Physicists Think They've Finally Seen Evidence of String Theory
Last month, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) collective reported that dark energy is evolving—specifically weakening—and it could help provide the first observational evidence of string theory.
While a new preprint reports that cosmological models using the string theory framework account for this weakening of dark matter, some physicists aren't convinced that DESI's data alone definitively speaks about the true nature of dark energy.
Luckily, future instruments such as the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory will hopefully either confirm these string theory findings or set physicists down a different path toward finding that ever-elusive 'theory of everything.'
The centuries-long Copernican journey of slowly displacing humans from the center of everything has provided our species with an unprecedented understanding of our planet, Solar System, and the known universe. But with every cosmological answer comes an all-you-can-eat buffet of new questions, none of which are quite as enticing as the mystery of dark energy.
Ever since the first observational evidence in 1998, when scientists discerned that the universe's expansion was actually accelerating, dark energy has figured prominently in most leading theories attempting to explain the workings of the universe. String theory—the theoretical roots of which date back to the late 1960s—is one of those explanations, and the framework's fortunes have risen and fallen with the passing decades. Many scientists have declared the theory all but dead (or, at the very least, on life support), but new data from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), which was designed to capture spectroscopic surveys of distant galaxies, has provided some encouraging evidence that string theorists may actually be onto something.
At least, that's the idea behind a new preprint paper, published on the server arXiv. Scientists from Virginia Tech, State University of New York (SUNY) and the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa argue that the bombshell observations from DESI—primarily, that the dark energy is weakening over time—could provide some of the first direct observational evidence of string theory.
'Given our proposal for the origin of dark energy from the geometry of the dual spacetime, the latest results from DESI might point to a fundamentally new understanding of quantum spacetime in the context of quantum gravity,' the authors wrote in the non-peer-reviewed paper.
Unlike the Standard Model, which considers particles to be point-like, string theory—as its name suggests—conceptualizes these particles as one-dimensional vibrating strings, the vibrations of which dictate the behaviors and qualities of the particles. After the announcement of DESI's discovery last month that the impact of dark energy may be weakening over time, string theorists perked up, as this new piece of data fits well within many existing string theory predictions. Cumrun Vafa, a string theory physicist at Harvard University, told Quanta Magazine last month that 'the theory kind of demands that [dark energy] change.'
According to Live Science, this new study developed a string theory model that yielded a dark energy density that closely mimicked the data found by DESI. They also discerned that dark energy is impacted by two completely different types of lengths: the ultra-small Planck scale and the absolute size of the universe. This connection hints that dark energy is somehow related to the quantum nature of spacetime itself.
'This hints at a deeper connection between quantum gravity and the dynamical properties of nature that had been supposed to be constant,' SUNY's Michael Kavic told Live Science. 'It may turn out that a fundamental misapprehension we carry with us is that the basic defining properties of our universe are static when in fact they are not.'
This doesn't suddenly mean that we've found the ever-elusive 'theory of everything'—a concept that unifies all physics both classical and quantum. For one, independent observations would need to confirm the assertions in this paper (though, the authors believed they've identified ways to possibly accomplish that feat). However, others argue that even the DESI data isn't conclusive on the true nature of dark energy, and that we need superior instruments to really understand what's going on.
Luckily, we're getting just that. NASA is preparing to launch the Nancy Grace Roman space telescope in 2027, and the National Science Foundation is set to achieve 'first light' with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory later this year. DESI's impressive dataset has set physics down a new path of discovery, but these new instruments will hopefully provide long sought-after cosmological answers—and also a few new questions we never even thought to ask.
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
A new observatory is assembling the most complete time-lapse record of the night sky ever
On 23 June 2025, the world will get a look at the first images from one of the most powerful telescopes ever built: the Vera C. Rubin Observatory. Perched high in the Chilean Andes, the observatory will take hundreds of images of the southern hemisphere sky, every night for 10 years. In doing so, it will create the most complete time-lapse record of our Universe ever assembled. This scientific effort is known as the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). Rather than focusing on small patches of sky, the Rubin Observatory will scan the entire visible southern sky every few nights. Scientists will use this rolling deep-sky snapshot to track supernovae (exploding stars), asteroids, black holes, and galaxies as they evolve and change in real time. This is astronomy not as a static snapshot, but as a cosmic story unfolding night by night. At the heart of the observatory lies a remarkable piece of engineering: a digital camera the size of a small car and weighing over three tonnes. With a staggering 3,200 megapixels, each image it captures has enough detail to spot a golf ball from 25km away. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. Each image is so detailed that it would take hundreds of ultra-high-definition TV screens to display it in full. To capture the universe in colour, the camera uses enormous filters — each about the size of a dustbin lid — that allow through different types of light, from ultraviolet to near-infrared. The observatory was first proposed in 2001, and construction at the Cerro Pachón ridge site in northern Chile began in April 2015. The first observations with a low-resolution test camera were carried out in October 2024, setting up the first images using the main camera, to be unveiled in June. The observatory is designed to tackle some of astronomy's biggest questions. For instance, by measuring how galaxies cluster and move, the Rubin Observatory will help scientists investigate the nature of dark energy, the mysterious force driving the accelerating expansion of the Universe. As a primary goal, it will map the large-scale structure of the Universe and investigate dark matter, the invisible form of matter that makes up 27% of the cosmos. Dark matter acts as the 'scaffolding' of the universe, a web-like structure that provides a framework for the formation of galaxies. The observatory is named after the US astronomer Dr Vera Rubin, whose groundbreaking work uncovered the first strong evidence for dark matter – the very phenomenon this telescope will explore in unprecedented detail. As a woman in a male-dominated field, Rubin overcame numerous obstacles and remained a tireless advocate for equality in science. She died in 2016 at the age of 88, and her name on this observatory is a tribute not only to her science, but to her perseverance and her legacy of inclusion. Closer to home, Rubin will help find and track millions of asteroids and other objects that come near Earth – helping warn astronomers of any potential collisions. The observatory will also monitor stars that change in brightness, which can reveal planets orbiting them. And it will capture rare and fleeting cosmic events, such as the collision of very dense objects called neutron stars, which release sudden bursts of light and ripples in space known as gravitational waves. What makes this observatory particularly exciting is not just what we expect it to find, but what we can't yet imagine. Many astronomical breakthroughs have come from chance: strange flashes in the night sky and puzzling movements of objects. Rubin's massive, continuous data stream could reveal entirely new classes of objects or unknown physical processes. But capturing this 'movie of the universe' depends on something we often take for granted: dark skies. One of the growing challenges facing astronomers is light pollution from satellite mega-constellations – a group of many satellites working together. These satellites reflect sunlight and can leave bright streaks across telescope images, potentially interfering with the very discoveries Rubin is designed to make. While software can detect and remove some of these trails, doing so adds complexity, cost and can degrade the data. Fortunately, solutions are already being explored. Rubin Observatory staff are developing simulation tools to predict and reduce satellite interference. They are also working with satellite operators to dim or reposition spacecraft. These efforts are essential – not just for Rubin, but for the future of space science more broadly. Rubin is a collaboration between the US National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy, with global partners contributing to data processing and scientific analysis. Importantly, much of the data will be publicly available, offering researchers, students and citizen scientists around the world the chance to make discoveries of their own. The 'first-look' event, which will unveil the first images from the observatory, will be livestreamed in English and Spanish, and celebrations are planned at venues around the world. For astronomers, this is a once-in-a-generation moment – a project that will transform our view of the universe, spark public imagination and generate scientific insights for decades to come. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Noelia Noël does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
07-05-2025
- Yahoo
Scientists Say That Something Very Weird Is Going on With the Universe
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways Astronomers have made an intriguing discovery that could upend everything we know about the structure of the universe and its expansion. Scientists recently found that dark energy, the mysterious form driving the accelerating expansion of the universe, could be weakening over time. The findings could undermine the existing standard cosmological model of the universe called the lambda-cold dark matter (LCDM) model, which takes dark energy, ordinary matter, and cold dark matter — a hypothetical form of dark matter that moves slowly compared to the speed of light — into consideration. The symbol lambda in the model refers to Albert Einstein's cosmological constant, which assumes that the universe is accelerating at a fixed rate. Yet, last year, scientists concluded that dark energy isn't a constant after all, analyzing observations by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) in Arizona, as New Scientist reports. They found that the mysterious force could be evolving and weakening over time. In March, scientists released a follow-up, strengthening the unusual findings. "This is exciting – it might actually be putting the standard model of cosmology in danger," Autonomous University of Madrid assistant research professor Yashar Akrami told New Scientist. Instead of making changes to the LCDM itself, Akrami and his colleagues suggested redefining dark energy as a "quintessence field," which has been used to explain observations of an accelerating rate of expansion of the universe. That could allow scientists to harmonize more advanced string theory with the standard cosmological model. "If you prove that quintessence is dark energy, it's very good for [string theorists]," Akrami told New Scientist. "That's why the string theory community is really excited now." An altered take on the quintessence model of dark energy suggests the mysterious force could be interacting with gravity itself. "We've always grown up thinking about the universe as having the gravitational force, and gravity fuels everything," University of Oxford astrophysicist Pedro Ferreira told the publication. "But now there's going to be an additional fifth force, which is due to the dark energy, which also fuels everything." But before we can add this fifth force, we'd have to reconcile the fact that we simply haven't seen any evidence for it, at least not when we're making precise measurements of our neighborhood of the universe. "Physics ends up being even more complicated than we thought it could have been, and that kind of makes you wonder, why do you want to go down that route?" Ferreira added. The researcher believes it's most likely that scientists will debate different models of dark energy and "never resolve it." Yet, there's still a chance researchers could observe gravity being influenced by dark energy in upcoming observations by the European Space Agency's Euclid satellite and DESI. More on dark energy: Scientists Say They've Built a "Black Hole Bomb"
Yahoo
02-05-2025
- Yahoo
Why ‘Evolving' Dark Energy Worries Some Physicists
In 2024 a shockwave rippled through the astronomical world, shaking it to the core. The disturbance didn't come from some astral disaster at the solar system's doorstep, however. Rather it arrived via the careful analysis of many far-distant galaxies, which revealed new details of the universe's evolution across eons of cosmic history. Against most experts' expectations, the result suggested that dark energy—the mysterious force driving the universe's accelerating expansion—was not an unwavering constant but rather a more fickle beast that was weakening over time. The shocking claim's source was the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), run by an international collaboration at Kitt Peak National Observatory in Arizona. And it was so surprising because cosmologists' best explanations for the universe's observed large-scale structure have long assumed that dark energy is a simple, steady thing. But as Joshua Frieman, a physicist at the University of Chicago, says: 'We tend to stick with the simplest theory that works—until it doesn't.' Heady with delight and confusion, theorists began scrambling to explain DESI's findings and resurfaced old, more complex ideas shelved decades ago. In March 2025 even more evidence accrued in favor of dark energy's dynamic nature in DESI's latest data release—this time from a much larger, multimillion-galaxy sample. Dark energy's implied fading, it seemed, was refusing to fade away. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] Soon afterward, however, Daniel Green, a physicist at the University of California, San Diego, took to social media to argue over the DESI team's preferred interpretation of the data. 'I'm particularly skeptical of DESI's press release,' Green says. 'The tendency should be to say, 'Hey, why don't we explore all the possible interpretations?' DESI didn't do that many analyses.' The situation, Green says, is akin to looking for a lost set of car keys in a dark parking lot—but only where the light is bright: 'When all you look under is one lamppost, you only see what you find there.' Other explanations exist for DESI's measurements, Green says, and not all of them require the cosmos-quaking prospect of an evolving dark energy. His preferred model instead invokes the putative decay of another mysterious aspect of cosmology, dark matter—thought to be a substance that gravitationally binds galaxies together but otherwise scarcely interacts with the rest of the universe at all. Yet his and other alternative proposals, too, have drawbacks, and the resulting scientific debate has only just begun. The standard cosmological model at the heart of all this is known as 'LCDM.' The 'CDM' component stands for 'cold dark matter,' and the 'L' stands for the Greek letter 'lambda,' which denotes a constant dark energy. CDM is the type of dark matter that best accounts for observations of how galaxies form and grow, and—until DESI's proclamation suggested otherwise, that is—a constant dark energy has been the best fit for explaining the distributions of galaxies and other patterns glimpsed in large-scale cosmic structures. 'Once they had this constant, everything snapped into place,' Green says. 'All of the issues that had been around for 20 years that we'd been hoping were just small mistakes were really resolved by this one thing.' But dark energy's constancy has always been more of a clever inference rather than an ironclad certainty. DESI is an effort to clarify exactly what dark energy really is by closely monitoring how it has influenced the universe's growth. Since 2021 the project has been meticulously measuring the motions and distributions of galaxies across some 11 billion years of cosmic time. DESI's data on galactic motions come from measurements of redshift, the stretching out of galaxies' emitted light to the red end of the spectrum by the universe's expansion. And its tracing of spatial distributions emerges from spying enormous bubblelike arrangements of galaxies thought to have formed from more primordial templates, called baryon acoustic oscillations (BAOs). BAOs are essentially ripples from giant sound waves that coursed through the hot plasma that filled the early universe, which astronomers can glimpse in the earliest light they can see, the big bang's all-sky afterglow known as the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The waves' matter-dense crests sowed the seeds of future galaxies and galaxy clusters, while galaxy-sparse voids emerged from the matter-poor troughs. Combined with CMB data as well as distance-pegging observations of supernovae, DESI's measurements offer a reckoning of the universe's historic growth rate—and thus the action of dark energy. DESI co-spokesperson Nathalie Palanque-Delabrouille, a physicist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, recalls the private December 2023 meeting where she and the rest of the DESI team first learned of the project's early results. Up until then, the researchers had worked on blinded data, meaning the true values were slightly but systematically altered so as to ensure that no one could deliberately or inadvertently bias the ongoing analysis to reach some artificially preordained result. These blinded data showed a huge divergence from LCDM. But when the real data were unveiled, 'we saw all the points came very close to LCDM, and that was initially a huge relief,' she recalls. That alignment suggested 'we did things right.' Those feelings quickly changed when the group noticed a small, persistent deviation in DESI's estimate for the value of lambda. Still, there was a considerable chance that the results were a statistical fluke. But in DESI's latest results, which were posted to the preprint server last March and incorporated much larger and richer data sets, the statistical robustness of the unexpected lambda value soared, and most talk of flukes dwindled. Theorists could scarcely contain their excitement—or their profound puzzlement. The results rekindled preexisting ideas about dynamic dark energy first formulated decades ago, not long after dark energy's discovery itself in 1998. One popular theory posits a fifth fundamental force in addition to the known four (electromagnetism, gravity, and the strong and weak nuclear forces), emerging from some as-yet-undiscovered dark matter particle that can influence dark energy. Frieman says the data from DESI is so precise that if this particle is the correct explanation, physicists already know its crucial parameters. Constrained by the DESI data, Frieman says, the best-fitting model that would support this 'fifth force' hypothesis 'tells us that this [hypothetical] particle has a mass of about 10–33 electron volts.' To put that into perspective, this means such a particle would be 38 orders of magnitude lighter than an electron—which, Frieman notes, is 'by far the lightest stable particle we know of that doesn't have zero mass.' But while some theorists used DESI's data to revive and sharpen intriguing theories of yesteryear, Green and others issued a warning. The problem: an evolving dark energy would seem to defy well-founded physical principles in other cosmic domains. The first major point of controversy involves something called the null energy condition, under which—among other things—energy can't propagate faster than light. If circumstances were otherwise, then perilous paradoxes could emerge: time machines could violate causality, matter could repel rather than attract, and even spacetime itself could be destabilized. Theorists have mathematically proven the condition's apparent necessity in numerous circumscribed scenarios within quantum and relativistic domains—but not for the universe at large. Appealing to this sort of theoretical incompleteness, however, 'is like a lawyer saying there's a loophole,' Green says. 'Most physicists would say that's totally crazy.' A discovery that something in the universe violates the null energy condition would be groundbreaking, to say the least: a more impolitic term would be 'nonsensical.' This astounding violation is exactly what Green and others say most of DESI's analyses are showing, however. On this point, several theorists push back. The controversy goes all the way down to the foundations of modern cosmology, centering on a parameter unceremoniously known as w(z). In 1917 Albert Einstein first introduced lambda as a way to ensure that a static universe would pop out of his equations. But after work led by Edwin Hubble proved the universe was expanding, Einstein abandoned his fudge factor (even calling it his 'greatest blunder'). It wasn't until the late 1990s, when astronomers found that the universe's expansion wasn't constant but in fact accelerating, that lambda once again returned to theoretical prominence. This time theorists interpreted it to represent the magnitude of the universe's dark energy density, a constant that doesn't change with time. But if there's one thing modern cosmology has shown, it's that little, if anything, about the universe is ever so neat and tidy. So, despite a lack of evidence, theorists of the time reimagined LCDM as w(z)CDM, where w(z) is a time-varying term representing the ratio of dark energy's pressure to its energy density. When w(z) has a value of exactly –1, w(z)CDM is equivalent to LCDM. For w(z) greater than –1, the universe's dark energy dilutes over time, consistent with DESI's findings. On the other hand, w(z) less than –1 leads to devastating consequences: dark energy's pressure overpowers its density, ultimately causing everything from galaxies all the way down to atoms to be ripped apart—a 'big rip' that violates the null energy condition and would seemingly doom the universe to a violent death. The DESI group collaboration's March preprint includes a graph that shows w(z) with values below –1 for later epochs in the universe's history, seemingly validating the criticisms of Green and others. But all is not as it seems. Such criticisms 'draw the wrong conclusions,' says Paul Steinhardt, a cosmologist at Princeton University. That's because in a second graph in the DESI paper, w(z) never crosses the critical –1 line. The difference: despite DESI's curved data, the first chart uses a simple line fit for w(z). Steinhardt and Frieman both say that because of the poor fit, the linear w(z) isn't physically meaningful. Researchers merely find it convenient for comparing different dark energy models and experiments. The second graph shows a curved fit for w(z) that more closely matches the data. It rolls down to, but never crosses, the critical –1 value, consistent with a weakening dark energy that would avoid the universe ending in a big rip. But Gabriel Lynch, a Ph.D. student at the University of California, Davis, who has an alternative explanation for the DESI data, says that even if any of DESI's w(z) estimates are physical, coaxing out a theory to support them leads to incredibly fraught circumstances. 'This is saying something weird,' Lynch says. 'It's not impossible, but maybe it would be good to look into some alternatives.' Whether or not DESI's results would violate the null energy condition, everyone agrees on another problem. Models that accommodate a changing dark energy inevitably conclude that a class of tiny fundamental particles known as neutrinos have a negative mass. Yet multiple generations of empirical experimentation have indisputably shown that neutrinos do have mass. Frieman suggests that something else, perhaps an unknown particle, might be mimicking a negative-mass neutrino. But a new approach by Lynch and his thesis advisor Lloyd Knox, detailed in a preprint that was posted to in March, sidesteps this 'negative neutrino' problem altogether. If some of the mass in the universe somehow disappeared over time, its influence on DESI's data would be the same as a weakening dark energy—without necessitating a negative mass for neutrinos. Although physicists have good reasons to believe that certain seemingly stable subatomic particles could contribute to this notional effect by decaying over time, this process is thought to be far too slow to account for DESI's observations. For instance, experiments have shown the proton to be so stable that its half-life must be at least a hundred trillion trillion times the age of the universe. But no one knows what the half-life of putative particles of dark matter would be. So, Lynch asks, what if dark matter has a half-life of roughly a billion years? Fast forward about 14 billion years to today, and some would have decayed into dark radiation, erasing the heavy matter signal. If the idea holds true, DESI's data might be a way to find the exact value for neutrino masses as well as for dark matter particles, which would be a big deal. 'That is a breakdown of LCDM that we totally expected,' Green says. 'And we were just waiting to detect it.' Owing to dynamic dark energy's paradoxes, 'you really need to explore every alternative explanation [for the results], because evolving dark energy is the absolute last one that I would be willing to believe,' Green says. Despite such strong words, all parties caution that this debate is still in its early days. 'This is only the first round of the fight,' Steinhardt says, and no model currently explains all of DESI's results. More data are needed, especially from even bigger and better cosmic surveys by planned next-generation telescopes. And, naturally, more analyses are needed, too, before the community can reach any consensus. Whether a resolution comes from dynamic dark energy, dark matter decay or something entirely different, the LCDM model has seemingly been stretched to its breaking point. Every reasonable explanation for DESI's data involves new, scarcely explored physics. 'They are all exotic models. We're beyond LCDM both ways,' Palanque-Delabrouille says. 'We just want to know the truth.'
