raring to go at the starting line at Marina Barrage. PHOTO: INCOME INSURANCE Income Insurance's chief executive officer Andrew Yeo said: 'We are proud to champion zero waste not just in principle but in practice – from how we manage logistics, materials and waste, to how we rally and engage the public on sustainable choices.' At the hydration points along the route, for instance, a total of 73,000 compostable, plastic-free cups were used. Instead of being sent to the landfill, these cups will be composted along with banana peels that were collected as part of broader waste-segregation efforts. The organisers also avoided further waste by encouraging participants to run in their own or past Eco Run shirts. Those who completed their runs received e-certificates instead of physical medals, and the run bibs they wore were about 65 per cent smaller than standard bibs. At last year's Eco Run, 60 per cent more recyclables were recycled including metal cans, paper cartons and plastic bottles, and general waste generated per person dropped by 25 per cent.
Independent Singapore
6 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
‘Just seeing her gives me cold sweat' — Accountant wants to quit her job after just one year because her supervisor blames her for everything that goes wrong
SINGAPORE: A 25-year-old accountant is thinking about leaving her job after just one year due to ongoing issues with her supervisor. Posting on r/askSingapore, she shared that although the job itself isn't terrible and comes with generous benefits like 20 days of annual leave, the daily interactions with her only direct supervisor have taken a toll on her mental well-being. 'My only and direct supervisor has been really hard to work with,' she wrote. 'An example being how she loves to accuse that it MUST be me messing up the printer settings when I don't receive it in my mail.' In another incident, the accountant said she was blamed for misplacing a client's cheque book, only for it to be found later on her supervisor's cluttered desk. The accountant added that, despite desperately wanting to quit, she's afraid that leaving her job so soon might affect her reputation when applying for new roles. She wrote, 'I'm worried that it will look bad in my CV that I'm changing jobs even though I stayed for a year. A friend told me that for my age group, it is very common to be job-hopping, and I shouldn't worry too much. But I would still like to get insights from HR/job recruiters if it will affect the rate of my being hired?' She ended the post by seeking advice from HR professionals and recruiters, asking if staying only a year in her current role would reduce her chances of getting hired elsewhere. 'I appreciate any feedback. I would love to take the step forward because just seeing my supervisor causes me enormous stress that I'd get cold sweat by her calling my name.' 'Better things are out there; no harm in just giving it a try!' In the comments, many assured the accountant that leaving her job after a year is not unusual, especially given the circumstances. Several users, including those who work in human resources or recruitment, explained that staying in a role for at least a year is generally seen as acceptable. One recruiter commented, 'One year is fine; your reason for leaving to be shared with your next prospective employer could simply be looking for better opportunities.' Another shared, 'HR here. If it's the start of your career or if this is the only instance, it's perfectly fine. My suggestion, however, is to start looking. And if the company you are interviewing at asks why you're leaving, say there are no active push factors, but the pull factor that attracted me to your company is (insert some random stuff).' Others shared their own experiences of quitting jobs within a year and still managing to secure better opportunities afterwards. One said, 'My peers and I have changed jobs even with less than one year tenure. Also, there are places with more than 20 days of AL. Better things are out there; no harm in just giving it a try!' In other news, a nursing student took to Reddit to express her frustration over the negative perceptions people have of her chosen career. In her post titled 'Why are nurses so poorly regarded in society despite how hard they work?', the student shared that whenever she tells someone she is studying nursing in a polytechnic, she often receives a 'judgy look.' Some even go so far as to ask whether nursing was her 'first choice.' Read more: 'Why is nursing looked down on?' Student in Singapore pushes back against tired stereotypes Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)
Independent Singapore
6 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Job applicant walks out of interview after being asked, 'Do you support your parents?' and other personal questions
SINGAPORE: A jobseeker was left shocked and unsettled after a virtual interview with a local IT company took a deeply personal and inappropriate turn, prompting her to exit the session midway. On Friday (June 6), she shared her experience on Reddit's Ask Singapore forum, detailing what she described as 'the worst interview' she's ever encountered. According to her post, the interview was conducted online by someone who identified herself as the company's 'business advisor.' 'It started off alright,' the jobseeker recalled. 'Then came personal questions asking me to speak and describe my family. I did talk about family, gave some brief details, and the follow-up questions were, 'Are your parents working? Do you need to support your parents financially?'' The jobseeker, applying for an account manager role, said she questioned the importance of those personal questions. 'I asked the interviewer what the relevance was to the job scope. And she said, 'I need to know my team well before hiring,'' the jobseeker said. 'After asking for the relevance and expressing to her that I was uncomfortable in answering, the next question was still family-related and personal. Told her I wasn't interested in the job and left the call.' At the end of her post, she asked, 'Anyone has similar experiences with such interview questions?' 'You did the right thing! They should not be allowed to ask these types of questions…' In the discussion thread, many Singaporean Redditors criticised the interviewer's conduct, calling it unprofessional and inappropriate. One said, 'Definitely not relevant and probably discriminatory. If it's the hiring manager, I think that's a bit of a red flag. If you have options, you should report it to HR and imply that you would complain to MOM.' Another wrote, 'Lol. These kinds of questions sound like the company sussing out characteristics to discriminate against employees for.' A third added, 'You did the right thing! They should not be allowed to ask these types of questions; there is a difference between small talk and an invasion of privacy. Anyway, chit-chat is also not very professional. People are hiring for a specific job, not to find a mate. In Europe and in Canada, this type of questioning is not permitted.' Others also shared their own experiences, saying they too had been asked personal questions in interviews that had nothing to do with the job. Some recalled being questioned about their relationship status, religion, family background, or financial responsibilities. One wrote, 'Some hiring managers have no brains. Many years ago, I encountered someone who asked about my religion (admin role in the banking industry). I didn't get shortlisted, dodged a bullet.' Another recounted, 'I had mine ask if I have a BF, and if I will get married. I rejected the job offer as I was not comfortable. I had another question if I'm comfortable dressing up as a manager to meet clients for sales. I retorted rudely, 'What has it got to do with the role?' (not a customer-facing role)? and left immediately.' Interviewers should steer clear of sensitive or discriminatory questions According to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM), interviewers should ask only job-related questions and avoid topics that could be seen as sensitive or discriminatory. To ensure fairness, employers are encouraged to adopt clear, objective, and relevant selection criteria when shortlisting and evaluating applicants. See also How to Scale Your E-commerce Company From Zero to $100M MOM also advises that job application forms should only collect information necessary to assess a candidate's ability to perform the job. This includes qualifications, skills, knowledge, and work experience. Employers should not request details such as age, gender, race, religion, marital status, pregnancy status, number of children, or disabilities, unless there is a valid and job-related reason to do so. If such information is genuinely required, the purpose must be clearly explained to the applicant. Read also: Wife discovers husband secretly spent S$80k on in-game purchases, plunging family into debt Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)
