UK retail footfall falls 0.4% in July, BRC urges rate cuts
UK retail footfall fell 0.4 per cent YoY in July, improving from June's 1.8 per cent drop, BRC-Sensormatic data shows. High Streets were down 1.7 per cent, shopping centres 0.3 per cent, while retail parks rose 1.7 per cent. Wales saw growth; other nations fell. BRC's Helen Dickinson urged deeper business rates cuts to revive empty shops, as sentiment stays cautious despite signs of improvement.
High Street footfall fell by 1.7 per cent YoY, easing from a 3 per cent decline in June. Retail Parks recorded a 1.7 per cent YoY increase, rebounding from a 1.1 per cent fall in the previous month. Shopping Centres saw footfall dip by 0.3 per cent YoY, improving from June's 1.6 per cent drop.
Regionally, Wales was the only nation to post growth, with a 0.4 per cent YoY rise in footfall. England saw a 0.3 per cent decline, Scotland dropped 1.3 per cent, and Northern Ireland recorded the steepest fall at 3 per cent, BRC said in a release.
Persistent shop vacancies—with around one in seven stores empty—remain a barrier to revitalising shopping destinations, according to Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the British Retail Consortium. While welcoming the government's plan to reduce business rates, she called for a substantial cut to deliver meaningful benefits for communities and revive empty shops. She also stressed that many smaller retailers depend on larger anchor stores to draw visitors, cautioning that upcoming reforms must ensure no store faces higher costs to avoid potential closures or price increases.
'July failed to bring about the summer boost in shoppers many retailers had hoped for. Instead, footfall dipped in July for the second consecutive year. There were bright spots, with Manchester, Birmingham, and Leeds all showing an improvement in numbers of store visits. Retail parks continued to outperform other destinations with some seeing big brands opening new outlets,' Dickinson said.
'The early-July heatwave, following a scorcher in June, may have lifted leisure footfall more than retail, while one year into a new Labour government, consumer sentiment remains cautious. The underlying footfall trend may be improving, but this is still negative growth on negative 2024 figures - raising the question: are shoppers returning, or simply shopping around more as they try to spend less? Either way, retailers who can offer value, experience, and convenience may be best placed to convert tentative footfall into lasting growth,' Andy Sumpter, retail consultant EMEA for Sensormatic, commented.
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (HU)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
12 hours ago
- Business Standard
UK growth slows in second quarter but comes in higher than expected
Though that was lower than the 0.7 per cent increase in the first quarter of the year, it was ahead of market expectations of only a 0.1 per cent rise AP London Britain's economy slowed down during the second quarter of the year in the face of higher taxes on businesses and global tariff uncertainties, but growth came in higher than anticipated, official figures showed Thursday. The Office for National Statistics said output expanded by 0.3 per cent during the second quarter from the previous three-month period, largely as a result of a strong performance in June. Though that was lower than the 0.7 per cent increase in the first quarter of the year, it was ahead of market expectations of only a 0.1 per cent rise. The bigger than expected increase will be welcome news to the Labour government, which has made improving growth its number one priority since it returned to power in July 2024. Higher growth will also bolster public finances as it leads to higher tax revenues. If growth continues to beat expectations in coming months, Treasury chief Rachel Reeves will be under less pressure to deliver another big tax-raising budget this fall. Reeves said Thursday's figures were positive but added that there is more to do to drive growth in the economy. The British economy, the sixth-largest in the world, has under-performed its long-run average since the global financial crisis of 2008-9. Critics say Reeves is partly responsible for much of the gloomy economic news since Labour returned to power after 14 years, because she was overly downbeat when taking on her role and has increased taxes, particularly on businesses. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
13 hours ago
- Business Standard
Tourist tax on cards? Why London may mimic Paris in charging visitors
Taxes have always been as inevitable as death. In Rachel Reeves' Britain, it's looking like tax increases are now as unavoidable as the grim reaper. The chancellor must find billions of pounds to fill a black hole in the public finances before the autumn budget. So far, she has proven unable to cut public spending thanks to a series of rebellions by Labour MPs. And Keir Starmer's 'defining mission' of making the sums add up by turbocharging growth has also been stymied, partly by Reeves' move to hike national insurance for employers in her last budget. GDP figures out Thursday came in at a relatively anemic 0.3% increase for the second quarter of 2025. That leaves taxes and, having ruled out increasing the burden on 'working people,' Reeves and her team are spending the summer eying other sources of cash. One idea being pushed by some in Westminster is a tourist tax. It's worth taking seriously, both for the potential to raise some much-needed revenue and as a driver of growth. A stroll around the center of London on a warm August day this week confirms there's plenty of scope. Crowds were 10 deep outside Buckingham Palace and, inside, visitors of various ages and nationalities were glued to audio guides as they gawped at the King's riches before stopping off for a cream tea in the cafe. London was the third most popular destination in the world in terms of international arrivals last year and third for tourist dollars spent in 2023. An estimated 43 million foreign visitors are expected this year and are anticipated to collectively spend £33.7 billion ($45.7 billion), according to VisitBritain. That's not including business travelers and domestic visitors, who may or may not be caught by a potential tax, depending on how it's levied. Among the most world's most popular tourist destinations, London is rare in not already levying a tax on hotel stays. From Tokyo to Barcelona, New York to Amsterdam, the additional nightly charge is a familiar, if mildly irritating, sight on hotel bills. As Sadiq Khan, London's mayor who favors a tourist tax, put it, most travelers: 'don't really mind paying the few extra euros' when they visit cities such as Paris and Berlin. Reeves is said to disagree, reportedly squashing proposals by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner to introduce measures in the Devolution Bill, currently going through Parliament, that would allow local authorities to impose a tourist tax. She should reconsider. There are different ways of imposing levies on tourism, but the most common is a nightly charge, often with varying rates depending on the standard of the hotel or as a percentage of the final bill. Assuming a stay at a 4-star accommodation, analysis by the Telegraph suggests the most expensive popular European tourist destination is Amsterdam, at the equivalent of £16 a night, down to £3.40 for Lisbon, with Venice, Paris and Rome coming in at just over £8. Given the sums I saw being handed over for Buckingham Palace-branded merch, including a £10 jar of honey and £17 socks, a similar tax in London seems unlikely to break the bank of the average overseas visitor. The fear for a hospitality industry with fresh memories of Covid is that any tax would inhibit visitor numbers and make alternative, cheaper destinations more attractive. But given most major cities already have a tax, that argument doesn't stack up. In any case, a recent report by the House of Commons Library into the potential impact of a tourist tax pointed out that currency fluctuations and the strength of the pound appear to have little impact on arrival numbers, suggesting that so long as the rate is set at a comparable figure to other cities, it's unlike to put travelers off. What about the effect on destinations that may prove less of a lure for visitors? England's beleaguered seaside resorts would be particularly loathe to adopt any measure that would further put off holiday makers. The solution to that is to make a tax optional, with local authorities choosing whether one might suit their particular local circumstances. That's the model favored by mayors including Manchester's Andy Burnham, who I discussed tourist taxes with recently, as well as Khan and Steve Rotheram in Liverpool. Local councils across London are supportive, along with the Institute for Government and the County Councils Network, although the trade body UK Hospitality described such a move as 'deeply misguided,' pointing out that Britain charges a higher rate of VAT than most countries, which is included in hotel bills. Maybe so. But Manchester and Liverpool have already taken advantage of a loophole in the law to introduce hotel charges as part of scheme allowing hotels to band together in 'Business Improvement Districts' to raise levies, without any impact on visitor numbers, according to analysis by the journal Tourism Management. Manchester's £1 nightly fee is estimated to have raised around £2.8 million in its first year, but the scheme is voluntary for hotels and limited in geographical scope and the mayors want to go further. Scotland has adopted similar powers and Wales is expected to follow suit next year. Given how skewed international travel is toward the capital, which attracts more than half of all visitors to the UK, a tourist tax would have to be be introduced in London to have a significant impact on the nation's finances. That seems fair. Londoners love tourists — but visitors shouldn't get a free ride. As protests in cities around the world highlight, locals suffer from the impact of tourism, in terms of congestion and the added strain on services. Buckingham Palace's coffers may benefit, but Londoners go uncompensated for tourists drinking their water supply, walking their well-lit streets, leaving litter or slowing down their commute. A recent YouGov poll found 45% of Londoners would support a tourist tax compared with 37% who opposed — this feels more tolerant than the Barceloni, who have taken to shooting visitors with water pistols. Many taxes, including those in Manchester, are designed to be reinvested in the tourist industry, making them a potential driver of the precious growth Reeves is seeking. A broad definition of what constitutes the industry, such as allowing spending on transport that tourists also utilize, would free the chancellor up to divert money elsewhere. And here's another idea. Unusually for a global city, most of London's leading tourist attractions (although not Buckingham Palace) are free. That means tourists get to glory in the treasures of the British Museum, the National Gallery, the National History Museum and the rest without paying a penny. How about introducing fees for non-residents, as New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art does, with locals allowed to 'pay as you wish' (they must produce a credit card with a New York billing address to qualify)? The savings could be pocketed by the Treasury in terms of reduced grants to the nation's cultural institutions — the British Museum alone received £43.2 million in government funding last year. Reeves is right to be leery of imposing any more pain on a hospitality industry already struggling with the national insurance and minimum wage increases. But by being smart about how a levy is introduced — limiting it to areas such as London and the wealthy tourists who can afford it — estimates are that she could raise £500 million a year (on a nightly bed tax of £12). That won't fill her budgetary black hole — but it would be a start.
New Indian Express
13 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Employment subsidy in textiles policy increased in Odisha
BHUBANESWAR: The state government has amended provisions of the Odisha Apparel and Technical Textiles Policy-2022 to provide more incentives to new industrial units in the sector through employment cost subsidy. The Handloom, Textile and Handicraft department on Wednesday informed that new industrial units will be eligible for a monthly incentive of Rs 7,000 per female worker and Rs 6,000 per male worker for a period of five years, starting from the commencement of commercial production. Prior to the amendment, the incentive was Rs 6,000 per female worker and Rs 5,000 per male worker. Officials said due to revision of minimum rate of wages for unskilled, semi-skilled, skilled and highly-skilled categories by the Labour & ESI department, these labour-intensive units are facing various financial challenges. The enhanced incentive is a necessary measure to offset the challenges and ensure the state remains a viable and attractive destination for investment.
