logo
Day Ahead of Monsoon Session, Opposition Raises Pahalgam, Trump's Claims and Bihar SIR in All-Party Meet

Day Ahead of Monsoon Session, Opposition Raises Pahalgam, Trump's Claims and Bihar SIR in All-Party Meet

The Wire20-07-2025
Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju said that the government is 'ready for discussions with an open heart' but did not provide any clear answers to whether the demands will be heeded to.
Union Ministers J.P. Nadda and Kiren Rijiju, along with others arrive to attend the all-party meeting ahead of the Monsoon session of Parliament. Photo: PTI
New Delhi: The monsoon session of parliament is set for a stormy start as opposition parties on Sunday (July 20) at the customary all-party meeting convened by the Union government demanded a discussion on the Pahalgam terror attack, US president Donald Trump's continuing claims of ceasefire mediation between India and Pakistan and the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in poll-bound Bihar.
The monsoon session of the parliament will begin on Monday, July 21.
Following the all-party meeting which was attended by 54 MPs, Union parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju said that the government is 'ready for discussions' but did not provide any clear answers to whether the opposition's demands will be heeded to and said that the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) will take a final decision.
He also said that whether it is the US President or anyone else, responses can only be given in parliament when a discussion or statement is being given.
'All parties put forth their positions. From the government we noted down all their points. We have said that to ensure that the House functions properly, the government and opposition should work together with good coordination. We might be political parties of different ideologies but it is everyone's responsibility to ensure that Parliament functions properly – opposition's as well as the government's,' said Rijiju to reporters after the meeting.
'Several important issues have been raised by the members asking for a discussion in parliament. We are ready for a discussion with an open heart. We follow rules and parliamentary traditions,' he added.
As the opposition raised Trump's claims of mediating the ceasefire – he claimed it 24 times by some accounts – in the all-party meeting, along with his latest statement that 'five jets ' having been shot down, Rijiju said that whether it is the US president's statement or anyone else, an answer can only be given when a discussion is held in the parliament.
'Whether it is the US President or anyone else, I cannot give an answer here as this is not the proper forum. The correct forum for an answer or a statement is when a discussion will be held in parliament and at that time all answers will be given,' said Rijiju.
'I cannot make any announcement at the moment because the demands and issues raised today by both opposition parties and the ruling alliance will now be taken up in the Business Advisory Committee (BAC). A meeting will then be held under the chairmanship of the Rajya Sabha Chairman and Lok Sabha Speaker, where a final decision will be made,' he said.
'As for notices submitted by members, we cannot deny them. Requesting a discussion is every member's right, and we cannot refuse that,' he added.
The monsoon session will be the first parliament session since the Pahalgam terror attack, and the four-day long military conflict with Pakistan following Operation Sindoor. The opposition had made continued demands for a special session of parliament, but the government had not heeded to the demands.
'We have demanded that several important issues are raised in this session, due to which we hope that Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses the nation through the parliament. Those important issues are Pahalgam – the lapses that led to the attack and the statements made by the Lieutenant Governor. A lot of time has passed and the government will have to speak. The statements coming from the US President today (Saturday), raise questions on the dignity of India, the bravery of the Indian armed forces. Only the Prime Minister can respond to the statements made by the US President,' said Congress' deputy leader in the Lok Sabha Gaurav Gogoi.
Gogoi further said that the prime minister must also address concerns arising from the ongoing SIR in Bihar, as well as the two-front axis being built by China and Pakistan that have implications for Indian foreign policy.
'It will be very important for Prime Minister Modi to come to this House and put forth his views on these three subjects,' he said.
These issues were decided upon by the INDIA bloc in its virtual meeting on Saturday, July 19, attended by 24 parties. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) stayed away and said that the alliance was only for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. However, AAP MP Sanjay Singh, who attended the all-party meeting on Sunday, raised some of the same issues that were highlighted by the INDIA bloc.
'The issue I have raised on behalf of my party is that the US President is repeatedly saying that he got the ceasefire done in the name of a trade deal, the government should give clarification on this," said AAP MP Sanjay Singh.
Singh added that the government must also address the slum demolitions in Delhi, the SIR exercise in Bihar, as well as the Air India plane crash last month.
Communist Party of India MP Sandosh Kumar P. said that the 'Prime Minister must come to the House and address the Pahalgam terror attack and its subsequent developments. The government did not say anything clearly.'
Biju Janata Dal MP Sasmit Patra said that he had raised the 'alarming breakdown of law and order in Odisha under the BJP government.'
'There has been a disturbing rise in heinous crimes against women and children. The tragic self-immolation of a student in Balasore; who had reached out to a BJP MP, the administration and even tweeted to the Odisha's chief minister, Union ministers, and several BJP leaders; has shaken the conscience of the nation. She was an ABVP member, yet her pleas were ignored. Just yesterday, a 15-year-old girl in Puri was set ablaze. Around 20 days ago, the Additional Commissioner of BMC was assaulted by five local BJP leaders. The recent chaos during the Puri Rath Yatra stampede is another example of this lawlessness. These issues will be strongly raised during the session,' Patra said.
During the meeting some opposition members also raised the issue of communal remarks made by Justice Shekhar Yadav and demanded that the impeachment notice against him should be taken up.
Meanwhile, Rijiju said that the government is in the process of gathering signatures from MPs against Justice Yashwant Varma – at whose house charred currency notes were discovered – and who has filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court challenging the in-house inquiry committee's report indicting him in the case.
"I cannot comment on any business in terms of priority because until or unless the matter is passed by the BAC (Business Advisory Committee) with approval by the Chair, it is difficult for me to make an announcement outside… The signature is underway and it has crossed 100 already,' said Rijiju.
A total of 100 signatures from MPs are required to move a motion for impeaching a judge.
A huge sum of currency notes were discovered at an outhouse of Justice Varma, when he was a Delhi high court judge, during an accidental fire at his residence in the national capital.
A committee appointed by then Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna had indicted him following which he had moved the Supreme Court.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SC to hear pleas challenging Bihar electoral roll revision on August 12, 13; says ‘will step in if there is mass exclusion'
SC to hear pleas challenging Bihar electoral roll revision on August 12, 13; says ‘will step in if there is mass exclusion'

Indian Express

time7 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

SC to hear pleas challenging Bihar electoral roll revision on August 12, 13; says ‘will step in if there is mass exclusion'

The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will hear on August 12 and 13 pleas related to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the voters' list being carried out by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in Bihar and sought to assure petitioners who challenged the process that 'if there is mass exclusion, we will step in'. Hearing the matter on Monday, a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, while refusing to stop the ECI from publishing the draft revised list, had asked the parties to inform it on Tuesday how much time they will take to make their submissions so that the court can fix a date. As the court took up the matter on Tuesday, Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for the ECI, submitted that the draft has been advertised and given to political parties. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) MP Manoj Jha, said those who have been left out must have a chance to submit objections. 'They will have the right. Who said they won't?' Justice Kant said, adding, 'The moment they deviate from the notification, we will interfere.' To this, Sibal said, 'We don't know who has been left,' and asked if the ECI had given the names of those excluded. Dwivedi replied, 'It won't be given to you. Take from the website.' Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioner Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), submitted that according to the ECI, 65 lakh people have not submitted the enumeration forms as they are either dead or have permanently shifted elsewhere. Contending that those excluded will have to apply afresh, he wondered how they will come to know whether they are in the draft. Justice Kant said that the ECI is a constitutional body and 'we would deem their action will be in accordance with the law.' He assured that the court is there to take care of any concern. 'We are here, we will hear you,' he stated. Justice Bagchi said, 'January 2025 list is the starting point if there was no SIR. Draft list will be published by ECI. Your apprehension is 65 lakh-odd voters will not feature… They (ECI) are seeking correction vis-a-vis 2025 entry. We are overviewing the thing as a judicial authority. If there is mass exclusion, we will step in. Bring 15 people saying they are alive but left out.' The ECI counsel, however, said there is a 30-day window for filing objections and that the petitioners should help with adding names. Justice Kant stated that political parties should operate like NGOs during the process. Sibal said the petitioners will have no problem if the ECI mentions who were excluded. Justice Kant then said, 'If the draft list is conspicuously silent, you will bring (it) to our attention.' Dwivedi said the final number would be made public only after the objections are considered. 'Once objections are considered, a real picture would come as to who has been excluded. At least by September 15, we are expecting (the final list),' he added.

Parliament Monsoon session: Amit Shah confirms killing of terrorists involved in Pahalgam terror attack
Parliament Monsoon session: Amit Shah confirms killing of terrorists involved in Pahalgam terror attack

The Hindu

time9 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Parliament Monsoon session: Amit Shah confirms killing of terrorists involved in Pahalgam terror attack

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Tuesday (July 29, 2025) confirmed that three terrorists who were involved in the killing of civilians were eliminated by the security forces during Operation Mahadev. Mr. Shah said this as he began his address in Lok Sabha amid the ongoing debate on Operation Sindoor and informed that those who killed our citizens in the ghastly Pahalgam terror attack have been killed. "In a joint Operation Mahadev, the Indian Army, CRPF, and J&K Police have neutralised three terrorists who were involved in the Pahalgam terror attack," Mr. Shah said while addressing the lower house. "Innocent civilians were killed in front of their families by asking their religion. I condemn this barbaric act. I express my sympathies to the families who lost their loved ones," he added. On Monday, three terrorists were killed in Operation Mahadev in an intense firefight with security forces in the Harwan area near Dachigam National Park of Srinagar in Jammu and Kashmir. During the discussion on Operation Sindoor in Parliament, BJP MP Baijayant Jay Panda told the House that it appears that at least one terrorist involved in the Pahalgam attack has been neutralised in an ongoing anti-terror operation, Mahadev, in Jammu and Panda said, "As we were debating this issue today, some of us must have seen in the news that an Operation Mahadev is being conducted in Jammu and Kashmir, targeted at terrorists and it appears that at least one of those eliminated today was involved in the Pahalgam attack." The anti-terror Operation Mahadev took place in the general area of Lidwas, Chinar Corps of the Indian Army said."OP MAHADEV - Contact established in General Area Lidwas. Operation in progress," the Chinar Corp said in a previous post on X.

Voter number, guns, chocolate…: Amit Shah lists proofs Pahalgam terrorists were Pakistanis
Voter number, guns, chocolate…: Amit Shah lists proofs Pahalgam terrorists were Pakistanis

First Post

time9 minutes ago

  • First Post

Voter number, guns, chocolate…: Amit Shah lists proofs Pahalgam terrorists were Pakistanis

Amit Shah rebutted P Chidambaram's claim that the Pahalgam terrorists could be 'homegrown', saying in Parliament that there is clear proof, including voter IDs and rifles, linking them to Pakistan. read more Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Monday hit out at Congress leader P Chidambaram over his recent remarks questioning the identity of the Pahalgam attackers, asserting that India has irrefutable proof that the terrorists killed in the operation were from Pakistan. Speaking in Parliament debate on Operation Sindoor, Shah said the government had concrete evidence, including Pakistani voter ID numbers, rifles, cartridges, and even Pakistan-made chocolates, linking the April 22 Pahalgam terror attackers to Pakistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'NIA had already arrested those who gave them shelter. Those who fed them were detained. When the terrorists' dead bodies reached Srinagar, they were identified as the three people who carried out the terror attack in Pahalgam. The FSL report of the cartridges from the terror attack was already ready. Yesterday, the rifles of the three terrorists were seized and matched with the FSL reports. Further tests were carried out in Chandigarh yesterday, after that it was confirmed that these three were those who carried out the terror attack,' Shah told the House. VIDEO | Parliament Monsoon Session: Union Home Minister Amit Shah (@AmitShah) during debate on Operation Sindoor says, "I was pained yesterday when former Home Minister P Chidambaram raised the question that what was the proof that the Pahalgam terrorists came from Pakistan? What… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) July 29, 2025 Hitting out at Chidambaram directly, Shah said, 'Yesterday, Chidambaram ji raised the question, what proof is there that the terrorists came from Pakistan? This question was raised just before the discussion was to take place in Parliament. I ask, what will you gain by protecting Pakistan?' We have their voter IDs..: Amit Shah He further accused the former Home Minister of giving a 'clean chit' to Pakistan, 'I want to tell Chidambaram ji that we have proof , those involved in this attack were from Pakistan. We have their voter ID numbers, and the rifles and cartridges used were made in Pakistan. The former Home Minister of this country is giving Pakistan a clean chit in front of the entire world.' Pahalgam attackers could be 'homegrown terrorists': Chidambaram The controversy was sparked by an interview Congress leader P Chidambaram gave to The Quint, where he questioned the government's claims linking Pakistan to the April 22 terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, which claimed 26 lives, mostly civilians. 'Have they identified the terrorists? Where they came from? I mean, for all we know, they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do you assume that they came from Pakistan? There's no evidence of that,' Chidambaram had said in the interview. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store