logo
How the Houthis rattled the US Navy—and transformed maritime war

How the Houthis rattled the US Navy—and transformed maritime war

Minta day ago

The evening of May 6, an F/A-18 Super Hornet was coming in for a landing on the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier in the Red Sea. An onboard mechanism to slow down the fighter jet failed, and the $67 million aircraft slid off the carrier's runway and into the water.
It was the third fighter jet that the Truman had lost in less than five months, and came hours after President Trump surprised Pentagon officials with the announcement that the U.S. had reached a truce with the Houthis in Yemen. The Truman had arrived at the Red Sea in December 2024 to battle the Iran-aligned militants—joining a campaign filled with heavy exchanges and close calls that strained the U.S. Navy.
Officials are now dissecting how a scrappy adversary was able to test the world's most capable surface fleet. The Houthis proved to be a surprisingly difficult foe, engaging the Navy in its fiercest battles since World War II despite fighting from primitive quarters and caves in one of the world's poorest countries.
The Houthis benefited from the proliferation of cheap missile and drone technology from Iran. They fired antiship ballistic missiles, the first-ever combat use of the Cold War-era weapon, and they innovated how they deployed their weaponry. The latest technologies have transformed maritime warfare, much the way they have rewritten the script for land wars in Ukraine—forcing militaries to adapt in real time. The U.S. is developing fresh ways to intercept the newest drones and missiles but still relies largely on expensive defense systems.
Some 30 vessels participated in combat operations in the Red Sea from late 2023 through this year, around 10% of the Navy's total commissioned fleet. In that time, the U.S. rained down at least $1.5 billion worth of munitions on the Houthis, a U.S. official said.
The Navy was able to destroy much of the Houthis' arsenal—but it has yet to achieve the strategic goal of restoring shipping through the Red Sea, and the Houthis continue to regularly fire missiles at Israel.
Military and congressional leaders who have begun scrutinizing the campaign for lessons worry about the strain of such grueling deployments on overall force readiness. The Pentagon is also investigating the lost planes and a separate at-sea collision—incidents that all involved the Truman strike group—with results expected in the coming months.
Central Command—also known as Centcom, which oversees U.S. military operations in the Middle East—declined to comment on ongoing investigations or on the campaign's performance and impact.
The effects of the deployment will be felt for years. It drew resources from efforts in Asia to deter China and pushed back maintenance schedules for carriers. That could create critical gaps in the second half of the decade, when the giant warships will have no choice but to dock for service.
Despite the wear and tear, Navy officials said the fight with the Houthis offered invaluable combat experience, and the Red Sea conflict is viewed inside the Pentagon as a warm-up for a potential 'high-end" conflict with China.
The Houthis have gained considerable power since the group—combatants in Yemen's long-running civil war—conquered much of the country a decade ago. They later fought off a campaign led by Gulf powers Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates to roll them back.
At the start of the war in Gaza, the Houthis, who chant 'death to America, death to Israel" and cast themselves as defenders of the Palestinians, began attacking Israeli cities as well as ships transiting the Red Sea.
The USS Carney destroyer was in the Red Sea when the Houthis launched their first barrage of drones and missiles on Oct. 19, 2023, catching the sailors aboard off guard. By the end of the 10-hour engagement, the crew had endured the most intense combat a U.S. Navy warship had seen in the better part of a century, shooting down more than a dozen drones and four fast-flying cruise missiles.
With the Houthis pledging to intensify attacks, U.S. military officials scrambled to solve a logistical problem: Destroyers like the Carney were out of the fight for as long as two weeks as they traveled to and from the Mediterranean to rearm, and nearby countries were wary of themselves becoming Houthi targets. The Pentagon eventually secured access to what one official called a 'game-changing" port in the Red Sea that allowed warships to reload without leaving the theater.
In December of that year, Biden cobbled together a multinational coalition to protect one of the world's busiest shipping lanes and then launched a U.S.-led campaign of airstrikes. For much of the campaign, the Pentagon kept two carrier groups in the region, each comprising at least five ships and around 7,000 sailors.
Throughout 2024, the Houthis launched dozens of attacks on commercial shipping, and the U.S. struck back in Yemen to prevent imminent attacks or degrade the militants' arsenal. In February, a British-owned bulk carrier was struck and later sank with its cargo of fertilizer. Three people were killed on board a Barbados-flagged ship after it was struck in March. Two more ships were abandoned in June after being struck by Houthi missiles.
The pace of operations took a toll on sailors, who were constantly within range of the Houthis and needed to remain vigilant around the clock. The USS Dwight D. Eisenhower aircraft carrier made just one short port call during seven months of fighting.
On a particularly busy day last November, Navy ships defeated at least eight one-way attack drones, five antiship ballistic missiles and four antiship cruise missiles launched by the Houthis, without incurring any injuries or damage.
At a recent naval symposium, Vice Admiral Brad Cooper, the deputy commander of U.S. military command in the Middle East, described one night late last year on the USS Stockdale. As the destroyer sailed through a chokepoint in the southern Red Sea, the crew switched off the lights, charted a zigzag course and braced for attack.
Just past midnight, the Houthis launched four ballistic missiles. The 509-foot destroyer accelerated and fired surface-to-air missiles in defense. One Houthi missile, traveling at nearly 4,000 miles an hour, was so close when it was intercepted that falling debris had to be shot down as well.
Ten minutes later, the Houthis fired an antiship cruise missile, which was taken out by fighter jets from a nearby aircraft carrier. Jets downed another cruise missile and multiple drones loaded with explosives, while the carrier struck Houthi targets inside Yemen.
Around 2 a.m., another Houthi drone was picked up flying low and slow directly at the Stockdale. The only option was to open fire with an automatic artillery gun mounted on the deck. When the drone dropped into the sea, the crew erupted in cheers and high-fives.
The battlefield favored the militants. In the Red Sea's confined waters, barely 200 miles at the widest point, large ships have limited ability to maneuver and spend long periods in view of the coastline, where Houthi spotters can help target ships.
Crews usually only picked up drone and missile launches a minute or two before impact and had to decide how to respond within about 15 seconds. They intercepted hundreds of attacks by the Houthis.
'You make it a sitting duck out there and within range of Houthi weapons," Bryan Clark, a former Navy strategist and senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, said of deploying a carrier to the area.
The Navy is used to operating in a similar environment in the Persian Gulf, where the Iranians are at close range. But militias like the Houthis are harder to deter than a regular government—and such groups have become more dangerous with the proliferation of antiship ballistic missiles and attack drones.
'We used to be able to operate close to shore like this, because the expectation was that adversaries would not attack a carrier out of concern for the repercussions," Clark said.
Sailors often had radar systems tuned to high sensitivity to give them time to intercept drones and missiles. Reviewing and refining radar settings to avoid picking up false positives while still spotting threats at a useful range was one of the most difficult tasks and a key source of stress for shipboard operators, according to an officer who spent six months in the Red Sea.
The USS Truman's three lost fighter jets are now under investigation by the Pentagon. 'It's unprecedented," said a Navy official. 'Perhaps it's just pure coincidence or bad luck—or there are some underlying issues."
Two Navy SEALs, or sea-air-land special-operations forces, were lost at sea early last year while boarding a boat at night that officials said was carrying ballistic and cruise missile components from Iran to Yemen. One of the SEALs fell into the water while trying to climb into the boat and the other one jumped in after him. The Navy searched for them for 10 days before declaring them dead. The fatalities occurred off the coast of Somalia in the Arabian Sea, hundreds of miles from Yemen's shores.
'Over the past year, the Navy has operated under intense and sustained combat conditions in the Red Sea—the most active maritime conflict zone in a generation," Rep. Ken Calvert (R., Calif.), who chairs the House appropriations subcommittee on defense, said at a hearing on May 14. 'But this persistent operational tempo comes at a cost. Ships and crews are being pushed hard, deployments are being extended, and readiness for other global contingencies is being strained."
While the Houthis never successfully hit a U.S. vessel, they did get better at tracking moving targets.
Early on, the Houthis would often fire one or two missiles and drones at a time at relatively high altitude, which the Navy was capable of intercepting, Navy officials said. Later, the militants launched attacks at night and sent projectiles skimming just above the waves, making them harder to trace. They also mixed up missile and drone strikes in changing patterns.
The Houthis were also able to down more than a dozen U.S. Reaper drones, each worth around $30 million.
When the Houthis began attacking Red Sea shipping in 2023, senior officials at Centcom wanted to act aggressively to degrade their capabilities, according to a U.S. official, but the Biden administration was wary of escalation. By the time strikes were approved, the Houthis had changed tactics or moved their assets, and U.S. officials often found their planning and intelligence outdated, the official said.
After Trump took office, he gave Gen. Erik Kurilla, the head of Centcom, authority to approve strikes, enabling the U.S. to act more quickly on targeting intelligence for missile launchers and drones. Centcom declined to comment on presidential decisions.
The U.S. poured resources into the effort in mid-March, launching an operation dubbed Rough Rider, including a second U.S. aircraft carrier, half a dozen B-2 bombers, a squadron of advanced F-35 fighters and a host of destroyers armed with guided missiles.
An area hit by a U.S. airstrike in San'a, Yemen, in March.
After 53 days of bombardment, the Houthis were battered but not broken. U.S. airstrikes killed hundreds of fighters, including several senior officials, and destroyed a critical fuel port and large stocks of weapons and war materiel. The Houthis failed to hit any U.S. ships.
Hundreds of Yemeni civilian casualties were reported after the U.S. intensified strikes, according to the Yemen Data Project, an independent monitoring group. Centcom said it was conducting an inquiry into the claims of civilian casualties in Yemen.
A week before the truce was announced, an officer familiar with Houthi operations expressed amazement at the militants' resolve and ability to adapt. 'Their missiles are getting more advanced, which is crazy," he said. 'So far the U.S. Navy is batting a thousand [on interceptions], and I expect that to continue, but for how long?"
Ultimately, Trump settled for a cease-fire on the most basic terms: The Houthis would stop shooting at American ships, and the U.S. would pause its bombing. As the Truman transited the Suez Canal and steamed out of the Mediterranean, the Houthis kept lobbing ballistic missiles at Israel.
Write to Stephen Kalin at stephen.kalin@wsj.com and Shelby Holliday at shelby.holliday@wsj.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fact check: Is Russia's new fact-checking platform credible?
Fact check: Is Russia's new fact-checking platform credible?

Time of India

time41 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Fact check: Is Russia's new fact-checking platform credible?

In early April, Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs unveiled the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN) — a self-proclaimed international alliance of fact-checkers and media outlets. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The initiative was first presented at the "Dialogue about Fakes 2.0" forum in Moscow in November 2024. At a press briefing following the April announcement, Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova framed the GFCN as a counter to what she called the West's "relentless stream of fake stories and disinformation campaigns," accusing Western fact-checkers of engaging in "biased pseudo-fact-checking. " "This global civic initiative," Zakharova said, "will enable us to counter destructive Western actions using our own constructive agenda." But established fact-checking sites such as Facta and Maldita have raised red flags over the GFCN's Kremlin-aligned backers, opaque operations, and overtly one-sided narratives. DW Fact check takes a closer look Who's behind the GFCN? The GFCN was co-founded by TASS, Russia's state-run news agency, and the Autonomous Non-Profit Organization ANO Dialog — both known for their close ties to the Kremlin. TASS was suspended in 2022 by the European Alliance of News Agencies (EANA) over concerns about its editorial independence. In 2023, the European Union sanctioned ANO Dialog for its role in spreading disinformation and for operating the pro-Kremlin website War on Fakes. Ahead of Russia's 2024 presidential election, the US Treasury also sanctioned the group under Executive Order 14024, targeting individuals and entities linked to the Russian government. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Does the GFCN meet global fact-checking standards? Independent fact-checking relies on transparency, verifiable sourcing, and open methodologies. Leading organisations such as the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) require fact-checks to cite public data and provide transparent methods that others can replicate. DW reviewed several GFCN articles and found consistent problems with sourcing and methodology. In one article titled "The Romanian Elections: How Did the West Win Only on the Second Try?", the author cites the 2024 Eurobarometer, claiming only 22% of Romanians support aid to refugees, only 14% back the EU's actions on Ukraine, and only 13% favor Ukraine's EU candidate status. But these figures are false. DW cross-checked the data and found significantly higher levels of Romanian support for EU policies on Ukraine in the 2024 Eurobarometer contradicting the article's core claim. Another piece alleges that the Soros family was the "shadow organizer" behind the "HANDS OFF!" protests against US President Donald Trump's second administration, which took place across the United States on April 5, 2025. The article argues that, since some organizers had previously received grants from the Open Society Foundations, the Soros family must have orchestrated the protest. That's misleading. The piece focuses narrowly on two groups — MoveOn and Indivisible — and ignores the broader coalition behind the rallies. While both organizations have indeed received funding from Open Society Foundations, the grants supported general programming, not the April 5 protests specifically. Moreover, these groups list dozens of funders, not just the Soros-backed foundation. Receiving support from Open Society Foundations doesn't prove direct involvement on the part of the Soros family, whose philanthropic work has long been targeted by conspiracy theorists. These narratives often paint Soros as a puppet master behind protests, migration, or global unrest — claims that have been widely discredited. Another GFCN article titled "Is ChatGPT Prone to Russian Propaganda?" fails to seriously engage with the question it raises. Instead, it spends most of its word count defending TASS and attacking a Norwegian media outlet that questioned the Russian agency's credibility. The article barely mentions recent investigations — such a report by NewsGuard, which DW covered — which document Russian attempts to manipulate generative AI platforms. The piece's only conclusion appears in the final paragraph, which vaguely states: "It is incorrect to give a chatbot human qualities and accuse it of 'preferring' one of the sources to the others." GFCN: Who is writing these stories? One contributor to the GFCN is Sonja van den Ende, a Dutch journalist living in Russia who has been embedded with Russian troops in Ukraine. Some Dutch media have described her as a conspiracy theorist. On X, she recently posted: "Germany is the country of knife pullers, used to be a country of beer and bratwurst, now asylum seekers, i.e. radicalised rebels from Syria, Iraq etc." Other GFCN contributors include Tim Anderson, director of the Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies. He has called the massacre of Ukrainian civilians in Bucha a "scam" and falsely claimed that Russia's invasion of Ukraine did not involve the targeting of civilian infrastructure. A familiar Russian playbook: mimic and confuse Observers say the GFCN's name — just one letter removed from the IFCN — is no accident. The International Fact-Checking Network, founded in 2015 by the Poynter Institute, is a respected consortium of more than 150 independent fact-checkers worldwide. It trains journalists, enforces professional standards, and certifies outlets based on transparency and editorial independence. The GFCN, on the other hand, appears to follow a long-standing tactic of the Russian state: imitating legitimate institutions to blur the line between journalism and propaganda. "We do not consider their activities to fall within the professional fact-checking ecosystem," IFCN director Angie Drobnic Holan told DW, citing Russia's consistent suppression of independent journalism. "Professional fact-checking requires the ability to independently verify claims across the political spectrum," she said. "Journalists must be free to publish findings that contradict the government. We are highly dubious that this effort allows for that." Tommaso Canetta, a policy officer with the European Digital Media Observatory (EDMO), called the GFCN a classic case of political appropriation. "This is a tactic we've seen many times; co-opting terms with credibility, like 'fact-checking,' and stripping them of meaning," he explained. "Political actors often label partisan narratives as 'fact checks' when they clearly are not." He stressed that affiliations with networks like the IFCN or the European Fact-Checking Standards Network (EFCSN) help distinguish legitimate outlets from those engaged in manipulation. "Without such standards, we end up with initiatives — like this one from Russia — that pollute the term and muddy the waters."

Is China arming Iran with missiles? Report says new order enough to make 800 ballistic weapons
Is China arming Iran with missiles? Report says new order enough to make 800 ballistic weapons

First Post

time42 minutes ago

  • First Post

Is China arming Iran with missiles? Report says new order enough to make 800 ballistic weapons

At a time when the Trump administration is holding talks with Iran about its nuclear programme, Iran is procuring thousands of tons of missile fuel from China that could power up to 800 ballistic missiles, according to a report. read more A missile unveiled by Iran is launched in an unknown location in Iran in this picture received by Reuters on August 20, 2020. Iran is procuring thousands of tons of missile fuel from China that can power hundreds of ballistic missiles, according to a report. The development has come at a time when the United States and Iran and engaged in talks regarding the regime's nuclear programme. Iran has ruled out stopping nuclear fuel enrichment. Moreover, the report of missile fuel's purchase from China has now emerged for the second time this year. Iran has placed an order for thousands of tons of ammonium perchlorate to a Chinese entity based on Hong Kong, according to Wall Street Journal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The newspaper said that the chemical ordered could power as much as 800 ballistic missiles. Previously, a report had said in January that said that Iran had bought the chemical from China to power ballistic missiles. However, that lot was later understood to have caught fire in the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas. The massive fire killed dozens and injured more than 1,000 people. Iran ramps up missile programme amid talks At a time when the United States is engaging in talks with Iran, the regime has sought to rebuild its missile programme. In clashes with Israel last year, Iran had suffered damages to its air defence systems to the extent that officials said it was left virtually naked. Israel had also struck a missile production site and a site related to the nuclear weapons programme. The Journal has reported that shipments of ammonium perchlorate are expected to arrive in Iran in the coming months from China. Sources told the newspaper that some of the chemical would be likely sent to Yemen-based Houthis. While Houthis have reached a ceasefire with the United States, they remain at conflict with Israel. The newspaper has reported that the chemical was ordered likely before the United States and Iran entered talks. In April, the United States sanctioned six persons and six entities in Iran and China for the trade of missile fuel, including sodium perchlorate, for Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

Deport 'illegal alien' Elon Musk and 'seize SpaceX':  Trump ally Steve Bannon demands probe into Tesla CEO's immigration status
Deport 'illegal alien' Elon Musk and 'seize SpaceX':  Trump ally Steve Bannon demands probe into Tesla CEO's immigration status

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Deport 'illegal alien' Elon Musk and 'seize SpaceX': Trump ally Steve Bannon demands probe into Tesla CEO's immigration status

Steven Bannon, former White House official, called for Elon Musk to be investigated and deported, claiming the billionaire is in the US illegally. He urged Trump to "initiate a formal investigation" over claims that Musk is "is an illegal alien." Speaking on his War Room podcast Thursday evening, Bannon fumed over the tech billionaire's threat to decommission its Dragon spacecraft 'immediately' after the president mulled canceling billions of dollars of government subsidies to Musk's companies. 'President Trump, tonight, should sign an executive order calling for the Defense Production Act ,' Bannon said, referring to the Cold War-era law that gives presidents emergency authority to control domestic industries. 'And seize SpaceX tonight, before midnight,' he added. 'They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status, because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately,' he said while talking to The New York Times. ALSO READ: Elon Musk to start new political party amid feud with Trump? Tech mogul drops big hint on X Live Events Steven Bannon demands probe against Musk Steve Bannon has called for investigations into Elon Musk's alleged drug use and a reported attempt by the South African-born billionaire to access a classified Pentagon briefing on China. He argued that Musk's security clearance should be revoked and all government contracts suspended while the inquiry is ongoing. Speaking on his War Room podcast, Bannon also urged Donald Trump to invoke the Defense Production Act to take control of SpaceX. This followed Musk's brief suggestion that he might decommission the Dragon spacecraft, which NASA relies on to send astronauts to the International Space Station. Although Musk later retracted the comment, Bannon pressed Trump to act immediately. While the Defense Production Act—originally passed during the Korean War—enables the president to prioritize contracts vital to national defense, it does not explicitly authorize the seizure of private companies. Musk denied asking for a briefing on China, branding the Times as "pure propaganda." He also defended himself against the drug use allegations. ALSO READ: Amid Elon Musk-Trump feud, tech billionaire's ex Ashley St Clair offers 'breakup advice' to President Bannon, a vocal critic of Musk, has previously questioned his immigration status, labeling him a "parasitic illegal immigrant." Trump expressed his thoughts on Truth Social Thursday: "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!". ALSO READ: Meet Thomas Fugate: 22-year-old ex-gardener and grocery store assistant to lead $18 million terror prevention team Elon Musk was originally from South Africa, where he spent his early life before moving to Canada with his family. After some time in the US as a student at the University of Pennsylvania, Musk obtained American citizenship in 2002, according to Walter Isaacson's biography cited by Newsweek. During the initial stages of what would've been Trump's second term, Musk was appointed to oversee the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The news came amid a bitter public spat between the two regarding what Trump has described as his "big, beautiful bill," which has secured passage in the House.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store