Farmer becomes first person to die during Trump's ICE raids
Jaime Alanis, 57, is the first person to die as a result of Donald Trump's Immigration Compliance and Enforcement (ICE) raids.
His niece, Yesenia Duran, posted on the fundraising site GoFundMe to say her uncle was his family's only provider and he had been sending his earnings back to his wife and daughter in Mexico.
The United Food Workers said Mr Alanis had worked on the farm for 10 years.
"These violent and cruel federal actions terrorise American communities, disrupt the American food supply chain, threaten lives and separate families," the union said in a recent statement on X.
4:28
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said it executed criminal search warrants at Glass House Farms facilities on Thursday.
Mr Alanis called family to say he was hiding and possibly fleeing agents before he fell around 30ft (9m) from the roof and broke his neck, according to information from family, hospital and government sources.
Agents arrested 200 people suspected of being in the country illegally and identified at least 10 immigrant children on the sites, the DHS said in a statement.
0:52
Mr Alanis was not among them, the agency said.
"This man was not in and has not been in CBP (Customs and Border Protection) or ICE custody," DHS assistant secretary for public affairs Tricia McLaughlin said.
"Although he was not being pursued by law enforcement, this individual climbed up to the roof of a greenhouse and fell 30ft. CBP immediately called a medivac to the scene to get him care as quickly as possible."
Four US citizens were arrested during the incident for allegedly "assaulting or resisting officers", the DHS said, and authorities were offering a $50,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of a person suspected of firing a gun at federal agents.
In a statement, Glass House, a licensed Cannabis grower, said immigration agents had valid warrants. It said workers were detained and it is helping provide them with legal representation.
"Glass House has never knowingly violated applicable hiring practices and does not and has never employed minors," it added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Gov. Gavin Newsom unloads on ‘son of a b***h' Trump over ‘Newcsum' moniker
California Gov. Gavin Newsom launched a broadside against President Trump Monday, calling him a 'son of a b*****' for the president' s frequently used moniker 'Gavin Newscum.' The governor told podcast host Shawn Ryan about his values to begin the show, saying, 'I'm not anti-gun at all. He then drilled down that he was more concerned about 'common sense around background checks and age appropriateness. He then moved on to chastise Trump for branding him 'Gavin Newscum' and said the matter had now led to his child receiving taunts in school. 'I don't like bullies. It goes to why I have strong opinions about Trump, man. It's like it triggers me. All of us have that. I don't like people talking down to people, past people. I don't like people exploiting weakness,' Newsom said. 'That's what I don't like about this son of a *****. I don't. And forgive me, I know he's the president of the United States, yeah, he calls me 'Newscum', yeah, come on. How do I explain that to my kid?' Newsom went on to scold Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who brushed off a conversation with Trump about Jeffrey Epstein at the weekend and who Newsom said is 'a son of a b***** in every goddamn campus, progressive parts of the country.' Just days before the interview, Newsom wrote 'Trump calls me 'Newscum' — but he's the real scum,' in response to a KTLA5 video of protestors and suspected raid targets, fleeing from tear gas being sprayed by officers in Camarillo, California on X. Moreover, Newsom told Ryan, 'I got my kid's friends calling my kids 'Newscum' – that I get because I was called that in seventh grade, but not by a 79-year-old.' He called on the president to 'model better, goddamn behavior, man,' adding, 'Forgive the goddamn, it's what I don't like about him.' Newsom said the feud between him and Trump would only ever be resolved 'when it doesn't get any attention,' but added that the administration is determined to 'test the boundaries.' In early June, Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration calling for an end to the 'illegal and unnecessary takeover of a CalGuard unit' during the LA riots, which erupted after controversial ICE raids in California. Newsom believes that Trump's heightened military response to the protests 'needlessly escalated chaos and violence in the Los Angeles region.' Equally, the governor claims the president failed to give him a 'heads up' the night before on the decision to deploy the National Guard, stating that he was left entirely in the dark. 'Not one f****** word on the topic,' Newsom said, claiming that the pair talked about everything the night before except the violence that was unfolding on LA streets at the time. 'He completely lied about that conversation and totally surprised me with the National Guard.' Newsom feels that the Trump administration is using the second presidential term as a 'petri dish' to test the limits of executive power.
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Why Conor McGregor hasn't married his 'long-time lady' Dee Devlin after 16 years together amid new 'nudes' allegations and cheating scandal
Conor McGregor has offered up a variety of reasons why he has not married his 'long-time lady' and partner of 16 years Dee Devlin. The comments of the former UFC champion regarding his fiancée of five years and the mother of his four children comes in the wake of the latest controversy involving the Irishman. On Monday, rapper Azealia Banks shared alleged nude photos of McGregor, which she claimed he sent to her unprompted. Banks' accusations came after McGregor was caught packing on the PDA with a mystery bikini-clad woman on a Florida beach over the weekend. Last year a jury also found McGregor liable after he was accused in a civil case of sexually assaulting a woman in a hotel room back in December 2018. The former two-weight UFC champion, who is appealing that verdict, is alleged to have choked the complainant and made her fear for her life in a hotel room. He has faced no criminal charges related to the incident and instead argues that the pair had consensual sex. The latest cheating scandal has brought McGregor's long-time relationship into focus, with the 37-year-old's previous statements on marrying Devlin resurfacing. Comments have resurfaced in the wake of rapper Azealia Banks accusing the UFC legend of sending alleged nudes to her unprompted Speaking to MMA Fighting in 2015, he said: 'I love to spoil her [Devlin]. She does not work anymore. I hired her for the business. She works for me now and collects the cheques. 'Dee worked very hard throughout the years and stuck by me when I had essentially absolutely nothing. I only had a dream that I was telling her. 'For me to be able to take her out of work, give her everything she's ever wanted and to travel the world with her fills me with pride. It keeps me going. We've been together a long time. She's been through it all with me.' Two years later revealed that the 'bloody bomb' spent on the christening for one of their children had taken a sizeable dent out of the marriage budget. Last year, McGregor issued another update, which indicated that planning for a special ceremony was in the works. 'We are set to get married soon, we are just trying to find a location. I am ready to go; we are just trying to get a location,' he told the Irish Mirror. Is it at home? I'd like for it to be at home. We are deciding on a location. Hopefully, we get the marriage done, and that is what I'm looking forward to. 'These are the decisions we have. I go between do we want an extreme and extravagant. It will be extravagant and I will spare no cost for sure for my lady and my family but is it invite everyone or is it private, these are the things we are trying to figure out. 'We are private people but we wouldn't like to do it and think we should have done it a bit bigger. So we are in decision mode at moment, but let's see, things are good. But that's my lady all the way, the highs or lows before all of this.' Earlier on Monday, Banks, who is known for getting into high-profile feuds on social media, posted two shocking photos seemingly of McGregor posing in the mirror while completely naked, which she alleges he sent to her via direct message on X despite not following him. 'How you gonna send a b**** a some crooked d*** pics then threaten her not to tell,' she wrote alongside the screenshots. '@TheNotoriousMMA n**** do you know who the f*** I am? This is HARAM'. Banks then continued: 'Like how are you really going to sexually harrass me with the potato farmer d*** then threaten me not to tell???? Honey…… ain't u trying to be the president of Ireland what is it giving fam? Use some f***ing sunscreen damn'. As well as the alleged nude selfies, the screenshots also show a message from what appears to be McGregor's account reading: 'Don't be a rat cos all rats get caught'. Alongside one image which seemingly shows his manhood strapped to a dumbbell, the Irish fighter apparently wrote: 'Lifting weights'. Banks then shared another screenshot of the alleged pictures suddenly being 'hidden' on X because she does not follow McGregor's account. Although it is unclear if he had anything to do with that change, she commented: 'The motherf***er woke up early LOL.' has reached out to the last-known attorneys on record for Conor McGregor, his agent and Azealia Banks' agent for comment. Banks' post followed the sight of a beaming McGregor all over the unknown woman during a beach day in Fortwife Lauderdale, Florida. McGregor was spotted enjoying a cold beverage while the woman, who was dressed in a racy leopard print bikini, shared his sun lounger. The pair chatted away in the shade as the sportsman cozied up to her by wrapping his arm around her back.
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Employees at the nation's consumer financial watchdog say it's become toothless under Trump
The lights are on at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau across the street from the White House, and employees still get paid. But, in practice, the bureau has been mostly inoperable for nearly six months. CFPB employees say they essentially spend the workday sitting on their hands, forbidden from doing any work by directive from the White House. The bureau is supposed to be helping oversee the nation's banks and financial services companies and taking enforcement action in case of wrongdoing. Instead, the situation is Kafkaesque: the main function seems to be undoing the rulemaking and law enforcement work that was done under previous administrations, including in President Donald Trump's first term. American consumers can no longer look to the bureau for help when it comes to their checking account, credit card, payday loan, auto loan or mortgage. Trump has neutered the watchdog, employees say, the culmination of a yearslong effort by Republicans who felt the agency often went overboard in its efforts. One current employee, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the directive forbids staffers from speaking publicly about their jobs, said outsiders would be amazed at how little work is being done. Employees are reluctant even to talk to one another, out of fear that a conversation between two employees would be considered a violation of the directive. Another employee described the drastic shift in mission, from trying to protect consumers to doing nothing, as 'quite demoralizing.' To gain an understanding of what is happening inside the CFPB, The Associated Press spoke with 10 current and former employees, as well as bankers and policymakers who used to interact with the bureau nearly every day but now say their emails and voicemails go into a black hole. The agency's press office doesn't respond to emails. Different approaches Bureau rank-and-file employees and former CFPB officials say they expected the bureau to keep doing its work under 'Trump 2.0,' although likely in a more restrained fashion. In Trump's first term, his then-director Kathy Kraninger took a lighter approach to supervision and enforcement, but still some of the biggest financial settlements in the bureau's history took place during that time. President Joe Biden's choice to run the bureau, Rohit Chopra, took an expansive view of its authority, targeting profitable practices by banks such as overdraft and credit card late fees, as well as investigating companies over credit reporting and medical debt. He even turned a spotlight on big tech companies that have increasingly made inroads into financial services. The CFPB ordered Apple to pay $89 million in fines and penalties for problems related to the Apple Card. Paypal's Venmo is used by millions to split a bill, and the bureau found that payment and funds transfer apps like PayPal and Venmo should fall under the federal consumer protection laws, just like banks. Banks and the financial services industry felt Chopra acted too aggressively, particularly with a proposal to cut overdraft fees to $5 from the industry average of $27 to $35. The bureau estimated the move would save consumers roughly $5 billion a year. The proposal was overturned by Congress with Trump's backing earlier this year. 'We are thankful that the Trump Administration recognized the harm to consumers, the market, and the overall economy posed by the CFPB's overreaches under its prior leadership,' said Lindsey Johnson, president of the Consumer Bankers Association. Under Trump 2.0, the bureau became a main target of the Department of Government Efficiency, then run by Elon Musk, who posted on X that the CFPB should 'RIP' shortly after DOGE employees became embedded at the agency. Through the bureau's acting chief, Russell Vought, the White House issued a directive that CFPB employees should ' not perform any work tasks. ' The administration then tried to lay off roughly 90% of the bureau's staff, or roughly 1,500 employees. Courts have blocked those layoffs, but there is a feeling inside the bureau that the court rulings are only a temporary reprieve. 'Reverse-engineering' Sensing blood in the water, companies that committed wrongdoing, or had open investigations, have lobbied the bureau and the White House for their punishments to be rescinded. Employees at the bureau say the only time their workdays get remotely busy these days is when the White House instructs them to begin rescinding one of these punishments. It often involves 'reverse-engineering' reasons why the bureau, which investigated and found that these companies did harm to consumers, now no longer believes that happened. In 2024, Navy Federal Credit Union agreed to settle claims that it illegally charged overdraft fees to its members. Among the customers at the $180 billion financial institution are Navy service men and women, and veterans. Vought canceled the settlement last month, and Navy Federal will no longer have to pay back $80 million in fees. A spokesman for Navy Federal declined to comment on whether the credit union planned to return those funds to its members, as it originally said it would. In 2023, the auto financing arm of Toyota was found to be illegally bundling products onto car buyers' auto loans, refusing to cancel those products and doing harm to customers' credit scores. Toyota was ordered to refund $48 million to harmed customers. That settlement was rescinded in mid-May. A spokesman for Toyota declined to say whether customers would be reimbursed. 'Companies are lining up to get out of repaying harmed customers,' said Eric Halperin, former enforcement director at the bureau, who resigned earlier this year. It's not just settlements from the Biden era. At the end of Trump's first term in 2020, the CFPB sued the Chicago-based mortgage company Townstone Financial after the company's executives made statements that were seen as discouraging Black homebuyers from applying for a loan with the company. Townstone and its executives fought vigorously with the bureau, saying that words spoken on a podcast or on social media cannot be construed as discrimination or redlining. Courts agreed with the bureau and eventually Townstone settled in November, agreeing to pay a $105,000 penalty. Under Vought, the bureau said it would move to vacate the settlement and would return Townstone's fine. Courts have blocked the dismissal of that settlement, with one judge saying the CFPB wanted to commit 'an act of legal hara-kiri that would make a samurai blush.' The Associated Press sent a list of questions to the White House regarding President Trump's vision for the CFPB. The White House did not respond. While the lack of new initiatives and the scuttling of old ones frustrate employees the most, they also note that even everyday tasks like collecting consumer complaints about financial service companies have largely fallen to the wayside. The CFPB has run a consumer complaint database for nearly a decade, basically an online portal where a consumer uploads a complaint and the bureau then forwards that complaint to the subject company. A report done by the office of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the senior Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, found that the bureau is uploading roughly 2,200 complaints a day compared to the roughly 10,500 complaints it was doing in the months before Trump took office again. Warren came up with the idea for the bureau when she was a law professor at Harvard University. The bureau did take an enforcement action on Friday. The pawn shop chain FirstCash Inc. agreed to pay $9 million in refunds and fines to settle claims that it charged excessive interest rates on loans to armed service members, in violation of the Military Lending Act. FirstCash operates more than 1,000 stores and had net income of $259 million in 2024. Budget Cut The bureau is going to be even further diminished in the coming months. The new budget law signed by Trump earlier this month cuts the CFPB's funding by roughly half, meaning the bureau will be forced into mass layoffs. Senate Democrats are looking for ways to restore that funding. 'The agency is still standing and its mission to protect consumers remains as important as ever,' Warren said in a statement. "We will fight back using every tool at our disposal.' That said, one supervision employee grimly joked that a 50% budget cut to the bureau will mean little, based on how the bureau is currently operating. 'A 50% cut of nothing is still nothing,' they said. In the meantime, employees go about their mundane routine: They continue to check their email once or twice a day to see if any of their previous work has been slated for being undone. They don't talk to anyone, not even the banks they are supposed to supervise. They wait to be laid off. The only constants are the silence from bureau political appointees or the 'mini funerals' that happen every Friday, when another batch of employees who have decided to leave the bureau voluntarily have their last day. 'I don't think I'll ever work in public service again,' said one current employee, who has been looking for a new job for the past three months.
