Malaysia's role as Asean Chair recognised internationally, says PM
He said that although there were certain quarters that refused to acknowledge Malaysia's role, the trust placed by the countries involved was clear proof that they held Malaysia's political and economic stability in high regard.
"Thank God, in Malaysia our politics are stable and our economic development is respected. So, when disputes arise, the task of reconciliation is entrusted to us. This is a form of international recognition, even if some in Parliament may choose not to acknowledge it — and that is fine," he said.
Anwar made the remarks when opening the Madani Dairy Entrepreneur Carnival at Farm Fresh Perak Dairy Complex today.
Also present were Perak Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Saarani Mohamad, Agriculture and Food Security Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Sabu and Education Minister Fadhlina Sidek.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
7 hours ago
- Barnama
PM Anwar Extends Aid To Cancer Patient And Retired Soldier In Kuantan
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 17 (Bernama) -- Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has presented donations to stage-four nasal cancer patient Mohd Sharul Ikmal and retired soldier Pak Nik Soh, who is nearly blind from optic nerve complications. The aid was handed over on behalf of the Prime Minister by his political secretary, Datuk Ahmad Farhan Fauzi, during a Ziarah MADANI programme visit to Taman Balok Jaya, Kuantan, Pahang. 'I was deeply moved when I heard two truly touching life stories, beginning with Sharul, 27, who, at such a young age, has to battle stage-four nasal cancer.
The Star
15 hours ago
- The Star
Thai army to lead Asean observers keen on assessing alleged ceasefire violations at Thai-Cambodian border
BANGKOK: The Royal Thai Army (RTA) will lead the Asean Interim Observation Team (IOT) to visit the Thai-Cambodian border from Monday (Aug 18) to Wednesday (Aug 20). The mission aims to monitor alleged breaches of international law and ceasefire conditions by Cambodian troops, government spokesman Jirayu Houngsub (pic) said on Sunday (Aug 17). Asean and Ottawa Convention envoys visit Si Sa Ket Jirayu noted that the visits follow two successful trips organised earlier by the Thai government for international governments and organisations. On Saturday, Asean envoys and representatives from countries that ratified the Ottawa Convention visited Si Sa Ket province. The Ottawa Convention, formally known as the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction, bans the use of landmines. During the visit, envoys witnessed evidence of anti-personnel mines allegedly laid by Cambodian troops and spoke directly with affected residents. Jirayu said the Thai government believed the envoys would report their findings to their respective governments and raise the issue with the international community. ICRC representatives assess humanitarian impact The RTA, in coordination with the Foreign Ministry and Interior Ministry, also facilitated a visit by representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). They assessed the humanitarian impact of cross-border attacks on civilians in Surin, Si Sa Ket, and Ubon Ratchathani provinces. ICRC representatives interviewed local residents in Phanom Dong Rak and Kab Choeng districts of Surin, Kantharalak district in Si Sa Ket, and Nam Yuen district in Ubon Ratchathani. Jirayu said the visit demonstrated Thailand's commitment to working with the ICRC to strengthen humanitarian protection mechanisms. ICRC to submit findings to both countries The ICRC gathered facts on the ground, interviewed affected civilians, and will compile a confidential report on the humanitarian impact of the conflict. The organisation will not make its findings public but will submit the report directly to both Thailand and Cambodia. - The Nation/ANN
The Star
16 hours ago
- The Star
From tariff talks to conflict resolutions: Negotiators wanted?
IN today's fragmented and divisive world, demands for skilled negotiators, those steeped in diplomacy and dialogue as statecraft, should be at a premium. After all, a perfect storm is brewing: global politics are becoming increasingly fraught, and common global issues are being weaponised. Open conflicts are flaring up in places like Europe and the Middle East, while other regions, such as East Asia, face renewed risks of unintended conflict due to miscalculations over long-standing disputes. Even South-East Asia, long marked by the absence of open conflict between Asean member states, was recently reminded of the dangers of complacency and the need to continuously nurture a culture of peace. Cross-border issues, such as the climate crisis, demand a cooperative global response, yet nations are unable to look past their immediate interests. A proverbial diplomatic traffic jam confronts us as countries scramble to reach 'a deal' to stave off tariff wars. With true statesmanship, these fraught conditions would be an ideal opportunity for diplomats and negotiators to thrive, demonstrating their unique skills in managing international relations, bridging differences and forging consensus tactfully and respectfully. Unfortunately, the opposite seems to be happening. Diplomacy is facing headwinds as countries increasingly turn inward, seemingly oblivious to the fact that national goals cannot be achieved in a vacuum. Instead, they require a keen awareness of external dynamics and how they affect a country's objectives. Furthermore, multilateral institutions are facing a critical test of their relevance and credibility. They are often seen as disconnected from shifting power dynamics. Complex issues are often oversimplified for headlines, and the popular focus on making 'deals' instead of 'agreements' highlights a short-term, transactional mindset. Do professional negotiators and diplomats matter? The work of a professional negotiator is not one-size-fits-all. Every situation is unique. The setting can vary, from bilateral to multilateral negotiations. Multilateral settings might involve a few countries, often within a region, or many countries, as seen in the United Nations system. Bridge-building efforts can also take place within countries, where the term 'dialogue' is often preferred over 'negotiation'. It is important to recognise that the resolution of internal conflicts, particularly in South-East Asia, has benefited immensely from the tactful, nuanced and calibrated skills of the region's diplomats, who are always conscious of hidden tripwires that could halt fragile dialogues. The subject matter can also vary widely, including political, security, economic, trade, finance and global cross-border issues. To add to the complexity, these subjects are often intertwined, defying clear distinctions between them and between the local, national, regional and global levels. A country's role can also differ, ranging from being a party to a dispute, a facilitator or mediator, to a strictly third-party observer focused on minimising risks and maximising opportunities. In all these different circumstances, the professional negotiator offers important, often unquantifiable, skills. First, a deep understanding of national interests is crucial. Professional negotiators have the ability to clearly identify and, if necessary, recalibrate their country's national interests on international issues. They focus on long-term interests rather than short-term, fleeting ones. Their institutional memory allows them to be alert to even the subtlest shifts that could inadvertently cause irreparable harm. Negotiators also have the capacity to take a comprehensive, unified approach. They are able to develop a whole-of-government, or even whole-of-society, approach in formulating a country's negotiating position, rather than a fragmented, 'siloed' one. This approach creates a sense of common national ownership and participation, making the country's position more resistant to the probes of other negotiating parties and ensuring the effective implementation of any agreements reached. They also possess full knowledge of their country's 'red lines' to adeptly manage changing negotiation dynamics. The real work of negotiation begins after initial positions are presented, it is more than just reading a prepared statement. Second, professional negotiators are trained to develop an acute knowledge and 'feel' of the other side's position, of their interests and objectives as well as their 'red lines'. They understand the other side's constraints and how they align or diverge from their own. This awareness is not a sign of weakness, it is crucial to ensure the most efficient (not to overpromise or over-concede for the sake of reaching agreements) and effective ('national' interest becoming synonymous with 'common' interest) attainment of the set objectives. In today's complex environment, experienced negotiators also discern wider stakeholders and their interests, even if they are not directly involved. This ensures that outcomes are supported and not contested, and that these dynamics work in their country's favour. Nothing happens in a vacuum. Third, professional negotiators have a strong appreciation for detailed preparation. They leave nothing to chance. Every step of a negotiation, no matter how small, is prepared for and, if necessary, negotiated over. The agenda, format, working methods and even seating arrangements matter and can significantly affect outcomes. Unfortunately, such attention to detail, the minutiae of a negotiation process, is sometime mistakenly viewed as archaic and overly bureaucratic. The truth is, they help draw the proverbial line in the sand, to test resolve before attention turn to the issues of substance. Finally, the experienced negotiator possesses a range of unquantifiable qualities. These include the ability to 'read the room' and sense underlying dynamics, points of convergence and the other side's readiness to compromise. They have a keen appreciation for timing, knowing when to reveal a national position or submit fresh proposals. A genuine capacity for empathy allows them to build trust and a comfort level with the other side without being co-opted. They also know how to agree to disagree respectfully, avoiding excessive celebration of gains that could burn bridges for future negotiations. An almost infinite reservoir of patience and resilience is critical in a battle of will and wit. Negotiators must not be too eager for results or fall into the trap of unilaterally set deadlines. Ultimately, since all agreements are expressed in words, experienced negotiators are wordsmiths, equipped with a command of language. They must also be seen as trustworthy, reliable and principled individuals whose words can be relied upon. In our fragmented world, the efficacy and importance of diplomacy as a means to manage relations between states should be beyond doubt. The skills of the diplomat-negotiator should be in high demand, and a surge in diplomacy is needed. — The Jakarta Post/ANN Marty Natalegawa is a former Indonesian foreign minister and founder/convenor of the Amity Circle, which focuses on the promotion of diplomacy, negotiation and dialogue.
