Welsh Rugby Union defends plans to halve number of professional men's teams
Welsh Rugby Union
has recognised the 'hurt and anger' caused by their proposal to reduce the number of professional men's sides in Wales from four to two, but insisted maintaining the status quo is not the 'right thing' to do.
Welsh rugby's governing body has produced a radical plan to turn around the game at both club and international level, outlining its ambitions in a 90-page consultation document entitled 'The Future of Elite Rugby in Wales'.
There will be a six-week consultation period before the WRU makes a final decision on the plans, and WRU chief executive Abi Tierney has urged people to 'improve on the proposals' and provide 'something fit for purpose for Welsh rugby'.
The WRU's proposal to halve its number of four men's professional sides – Cardiff, Dragons, Ospreys and Scarlets – to two will be the biggest talking point in a document which outlined four potential models for the game in Wales.
READ MORE
It remains unclear whether the two future sides being proposed will be new entities or existing teams, but the two organisations will each have a men's and women's team.
Tierney said: 'This is a momentous day for Welsh rugby. No decisions have been made, but we feel based on the analysis this is the strongest (option) yet.
'I know how emotional rugby is in Wales and people will be hurting today, when they think what it could mean potentially for them and their team.
'I recognise the hurt and anger people are going to be feeling. Change is hard and this is hard for fans.
'But fans' numbers drop has also not been a great experience for anybody, and we want to create an experience they can be proud of.
'What we were doing and keeping doing for fans was not the right thing. I would encourage everybody to imagine how exciting it could be and take that step into the future.'
The WRU proposal comes amid Ospreys plans to move into a redeveloped stadium at St Helen's in Swansea for the 2026-27 season and the Scarlets having recently unveiled new investors.
Dragons said this week elite professional rugby must continue in Gwent, while Cardiff are currently owned by the WRU having gone into administration in April.
It is possible the WRU will face legal action from regions that could essentially be put out of business, with WRU chairman Richard Collier-Keywood saying 'two or three areas of potential legal challenge' exist.
The WRU has also proposed the creation of a national campus at a site yet to be decided, which would be the home of the men's and women's professional teams, as well as Wales' national sides and the union's academy.
Players were briefed on the WRU's plan on Tuesday and Dave Reddin, the new director of rugby and elite performance, is confident suggestions of possible player strike action will not materialise.
Reddin said: 'The national campus would be a radical departure and doing something different, a defensive moat for Welsh rugby and creating a competitive advantage.
'We've got to look outside the box if we want to try and do things differently.
'Be brave enough to to lead sometimes and do things that no one else is doing. Do things that people think are a bit nutty, too different or too uncomfortable.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the US/EU trade statement: some certainty on tariffs
It is unlikely that for as long as US president Donald Trump is in power the environment for trade will ever be settled. Potential chaos will always be around the corner. However, it is important to recognise the better days, too, and yesterday falls into this category. The agreed EU/US statement on trade – following the handshake deal more than three weeks ago between Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen – is first of all important in and of itself. Initially expected within days of the meeting in Scotland, its nonappearance had raised fears that both sides were not on the same page. Now, an agreed piece of paper with important details has been signed off in Brussels and Washington. And some of the detail suggests that the EU side may have got more from the deal than some have suggested. Time will tell. In particular, a commitment to cap tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors at 15 per cent removes some uncertainty. There had been fears of higher tariffs in these areas following special studies being undertaken on them by the Trump administration. READ MORE Presuming the deal sticks, this will not now happen, while some areas of pharma will be excluded altogether. That said, as with other sectors, tariffs impose costs on consumers and producers and are a no-win policy approach. The 15 per cent tariffs on many exports – and the expectation of something similar on pharma – will be a burden on exporters. They will also damage the US economy and push up prices. Trump's tariff agenda is still bad news for Ireland and uncertainties remain about the impact of his wider industrial policy. But the codification of large elements of the US/EU deal at least keeps this process on track and avoids a transatlantic trade war. It also gives some more clarity to key sectors of the economy and raises hopes that the worst can be avoided. More battles and uncertainty remain ahead, but the publication of the joint statement is a positive step.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
The battle for Eberechi Eze was a fight with Arsenal that Spurs knew they wouldn't win
It was towards the end of June when it became clear that Tottenham were considering a move for Eberechi Eze, one to install him as the centrepiece of their new project under Thomas Frank. Or, at least, when it became public knowledge. And it was the prompt for two things to happen. Firstly, it would be reported a few days later that Arsenal were also on the case. The club's new sporting director, Andrea Berta, had put the feelers out for the Crystal Palace forward. Call it a declaration of interest, albeit Berta was having a lot of conversations about a lot of potential targets at the time. His idea was to have plenty of options on the boil before deciding which to prioritise. Then, there was a subtle change to the mood music at Spurs, a kind of step back into a holding pattern. Agent talk, was the word inside the club. Eze was more likely to stay at Palace. It would be wrong to get too far ahead of anything on this one. But it was impossible to ignore the alternative reading: Spurs did not want to be drawn into a battle with their rivals over one of the most exciting talents on the market. Spurs were fearful of that, and for good reason. They had to know that, given the choice, Eze would go for Arsenal over them. There were the emotional reasons. He had supported Arsenal as a kid and played in their academy until his release as a 13-year-old; the line about how he cried for a week after is a well-known part of his story. Yet it would not only be about dreams and unfinished business. Eze would surely look at the Premier League table from last season. At which club would he stand the better chance of winning the title? READ MORE At this point it is worth introducing Mikel Arteta, who let it be known just how highly he rated Eze and how perfectly he would fit into his team. Eze's head was turned. So Spurs entered territory in which the reward was tantalising, almost irresistible, but the risk was extreme. It was as if they were shadow boxing with Arsenal, their every move over Eze likely to come right back at them. Arsenal were a devil on their shoulder; watching, waiting. Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta. Photograph: Peter Powell/AFP via Getty Images Spurs would pivot to Morgan Gibbs-White in July only to run into the immovable object that is Evangelos Marinakis. No deal, the Nottingham Forest owner said. There would be a new one for Gibbs-White at Forest and, sadly for Spurs, egg on their face after they believed they would be able to exploit a £60 million release clause in his old contract. The Gibbs-White episode has been a climate-shaper in Spurs's summer and then there was the moment when James Maddison ruptured his anterior cruciate ligament in the preseason game against Newcastle on August 3rd; a shattering blow for him and his team. Dejan Kulusevski, the club's other key central attacking midfielder, underwent knee surgery in May and is out until around the turn of the year, so the need to act in the market was obvious and urgent. Why not move straight away for Eze; give him and Palace a decision to make by meeting the £68 million release clause in his deal, which was in place until August 15th? Spurs's hesitation was to do with the fact they considered the number to be too high for a 27-year-old with 12 England caps and no experience of European football at club level. It is not the only detail in terms of optics that has hurt them as Arsenal prepare to pay pretty much that amount to take Eze to the Emirates, with Spurs themselves having ended up ready to do likewise. There has been the idea that Spurs had a clear run at Eze because Arsenal, after spending around £200 million on six other signings, would need to raise money via sales before they could make a bid. Well, they have sold nobody and still pushed the button. Unless Arsenal have a sale or two lined up, could it be that they have more financial headroom than they have let on? Eberechi Eze. Photograph: John Walton/PA It is easy to pick over the curiosities. Eze is represented by CAA Base, the influential firm of agents who have close links to Spurs. Should that have given Spurs an edge? It must be said that Base will always put the wishes of their players first. And why did it seemingly take Kai Havertz feeling a knee injury after Sunday's win at Manchester United for Arsenal to move on Eze? There are similarities in the profile of both players but there is a fundamental difference: Havertz can play as a number 9, Eze cannot. With Gabriel Jesus a long-term injury casualty, the loss of Havertz ought to have seen Arsenal look for a number 9 to provide support for the new signing, Viktor Gyökeres. Not take Eze. The reality is that Spurs were never going to win this fight. We will never know what would have happened if they had offered to pay Eze's release clause. But it feels fair to assume that it would have led Arsenal into following suit. Spurs eventually reached an agreement with Palace on Wednesday and they believed they had one with Eze, too. If Arsenal were not an option, Eze would have joined Spurs. At this stage of his career, after giving everything for Palace across five seasons, he is ready for a change; the chance to play in the Champions League . But Arsenal were an option; they never went away. It took them a matter of hours to slide in for the steal. The bad news for Spurs is that the very thing they feared has come to pass. The memes are out, an Eze mural has appeared in the tunnel outside the Emirates and the time is tighter to provide Frank with a new number 10. Have Spurs built on the momentum of their Europa League triumph from last season? They have added João Paulinha and Mohammed Kudus for the starting XI, while it was a tonic to tie the new captain, Cristian Romero, to a long-term contract. But when their supporters look around, they see that Liverpool, Chelsea, Manchester United and Arsenal have spent £200 million or significantly upwards on signings. Manchester City, meanwhile, have invested £150 million. The mood at Tottenham is back to being edgy. Arsenal have made a statement of intent. – Guardian
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Global markets muted as traders wait for Powell's speech Jackson Hole symposium
Global markets were muted and gold prices eased on Thursday, as traders avoided making big moves and before Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell's speech at the Fed's three-day annual Jackson Hole symposium in Wyoming. Dublin Euronext Dublin finished the day down 0.2 per cent on what was a quiet day in advance of a bank holiday in Britain on Monday. Trading volumes were down across the board, but among the financial names Bank of Ireland were up 1.6 per cent and 0.7 per cent respectively. In terms of the food names, Kerry Group dropped 0.7 per cent, while Glanbia was down 0.1 per cent at close of business. READ MORE The housebuilders were one of the few sectors to finish in the green with Glenveagh Properties and Cairn Homes up 0.9 per cent and 1.4 per cent respectively. Ires Reit, the biggest landlord in the State, was down 1 per cent at the closing bell. London The FTSE 100 climbed 0.2 per cent to close above 9,300 for the first time, outperforming European peers and taking heart from better-than-hoped borrowing and economic activity data. The FTSE 250 ended down 0.3 per cent, and the AIM All-Share finished down 0.1 per cent. Trading received a lift but some better economic data after a run of downbeat news. Shares in WH Smith plunged 42 per cent after an accounting error forced the travel retail firm to slash profit guidance for its North American business. The Swindon-based company now expects headline trading profit from the North America division to be around £25 million (€28.9 million) for the financial year ending August 31st, down from previous expectations of around £55 million. Hays fell 1.7 per cent as it reported a plunge in annual profit, confirming the bad news the company gave to the market in a profit warning back in June. The London-based recruiter had said it expected annual profit to be below market consensus, as it grappled with challenging market conditions, amid 'low levels of client and candidate confidence'. Hays said operating profit before exceptional items was £45.6 million in the financial year to June, down 57 per cent from £105.1 million. This was in line with the guidance the company provided back in June. Elsewhere, Renishaw jumped 6.9 per cent as it forecast annual adjusted pretax profit will be towards the top of expectations. Europe On the continent, the pan-European Stoxx 600 lost 0.04 per cent, while the Cac 40 in Paris ended down 0.4 per cent, while the Dax 40 in Frankfurt closed up 0.1 per cent. Analysts attributed a pullback in tech stocks this week to concerns that AI investments were not delivering returns. Euro zone business activity accelerated in August, PMI data showed, with Germany registering its fastest growth since March and France's downturn easing. Euro zone bond yields were mostly higher, with the benchmark 10-year German Bund up 2.5 basis points at 2.751 per cent. New York Wall Street's main indexes slipped as cautious investors awaited clues on monetary policy from a Federal Reserve conference in Jackson Hole, while big-box retailer Walmart's quarterly results did little to boost sentiment. Walmart raised its fiscal year sales and profit, driven by strong demand from shoppers across all income levels, but missed quarterly profit expectations and flagged higher costs from tariffs. Shares of the retailer fell 3.4 per cent and pressured the consumer staples sector, which declined 0.9 per cent. The spotlight was on reports from retailers, including Target and Home Depot, this week as investors tried to gauge the impact of US tariffs on consumer spending. All eyes are now on the Fed's annual symposium, where chairman Jerome Powell is scheduled to speak on Friday at 10am eastern time. Traders will closely monitor Mr Powell's speech for any clues on interest rate cuts in September following recent job market weakness. A sell-off in technology stocks earlier this week appeared to subside, with technology-related stocks such as Meta, Amazon and Advanced Micro Devices marginally lower. – Additional reporting: Agencies
