logo
Disability advocates hoping for change to Medicaid program

Disability advocates hoping for change to Medicaid program

Axios28-03-2025

A small program aimed at helping Hoosiers with disabilities keep their Medicaid benefits while working hasn't changed in more than 20 years — but advocates are hoping this year could be different.
Why it matters: MEDWorks is Indiana's Medicaid buy-in program, designed to make it easier for adults with disabilities to work and keep the health coverage they need.
Yes, but: Income and asset limitations haven't changed since it was implemented in 2002, discouraging some Hoosiers with disabilities from seeking employment.
How it works: To qualify for MEDWorks, individuals must be between the ages of 16 and 64, be determined to be disabled and make no more than 350% of the federal poverty level.
This year, that's $54,775 for an individual.
There's also a resource limit of $2,000. Your primary home, one car and a retirement account don't count toward that, but a savings account does.
What they're saying: "It really prevents someone from saving for emergencies," said Tom Crishon, chief legal officer with The Arc of Indiana.
MEDWorks has a work requirement built into the program and participants pay a premium, based on a sliding scale — two concepts that lawmakers want to incorporate into traditional Medicaid programs, Crishon said.
What they're asking: Advocates want lawmakers to increase the income limit to 500% of the federal poverty level, which would be $78,250, and to increase the asset limit to $20,000.
They also want to raise the maximum age for participation from 64 to 67, to match the full retirement age for Social Security benefits.
Context: The requests come from recommendations made by a subcommittee tasked with studying the MEDWorks program by legislation passed last year.
House Bill 1067 asked for recommendations to eliminate barriers to employment and independence for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and to increase workforce participation for individuals participating in the program.
"The benefits extend far beyond people with disabilities," said Rep. Ed Clere, R-New Albany, who authored HB 1067. "This should be part of our conversation about workforce."
This year, he wrote House Bill 1106 to take the recommendations from the report and make them law, but it didn't get a hearing.
He views the bill as a way to get thousands of unemployed or underemployed Hoosiers working. As they would move up in the workforce, they would become more self-sufficient and pay more toward their Medicaid premiums.
Clere told Axios he's hoping to find a home for the ideas in legislation that's still moving this session.
When Clere's bill didn't move, advocates took the requests to the state's budget writers.
"A lot of people would work if the asset limit was higher than the $2,000 because they're afraid of losing their benefits," Shawn Fulton told the Senate Appropriations Committee last week. Fulton, the advocacy engagement and education manager with The Arc, does career counseling and referrals for individuals with disabilities.
Zoom in: Fulton is also a MEDWorks program participant.
Working enabled him to achieve his dream of owning a home, but when it needs a new roof in a few years, he's going to have to take out a loan to pay for it because the program prevents him from saving more than $2,000.
"I do really well at my job, and my job wants to give me a raise," Fulton told Axios, "but if I get another raise, I'm gonna lose all my benefits."
State of play: It's a tight budget year, so very few requests for new dollars are getting granted.
Advocates, though, say that the small program is unlikely to cost the state much and will have trickle-down benefits to the state economy as it encourages more Hoosiers with disabilities to work without fear of losing benefits.
In December, 2,700 people were enrolled in MEDWorks.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary warns Americans on 401(k)s
Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary warns Americans on 401(k)s

Miami Herald

time17 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary warns Americans on 401(k)s

Most American workers generally understand that Social Security monthly paychecks will one day significantly contribute to their future retirement income. But because those Social Security benefits are not by themselves enough to provide people with the financial resources they need to live on comfortably, most also recognize that 401(k) plans and IRAs (Individual Retirement Accounts) are additional tools necessary for securing their financial future. However, finding the extra money to contribute to these accounts can be a significant challenge. Kevin O'Leary, a prominent entrepreneur and investor widely known for his appearances on ABC's "Shark Tank," shares a method that enables workers to cut expenses and direct more money toward their 401(k) and IRA savings. He also offers a stark financial warning. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Participating in an employer-sponsored 401(k) plan is a dependable way to build retirement savings, especially when employers offer matching contributions. With automatic payroll deductions, this method allows employees to invest in their future effortlessly, making it both practical and efficient. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message to Americans on Social Security IRAs, on the other hand, provide a wider selection of investment options not typically available through 401(k) plans. However, they require more hands-on management, as individuals must open an account and set up automatic contributions independently. In addition to a major warning, O'Leary offers valuable advice on how individuals can cut costs and increase their retirement contributions, which for many Americans primarily consist of 401(k) plans. Many workers who are committed to contributing as much money as they can toward their 401(k) plans find it difficult to do so because their spending habits leave little left to put away for the future. In fact, O'Leary emphasizes, many people spend more than they make - and are working in large part to finance their debts and pay their bills. "You are in constant fear of losing your job, or of your assets losing their value. You worry that one big, unexpected bill might put you under for good, and then you avoid that thought," described O'Leary in his book, "Cold Hard Truth on Men, Women and Money." "You're avoiding the phone and people to whom you owe money. Maybe you're retreating from friends and family out of fear or shame," O'Leary continued. "You're steeped in magical thinking about money - for example, believing you're one lottery ticket, inheritance, or windfall away from total financial transformation." "You wake up in despair and you go to bed defeated. You don't live within your means because you don't even know what they are." More on retirement: Jean Chatzky shares major statement about Social SecurityDave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on retirementScott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threat O'Leary explains that people who feel this describes them to any degree should correct it immediately. He offers a first step people can take to get a handle on where they stand financially. Related: Dave Ramsey warns Americans on Social Security In order to increase retirement savings and add a larger percentage of their income to 401(k) plans, people first need to get a good feel for where they are financially. O'Leary suggests simplifying money management down to a single figure - either positive or negative. He encourages individuals to calculate their total earnings over three months, calling this their 90-Day Number. The process starts with identifying income. If pay stubs aren't easily accessible, reviewing bank statements can help track all incoming funds, including salaries, side jobs, and other sources of cash flow. Next, he recommends listing all expenses separately - small purchases such as coffee, clothing, and snacks, as well as major costs such as bills, debt payments, rent, and car loans. The key step is subtracting total expenses from total income. If the result is positive, the individual is in good financial shape and can immediately consider increasing their 401(k) contributions. A negative outcome signals a need for adjustments. The extent of necessary changes depends on how much spending exceeds earnings, requiring smarter budgeting to create space for investments in long-term financial security, O'Leary explains. In the latter instance - after some planning, budgeting and hard work - a person can still reach the point of increasing investments in their 401(k) plans. Related: Dave Ramsey sends major message to Americans on IRAs, Roth IRAs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

‘Marbles in the rear ends of cats': WGN fact checks Hegseth's claim
‘Marbles in the rear ends of cats': WGN fact checks Hegseth's claim

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

‘Marbles in the rear ends of cats': WGN fact checks Hegseth's claim

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's testimony before the Senate Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday took an unexpected twist when he mentioned cats, marbles, and medical research. Hegseth was facing questions from Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) about cuts to the Defense Department's medical research budget when he made a startling claim: 'We're talking about some stuff I shouldn't, shouldn't say in public, you know, marbles in the rear ends of cats, tens of millions of dollars,' Hegseth told Illinois' senior U.S. senator. Hegseth referred to the research as a 'boondoggle.' WGN Investigates: Investigating public corruption, crime & fraud Durbin immediately fired back, asking whether Hegseth's claim was similar to unproven tales told by President Donald Trump and his DOGE team about people hundreds of years old still receiving Social Security checks in their name. The research Hegseth appears to be referencing was money awarded in 2020, during President Trump's first term, to reimburse the University of Pittsburgh $10M for research to 'develop revolutionary new treatment approaches for spinal cord injuries.' The contract award is available on the Department of Defense website. Hegseth's claim about marbles being inserted into the rear ends of cats is correct, but lacks all context. Soldiers – or anyone else – who suffer severe spinal cord injuries can lose control of their bowels. The study used anesthetized cats as test subjects to study the impact of a new procedure to restore functionality in the sphincter and rectum. The marbles were meant to simulate defecation and determine whether a procedure restored control in test subjects. The results were encouraging, according to the American Journal of Physiology. '[The] study indicates the possibility to develop a novel…device to restore defecation function after spinal cord injury using a minimally invasive surgical approach.' Read more: Latest Chicago news and headlines Durbin said Hegseth's proposed budget cuts two-thirds of funding for the Defense Department's medical research. Hegseth countered that his team was targeting 'waste, fraud, and abuse' and would not cut funding for programs that benefit members of the military. He previously announced $5 billion in cuts across the entire Department of Defense. 'The Defense Department has been a place where organizations, entities, and companies know they can get money almost unchecked, whether or not it actually applies to things that happen on the battlefield,' Hegseth told Durbin. 'That's just that's what we worked very hard to find in ways that other secretaries have not.' After the hearing, a spokesperson for Sen. Durbin told WGN: 'While Secretary Hegseth attempted to distract from the larger issue with his comment about marbles and cats, here are just a few examples of DoD research contracts that have been canceled or frozen under this Administration: new breast cancer and prostate cancer therapies, which would help afflicted service members; improved protective gear to defend soldiers against projectiles and chemical threats; advanced materials for more durable and lightweight aircraft parts—and the list goes on. Do these sound like 'boondoggles' to you?' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Arkansans getting government assistance ask senators to vote down ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
Arkansans getting government assistance ask senators to vote down ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Arkansans getting government assistance ask senators to vote down ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – Arkansans receiving government assistance are asking Arkansas senators in Washington to vote against President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' Chanting 'The big ugly bill will kill,' about a dozen people spoke out against changes to Medicaid, SNAP, and HUD Housing in the 1,000-page bill while arguing that health, food and housing are human rights. Big, beautiful bill heads to the Senate Norma Huffman is a member of Arkansas Community Organizations, the group that organized a visit to the Washington D.C. and Little Rock offices of Senators Cotton and Boozman on Wednesday. 'We are here to try to convince the head honcho of this office to vote no,' Huffman stated. Huffman is a single parent and says she is permanently disabled. She is on Medicaid, SNAP, and housing assistance for her needs, and she fears what the future will hold if Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' becomes law. 'We have to fight for ourselves because we know for a fact nobody else is going to,' Huffman argued. The act proposes substantial cuts, restrictions, and added requirements for Medicaid and SNAP, shifting more costs to states, limiting eligibility, and repealing support programs. For HUD, the bill removes funding for cost-cutting green retrofitting. Hattie Temple says any change could be a triple blow to her and hundreds of thousands more. 'It makes our deficit higher. It doesn't make any sense. Everything that he (Trump) cuts is to keep the folks down that are already down,' Temple stated. Trump 'disappointed' by Musk criticism of 'big, beautiful bill' Senator John Boozman provided this statement when asked about the visit: 'Work requirements for able-bodied adults are a fair and effective way to ensure SNAP and Medicaid benefits are directed to those who truly need them. By implementing commonsense policies, we can strengthen the programs while eliminating waste, reducing federal spending and promoting accountability.' -Senator John Boozman At the time of this report, Senator Cotton's office has not replied to requests for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store