NA nod sought for Rs345b spending
Listen to article
The government has sought ex-post facto approval from the National Assembly for nearly Rs345 billion in additional spending incurred during the current fiscal year without prior parliamentary approval. No war-related expenditures with India were booked in the accounts.
A Rs60 billion supplementary grant was allocated for defence purposes in the outgoing fiscal year, but it was not war related. Pakistan's armed forces met war-related expenses with India from their regular approved budgets, said Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb.
The National Assembly's approval is being sought along with the new budget. While the Rs344.6 billion figure appears high, especially against the government's claim of strict expenditure control, it is still lower than in the previous fiscal year.
Under the Constitution, the federal government can approve supplementary grants for unforeseen expenditures without prior National Assembly approval. However, it must later follow the same approval process as for the new budget. Over time, this constitutional provision has been used routinely rather than exceptionally.
Details show that Rs345 billion in additional spending was incurred on unbudgeted items by diverting funds from other heads. This has not impacted the overall budget size, but the volume of these grantsmost approved by the Economic Coordination Committee of the Cabinetreflects poor budgeting and financial control.
Under the $7 billion International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailout package, the federal government has committed that – in order to ring fence the fiscal programme – no supplementary grants will be allowed beyond the approved budget, except in case of severe natural disasters. It has also pledged to seek ex-ante approval from the National Assembly for any spending exceeding budgetary appropriations.
Sources said discussions also took place at the IMF level about discouraging supplementary grants made through internal fund reallocation, to improve fiscal discipline.
The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N)-led government approved these additional grants for all kinds of expenditures, including power subsidies, the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC), armed forces, helicopter repairs, hosting the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, and discretionary spending on parliamentarians' schemes and civil armed forces' capacity building.
The single largest supplementary grant was for power sector subsidies, accounting for 37% of total additional spending. The government gave Rs115 billion in supplementary grants to pay independent power producers, while Rs308 million was allocated for structural reforms in the power sector.
An additional Rs14 billion was given to settle liabilities for solarising agricultural tube wells.
A Rs258 million grant was issued for financial compensation to families of Chinese nationals killed in a terrorist attack that Pakistani authorities attributed to foreign involvement.
The government allocated Rs59.5 billion to the armed forces in supplementary funding. This included Rs23.3 billion for Pakistan Army's counter-terrorism capacity enhancement, Rs8 billion for defence force projects, and Rs7 billion for the Jinnah Naval Base in Omara, according the finance ministry's budget book.
Additionally, Rs8 billion and Rs4 billion were allocated for the Special Security Division South and North, respectivelyunits that have existed for years and should be part of the regular budget.
The government also approved Rs5 billion for internal security duty allowances and Rs2 billion for technological upgrades at the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR).
A Rs1.3 billion supplementary grant was provided for fence maintenance along the Afghanistan and Iran borders, while Rs800 million was allocated for developing the naval air station in Turbat.
Another Rs1.8 billion supplementary grant has been allocated toward overhauling engines of VVIP aircraft, according to the finance ministry's budget documents.
The Reko Diq mining project received Rs3.7 billion in additional funds. A Rs1 billion grant was given for hosting the SCO summit, as per the budget book.
Despite some concerns, Rs2 billion was allocated to restructure Pakistan Revenue Automation Limited (PRAL) — a company and not a federal entity. An additional Rs2 billion was granted for Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) officers, and Rs1.6 billion for setting up anti-smuggling posts.
For transition accommodation of FBR officers, Rs430 million was approved, and Rs869 million was provided to enhance the organisation's operational efficiency. Despite this, the FBR has posted a record Rs1.03 trillion shortfall in tax collection for the current fiscal year, with one month remaining.
A compulsory Rs1.3 billion grant was given to the Election Commission of Pakistan for holding local government elections. Rs7.2 billion was allocated for Sindh-specific discretionary spending on small schemes and for operationalising the Green Line Bus Rapid Transit project.
The interior ministry received a Rs4.3 billion development grant for initiatives such as transforming the National Forensic Agency, building women's facilities in tribal areas, setting up check posts, and launching water supply schemes.
A Rs30 billion supplementary grant was provided for flood-affected areas of Sindh, and Rs19.2 billion was allocated for small development schemes executed by the now-defunct Pakistan Public Works Department. Sindh also received Rs9 billion in additional financial support for projects, but the finance ministry did not detail the projects.
An additional Rs7 billion was given for parliamentarians' schemes and Rs23.4 billion grant was approved for the federal Directorate of Immunisation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Assured confusion
Listen to article This is perhaps the first budget in history which is at the cusp of a mini-budget even before being legislated. The euphoric order that it has laid by forecasting growth at 4.2% – at a time when all plum chips of production, agriculture, exports and FDIs are in disarray and tax collection is stagnated – is nothing but a proposition jotted down in economic non-viability. Moreover, the Rs17.573 trillion layout categorically suggests that it will come down hard on spending, having already gone to the extent of unduly taxing revenue generating digital marketplaces, solar panels, cars and fuel, as well as agrarian tractors. The point is that there is a serious flaw in budget-making, and the finance minister's proposal to raise new taxes to the tune of Rs432 billion is in doldrums. The obstacle has come from forces of status quo and they are the parliamentarians themselves! The warning from the finance wizards that revenue numbers are already locked with the IMF, and in case of non-legislation of the proposed "restrictions on economic transactions by ineligible persons lacking sufficient financial resources", the government will have to impose an additional Rs500 billion worth of new taxes. This is where the supra-mini budget is on the cards. So, what's next? And what if the IMF refuses to listen to our pathetic post-budget tale? Under a deal, as the second tranche of loan was released, the Fund was assured that at least Rs389 billion worth of new taxes should be raised through "enforcement measures", which is not possible without new legislation. The relevant House committee is already raising a hue and cry, and the prevalent partisanship in the coalition makes it an untenable order. The government has exhibited selectiveness by unnecessarily appeasing the parliamentarians with a six-fold increase in salaries, and raising their developmental funds to the tune of Rs70 million each. For them, the FinMin acted as the devil's advocate too. On the other hand, the government slapped a 2.5% deductable tax on the first slab of salaried class and failed to raise minimum wages this year. This waywardness is toiling and pushes the budget to the cliff.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
The corridor that redrew the map
Listen to article Power, once loud and territorial, now moves silently. It flows through undersea cables, over smart rail, beneath oil pipelines, and into the bloodstream of emerging economies. It wears no uniform, flies no flag. And today, it speaks Mandarin. The latest flashpoint between India and Pakistan carried the weight of a message far beyond a routine skirmish; it signaled a shift. Because the real confrontation unfolded on a deeper plane, where commerce, infrastructure and digital routes now redraw the map of influence. And at the centre of that new cartography stands China. When Indian Rafales took to the skies over contested territory, Pakistan answered with something unfamiliar: Chinese-made J-10Cs, armed with PL-15E missiles, long-range, radar-guided, and built for reach. Pakistan returned fire with precision, moving in concert with China, whose exported military ecosystem entered the arena, marking its arrival as a force rewriting the rules of engagement. Precision. Deterrence. Performance under pressure. Analysts worldwide watched for what worked. The J-10C, long dismissed as a second-tier platform in defence circles, performed with surgical accuracy. Beijing's quiet confidence in its defence hardware was suddenly matched by proof. Pakistan had emerged as China's strategic partner as well as its showroom. Yet this confrontation in the clouds was only the surface of something deeper. The real battleground lies underfoot. Beneath the dust of Balochistan and the waves off Gwadar, China is etching a new route into global power. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) begins as a network of roads and ports, yet unfolds as China's bold reply to Western naval dominance. It provides Beijing direct access to the Arabian Sea, bypassing US-patrolled chokepoints. It allows Chinese goods to flow south through the Karakoram instead of east through contested straits. It is Beijing's pivot from containment to connectivity. And for India, this is the real incursion. CPEC undermines New Delhi's vision of South Asia as its backyard. It rearranges the chessboard. And more dangerously, it proposes an alternative architecture, where power comes through partnership, not subjugation; through trade, not tanks. This is the rise of China as a civilisational strategist. Just as the West once built empires on railroads and gunboats, China builds corridors of steel, fiber, and credit. Where others sow dependence, it offers interdependence. Where others export chaos, it brings roads and routers. To many, especially those weary of IMF prescriptions, this is a different kind of proposition, one that doesn't ask for regime change, only right-of-way. So when the Indian attacks came wrapped in counter-terror narratives, their true purpose was to stall this momentum. Disrupt logistics. Spook investors. Cloud the promise of a Pakistan aligned with China, rather than circling in the margins of colonial memory. Rahul Gandhi said the quiet part aloud: that Pakistan-China alignment is a "crime" against India. But beneath the bluster was the real fear - that CPEC could work; that it could anchor Pakistan's economic autonomy; that it could succeed where Western partnerships had mostly produced crisis. This is China's most subversive act: offering peace as power. It doesn't march into capitals. It funds metros, ports, power plants. It embeds supply chains. Its method is quiet, its scale planetary. CPEC is where that vision takes form. China's imprint achieved through connection rather than conquest. It signals Pakistan's shift toward Beijing's multipolar world. In this alignment, Pakistan emerges as a sovereign bridge between regions, no longer defined by subservience but by strategic geography, activated with intent and positioned for relevance. And that logic is difficult to ignore. China builds with choreography, each project a move in a larger, deliberate design. Its vision for Pakistan reaches beyond asphalt and steel. CPEC has already delivered energy projects that lit up once-dark cities, coal plants in Sahiwal and Port Qasim, hydropower stations in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, and solar fields in Bahawalpur. It connects Hazara through the Havelian-Thakot motorway, threads rail from Karachi to Peshawar, and transforms Gwadar with a deep-sea port, international airport and free trade zone. Plans include special economic zones in Rashakai and Dhabeji, industrial hubs meant to attract regional manufacturing. With fiber-optic cables stretching from Khunjerab to Rawalpindi, and a digital corridor in the making, China envisions a Pakistan that shapes flows of data, power, and influence. China needs stable partners. And Pakistan, if it plays its cards right, can transform from periphery to pivot, so long as it chooses coherence over crisis. But that choice demands a shift within. Pakistan faces a reckoning with its addiction to short-termism. The time has come to align policy with vision, and governance with lasting continuity. Curricula need to evolve from rote memorisation to bold innovation. Universities should forge ties with Central Asian peers, creating networks of shared ambition. Trade diplomacy deserves its rightful place, as the spearhead of a new foreign policy. And youth must become more than an audience. They must be equipped as agents. This is where China's model speaks loudest: think in decades, plan in corridors, build for permanence. If Pakistan mirrors that thinking, offering venture capital for student start-ups, technical training in forgotten districts, fellowships in trade and climate, it builds more than infrastructure. It builds belief. Of course, none of this will be smooth. Global volatility will test resolve. Delays will tempt despair. China's rise emerged through turbulence, carved in resilience, shaped by strategy, and driven with unrelenting purpose. Pakistan, too, can choose that arc. The old order will resist. It always does. CPEC moves cargo, and with it, ideas. It suggests that autonomy isn't the privilege of the powerful, but the prize of the prepared. It declares that smaller states can shape maps if they hold their course. Today's sharpest borders are etched not in terrain, but in worldview. On one side: collaboration, connectivity, self-determined futures. On the other: coercion, chaos and manufactured instability. Pakistan now stands at that border. And how it steps forward will shape far more than its own map.
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Federal ministers propose revision in e-commerce taxation framework to support SMEs
Federal ministries for Commerce and Information Technology & Telecommunication have jointly proposed to revise taxation framework announced for the e-commerce sector in the budget for the financial year 2025-26. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb announced Pakistan's federal budget 2025-26 'for a competitive economy' on Tuesday, targeting a modest 4.2% growth for the coming fiscal year, compared to 2.7% expected in the outgoing FY25. In the budget proposals, the government also announced to impose taxes on e-commerce, for which the federal ministers, Jam Kamal Khan and Shaza Fatima Khawaja called for a revision to support the country's e-commerce sector and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The two ministers discussed aspects covering e-commerce at a high-level meeting, aiming to 'address key issues in Pakistan's rapidly expanding e-commerce sector,' according to press statement issued by the Ministry of Commerce on Thursday. Is the budget changing how government views e-commerce? Aurangzeb announced to impose 18% sales tax on sales of goods to be sold by e-commerce platforms. 'The rapid growth of online businesses and digital marketplaces has created challenges for traditional businesses which comply with tax laws. To ensure a level playing field and full compliance with tax regulations, it is proposed that courier and logistics service providers delivering on behalf of e-commerce platforms collect 18% sales tax from these platforms and deposit it accordingly,' he said. According to Finance Bill 2025, Pakistan's Finance ministry proposed 0.25% to 2% tax 'on payment for digitally ordered goods or digitally delivered services through e-commerce platforms including websites…' The tax would also be collected on payments made in cash on delivery by courier services, it added. Details suggest the consumer will pay 1% of gross amount to be paid upto Rs10,000 payment via digital platforms including online banking and mobile banking. They are liable to pay 2% of the gross amount to be paid in range of Rs10,001 to Rs20,000. The rate of tax would be 0.25% of the gross amount exceeding Rs20,000, according to the bill. Similarly, consumers would pay 0.25% of gross amount on receipt of electronic and electrical goods in case of cash on delivery. They would pay 1% of the gross amount on delivery of clothing articles, apparels, garments etc. And the tax rate would be 1% of the gross amount on cash on delivery if consumers bought other than clothing articles and electronic goods, as per the budget proposals. 'Pakistan's e-commerce sector has witnessed rapid growth, reaching a market size of $7.7 billion in 2024, with projections estimating a 17% compound annual growth rate through 2027, the Commerce ministry statement read. Key highlights of Pakistan budget for 2025-26 In line with the consultative approach of the forthcoming e-commerce policy, Minister Kamal Khan announced the formation of a joint working group, with input from the IT ministry, to gather comprehensive recommendations on taxation, vendor compliance, and digital payments. The group's findings will be formally presented to the prime minister for final consideration. Minister Kamal also confirmed that eCommerce Policy 2.0 was in its final stages of internal review and would soon be submitted for cabinet approval. The finance bill elaborated that 'e-commerce' means sale or purchase of goods and services conducted over computer networks by methods specifically designed for the purpose of receiving or placing of orders either through websites, mobile applications or online marketplace having digital ordering features by using mobile phones, automated computer-to-computer ordering system or any similar device.
