Over-the-counter health test results available on NHS app
Penny McCormick, chief executive of MyHealthChecked, said: "Our partnerships with PKB and UK retailers are integral in helping us support customers to make informed decisions about their health, with the aim of living healthier, and hopefully, for longer.
"For the first time, customers taking one of our at-home blood or DNA tests will be able to link their test results into their patient record and access these via the NHS app."
The integration is now being piloted in Wales through Hywel Dda and Swansea Bay University Health Boards, as well as kidney centres in north Wales and Cardiff.
Martin Bevan, group medical director for Neath Port Talbot and Singleton hospitals, said: "We have listened to our patients who have told us they want to feel empowered to manage their conditions.
"Swansea Bay patient portal (PKB) improves the ability of patients to be involved in their own care and have a meaningful dialogue with their clinicians."
The MyHealthChecked tests, available at selected Boots stores and online, cover areas such as thyroid function, cholesterol, healthy weight, vitamins, and food intolerances.
Samples are processed in UK laboratories, and results are screened before being shared through the platform.
PKB recently achieved full integration of GP data across England.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Six in 10 Brits claim to dislike foods they've never even tried
Six in 10 Brits claim to dislike foods they've never even tried, according to research. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A poll of 2,000 adults found they have an average of eight foods they refuse to eat, with five of those being ones they've never tasted. Sushi, black pudding, and kimchi are among the foods people most commonly to dislike without trying first, along with plant-based alternatives to cheese and anchovies. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Tofu, liver, and plant-based equivalents to milk also featured in the top 10. Despite this, 65 per cent proudly claim to have adventurous palates, while 74 per cent said they are willing to try new foods. The study was commissioned by Boursin Plant-based, which has partnered with TV foodie Frenchman Fred Sirieix to investigate food biases by hosting blind tastings at food festivals throughout the summer. Fred Sirieix said: 'Brits claim to eagerly embrace culinary trends and global flavours, but they can be particularly prejudiced when it comes to certain foods, and this is one of the biggest barriers to discovery. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Many ingredients including plant-based alternatives to cheese have huge negative preconceptions. 'But despite many claiming they'd be able to differentiate plant-based from dairy, even the most discerning foodies were fooled by this plant-based alternative to cheese when we let taste do the talking.' Fred Sirieix puts Brits taste buds to the test at food festival | Ben Stevens/PinPep 'Brits can be prejudiced when it comes to certain foods' The study found that 65 per cent of adults admit to judging food negatively before tasting, yet 53 per cent change their minds after trying – a reminder to stay open-minded. The biggest motivators for trying new flavours were blind taste tests or learning about a food's health benefits, each cited by 21 per cent of respondents. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Six in 10 said they would be honest if served something they didn't want to eat, with 32 per cent then refusing it outright, while 28 per cent would at least try a small bite. Despite all of the above, only 17 per cent actually admitted to being a fussy eater, according to data. It also emerged 67 per cent were adamant they'd be able to tell the difference between dairy and plant-based alternatives to cheese. With 46 per cent willing to give it a go if it tasted as good as the 'real thing'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Fred Sirieix, on behalf of Boursin, added: 'People are very clearly confident in their ability to tell dairy from plant-based alternatives but as we saw from experience, this was not actually the case. 'In reality, less than 10 per cent of people at the Foodies festival were able to differentiate between Boursin plant-based and dairy. 'It just goes to show – there's a whole world of flavours out there waiting to be explored if you're brave enough. 'Even ingredients you might dismiss because of previous experiences, judgements, or assumptions can still surprise you if prepared in the right way. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'So, embrace the challenge and let the taste do the talking.' Brits sampled Boursin's new plant-based alternative to cheese | Ben Stevens/PinPep Top 20 foods Brits refuse to eat without trying: Sushi Black pudding Kimchi Plant-based alternatives to cheese Anchovies Tofu Blue cheese Duck Liver Plant-based alternatives to milk Prawns Olives Asparagus Spicy curry Kale Pickles Beetroot Coriander Brussel sprouts Mushrooms
Rhyl Journal
3 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
‘Contradiction' in figures makes health experts question NHS data
Experts suggest that more patients are being referred for treatment than leaving the waiting list, despite the overall waiting list coming down. Analysis found that in May, for every 100 referrals for pre-planned care, only 86 patient 'pathways' were complete – a scenario that would expect to see the waiting list getting bigger. But the official figures for May, published last month, show that the waiting list for routine hospital treatment in England had dropped to its lowest level for more than two years. 'There appears to be a contradiction in the data,' analysts from the Nuffield Trust think tank said. Writing a piece for part of the Quality Watch programme, the experts claim that an increase in NHS activity alone has not been enough to cause the reduction in the waiting list. Their new report examines so-called 'unreported removals', which occur when someone is taken off the waiting list for a reason other than that person having received their treatment that month. The report says that over the last two financial years there has been an average of 244,500 unreported removals a month. Though the waiting list has started to go down, unreported removals have gone up, they add. Officials from the Department and Health and Social Care insist that over the last 12 months, the number and percentage of unreported removals are lower than 2019. The new report points out that some of these unreported removals will represent patients that did get treatment but it was not recorded properly at the time. Another issue could be problems with NHS software and data management processes. The authors of the review wrote: 'Improving the data quality of waiting lists is important to ensure that people who should not be on the list, like people who have been treated privately or left the country, are no longer counted among those waiting to be seen. 'However, accusations of gaming the validation process, by removing referrals from the waiting list inappropriately without treatment, are likely to persist in the absence of transparency about what actions the unreported removals materially represent. 'The NHS is delivering more planned care, but still not enough to keep up with demand. 'The planned care that is reported is not enough to explain the reduction in the elective waiting list, and the publicly available data provides little more insight.' Officials estimate that 85% of the reduction in the waiting list is because of increased NHS 'activity' and suggest that 15% is because of unreported removals. According to the latest NHS figures, an estimated 7.36 million treatments were waiting to be carried out at the end of May, relating to just under 6.23 million patients, down from 7.39 million treatments and just over 6.23 million patients at the end of April. These are the lowest totals since March 2023 for treatments and April 2023 for patients. The list hit a record high in September 2023, with 7.77 million treatments and 6.50 million patients. The size of the list had been on an upward trend for much of the last 10 years, passing three million treatments in 2014, four million in 2017, five million in 2021 and seven million in 2022. In February 2020, the last full month before the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, the list stood at 4.57 million treatments. The authors of the latest review add: 'The information available in the public domain is insufficient for independent scrutiny of the elective waiting list, and consequently for holding government to account. 'Removals from the waiting list should be described in publicly available data in a meaningful way; the current process is unduly obscure. 'Until more transparent reporting is provided, accountability around unreported removals remains impossible and the planned care waiting list will continue to be a misleading indicator of how the NHS is dealing with demand.' It comes as the NHS in England is to reveal its latest waiting list figures on Thursday. Commenting on the analysis, an NHS England spokesperson said: 'NHS staff have made significant progress in reducing waiting lists in the last year – down by more than 260,000 since June 2024 – and this is driven by the fact that 2,300 more patients are receiving treatment every day compared to last year.' 'While the validation process has a small impact on the overall waiting list – as is made crystal clear in our published monthly waiting list data – it's right we regularly clinically review those waiting so hospitals can prioritise patients more accurately and deploy their resources efficiently.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson added: 'Our drive to clear the huge waiting list backlog we inherited includes making sure all patients are getting the right treatment as quickly as possible. 'That's why we are supporting GPs to seek specialist advice before making referrals, and screening existing waiting lists to check that all patients need to be on there – freeing up capacity to get more people seen more quickly. 'This is one element of our wider work to cut waiting times for patients and improve productivity through our Plan for Change, through which we have already delivered over four million extra appointments and cut the waiting list by 260,000.'
Leader Live
3 hours ago
- Leader Live
‘Contradiction' in figures makes health experts question NHS data
Experts suggest that more patients are being referred for treatment than leaving the waiting list, despite the overall waiting list coming down. Analysis found that in May, for every 100 referrals for pre-planned care, only 86 patient 'pathways' were complete – a scenario that would expect to see the waiting list getting bigger. But the official figures for May, published last month, show that the waiting list for routine hospital treatment in England had dropped to its lowest level for more than two years. 'There appears to be a contradiction in the data,' analysts from the Nuffield Trust think tank said. Writing a piece for part of the Quality Watch programme, the experts claim that an increase in NHS activity alone has not been enough to cause the reduction in the waiting list. Their new report examines so-called 'unreported removals', which occur when someone is taken off the waiting list for a reason other than that person having received their treatment that month. The report says that over the last two financial years there has been an average of 244,500 unreported removals a month. Though the waiting list has started to go down, unreported removals have gone up, they add. Officials from the Department and Health and Social Care insist that over the last 12 months, the number and percentage of unreported removals are lower than 2019. The new report points out that some of these unreported removals will represent patients that did get treatment but it was not recorded properly at the time. Another issue could be problems with NHS software and data management processes. The authors of the review wrote: 'Improving the data quality of waiting lists is important to ensure that people who should not be on the list, like people who have been treated privately or left the country, are no longer counted among those waiting to be seen. 'However, accusations of gaming the validation process, by removing referrals from the waiting list inappropriately without treatment, are likely to persist in the absence of transparency about what actions the unreported removals materially represent. 'The NHS is delivering more planned care, but still not enough to keep up with demand. 'The planned care that is reported is not enough to explain the reduction in the elective waiting list, and the publicly available data provides little more insight.' Officials estimate that 85% of the reduction in the waiting list is because of increased NHS 'activity' and suggest that 15% is because of unreported removals. According to the latest NHS figures, an estimated 7.36 million treatments were waiting to be carried out at the end of May, relating to just under 6.23 million patients, down from 7.39 million treatments and just over 6.23 million patients at the end of April. These are the lowest totals since March 2023 for treatments and April 2023 for patients. The list hit a record high in September 2023, with 7.77 million treatments and 6.50 million patients. The size of the list had been on an upward trend for much of the last 10 years, passing three million treatments in 2014, four million in 2017, five million in 2021 and seven million in 2022. In February 2020, the last full month before the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, the list stood at 4.57 million treatments. The authors of the latest review add: 'The information available in the public domain is insufficient for independent scrutiny of the elective waiting list, and consequently for holding government to account. 'Removals from the waiting list should be described in publicly available data in a meaningful way; the current process is unduly obscure. 'Until more transparent reporting is provided, accountability around unreported removals remains impossible and the planned care waiting list will continue to be a misleading indicator of how the NHS is dealing with demand.' It comes as the NHS in England is to reveal its latest waiting list figures on Thursday. Commenting on the analysis, an NHS England spokesperson said: 'NHS staff have made significant progress in reducing waiting lists in the last year – down by more than 260,000 since June 2024 – and this is driven by the fact that 2,300 more patients are receiving treatment every day compared to last year.' 'While the validation process has a small impact on the overall waiting list – as is made crystal clear in our published monthly waiting list data – it's right we regularly clinically review those waiting so hospitals can prioritise patients more accurately and deploy their resources efficiently.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson added: 'Our drive to clear the huge waiting list backlog we inherited includes making sure all patients are getting the right treatment as quickly as possible. 'That's why we are supporting GPs to seek specialist advice before making referrals, and screening existing waiting lists to check that all patients need to be on there – freeing up capacity to get more people seen more quickly. 'This is one element of our wider work to cut waiting times for patients and improve productivity through our Plan for Change, through which we have already delivered over four million extra appointments and cut the waiting list by 260,000.'
