South Africa prioritises digital inclusion for rural and disadvantaged areas
Deputy Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies in South Africa Mondli Gungubele said that the Government is committed to internet connectivity to all rural and disadvantaged communities.
Image: Yogashen Pillay
Deputy Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies, Mondli Gungubele, has reiterated the government's commitment to enhancing internet connectivity across rural and disadvantaged communities in a bid to bridge the digital divide.
Speaking at the South Africa Internet Governance Forum held in Durban on Wednesday, Gungubele stressed the significance of this initiative as the nation prepares for the World Summit on Information Society review process.
'Digital governance is a global factor that our regulatory, ethical and social frameworks can often keep in place. We are here as South Africans and as global citizens to reflect on the challenges we face. We are here to respond to students, to ensure that they are free and free in the context of research,' he said.
Gungubele added that the government has made significant strides in embedding the multistakeholder model in internet governance approach, ensuring that all voices from the rural and township communities and metropolitan leaders are heard in shaping our digital future.
'The emergence of the global digital compact presents us with critical questions. Should governance of the internet shift towards a more centralized intergovernmental structure? Our position must be clear. We continue to stand for an internet that is open, secure, rights-based and accessible to all.'
Gungubele said the forum was critical in South Africa's digital landscape.
'Significance arises from the growing importance of the internet in driving relations advancement across various sectors, such as commerce, education, healthcare, governance, and entertainment,' he said.
'Since 2012, internet access has been acknowledged as a fundamental human right, aligning with the United Nations Human Rights Council's affirmation of individual freedom of expression and opinion.'
Gungubele added that research showed that technology will disrupt 75 million jobs, but create 130 million digital jobs.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
'The utilization of AI technology could either alleviate or exacerbate existing disparities, particularly in terms of employment and essential services accessibility. We are currently confronted by AI's increasing presence; tools like ChatGPT are becoming increasingly proficient in tasks traditionally performed by humans, such as coding, software vulnerability identification, and content creation. As AI progresses, concerns arise regarding potential job displacement among knowledge workers,' Gungubele said.
Moreover, he asserted the necessity for educational and training initiatives aimed at preparing the workforce for an AI-centric future. He concluded by stressing the importance of collaboration between government, industry, academia, and civil society to create policies that address the challenges posed by AI while maximising its benefits for the workforce.
Mpilo Sibiya, a representative from the KZN Premier's office, said that the province was advancing digital inclusion in rural communities through the traditional authorities connectivity project.
'This initiative provides traditional leaders such as Amakhosi with access to government services and direct communication channels with the provincial departments. So far, 23 international council facilities have been connected through the government,' Sibiya said.
'Moreover, libraries across the province are being transformed into digital hubs with full cyber credits assisting the residents with digital literacy, job searches, and educational resources. This effort has made a significant impact, especially in rural areas where access to digital infrastructure has been limited.'
Sibiya added that despite some challenges, particularly around budget constraints, KZN has been committed to expanding digital infrastructure, including inter-literacy across the province.
'Plans are already in place to build and connect more libraries, ensuring that digital links continue to grow and reach every corner of KZN. Our province is aligned with South Africa's NDP to build an inclusive economy that drives sustainable development and shared prosperity,' Sibiya said.
'We are investing in technology access, new skills, and innovation to improve the digital divide and create a future for all. By embracing digital transformation, we are building a connected, capable, and competitive province that leaves no one behind.'
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Most South African farmers are black: why Trump got it so wrong
There are more black farmers in South Africa than white farmers,says the authors Image: Karen Sandison/ Independent Newspapers When world leaders engage, the assumption is always that they engage on issues based on verified facts, which their administrative staff are supposed to prepare. Under this assumption, we thought the meeting at the White House on 21 May between South Africa's president, Cyril Ramaphosa, and US president Donald Trump would follow this pattern. Disappointingly, the televised meeting was horrifying to watch as it was based on misrepresenting the reality of life in South Africa. Issues of agriculture, farming and land (and rural crime) were central to the discussions. What is clear to us as agricultural economists is that the skewed views expressed by Trump about these issues originate in South Africa. This includes Trump's statement: 'But Blacks are not farmers.' In our work as agricultural economists, we have, in many pieces and books (our latest titled The Uncomfortable Truth about South Africa's Agriculture), tried to present South Africans with the real facts about the political economy policy reforms and structural dimensions of South African agriculture. Writing on these matters was necessary given that official data – agricultural census 2017, as well as the official land audit of 2017 – all provide an incomplete picture of the real state and structure of South African agriculture. The reason is that the agricultural census, which is supposed to provide a comprehensive and inclusive assessment of the size and structure of the primary agricultural sector, and the land audit, which was supposed to record the ownership of all land in South Africa, are incomplete in their coverage. The incomplete and inaccurate official data provides fertile ground for radical statements by the left and the right – and novices on social media. This is why South Africa has to deal with falsehoods coming from the US. These include Trump's statement that black people are not farmers in South Africa. South Africa is to blame for providing inaccurate data to feed these false narratives. The facts presented here should allow a more nuanced interpretation of South Africa's farm structure. Firstly, there are more black farmers in South Africa than white farmers. And not all white commercial farm operations are 'large-scale', and not all black farmers are 'small-scale', 'subsistence' or 'emerging'. Most farm operations can be classified as micro, or small in scale. This is important so that one doesn't view South Africa's agriculture as mainly white farmers. Indeed, we are a country of two agricultures with black farmers mainly at small scale and accounting for roughly 10% of the commercial agricultural output. Still, this doesn't mean they are not active in the sector. They mainly still require support to expand and increase output, but they are active. The facts In the wake of the circus in the Oval Office, we were amazed by the total silence of the many farmers' organisations in South Africa. We have not seen one coming out to reject all of Trump's claims. The only thing we can deduce from this is that these falsehoods suit the political position of some farmer organisations. But at what cost? Will many of their members be harmed by trade sanctions or tariffs against South Africa? The US is an important market for South Africa's agriculture, accounting for 4% of the $13.7 billion (R247bn) exports in 2024. When Ramaphosa highlighted the fact that crime, and rural crime in particular, has an impact on all South Africans and that more black people than white people are being killed, Trump's response was disturbing, to say the least: 'But Blacks are not farmers'. This requires an immediate fact check. We returned to the text from our chapter in the Handbook on the South African Economy we jointly prepared in 2021. In the extract below, we discuss the real numbers of farmers in South Africa and try to provide a sensible racial classification of farmers to denounce Trump's silly statement. As highlighted earlier, the two latest agricultural censuses (2007 and 2017) are incomplete as they restricted the sample frame to farm businesses registered to pay value added tax. Only firms with a turnover of R1 million qualify for VAT registration. We were able to expand the findings from the censuses with numbers from the 2011 population census and the 2016 community survey to better understand the total number of commercial farming units in South Africa. The Community Survey 2016 is a large-scale survey that happened between Censuses 2011 and 2021. The main objective was to provide population and household statistics at municipal level to government and the private sector, to support planning and decision-making. Data from the 2011 population census (extracted from three agricultural questions included in the census) shows that 2 879 638 households out of South Africa's total population, or 19.9% of all households, were active in agriculture for subsistence or commercial purposes. Only 2% of these active households reported an annual income derived from agriculture above R307 000. This translates into 57 592 households that can be considered commercial farmers, with agriculture as the main or only source of household income. This corresponds in some way with the 40 122 farming businesses that are registered for VAT as noted in the 2017 agricultural census report. If we use the numbers from the agricultural census it is evident almost 90% of all VAT-registered commercial farming businesses could be classified as micro or small-scale enterprises. If the farm businesses excluded from the census are accounted for under the assumption that they are too small for VAT registration, then the fact still stands that the vast majority of all farm enterprises in South Africa are small family farms. Graphic Image: Source: StatsSA There are, however, 2 610 large farms (with turnover exceeding R22.5 million, which are responsible for 67% of farm income and employed more than half the agricultural labour force of 757 000 farm workers in 2017. Graphic Image: Source: StatsSA (2020b) – based on additional analysis of the 2016 Community Survey Another way to get to farm numbers is to use the 2016 Community Survey. Using the shares as shown in Table 2, we estimate there are 242 221 commercial farming households in South Africa, of which only 43 891 (18%) are white commercial farmers. (This is very much in line with the VAT registered farmers but also acknowledging the fact that many white farm businesses are not necessarily registered for VAT.) Let's consider only the agricultural households with agriculture as their main source of income, surveyed in the 2016 community survey. We end up with a total of 132 700 households, of whom 93 000 (70%) are black farmers. This reality is something that policy makers and farm organisations find very difficult to deal with and it seems that Trump also found this too good to be true. We have tried here in a long winded way to deal with farm numbers and how to get to a race classification of farmers in South Africa. In the end we trust that we have managed to show that there are more black farmers in South Africa than white farmers. Their share in total output is smaller than that of their white counterparts. The National Agricultural Marketing Council puts black farmers' share of agricultural production as roughly 10%. But these numbers are also incomplete and largely an undercount. It will always be challenging to get to the real number of black farmers' share of agricultural output as nobody would ever know whether the potato or the cabbage on the shelf came from a farm owned by a black farmer or a white person but operated by a black farmer, for example. As South Africans know, the labour on farms, in pack houses, distribution systems and retail are all black. So, the sweat and hard work of black South African workers are integral to the food supply chain in South Africa. Let's get these facts straight and promote them honestly. The Conversation Image: Supplied
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
We are an evil and irresponsible nation, write our readers
As an evil nation, we got what we deserved The US President went out to humiliate the South African President. The issue of farmers and the 'genocide' of which they are victims as white people was clearly not on the agenda. The agenda focused on 'resetting relations and bilateral matters', according to the presidency. However, it is surprising that Ramaphosa invited white golfers and the minister of agriculture. That can only mean that South Africans were always wary of giving Trump an excuse to bring up the white farmer genocide. Nonetheless, the South African government received what it deserved. Also, the media, which has long protected Ramaphosa, received what it deserved. Trump humiliated all South Africans, so there was no chance to play great public relations. Indeed, the entire concept of a democratic South Africa that is 'non-sexist', 'non-racial', and has the 'sweetest Constitution and free media' facade has been exposed as the satanic lie it has always been. And the 'self-proclaimed' guardians of democracy known as the South African media were caught off guard, and Trump accused them of concealing the alleged genocide. The democratic government has done an excellent job of concealing the fact that the majority of people are Christians, the majority of violence victims are Black men, and the majority of marginalised people are Black. It hid God's role in South Africans' resolve to end apartheid. The government and biased media highlighted a few examples of Black and foreign pastors as the face of a 'rotten Christianity' and a God unneeded in our constitutional democracy, while ignoring the positive work of churches and pastors. This nation has hidden God from its children's education and attempted to justify xenophobia by citing frustration among the people. Many evil things have occurred in this country, but all have one common theme: to humiliate the God of Christians and demonstrate that we can do so through our secular Constitution! South Africa was becoming so arrogant in its devil-may-care attitude and 'Madiba magic' nonsense that it thought it could take it to the ICJ and get its way, just as it had done with Christianity and people like Bushiri. However, it has been exposed for the emptiness and hypocrisy that define it, as no one can be above their spirituality. As a Christian nation, South Africa's ethos and political stance should be based solely on Christianity, including championing human rights at the International Court of Justice. | Khotso Moleko Bloemfontein Let's sacrifice in solidarity with others Across the globe, countless countries have borne the brunt of war, devastating conflicts leaving behind a trail of destruction and despair. As we Muslims approach Eidul Adha, consider prioritising helping war victims, like in Gaza, by reducing personal extravagance, desire, overconsumption, and donate to bona fide humanitarian aid organisations. People in Gaza are facing enormous suffering and lack basic necessities like food, water, medical supplies and other human necessities. Currently, easing the suffering, pain and poverty in Gaza is the need of the hour and it is the time when help is most needed. Moreover, not only during Eid but also beyond Eid, as Muslims and human beings, we must lower the voice of our luxuriousness as around us are people in great agony and sorrow. The situation in Gaza has assumed apocalyptic proportions with hundreds of civilians being butchered on a daily basis. Those who are not killed by the Zionists regime face the grim and painful prospect of death through starvation. With humanitarian aid and commercial supplies blocked, nearly half a million people are facing imminent starvation. Let us do our best to assist. Besides prayers and aid we need to request the UN Security Council, EU and other nations to send in military support to stop apartheid Israel's egregious military offensive in Gaza and occupied Palestine. | MOHAMED SAEED Pietermaritzburg Investment in ESG is irresponsible It is saddening to note that the Coronation Fund Managers Stewardship Activities Report uncritically embraces the false globalist ideology of ESG (environmental social governance). Proudly the Coronation Fund Managers declare that they 'assess and advocate for improvements in their climate change strategies.' Clearly, despite Coronation's research capacity, they have wittingly or unwittingly allowed themselves to be shepherded by the controlled sirens of pliant science and the mass media in believing that human activity can influence climate change. Uncorrupted science and history have proved that warming periods occurred in millennia before fossil fuels were being widely used as they are today. Uncorrupted science has also shown that temperature changes occur as a result of the inconsistency of the earth's elliptical path around the sun and the slight variations that occur in the earth's tilt. So ignoring true science and history is really inexcusable. But what is worse is the agenda of the climate change globalists. It requires investing in the hugely expensive green deal – lithium powered vehicles, wind turbines and solar panels. It ignores the vast environmental damage the extraction of lithium causes and the unreliability of wind turbines with their terrible toll on bird life. By taking punitive action against what they condemn as carbon polluters like Sasol, the ESG disciples push up the cost of living and exacerbate impoverishment. Of course if they studied the science and history of carbon dioxide they would note that although it comprises less than one percent of the atmosphere, it is vitally important for plant and vegetation growth. The part of the Stewardship Report that shows double standards is Coronation's eye on the possible oil and gas bonanza off the Namibian coast. For all their green commitment, the allure of profitable investment in fossil fuel exploitation beckons. Although the Stewardship Report is silent on the social aspect of ESG, it needs to be pointed out that it concerns DEI – diversity, equity, inclusion. One wonders how that squares with Coronation's commitment to 'responsible investment' when it is a fact that the criterion of merit is excluded in the application of DEI policy. Given US President Donald Trump's administration's recognition of the globalists' green deal for the scam it is, in keeping with their commitment to responsible investment, Coronation's Fund Managers ought to be ditching ESG and focusing on the massive fossil fuel exploitation that is about to take off in the US. | DUNCAN DU BOIS Bluff DAILY NEWS
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The Finance Ghost: The retail lowdown on Lewis, Spar, Pick n Pay and Dis-Chem
There was a flurry of corporate activity in the past week as companies with February and March year-ends looked to get results out before the end of the month. Many companies manage to get results out within two months of the end of the reporting period, with others using the full three months that they are allowed by the JSE. Amongst all the noise, there were several retailers that released important results. As a major source of employment in South Africa and with businesses that everyone can relate to as you can easily visit the stores yourself, this sector is always deserving of attention. Lewis: the pick of the litter The narrative around furniture group Lewis is nothing like it used to be. For years, this was a story of tepid growth and a focus on cost control, with a capital allocation strategy that took full advantage of the benefits of share buybacks. Now, Lewis is behaving like a growth stock with double-digit revenue growth and a colossal jump in Heps of 60.3% for the year ended March 2025. Such has been the extent of share price growth that they didn't do any share buybacks at all in the second half of the financial year! advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Can they keep it up? This is the question on everyone's lips. Somehow, they've managed to boost credit sales (up 12.1% versus cash sales up 3.4%) without sacrificing the quality of the debtors' book. This is a holy grail outcome, as retailers that sell on credit must always consider the benefit of additional sales against the risk of credit losses. So far, so good at Lewis. The market is still wary of how sustainable this growth path is, so investors will be paying a great deal of focus to the next interim period. Spar retreats from Europe – well, mostly With Spar having been through such a terrible time in recent years, it was always unlikely that the pain would end with the disposal of the business in Poland. Things got so bad there that Spar essentially paid someone to take that asset away, with the group incurring debt to recapitalise the business in Poland before selling it for next to nothing. It's the equivalent of begging someone to arrive with a trailer to drag your broken old car off your lawn. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads To add to the headaches, the business in Switzerland had been showing some worrying signs for a while, as food is so expensive in that country that Swiss residents literally cross the border to buy their groceries instead of going to their local retailers like Spar. Risks like these are extremely hard for South Africans to foresee, which is why it's advisable to stick to familiar markets rather than doing business somewhere completely different. Unlike in the case of Poland where they waited until the very end to remove that tumour from the group, Spar has decided to sell the Swiss business. They are also letting go of AWG in southwest England, which came as a surprise as there weren't any obvious concerns around that business. This leaves them with only the businesses in Southern Africa and Ireland going forwards. Of course, there's a difference between simply deciding to sell something and actually getting it sold, so it will be a while until the group is so clean and simple. In the meantime, investors have to suffer through diluted Heps from total operations dropping by between -24% and -34% for the 26 weeks to 28 March 2025. If you look at only the continuing operations, it should be between 0% and -15% lower for the period – still a poor outcome. They have a lot of fixing to do at Spar. Pick n Pay is a reminder that turnarounds are hard Speaking of fixing, there's still a long way to go at Pick n Pay. In fact, with the results for the 53 weeks to 2 March 2025 now out in the wild, the group has noted that they only expect their core Pick n Pay segment to break even by 2028. CEO Sean Summers has agreed to extend his contract until then to help drive that outcome. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads This leaves the group in a situation where the controlling stake in Boxer is doing the heavy lifting, with the plan being to stem the bleeding in Pick n Pay as quickly as they can. There are at last some encouraging signs, like an uptick in like-for-like sales, but Pick n Pay will have to fight every step of the way in a market that is a bloodbath of competition. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads If you dig into the underlying earnings or read the company announcements, just be cautious of getting excited about the trading profit line. Due to silly accounting rules, lease costs (which are obviously substantial for retailers) are actually recognised in net finance costs, which come in below trading profit. In other words, trading profit ignores lease costs, so it's a very flattering view of profitability. This is why Pick n Pay clarifies that their breakeven goal for 2028 is based on trading profit net of lease costs, which is the correct way to look at things. Dis-Chem keeps delivering – but did the market want more? With Dis-Chem's share price closing 6.3% lower on Friday after the release of results for the year ended 28 February 2025, you would be forgiven for thinking that the numbers were weak. Instead, we find Heps growth of 20% and a similar increase in the total dividend for the year. Sure, Dis-Chem is now on a demanding Price:Earnings (P:E) ratio of 24.4x based on latest numbers, but could the market really have been expecting so much more than 20% growth in earnings? In such a case where the share price move isn't easily explained by the earnings, it's best to skip to the outlook section of the announcement to see if there are any clues there. Dis-Chem notes a constrained consumer environment, but we are hearing that story everywhere and it's not exactly anything new. Helpfully, they've also given a sales update for 1 March to 27 May (i.e. about the first quarter of the new financial year) that reflects 8.6% growth in group revenue. This is even better than the 8% full-year growth that they just reported! Comparable pharmacy store revenue has accelerated from 4.1% for FY25 to 4.6% for these past few months. Perhaps the worry was around growth in wholesale revenue to external customers, which slowed down significantly from 22.1% to 13.6%. Still, that really shouldn't be enough to drive a 6.3% drop in the share price. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads This share price dip comes after a strong 30-day performance in the market, so it may be due to profit-taking by punters in response to earnings. Regardless, the underlying business is strong and Dis-Chem has continued to deliver for investors despite the pressure on consumer spending. As local retail businesses go, this is one of the best. DM
