logo
British tourist arrested over alleged string of sex attacks on 33 tribal children in Namibia after he ‘offered kids sweets'

British tourist arrested over alleged string of sex attacks on 33 tribal children in Namibia after he ‘offered kids sweets'

News.com.au22-05-2025

A British tourist has been arrested in Namibia over an alleged series of sex attacks on San tribal children at a cultural 'living museum' in the remote north-east of the country.
Douglas Robert Brooks, 65, was detained on Sunday at the Ju'Hoansi Living Museum near Grashoek after allegedly offering sweets to local children in exchange for naked photos and inappropriate touching.
He now faces 38 charges, including rape, indecent assault, human trafficking and child exploitation, under Namibia's Child Care & Protection Act of 2015 and international protocols.
Brooks also faces charges of crimen injuria, which means a deliberate attack on a person's dignity through the use of vulgar or racially offensive words or gestures.
The pensioner allegedly persuaded 33 minors to strip and allow him to touch their genitals, with the promise of sweets he had brought to the camp.
He appeared at Grootfontein Magistrates Court on Monday afternoon, where prosecutor Erastus Christian laid out the charges. No plea was taken.
Namibian police Inspector Maureen Mbeha said Brooks is accused of groping the breasts and backsides of 16 teenage girls, 14 teenage boys and three younger children.
Police say the alarm was raised by concerned parents, leading to his arrest just a day after arriving at the remote museum for his third annual visit.
It's believed that his detention has since prompted further allegations.
Brooks entered Namibia on May 15 and drove six hours from the capital Windhoek to the camp, which is part of a network of seven 'living museums' set up by the Living Culture Foundation Namibia (LCFN), a German-Namibian organisation.
The museums are designed to preserve San traditions and culture by allowing visitors to observe and take part in daily activities such as bow-and-arrow hunting, fire dances, and traditional craft-making.
While some adult women remain topless in keeping with cultural norms, management said teenage girls are always fully clothed in leather antelope-skin dresses.
Tourists are explicitly warned not to give sweets to children due to the lack of dental care, and instead encouraged to donate to local groups who distribute gifts fairly.
The Namibian Ministry of Environment and Tourism has condemned his alleged actions stating they were 'deeply disrespectful' to the people of the San.
A spokesman said: 'The allegations are a serious violation of our law regarding the protection of minors and it is unacceptable for tourists to exploit them.
'We applaud the Namibia police for their swift actions in attending to this matter and are confident that the law and justice will take place in due course'.
Brooks has been remanded in custody by Magistrate Abraham Abraham and is due to reappear in court on June 19.
It is not yet clear if he will be transferred to a main prison.
The San – or bushmen as they were known in colonial times and a description some find outdated – are the oldest surviving civilisations in Southern Africa.
Their small stature and semi-nomadic lifestyle saw them persecuted and hunted and forced into poverty when their traditional hunting grounds were taken.
Some 2000 of the 30,000 San in Namibia remain faithful to their traditional roots, hunting and farming for survival, and do not entertain the modern way of living.
The San are thought to have diverged from other nomadic hunting groups some 200,000 years ago and spread out across Southern Africa surviving in the wild.
They are known for their 'click language' and supreme hunting and tracking skills and knowledge of nature and do not believe in possessions but sharing.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Changing Australia: Commander Helen Schneider and taking out online predators
Changing Australia: Commander Helen Schneider and taking out online predators

ABC News

time4 days ago

  • ABC News

Changing Australia: Commander Helen Schneider and taking out online predators

With the rapid growth in technology over the last few decades, reports of online child sexual exploitation have skyrocketed. AI is being used to create child abuse material and children and young people are being extorted online. But as this happens, there is also significant work going on behind closed doors to track down offenders and remove children from harm. If this discussion has raised any concerns for you, help is available: Lifeline 13 11 14 AFP Child Abuse Hotline 1800 700 250 Crime Stoppers 1800 333 000 If you or someone is in immediate danger, call 000. Guest: AFP Commander Helen Schneider, Commander of the Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation Producer: Nancy Notzon

Bail granted to 29-year-old Canberran woman charged with grooming boy she worked with
Bail granted to 29-year-old Canberran woman charged with grooming boy she worked with

ABC News

time6 days ago

  • ABC News

Bail granted to 29-year-old Canberran woman charged with grooming boy she worked with

A Canberra woman has fronted the ACT Magistrates Court accused of grooming a boy she worked with, despite knowing their interactions were "illegal". The court heard the 29-year-old woman had said "she loved him [the boy] and she meant it" during police investigations. ACT police raided the woman's home in Canberra on Saturday May 31 after learning about the allegations, seizing the woman's phone and laptop. She was charged with seven offences including three counts of committing an act of indecency with a young person under 16, two counts of sexual intercourse with a person aged between 10 and 16, possessing child exploitation material and grooming a young person. The court heard the allegations occurred over a five-month period. Prosecutor Corinne Kennedy said police had uncovered text messages between the pair which demonstrated the woman clearly knew their relationship was wrong, including ways to keep it a secret and "away from the eyes of others". Ms Kennedy said the "strong prosecution case" showed the woman had developed a relationship with a child involving a "notable power imbalance". She argued there was a serious risk the relationship would continue if the woman was granted bail, given she allegedly pursued the relationship despite knowing it was illegal. Magistrate Ian Temby said it seemed there was an "intensity" to their interactions and acknowledged the vulnerability of the child. He also expressed concern for the boy's "capacity to protect himself" but acknowledged the boy's support network was now aware of the circumstances. Legal Aid duty lawyer Samuel Collett said the woman knew she was facing "extremely concerning" charges but argued that strict bail conditions amounting to "effective house arrest" would protect the boy and any risk of the woman interfering with evidence. The woman was granted bail on the condition that she did not leave her home without her husband. The court heard the husband was willing to support her, including going so far as to change jobs to ensure the couple could afford their rent. The woman is also barred from contacting the boy or being within 100 metres of him, spending time with children without adult supervision, and she cannot be in possession of a smartphone or a laptop. The court also heard the woman had been cooperative with police since her arrest and intends to seek support from mental health services. The woman was not required to enter a plea to the charges. Her matter will return to court on July 1, 2025.

‘Not fair and reasonable': Hospital worker acquitted of filming girl in shower wins two years' back pay from employer
‘Not fair and reasonable': Hospital worker acquitted of filming girl in shower wins two years' back pay from employer

News.com.au

time30-05-2025

  • News.com.au

‘Not fair and reasonable': Hospital worker acquitted of filming girl in shower wins two years' back pay from employer

A Queensland hospital has been ordered to reimburse an employee nearly two years of lost wages after he was suspended without pay while facing criminal charges that he was ultimately acquitted of. Brian Arthur Campbell Mathers, a cook supervisor at Redcliffe Hospital, was initially charged by police with possessing and making child exploitation material back in February 2022. Police alleged that he had filmed a teenage girl in the shower of a home in Newport, north of Brisbane, allegations he denied. The Office of the Health Ombudsman informed the Metro North Hospital and Health Service (MNHHS) of the charges – resulting in Mr Mathers being suspended with pay that same month. An order from the Ombudsman was then issued a month later, forbidding him from providing any health service 'in either a paid or unpaid … clinical or non-clinical capacity'. Because of this, Mr Mathers was then suspended without remuneration from March 21, 2022 until May 2024. A jury in May 2024 ultimately found Mr Mathers not guilty on two charges of making child exploitation material and one count of possessing child exploitation material and he was acquitted. After Mr Mathers wrote to the hospital informing them of the verdict, the Ombudsman's order was revoked and he returned to work in August 2024, requesting reimbursement for the period of his unpaid suspension. But Queensland Health refused this, with correspondence from MNHHS chief executive Jackie Hanson determining the Ombudsman's order was 'justified'. 'These restrictions prevented you from engaging in any work capacity, including alternative duties, transfers or other work arrangements with any health service. As a result, you were not available to work for Metro North Health during the period of suspension without remuneration for reasons other than your suspension,' Professor Hanson wrote in her correspondence to Mr Mathers. 'The order remained unchanged during your suspension without remuneration, preventing you from working in any capacity.' In submissions to the Queensland Industrial Relations Council, Mr Mathers argued that the order was part of his suspension and he remained 'at hand' and available to work. He sought a full reimbursement of the pay for the duration of the two years he was on suspension. In a bombshell move, QIRC commissioner Christopher Gazenbeek in May allowed the appeal and ordered the hospital to reimburse Mr Mathers of the amount he was deprived. Part of the Ombudsman's order involved Mr Mathers being 'required to remain willing, ready and able to attend work if required', the published judgment states. 'Throughout his period of suspension, the appellant received several reminders of the requirement that he 'remain ready, willing and able to attend work if required',' Mr Gazenbeek said. 'In my view, the terms of that condition further support that the appellant was available for work throughout his suspension without remuneration, notwithstanding the effect of the interim prohibition order.' Mr Gazenbeek said the decision to suspend Mr Mathers without remuneration was 'not fair and reasonable'. In a separate QIRC matter, Mr Mathers failed to overturn a reprimand by Queensland Health after he did not inform his employer of the charges and that he had appeared in court. Commissioner John Dwyer said he had some degree of sympathy for Mr Mathers due to the 'unique dilemma' of wanting to protect his privacy in circumstances where he had not been convicted of the charges. 'He believed (apparently correctly) that he would not be convicted and, given the matters did not arise in the context of his employment, he elected to conceal them,' Mr Dwyer wrote. 'The stigma of merely being charged with criminal offences can have a lasting detrimental impact on professional and personal relationships. '(But) I do not consider that he took all steps reasonably open to inform himself of his obligations. Even if I am wrong about that, I do not consider that the legal advice or the absence of policy specific training relieved him of his obligation to comply with the policy. 'While I accept that his noncompliance was not a deliberate act of deceit, and that his failure to comply with the policy was not entirely his fault, I am unable to be satisfied that these factors render the decision unfair and unreasonable.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store