logo
Worsening Poverty And Social Misery In New Zealand

Worsening Poverty And Social Misery In New Zealand

Scoop3 days ago

Last week New Zealand's Treasury released a Child Poverty Report, which forecast that the proportion of children living in poverty will increase from 17.7 percent in 2024 to 18.4 percent in 2029.
The report was released along with the National Party-led government's austerity budget, which starves public services, while cutting workers' wages, reducing government contributions to retirement savings and barring thousands of unemployed teenagers from welfare.
The government is seeking to solve the worsening economic crisis by ramping up the exploitation of the working class, while protecting the fortunes of the super-rich.
Asked by a TVNZ interviewer why the government had not done more in the budget to address child poverty, Finance Minister Nicola Willis declared: 'there is not actually a magic money tree that allows me to show such generosity that I can solve every problem at once.'
Year after year, successive Labour and National Party governments have trotted out this refrain, even as they have handed tens of billions of dollars to the corporate elite through tax cuts, subsidies and bailouts, and spent billions on the armed forces.
The National-led coalition government—with the support of the opposition Labour Party—will spend an extra $13 billion over the next four years as part of its plan to double the size of the military and integrate New Zealand further into US-led imperialist wars.
Sarita Divis of the Child Poverty Action Group, a non-government organisation, pointed out in a New Zealand Herald column last month that the $3 billion annual increase in defence spending is exactly what the Treasury itself estimated it would cost to halve the level of child poverty by 2028.
The government's Child Poverty Report actually understates the extent of child poverty. Its data is more than a year old, covering the period from July 2023 to June 2024. Over the past year, the number of people in full-time work has fallen by 45,000 as unemployment increased from 4 to 5.1 percent, and living costs have continued to rise while wages stagnated.
Moreover, the government defines poverty as less than 50 percent of the median household income after paying for housing costs—an extremely low bar.
While the percentage of children below this poverty line was unchanged in the year to June 2024, the number of children living in 'material hardship'—the poorest of the poor—increased by almost a third between 2022 and mid-2024, from 10.5 percent to 13.4 percent. 'Material hardship' is defined as lacking access to six or more 'essentials,' such as decent housing, heating, healthy food, warm clothes and shoes, etc.
Another survey, by the Ministry of Health, found that last year 27 percent of children 'lived in households where food ran out often or sometimes,' up from 21 percent the year before.
Numerous reports illustrate an increasingly severe social crisis. The Christchurch Press wrote on May 22: 'Some families have moved into one heated room to keep warm, while others are taking out loans to pay their power bills as costs rise and temperatures drop.'
It noted that last year, 'Consumer NZ estimated 140,000 households had to take out a loan to pay their power bill, and a further 38,000 households had their power cut at least once as they couldn't pay their bill.'
In Wellington, the Post reported on May 10 that 'Food charities are facing an unprecedented surge in demand from struggling middle income earners.' In February, one soup kitchen 'served 7930 meals, 1200 more than across the same month in 2024.'
Nationwide 500,000 people, one tenth of the population, relies on food banks on a regular basis.
Homelessness continues to become more visible in every major centre. The government has boasted about reducing the number of emergency housing places from 4,000 in September 2023 to around 500 in December 2024—despite the 2023 census finding that 112,496 people, or 2.3 percent of the population, are 'severely housing deprived' (up from 99,462 people in 2018).
According to government data cited by the Press, 'the number of emergency housing special needs grants, which fund temporary accommodation for people in need, have dropped from 8873 in July 2023, to just 1338 in March 2025.'
Growing social misery and hopelessness is reflected in an unprecedented surge in the use of dangerous drugs. In Northland, the poorest region, as well as Southland and Otago, wastewater testing shows methamphetamine use has tripled in the past year. Nationwide, the amount of meth consumed between October and December 2024 was 78 percent higher than the average over the previous 12 months.
There is also a profound mental health crisis, particularly affecting young people. A May 14 report by UNICEF revealed that New Zealand had the worst youth suicide rate of the 36 countries in the OECD, with 17.1 suicides per 100,000 people aged 15 to 19 (based on data from 2018–20).
UNICEF appealed to the government to increase welfare payments for families with children and to address food insecurity by expanding the provision of free school lunches. The government has made cruel cuts in both areas.
The government has deflected blame for young people's poor mental health onto social media. It is seeking to ban under-16-year-olds from social media platforms. This has nothing to do with protecting children but is aimed at strengthening state control over the internet and stopping teenagers from accessing political material, especially socialist articles explaining the real causes of inequality, poverty and war.
While the Labour Party has criticised the latest budget cuts, this is entirely hypocritical. Homelessness, child poverty and the cost of living all became worse during the 2017–2023 Labour government, which is why it lost the 2023 election in a landslide. Labour transferred tens of billions of dollars to the super-rich through corporate bailouts, subsidies and quantitative easing measures during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Last year's National Business Review Rich List, profiling more than 100 of the country's richest individuals and families, showed that their collective wealth increased from $72.59 billion to $95.68 billion in just one year. More than half of this figure, over $50 billion, was held by just 10 billionaires.
This enormous wealth, accumulated by exploiting the labour of working people, must be expropriated, along with the money being wasted on war, so that it can be used to eliminate poverty, expand schools and hospitals and meet all other social needs.
The task facing workers and young people is to reject all capitalist parties, including Labour and the Greens, and the union bureaucracy which has suppressed any resistance from workers to the government's attacks, and to take up the fight for the socialist reorganisation of society.
By Tom Peters, Socialist Equality Group
30 May 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jacinda Ardern on a lifetime of feeling 'never quite good enough'
Jacinda Ardern on a lifetime of feeling 'never quite good enough'

1News

time2 hours ago

  • 1News

Jacinda Ardern on a lifetime of feeling 'never quite good enough'

Days away from learning if she would be New Zealand's next Prime Minister, 37-year-old Jacinda Ardern was wrestling with insecurities and a few odd physical symptoms when her friend handed her a pregnancy test. In an extract from her memoir, out today, she reflects on that unforgettable evening. I was in a standard bathroom. The kind you'd find in a 1950s timber home just about anywhere in New Zealand, with a dark linoleum floor and small handbasin – enough of a bowl to wash your hands, but not enough to contain all the water while you do it. I had pulled the lid down over the toilet and was sitting on top of the hard plastic. Waiting. My heart beat a little faster than usual. "The question for me was, could I keep going and do the job well?" – Watch more on this story on TVNZ+ On the other side of the door, I could hear my friend Julia moving around her kitchen – roasting pans hitting the side of the sink, plates clinking against one another as she stacked them. She was likely scraping away the remains of yet another dinner I had only pushed around my plate – this time, chicken with roasted kūmara, pumpkin, potato and fresh green beans. Julia was an excellent cook. I was just a nervous eater. Especially now. ADVERTISEMENT For the past seven weeks, I had been living on a diet of cheese, crackers and my mother's homemade bliss balls – giant energy-laden lumps of pureed dates, cashews and chia seeds that had a tendency to take up residency in my front teeth. That might be fine if these golf ball–sized snacks were being eaten in the privacy of my own home, but I had been eating them on the road in the middle of a campaign. A campaign to determine whether I would become the fortieth prime minister of New Zealand. Weeks had passed since election night, and I still couldn't answer that question. But at this particular moment, sitting in Julia's bathroom, that wasn't the question I was waiting to answer. I glanced down at my phone. Just a few more minutes. That night at Julia's was meant to be a break. A chance to catch my breath while my partner, Clarke, was away filming a TV show up north. I still had on my black-and-white sneakers, Lycra leggings and purple hoodie. As soon as I'd dragged my overnight bag through the door of my friend's home, I'd changed out of my work clothes. Then she and I had walked through the park near her house in the cool air of the late afternoon. I couldn't face another night in my small studio apartment in the city, the one I lived in when doing government work in Wellington. Not after the long days of negotiating and waiting. On election night, both of New Zealand's two major political parties, the conservative National Party and the progressive Labour Party that I led, finished without a clear majority. That meant neither leader could form a government yet. For one of us to win and become prime minister, we'd need to build a coalition with a smaller party called New Zealand First. And so, for the past eight days, both parties had been in talks to determine whom they would pick. For all the back-and-forth in the negotiations, for all the discussion about which policies we would implement and which we wouldn't, the calculation was actually simple. Either New Zealand First would choose the National Party, or they would choose us. After every meeting, I would leave with pages of notes, but it was the body language I was watching. A nod of the head. Eye contact. Something, anything, that would tell me what their choice would be. But there was nothing. The media diligently reported on the talks each night. They, too, had no insights on what might happen, and so kept repeating what I already felt deeply: 'the stakes are high'. But the stakes felt huge throughout the campaign. After all, I was thirty-seven years old. I had been the leader of my party for less than eighty days. And when the campaign started, we had been trailing by more than twenty points. We were never meant to win. And I was never meant to be leader. I pulled at my leggings, fidgeting. Surely time's up. I glanced down at my phone again. One more minute. My whole short life I had grappled with the idea that I was never quite good enough. That at any moment I would be caught short, and that meant no matter what I was doing, I had no business doing it. That's why I believed mine was a personality better suited to work behind the scenes. I was the worker who quietly and steadily got things done. I wasn't tough enough to become an actual politician. My elbows weren't sharp enough; my skin was too thin. I was idealistic and sensitive. ADVERTISEMENT Becoming a member of Parliament, I was certain, had been happenstance. But it turned out my fear of failing, of letting people down, was overshadowed by a grinding sense of responsibility. And so, as unlikely as it had once seemed, I became the deputy leader of my party, then leader, and now, possibly, the next prime minister. By now, the noise in the kitchen had stopped. Julia was probably sitting back at the dining room table, busying herself until my return. Julia was younger than me but also maternalistic, with a background in health care. Our conversations always started with her asking me the same question: 'How are you feeling?' Today, when I told her that I didn't feel quite right and described a few unusual symptoms, she had gone out and bought a pregnancy test. At the end of dinner, she had pulled it out of a shopping bag as if it were an after-dinner mint. 'Just in case,' she had said. And now that test was sitting on the edge of the sink, waiting for its big reveal. I looked down at the timer on my phone. 25 seconds, 23 seconds, 21. I was days away from learning if I would run a country, and now, as I sat in a bathroom in Tawa, New Zealand, I was seconds away from learning if I would do it while having a baby. I closed my eyes and lifted my head to the ceiling. Then I took a deep breath, opened my eyes and looked down. ADVERTISEMENT Extracted with permission from A Different Kind of Power, by Jacinda Ardern (published by Penguin Random House New Zealand) RRP $59.99, available in hardback, ebook and audiobook.

Chris Bishop Frustrated By 'Politicised' Stan Walker Aotearoa Music Awards Performance
Chris Bishop Frustrated By 'Politicised' Stan Walker Aotearoa Music Awards Performance

Scoop

time2 hours ago

  • Scoop

Chris Bishop Frustrated By 'Politicised' Stan Walker Aotearoa Music Awards Performance

Senior government Minister Chris Bishop says he was frustrated by the politicisation of Stan Walker's performance at the Aotearoa Music Awards, when he said "what a load of crap". During Stan Walker's performance of Māori Ki te Ao, performers took to the stage with flags displaying Toitū Te Tiriti, a movement borne out of opposition to the Treaty Principles Bill and other government legislation. Bishop, who was in attendance, was seen criticising the performance, and has since said he should have kept the comments to himself. On Tuesday, Bishop told reporters his comments were not directed specifically at Walker. "I was frustrated and annoyed by the sort of overt politicking around it," he said. "It's not about Stan Walker, I actually quite like Stan Walker, actually quite liked his performance. It was just the sort of politicisation of it that frustrated me," he said. Bishop singled out the Toitū Te Tiriti "banners and paraphernalia" as the source of his frustration, not the performance itself. He said he would not be apologising to Walker. "It's not clear what I'd be apologising for." His comments led to backlash from other performers, including Don McGlashan, who was seen on video confronting Bishop. The minister said the irony was he was a "huge" Don McGlashan fan. "I love the Mutton Birds. But Don McGlashan is a noteworthy non-supporter of the National Party. People might remember the 2008 election, in which he expressed some frustration at 'Anchor Me', which is a great Mutton Birds tune, being used by TVNZ on the election night coverage," Bishop said. "His political views are quite well-known, but look it is what it is, he's entitled to his views in the same way I'm entitled to mine." Arts, culture and heritage minister Paul Goldsmith, who was also at the event, brushed off whether the performance was controversial. "There's always controversy at music awards. It goes without saying," he said. Māori Crown relations minister Tama Potaka said he disagreed with Bishop's comments, but they were for Bishop to respond to. "I absolutely love Stan Walker and his commitment to te reo, and the mahi that he does particularly in his engagement with Ratana, the hāhi. I don't agree with minister Bishop's comments, however those are a matter for him to comment on," Potaka said. Labour's Māori Development spokesperson Willie Jackson said Bishop, as a music fan, should know that music had always been political. "He should know music better than anyone. Look around the world, people have been doing that for years. Whether it's Bob Marley, Bono, whatever, it's been happening, it's not like something new. He should talk to his Shihad heroes, cos the lead singer there's got pretty good politics too." The Prime Minister told Morning Report he was comfortable with Bishop's response, and had spoken to him over the weekend. "I just got his side of the story about what he said and it was exactly as reported. He corrected it well before I got to him... he just acknowledged he should have kept his thoughts to himself," Christopher Luxon said. "The bottom line is your listeners aren't losing a lot of sleep over what a politician sharing his opinion on some music was about." Labour leader Chris Hipkins said Bishop's behaviour was disappointing, but it was for the Prime Minister to bring his ministers in line. "You've got to remember when you're a government minister that you're on public display all of the time."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store