PETA calls to end Groundhog Day tradition, replace Punxsutawney Phil with 'vegan weather reveal cake'
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is calling to ax a beloved American tradition – and to replace it with what it calls a "delicious" vegan substitution.
The animal rights nonprofit organization is seeking to replace the Groundhog Day tradition with a vegan "weather reveal" cake. PETA announced the proposal in a news release on Jan. 20.
"PETA will deliver a delicious 'Weather Reveal' vegan cake each Groundhog Day in perpetuity if [the Punxsutawney Groundhog Club] agrees to let Punxsutawney Phil and his family retire to a reputable sanctuary, a move that will earn the outfit kudos from wildlife fans," the press release stated.
PETA also published pun-filled letter to the Punxsutawney Groundhog Club, arguing that the groundhog's annual duties were "no piece of cake" for him.
"Groundhogs are shy prey animals who, when allowed, actively avoid humans," the letter detailed. "Yet, year after year, Phil is transported to Gobler's Knob, whisked on stage, and subjected to a noisy announcer, screaming crowds, and flashing lights against all his natural instincts."
Groundhog Day Quiz! How Well Do You Know The Facts About This Unique Day?
Read On The Fox News App
"If approached in his natural habitat, he would run away in fear, not volunteer to live year-round in captivity, unable to do anything that's natural and important to him like hibernate or burrow – just to be a town's once-a-year fake meteorologist."
In a statement, PETA president Ingrid Newkirk also called for Groundhog Day officials to "sprinkle some happiness" into Phil's life by letting him retire.
"When allowed to be themselves, groundhogs avoid humans, create intricate networks of underground burrows, communicate with one another, and even climb trees, but poor Phil is denied all of that for a tired old gimmick," Newkirk argued.
PETA told Fox News Digital that it has not received a response from the Punxsutawney Groundhog Club, and called for the organization to develop "kinder, innovative" traditions that make animals happy.
Peta Suggests Replacing Punxsutawney Phil Groundhog With Giant Gold Coin: 'Cruel Annual Gimmick Is Abusive'
"Our letter suggests the groundhog club demonstrate true respect for Phil and set a wonderful example for how everyone can move beyond 'Groundhog' Day by replacing him with a delicious vegan 'Weather Reveal' cake that revelers can enjoy as an alternative to exploiting wild animals," a spokesperson explained. "The time is long overdue."
PETA has called for Groundhog Day alternatives in the past, including offering to send a giant gold coin to replace the animal in 2024.
Groundhog Day has been celebrated in the U.S. since 1887. Thousands of observers flock to Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania, every year on Feb. 2 to see Phil predict the weather.
Tradition dictates that if Phil sees his shadow at daybreak and runs away, six more weeks of winter will follow. However, if he has no shadow, spring will arrive sooner.
In 2024, Phil announced that he did not see his shadow, marking a rare prediction for an early spring.
Fox News Digital reached out to PETA and the Punxsutawney Groundhog Club for comment.
Fox News Digital's Ashlyn Messier contributed to this report.Original article source: PETA calls to end Groundhog Day tradition, replace Punxsutawney Phil with 'vegan weather reveal cake'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Frasier' star David Hyde Pierce honors Reagan's 'turning point' in Alzheimer's awareness
NEW YORK CITY, N.Y. - Fresh off of his performance at the Tonys, "Frasier" star and Broadway actor David Hyde Pierce emceed a gala to raise awareness for Alzheimer's disease in New York City on Monday, a cause close to his heart. Pierce led the cast of Broadway's "Pirates of Penzance," which was nominated for best revival of a musical, in an entertaining performance at Sunday's Tony Awards. But the theater is only one of Pierce's passions. The actor served as the Master of Ceremonies for the CaringKind Gala to help raise awareness of Alzheimer's on Monday evening at Cipriani restaurant in Midtown Manhattan. Pierce has a personal connection to the cause because his father suffered from dementia and his grandfather battled Alzheimer's. Ahead of his hosting duties, Pierce tried to dispel some misconceptions about Alzheimer's, as well as offered advice on how loved ones can still make the effort to stay connected to those affected by it. "I think it's always miraculous, what people sense, and feel, and know, beyond what we can imagine," Pierce told Fox News Digital. First Blood Test For Alzheimer's Diagnosis Cleared By Fda "You know, I'm old enough to have experienced that many times," he continued. "It's a privilege to be with someone making that final transition and in that moment, you just don't know. You have faith and hope that just your presence there is enough. It's just – they may not be able to respond in the way you're used to them responding, but that doesn't mean they're not listening." Read On The Fox News App Alzheimer's has been portrayed onscreen over the years in movies like "The Notebook" and "The Father," and Pierce said some of these examples have helped those afflicted "feel more seen." "One thing I've noticed, there are so many wonderful, accurate, compassionate portrayals now, onstage, on film, and it's a tribute to the commitment of the actors, and the writers and directors," he said. "It's also a reflection of how prevalent these diseases are, that more and more people know about them." CaringKind CEO Eleonora C. Tornatore-Mikesh offered the 2014 film "Still Alice" as another accurate portrayal of Alzheimer's, noting that her foundation even worked with Julianne Moore while she was prepping for the movie. Moore plays a renowned professor who discovers she's been diagnosed with early-onset Alzheimer's. Tornatore-Mikesh said the impact of the film was far-reaching. "Definitely pop culture always helps increase concern and awareness," she said. Alzheimer's Disease Could Be Prevented By Antiviral Drug Already On Market The late President Ronald Reagan is often credited with helping bring the disease into the American public consciousness. In November 1994, a few years after he left office, he wrote a heartfelt letter to the American people revealing his diagnosis, hoping he would encourage more people to undergo testing and become more informed. "So now, we feel it is important to share it with you," Reagan wrote in part. "In opening our hearts, we hope this might promote greater awareness of this condition. Perhaps it will encourage a clearer understanding of the individuals and families who are affected by it." "At the moment, I feel just fine," he added. "I intend to live the remainder of the years God gives me on this earth doing the things I have always done. I will continue to share life's journey with my beloved Nancy and my family. I plan to enjoy the great outdoors and stay in touch with my friends and supporters." Pierce praised Reagan and his family for being so candid about his struggles. "President Reagan speaking publicly about his Alzheimer's was one of many turning points," Pierce said. "And not only President Reagan, but consequently, his daughter Maureen was a tireless fighter and advocate. And I had the great privilege of working by her side. At that time, I was in California too. We went to Washington together and fought for more funding for research. She was a real hero and inspiration to me." Reagan And Alzheimer's – What The Public Doesn't Know About The 40Th President Tornatore-Mikesh also praised Reagan for his work in bringing the disease to the forefront. "One hundred percent," she said. "Nancy Reagan and Ronald Reagan and their entire family, 'til this day, are one of the beacon families that have helped raise concern and awareness." An estimated 7 million Americans are living with Alzheimer's disease as of 2023, according to the Alzheimer's Association. In May, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared the first-ever blood test to detect Alzheimer's, announcing its approval of the first in-vitro diagnostic device, Lumipulse. The method is intended for early Alzheimer's detection in adult patients over the age of 55 who are exhibiting signs and symptoms of the disease and is considered a breakthrough in patient care. Reagan concluded his 1994 letter by thanking Americans for allowing him the honor of serving as president. "I now begin the journey that will lead me into the sunset of my life," he wrote. "I know that for America there will always be a bright dawn ahead."Original article source: 'Frasier' star David Hyde Pierce honors Reagan's 'turning point' in Alzheimer's awareness
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Materialists' Is Nothing Like Your Average Rom-Com
Midway through screening 'Materialists,' the follow-up to Celine Song's Oscar-nominated 'Past Lives,' I realize I have the A24 romantic comedy all wrong — partly because the movie is a bit too serious to fit, say, the Nora Ephron standard of rom-coms. Another reason is that the film's vague synopsis hardly does justice to the poignant commentary you discover at the heart of it. In 'Materialists,' a young, ambitious New York City matchmaker finds herself caught between Mr. Right and an imperfect ex. That premise plays out clearly in the film's glittering trailer, which stars Dakota Johnson, Pedro Pascal and Chris Evans in a simmering love triangle that looks like it would swell to the typical dramatic stakes most would expect from a romantic drama. At least that's what I thought. But after watching 'Materialists,' I found that a far more compelling narrative side-stepped that familiar trope — one that thoughtfully explores the perils of love and relationships, as well as the shift in today's dating culture. That was a smart move on Song's part, saving the film's strongest elements for the full viewing experience (something I wish more contemporary movie trailers would do). The initial draw of 'Materialists' obviously lies in its charming lead cast and the allure of a new American romance that's been grossly missing from theaters. However, the deeper story that unfolds within it is just as engrossing, and more importantly, subversive to the romance genre, offering profound self-reflection in addition to the anticipated happily-ever-after. 'Materialists' follows lowly paid matchmaker Lucy (Johnson) on her quest to help her elite New York City clientele of moneyed professionals find their perfect love matches (a storyline hatched from Song's own stint as a matchmaker). Lucy's process is something like negotiating a corporate deal, which requires noting every pesky detail her clients are looking for in a prospective partner — the ideal physique, shared interests and hobbies, a college degree, a six-figure salary and 6-foot height to match for some — among other superficial traits almost too ridiculous to list. One client, a middle-aged Black woman, demands a partner who is a through-and-through conservative Republican. Another, a white man close to his 50s, refuses to budge on his maximum age requirement, because a woman in her 30s and 40s is way too old for his taste, he says (even 29 is pushing it). A 27-year-old is more his speed. Lucy tolerates her clients' shameless requests with a nod and a smile, because that's the nature of her gig: fulfill the fantasy, supply the demand and find the best possible person to get the deal done. Because matchmaking, by her high-end agency's standards, is the business of finding value in a person's best qualities, mostly those physical and financial. In a sense, Lucy knows it's a demoralizing approach to finding love, but she herself has a contradictory relationship with the concept. At an office party thrown by her co-workers to celebrate her nine-marriage success rate, Lucy credits her skills to the golden matchmaker's rule: 'If a girl asks for a tall drink of water with a salary over $500,000, you deliver.' Funny enough, Lucy is just as materialistic in her own love life. She refuses to settle down until she meets the man of her dreams — someone who's painfully, 'achingly' rich. However, she brushes off the first 'unicorn,' as she calls such handsome and wealthy rarities, she meets at a client's wedding. The unicorn in question is Harry (Pascal), a handsome, charming, tall drink of water who's very, very rich — and only has eyes for Lucy. The problem is, she doesn't think she deserves the private equity broker's money or affections (or $12 million apartment) because, in her mind, she's worthless and has nothing better to offer but her winning matchmaking services. A failed actress in debt and only raking in $80,000 a year, Lucy is convinced that Harry can do better. He thinks otherwise. Lucy offers to introduce the eligible Manhattan bachelor to other women he'd be perfect for, but, in classic rom-dram fashion, Harry is determined to court only her. But there's a fork in his plan when Lucy's complicated waiter ex, John (Evans), crashes the party. In a flashback, we learn just how much history runs deep between the matchmaker and the struggling actor: They were together for five years to be exact, according to an anniversary date that went from bad to worse. It's while running late to dinner reservations (which come with a costly no-show fee) in John's old hoopty that Lucy realizes she's tired of being a broke woman dating a broke man in New York City (with roommates). So, they break up — but now this wedding is their chance at a reunion. It's unspoken when John and Lucy embrace, having gone years without seeing each other, but there's still unfinished business between the two. And just as Lucy is making a decent living helping others find love, John swoops in to remind her who introduced her to it in the first place. That's when you think 'Materialists' is going to veer off to follow a tangled affair between Lucy and her two suitors, faced with having to choose between a promising new love and an old flame. A tale as old as time. For the most part, this plotline continues throughout the remainder of the movie. I'll skip ahead to avoid major spoilers — just know Lucy makes a choice and gets her happy ending, even if it's not the conventional one she always imagined. That's not even the most interesting half of 'Materialists.' In fact, it pales in comparison to what Song really tries to get at in her sophomore feature film: how true soul connections rebuke the shallowness of the modern dating world, where singles are more concerned with finding an aspirational kind of love that looks good on paper. 'The things that are in the movie came from the truth I learned,' Song said in the film's production notes, referencing her time as a dating consultant. 'That there is a very funny, very dark objectification of each other's humanity, and therefore a very real commodification of each other, as we go through this thing that we call dating. But it's supposed to be in pursuit of love.' That's a message the writer-director drives home in the opening scene of 'Materialists,' which shows a prehistoric cave couple exploring what could be the first human marriage, as they wordlessly exchange a flower ring symbolic of today's diamond ring proposal. But there are no expensive gems to gawk at or flashy jewelry to show off to friends, family and, in today's time, social media — just two people in love. The disconnect between that and today's superficial box-checking culture, as well as the way love is nowadays in constant conversation with money, is something Song is particularly interested in probing in 'Materialists' — even if it takes a while to round out her point. Speaking on her film's intention, Song told the Los Angeles Times: 'We're not just showing up here to be in love and beautiful and get to be in a rom-com. We're also going to take this opportunity to talk about something. Because that's the power of the genre. Our favorite rom-coms are the ones where we get to start a conversation about something.' That dialogue finally takes shape in 'Materialists' after the indulgence of a tangled love triangle, when an unthinkable client crisis bursts Lucy's bubble about her line of work. At the start of the film, we meet the matchmaker's toughest client, Sophie (Zoë Winters). Not tough because she's difficult to please, or unattractive, or not a great catch — she just desperately wants to meet a nice guy who likes her for who she is. But that breed is seemingly hard to find in NYC, as Lucy struggles to find Sophie the perfect guy. Still, her client subjects herself to the indignities of futile dates in hopes of striking gold. However, the reality of that smacks Lucy in the face when she learns that one match she sent Sophie on a date with sexually assaulted her. Lucy's boss (Marin Ireland) breaks the news, instructing her not to reach out to Sophie or get too hung up on the assault. According to Lucy's boss, if you stay in the matchmaking business long enough, sexual violence becomes pretty common. Bleak, yet true to the ugliness of the real world. Song does something bold here by venturing into darker territory. However, I struggled to understand her point of using sexual trauma as a narrative device to awaken Lucy from her own callousness and expose the exploits of an industry. It's not enough to call attention to a social issue as sensitive as this without a proper resolution. While that sobering plot helps explain why Lucy is at a crossroads in her love liaison gig, it doesn't bring much clarity to her love life. That mystery lingers at the end of the film, when Lucy finally confronts her superficial ideologies of love. Maybe it's a soul-bearing declaration from John that pushes her to that point. Or perhaps an awkward encounter with Harry about an unbelievable cosmetic surgery — seriously, you have to hear the ridiculous explanation that lives up to the movie's title. Either way, 'Materialists' leaves us with a lot to ponder after the credits roll. The film puts itself in conversation with many of its references, from 'Sense and Sensibility' to 'Pride & Prejudice,' yet still manages to contribute to the romance canon with a unique modern lens. It doesn't hinge on the gamble of love as much as it does on the observation of what many perceive love to be. Whether it's finding financial security, the ideal person to grow old with, or a soulmate you can't live without, 'Materialists' offers no easy answers there. Only a disquieting truth that the concept will always be deeply misunderstood. 'Past Lives' Will Quietly Surprise You At Every Turn 'Picture This' Doesn't Work As A Comedy Or Romance 'The Idea Of You' Is A Pretty Underwhelming Book-To-Movie Adaptation
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
100 years ago, the battle for television raged
Television's broadcast debut in 1936 unfolded like a plot made for the medium itself—complete with bitter competition, intrigue, celebration, and devastating setbacks. The story reached its climax when a fire at London's Crystal Palace destroyed parts of television inventor John Logie Baird's research laboratory on November 30, 1936. The timing could not have been worse. Baird was locked in a high-stakes showdown with his deep-pocketed rival, Electric and Musical Industries (EMI), who had partnered with wireless pioneer Guglielmo Marconi and the American radio giant RCA-Victor. Long before that fateful November day, the television landscape was crowded with inventors competing for the title to the as-yet unproven but promising medium. Despite his eventual defeat, Baird deserves credit for achieving the first wireless transmission of a moving image, as Popular Science writer Newton Burke reported in June 1925. The discrepancy between Baird's early success and later failure came down to a classic confrontation between old and new tech: Where Baird succeeded with mechanical television systems, he struggled to master the new and more efficient electronic technology. Despite its mechanical design, Baird's primitive television system was revolutionary for its time. Though it consisted of unwieldy components too impractical for commercial success, Burke noted that it successfully 'transmitted the motions of a human face, winking and smiling, from one room of a laboratory to another, without the aid of photography or wires.' The transmitted image was so crude that Baird's photographic evidence resembled the white hockey mask favored by serial killer Jason Voorhees in Friday the 13th films. Yet Burke recognized its significance, writing, 'The fact remains that the outline of the face is plain, so are the shadows of the eye sockets and the shape of the open mouth.' Baird's achievement, while novel, built upon decades of previous work. His system incorporated ideas from Maurice LeBlanc, an engineer from France who published the first principles of television transmission systems in 1880's 'Etude sur la transmission électrique des impressions lumineuses,' or 'Study on the electrical transmission of light impressions.' LeBlanc's design was part of a six-volume engineering compilation devoted to the advent of electric lights, La Lumière Electrique, as reported by Popular Science in June 1882. Baird also drew from the work of German inventor Paul Nipkow, who had developed an 'electric telescope'—a pair of spinning discs capable of scanning still images and transmitting them through electric wires, which he patented in 1885. Meanwhile, Charles Jenkins, a Washington, D.C.-based contemporary, achieved the first synchronized video and audio transmission on June 13th, 1925, though his system only handled still pictures rather than motion. Understanding Baird's mechanical system helps explain both its breakthrough nature and ultimate limitations. His apparatus used a rapidly revolving disk equipped with lenses that focused light from the subject onto a selenium cell. This cell converted the light impulses into electrical signals suitable for radio transmission—crucial because radio waves were the only practical distribution medium available at the time. A synchronized receiving disk with a ground-glass screen then reconstructed the image. As Burke explained, 'The images received on his ground-glass screen are described as being made up of exceedingly fine lines of varying darkness.' However, the width of these lines and their flicker rate were constrained by the physical limitations of the mechanical apparatus—problems that would require electronic solutions to overcome. While Baird perfected his mechanical approach, gradually improving display resolution from 30 to 240 lines by 1936—today's displays are measured in pixels, 8K being the latest generation—other inventors pursued electronic television systems using cathode rays to scan and project images. This technological shift created one of the most bitter patent battles in broadcasting history. Philo Farnsworth, a farm boy from Utah, and Vladimir Zworykin, a Russian émigré who fled during the Russian Revolution, each claimed first rights. While Farnsworth was officially awarded the first electronic television system patent in 1930, Zworykin had filed the first U.S. patent in 1923. Their rivalry sparked a long and rancorous legal showdown between Farnsworth and RCA, who had hired Zworykin to build America's first broadcast television system, the National Broadcasting Company (NBC), which debuted at the 1939 New York World's Fair. In the years before NBC's American debut, the center of television development was London, where the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) sought to upgrade beyond Baird's crude broadcasts that had been running for nearly a decade. Recognizing an opportunity to accelerate progress, the BBC commissioned a head-to-head competition in 1936 between rival systems. Baird's team collaborated with Farnsworth to create a hybrid mechanical-electronic system, while EMI partnered with Marconi for transmission technology and RCA to leverage Zworykin's electronic innovations. (By then the patent dispute had been settled, with RCA paying royalties to Farnsworth.) Both teams would broadcast identical programming from London's Alexandra Palace, allowing direct comparison of their capabilities. Even before the Crystal Palace fire, Baird faced an uphill battle. His system couldn't match EMI's superior 405-line resolution or transmission range. The devastating fire that destroyed his laboratory equipment proved to be the final setback. Shortly afterward, Baird abandoned his television work altogether. John Logie Baird, the first person to wirelessly broadcast moving pictures, died in 1946 without any financial stake in what would become one of the 20th century's most profitable industries. His mechanical breakthrough had paved the way for the electronic systems that would dominate broadcasting, but the rapid pace of technological change left him behind.
