logo
'We will fight corporate terror': EFF rejects Minister Malatsi's attempt to facilitate Starlink entry

'We will fight corporate terror': EFF rejects Minister Malatsi's attempt to facilitate Starlink entry

IOL News28-05-2025
EFF rejects Minister Malatsi's unlawful attempt to bypass South Africa's 30% local ownership law for Elon Musk's Starlink, saying legal compliance and transformation must be upheld to protect jobs, sovereignty, and national security.
Image: AP Photo/Francois Mori,
The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) has condemned Minister Solly Malatsi's recent actions aimed at enabling Elon Musk's Starlink satellite company to operate in South Africa without adhering to local ownership laws.
The party expressed deep concern over what it described as an unlawful attempt to bypass legislation designed to protect local economic interests and transformation.
On Tuesday, Malatsi appeared before the Portfolio Committee on Communications and Digital Technologies to justify his directive, which seeks to 'align' the Electronic Communications Act and the ICT Sector Code.
This 'alignment' would allow foreign entities to operate without complying with the 30% local ownership requirement mandated by law for previously disadvantaged groups.
Instead, the EFF said Malatsi wants Starlink to use 'Equity Equivalents' under the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) Act, an approach the EFF describes as an 'anti-transformation participation' strategy.
EFF spokesperson Sinawo Tambo said: "In what can only be described as an unlawful attempt at subverting the powers of the Parliament of South Africa by using a Ministerial Policy Directive, Minister Malatsi characterises the amendments he wants to make to two Acts of Parliament as regulatory alignment."
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
When pressed by the EFF, Tambo said the Minister failed to adequately address whether his directive amounts to amending the law.
More importantly, Malatsi admitted that the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) advised him that the correct path would be to amend the Electronic Communications Act itself, not circumvent it via policy alignment, he said.
"The fact that the regulatory authority is alive to the legislative irregularity of the Minister's attempts means there is certainty that the only lawful mechanism for Starlink to exist in South Africa is through full compliance with our laws, or through a legally sound amendment of legislation.
''No other mechanism, including a Ministerial Directive, can ease conditions for Starlink to operate in our country."
Beyond the legal issues, the EFF raised political concerns about allowing Starlink's entry.
Elon Musk, who owns Starlink, has previously peddled disinformation about South Africa, expressed disdain for transformation, and proposed to operate without guarantees for local jobs in the telecommunications industry, said the EFF.
Tambo noted that the Portfolio Committee echoed this sentiment with a 'resounding call' rejecting Starlink and any attempts to subvert legislation by abusing Executive powers and undermining the will of the people, which resides in Parliament.
Tambo said: "The EFF vows, that over and above legislative requirements, we will fight tooth and nail against corporate terror that uses access to diplomatic channels and Presidents to pursue business interests."
The EFF further links Starlink's push for entry in South Africa to demands made by Johann Rupert at the Oval Office and warns that Starlink represents a national security threat, a threat to local jobs, and a threat to the country's sovereignty and independence.
The party reiterated its firm stance to oppose any introduction of Starlink that does not comply fully with South African law, both inside Parliament and, if necessary, through the courts.
''We Say No To Starlink in South Africa!''
hope.ntanzi@iol.co.za Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
IOL Politics
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Clarity given on why men preside over Women's Parliament
Clarity given on why men preside over Women's Parliament

IOL News

time6 hours ago

  • IOL News

Clarity given on why men preside over Women's Parliament

House Chairperson Cedric Frolick says he and Deputy Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces, Les Govender, were given the responsibility of leading sectoral Parliaments such as the Women's Parliament and others. Image: Parliament of RSA House Chairperson of Parliament Cedric Frolick on Wednesday clarified why the proceedings of the P20 Women Parliament, currently under way in the National Council of Provinces (NCOP), were presided over by men. Frolick and NCOP Deputy Chairperson Les Govender are programme directors of the sessions of the Women's Parliament. Govender did the welcoming while National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza delivered the opening address, followed later by Deputy President Paul Mashatile. This happened as NCOP Chairperson Refilwe Mtshweni-Tsipane is attending the 54th Commonwealth Parliamentary Association Africa Region Conference in Gambia. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ At the start of the proceedings, Govender confessed that it was the first time he had been in one room with so many beautiful women. 'But for some reason, I don't feel intimidated,' he said. When it was his turn to preside, Frolick said some might find it strange that two males were presiding over the opening session. 'I wish to indicate that we were fortunate enough to be given this responsibility of leading sectoral Parliaments. That includes the Youth Parliament, the Women's Parliament, the Men's Parliament, the Climate Parliament, and so forth. 'We were given this responsibility by two very esteemed ladies, the honourable Speaker of the National Assembly and the honourable chairperson of the National Council of Provinces,' Frolick said. In her address, Didiza recalled that women were not represented at the NCOP before 1994, unlike in the democratic Parliament. She also said one of the things women who came in 1994 found was that there was only one toilet for women. 'It tells us about the journey that we have traversed, but I must also say that we meet today during an important month where we celebrate the heroic struggles that women have led towards the attainment of our democracy. 'It is through these moments that we take stock of the strategies that they applied in ensuring that they advance a struggle. These range from different epochs of our struggles,' she said. Didiza said one of the things they needed to do as Parliament was to look at the journey traversed since 1994 in how the country and legislature improved the lives of women. She also said one thing that happened in the country was to make sure that women could not only have a voice, but could also be seen. 'It is women representing our different parties elected by the electorate, who sit in these walls, define what legal framework must govern us, who bring concerns from communities on what not only women want, but what our societies and communities want.' Didiza acknowledged the struggles made by those before them who made sure that women were at the table where decisions are made. 'We can point at and say, had it not been for the struggles of those women, who, some of them were not even educated, who waged the struggle for women's emancipation to fight for an egalitarian society where women and men are equal, we would not be here.' She was hopeful that the Women's Caucus would transcend political thinking and make sure that laws are passed and the programmes undertaken prioritise women and girl-children. Didiza noted that it was the collective of the women that demanded that representatives at democratic negotiations be not only men, and that the equality clause in the Constitution and the Gender Commission should be provided for. Although she welcomed the Ministry of Women in the Presidency, Didiza said they now want a full ministry. 'We have a Women's Ministry today, not because we were given it, but because we demanded it. And the challenge is how do we make sure that the Women's Ministry works for women,' Didiza said.

ANC defends B-BBEE as DA pushes to dismantle empowerment policies
ANC defends B-BBEE as DA pushes to dismantle empowerment policies

IOL News

time6 hours ago

  • IOL News

ANC defends B-BBEE as DA pushes to dismantle empowerment policies

African National Congress (ANC) stands firm in defending B-BBEE policies, highlighting their role in empowering millions and urging beneficiaries to protect transformation gains against the DA's push to dismantle these initiatives. Image: IOL / Independent Newspapers The African National Congress (ANC) has accused the Democratic Alliance (DA) of seeking to dismantle South Africa's transformation policies, which the ANC says have brought tangible change to the lives of the majority. The party has called on all beneficiaries of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) to defend the gains made under democracy. This comes after the DA announced a set of reform proposals aimed at empowering state-owned entities (SOEs), which it claims offer a better alternative to B-BBEE, employment equity, and the Expropriation Act, policies the party insists must be scrapped. Speaking at a media briefing in Johannesburg, DA leader John Steenhuisen said the three laws are major obstacles to economic growth. 'BBBEE and racial quotas have failed, and together with expropriation without compensation, create an environment that deters investment, growth and job creation for the majority of South Africans,' he said. Steenhuisen added that the DA is not against transformation, but argued that current empowerment policies have failed ordinary South Africans. 'These policies are simply not fair. They don't help the millions of South Africans who just need the government to get out of the way. These policies must go,' he said. He called for the replacement of B-BBEE and employment equity with measures based on need and merit. In response, the ANC said that transformation policies must be continuously evaluated and discussed by all South Africans to ensure they remain aligned with the goals of democracy, social justice, and equality, as outlined in the Constitution. 'The ANC recognises that these conversations and debates must be held among all South Africans, particularly to address concerns that such policies may be unintentionally creating a new form of elitism,' said ANC spokesperson Mhlengi Bhengu-Motsiri. 'To effectively tackle any unintended consequences, the ANC believes that the discussion must be guided by scientific findings.' The ANC said it supports the BEE Commission's call for focused evaluation studies to assess the impact of B-BBEE, stating that such research will help ensure the policy achieves its intended purpose of building a more equitable society. The party highlighted the recent findings of the 2023–2024 Analysis of Major B-BBEE Transactions report, which it says confirms that B-BBEE is delivering measurable benefits to ordinary South Africans. According to the ANC, companies invested R7.2 billion in enterprise development, enabling thousands of black-owned and managed small businesses and cooperatives to grow. Supplier development reached R40.7 billion, while R64 billion was spent on skills development, with a focus on young people, women, and rural learners. Bhengu-Motsiri said B-BBEE is rooted in the democratic framework and is designed to benefit 'black South Africans, that is Africans, Coloureds and Indians, and further extends benefits to white women, who were also historically marginalised in economic participation.' 'These empowerment measures have opened pathways for millions of South Africans into business ownership, corporate leadership, and skilled employment,' she said. 'We call on all South Africans who have benefitted from these measures, including those appointed to various positions in the private sector, to stand in defence of their own gains and reject any political agenda aimed at reversing the progress made.' As the leader of society, the ANC added that it will continue to evaluate all transformation policies to ensure they serve their intended purpose. 'Where these policies are found not to benefit those who were previously oppressed and marginalised, they will be reviewed and strengthened,' the party said. [email protected] Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL Politics

Battle for SA's education future: BELA Act divides stakeholders as deadline approaches
Battle for SA's education future: BELA Act divides stakeholders as deadline approaches

IOL News

time7 hours ago

  • IOL News

Battle for SA's education future: BELA Act divides stakeholders as deadline approaches

Basic Education Minister Siviwe Gwarube Image: GCIS As the closing date for public comments on the controversial Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Act approaches, reactions from education stakeholders remain mixed, with some raising concerns about implementation and equity, while others welcome the legislation as a step toward accountability and fairness in South Africa's public schools. The Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Basic Education, Joy Maimela, warned that some of the regulations 'might undermine the legislation's intention.' 'Firstly, the committee has previously called for all the regulations to be gazetted in one go and not in a piecemeal fashion. We want the public to engage on a comprehensive document that will give expression to the intentions of the Act. 'While we understand the intent may be to avoid technical delays, this fragmented rollout undermines the coherence, urgency and integrity of the BELA implementation process. South Africa's children cannot afford to wait for bureaucratic caution or political compromise,' said Maimela. She added: 'Furthermore, it is noted that some of the terms used in the regulations seem to deviate from the Act. It gives the impression that the regulations aim to undermine the intention of the Act.' Maimela warned that this could contradict Parliament's goal of transforming South Africa's education system and might instead perpetuate the exclusion of vulnerable learners. 'The regulations on admissions, for example, refer to taking into account the demographics and education needs of the 'surrounding community'. In the Bela Act the responsibility for admission policy lies with the head of department (HOD) and is based on the 'broader Education Districts'. This potentially reinforce local demographic homogeneity, contrary to the type of inclusivity the Act intended.' She further noted: 'This, once again, points to keeping previously disadvantaged learners out via location. Historically it has been linked to exclusion. It seems these regulations are attempting to re-write the Bela Act and re-introduce matters that were unsuccessfully contested in the Bela Act legislative drafting process.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Andre De Bruyn from EUSA Image: Supplied 'The committee will continue to closely monitor this process and engage robustly with the Minister on the gazetted regulations, which seem to deviate from the national objective,' emphasised Maimela. Gwarube said the regulations provide 'an important opportunity for education stakeholders and the broader South African public to actively shape the future of basic education in our country.' 'These regulations are instruments that will affect how schools are governed and managed, how children are admitted, and how our values as a society are reflected in our education system. I call on all South Africans, including parents, teachers, school governing bodies, civil society, education experts and community members to participate meaningfully in this public comment process. Your voice matters. Let it be heard in shaping the policies and regulations that govern the education of your children,' said Gwarube. The Educators and Allied Workers Union, Western Cape (EUSA) has raised concerns about proposed learner–teacher ratios, warning they will remain 'a pipe dream' unless consistently enforced across all schools. André De Bruyn, Chairperson of EUSA, said: 'Post level 1 educators are bearing the brunt, often with very little or no administrative time, together with overcrowded classes. Poorer schools face relentless pressure to admit more learners, resulting in severe overcrowding, while affluent schools seldom face the same demands. Wealthier schools have the resources to challenge the department in court over forced admissions.' He added: 'If budget constraints are blamed, who will be appointing the teachers and building the classrooms to make a 1:40 ratio possible? The Department of Basic Education ultimately pursues its predetermined agenda regardless of community engagement. More and more demands are being put on teachers, especially in poorer schools, while the vision of 1:40 and 1:30, if not enforced in all schools, will remain an illusion.' The South African Democratic Teachers' Union (SADTU) expressed strong criticism of the regulations and the Minister's approach. SADTU highlighted that the Minister issued implementation guidelines earlier this year, which the union rejected as unlawful, arguing that only formal regulations have legal standing. Vanessa Le Roux from PEESA Image: Supplied 'The issuing of guidelines appears to be an attempt to sow confusion, delay the implementation of the Act and advance the DA's political agenda against the full implementation of Sections 4 and 5,' said SADTU in a statement. The union emphasised its commitment to safeguarding learners' constitutional right to quality education, warning that any provisions undermining these rights would be opposed. SADTU confirmed it is studying the draft regulations and will submit formal comments by the 5 September 2025 deadline. Vanessa Le Roux of Parents for Equal Education South Africa (PEESA) welcomed the BELA Bill, seeing it as a mechanism to enforce equity and accountability in public schools. 'As an organisation there is mixed feelings, especially because we reside in the Western Cape, over the years we saw the inequalities growing to the point where we feared that education will only be for those who can afford it. 'On the other hand we don't want to take away the power from the SGB/community, who is the real authority when it comes to schools, however what we saw over the years is that governing bodies, in especially township schools are not equipped with enough knowledge to govern the school, and ultimately the principal runs that school to the point where they are involved with finances of the school.' Le Roux said out of all the 9 Provinces in public participation, the Western Cape was the only province who took real issue with the Bela Bill and said it came down to a case of accountability. 'For far too long these former model C schools have gotten away with the violation of the rights to basic education for all learners, and they were protected by the education department. 'So whether they call it centralisation of power, we from poor communities, call it a step in the right direction. The same rules, policies, and laws should be applied. It is a matter of addressing inequalities, discrimination, and racism in public schools. We welcome the implementation of the Bela Bill with much hope, and open arms.' Weekend Argus

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store