logo
Day Ahead of Monsoon Session, Opposition Raises Pahalgam, Trump's Claims and Bihar SIR in All-Party Meet

Day Ahead of Monsoon Session, Opposition Raises Pahalgam, Trump's Claims and Bihar SIR in All-Party Meet

The Wire5 days ago
Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju said that the government is 'ready for discussions with an open heart' but did not provide any clear answers to whether the demands will be heeded to.
Union Ministers J.P. Nadda and Kiren Rijiju, along with others arrive to attend the all-party meeting ahead of the Monsoon session of Parliament. Photo: PTI
New Delhi: The monsoon session of parliament is set for a stormy start as opposition parties on Sunday (July 20) at the customary all-party meeting convened by the Union government demanded a discussion on the Pahalgam terror attack, US president Donald Trump's continuing claims of ceasefire mediation between India and Pakistan and the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in poll-bound Bihar.
The monsoon session of the parliament will begin on Monday, July 21.
Following the all-party meeting which was attended by 54 MPs, Union parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju said that the government is 'ready for discussions' but did not provide any clear answers to whether the opposition's demands will be heeded to and said that the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) will take a final decision.
He also said that whether it is the US President or anyone else, responses can only be given in parliament when a discussion or statement is being given.
'All parties put forth their positions. From the government we noted down all their points. We have said that to ensure that the House functions properly, the government and opposition should work together with good coordination. We might be political parties of different ideologies but it is everyone's responsibility to ensure that Parliament functions properly – opposition's as well as the government's,' said Rijiju to reporters after the meeting.
'Several important issues have been raised by the members asking for a discussion in parliament. We are ready for a discussion with an open heart. We follow rules and parliamentary traditions,' he added.
As the opposition raised Trump's claims of mediating the ceasefire – he claimed it 24 times by some accounts – in the all-party meeting, along with his latest statement that 'five jets ' having been shot down, Rijiju said that whether it is the US president's statement or anyone else, an answer can only be given when a discussion is held in the parliament.
'Whether it is the US President or anyone else, I cannot give an answer here as this is not the proper forum. The correct forum for an answer or a statement is when a discussion will be held in parliament and at that time all answers will be given,' said Rijiju.
'I cannot make any announcement at the moment because the demands and issues raised today by both opposition parties and the ruling alliance will now be taken up in the Business Advisory Committee (BAC). A meeting will then be held under the chairmanship of the Rajya Sabha Chairman and Lok Sabha Speaker, where a final decision will be made,' he said.
'As for notices submitted by members, we cannot deny them. Requesting a discussion is every member's right, and we cannot refuse that,' he added.
The monsoon session will be the first parliament session since the Pahalgam terror attack, and the four-day long military conflict with Pakistan following Operation Sindoor. The opposition had made continued demands for a special session of parliament, but the government had not heeded to the demands.
'We have demanded that several important issues are raised in this session, due to which we hope that Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses the nation through the parliament. Those important issues are Pahalgam – the lapses that led to the attack and the statements made by the Lieutenant Governor. A lot of time has passed and the government will have to speak. The statements coming from the US President today (Saturday), raise questions on the dignity of India, the bravery of the Indian armed forces. Only the Prime Minister can respond to the statements made by the US President,' said Congress' deputy leader in the Lok Sabha Gaurav Gogoi.
Gogoi further said that the prime minister must also address concerns arising from the ongoing SIR in Bihar, as well as the two-front axis being built by China and Pakistan that have implications for Indian foreign policy.
'It will be very important for Prime Minister Modi to come to this House and put forth his views on these three subjects,' he said.
These issues were decided upon by the INDIA bloc in its virtual meeting on Saturday, July 19, attended by 24 parties. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) stayed away and said that the alliance was only for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. However, AAP MP Sanjay Singh, who attended the all-party meeting on Sunday, raised some of the same issues that were highlighted by the INDIA bloc.
'The issue I have raised on behalf of my party is that the US President is repeatedly saying that he got the ceasefire done in the name of a trade deal, the government should give clarification on this," said AAP MP Sanjay Singh.
Singh added that the government must also address the slum demolitions in Delhi, the SIR exercise in Bihar, as well as the Air India plane crash last month.
Communist Party of India MP Sandosh Kumar P. said that the 'Prime Minister must come to the House and address the Pahalgam terror attack and its subsequent developments. The government did not say anything clearly.'
Biju Janata Dal MP Sasmit Patra said that he had raised the 'alarming breakdown of law and order in Odisha under the BJP government.'
'There has been a disturbing rise in heinous crimes against women and children. The tragic self-immolation of a student in Balasore; who had reached out to a BJP MP, the administration and even tweeted to the Odisha's chief minister, Union ministers, and several BJP leaders; has shaken the conscience of the nation. She was an ABVP member, yet her pleas were ignored. Just yesterday, a 15-year-old girl in Puri was set ablaze. Around 20 days ago, the Additional Commissioner of BMC was assaulted by five local BJP leaders. The recent chaos during the Puri Rath Yatra stampede is another example of this lawlessness. These issues will be strongly raised during the session,' Patra said.
During the meeting some opposition members also raised the issue of communal remarks made by Justice Shekhar Yadav and demanded that the impeachment notice against him should be taken up.
Meanwhile, Rijiju said that the government is in the process of gathering signatures from MPs against Justice Yashwant Varma – at whose house charred currency notes were discovered – and who has filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court challenging the in-house inquiry committee's report indicting him in the case.
"I cannot comment on any business in terms of priority because until or unless the matter is passed by the BAC (Business Advisory Committee) with approval by the Chair, it is difficult for me to make an announcement outside… The signature is underway and it has crossed 100 already,' said Rijiju.
A total of 100 signatures from MPs are required to move a motion for impeaching a judge.
A huge sum of currency notes were discovered at an outhouse of Justice Varma, when he was a Delhi high court judge, during an accidental fire at his residence in the national capital.
A committee appointed by then Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna had indicted him following which he had moved the Supreme Court.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No plan to remove ‘secular', ‘socialist' from Preamble: Centre
No plan to remove ‘secular', ‘socialist' from Preamble: Centre

Scroll.in

time26 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

No plan to remove ‘secular', ‘socialist' from Preamble: Centre

The Union government has no plans or intention to remove the words 'secular' and 'socialist' from the Preamble to the Constitution, Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal told Parliament on Thursday. Meghwal acknowledged that 'certain groups' were seeking the removal of the two words from the Preamble. 'Any discussions regarding amendments to the Preamble would require thorough deliberation and broad consensus, but as of now, the government has not initiated any formal process to change these provisions,' Meghwal told Rajya Sabha. The words 'socialist' and 'secular' were not part of the Constitution adopted in 1950 and were added in 1976 through the 42nd constitutional amendment. In November, the Supreme Court dismissed petitions filed by Bharatiya Janata Party leaders Subramanian Swamy and Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, in addition to a separate plea by a man named Balram Singh, challenging the 1976 amendment. Citing this ruling, the Union law minister said: 'The court clarified that 'socialism' in the Indian context signifies a welfare state and does not impede private sector growth, while 'secularism' is integral to the Constitution's basic structure.' The court had said in its order that there was no legitimate justification for challenging the constitutional amendment several decades later. The minister's response to Samajwadi Party MP Ramji Lal Suman's questions in the Rajya Sabha came about a month after a political row erupted about the inclusion of the words in the Constitution. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in June called for a review of the two terms. The RSS is the parent organisation of the ruling BJP. A day after the comment by RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale, Jagdeep Dhankhar, the vice president at the time, had said that the addition of the words 'secular' and 'socialist' to the Preamble of the Constitution during the Emergency was a ' sacrilege to the spirit of sanatana '. Sanatana dharma is a term some people use as a synonym for Hinduism. Union ministers Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Jitendra Singh had also voiced their support for a review. Chouhan had claimed that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' are not core to Indian culture and called for a discussion on their removal from the Constitution. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi had criticised the RSS for seeking a review of the two words in the Preamble, saying that the Hindutva organisation's ' mask had come off again '. In 2015, a controversy erupted after the BJP-led Union government's newspaper advertisements on Republic Day featured a Preamble with the two words omitted. In September 2023, Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury claimed that the two words were missing from the Preamble

Should EC let dead people be in poll rolls, asks CEC
Should EC let dead people be in poll rolls, asks CEC

Hindustan Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Should EC let dead people be in poll rolls, asks CEC

Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on Thursday defended the ongoing Special Intensive Revision of Bihar's electoral rolls, questioning whether the Election Commission should allow deceased persons, permanent migrants and duplicate voters to remain registered amid opposition allegations that the exercise would disenfranchise crores of legitimate voters. Should EC let dead people be in poll rolls, asks CEC Kumar's strident defence came as Congress leader Rahul Gandhi escalated his attack on the poll panel, claiming his party possessed definitive proof of electoral fraud in Karnataka and threatening consequences for election officials. Speaking in Parliament premises, Gandhi declared: 'Not 90 per cent, when we decide to show it to you, it is a 100 per cent proof.' He alleged the Congress had discovered thousands of unauthorised voter entries for people aged 50, 60 and 65 in a single Karnataka constituency, alongside deletions of legitimate voters above 18. 'We just looked at one constituency and we found this. I am absolutely convinced that constituency after constituency this is the drama that is taking place,' Gandhi said, claiming similar manipulation was occurring during Bihar's SIR exercise. 'I want to send a message to the Election Commission: If you think you are going to get away with it, you are mistaken. We are going to come for you,' Gandhi warned. The CEC, in his remarks aimed generally at political criticism with respect to the exercise in Bihar, invoked constitutional principles, asking whether the Election Commission should 'get misled by some people' and 'pave the way for some to cast fake votes in the name of deceased voters, voters who have migrated permanently, voters who have got their votes registered at two places, fake voters or foreign voters, going against the Constitution, first in Bihar, then in the entire country.' 'The Constitution of India is the mother of Indian democracy,' Kumar stated, arguing that authentic voter lists prepared through transparent processes formed 'the foundation stone for fair elections and strong democracy.' 'Perhaps the most appropriate time for this essential thinking for all of you has now arrived in India,' he added, urging citizens to think beyond political ideologies. In a Thursday press note, the Commission revealed that 99% of Bihar's electors had been reached in the revision exercise, with forms from 72.1 million voters—91.32% of the total—already received and digitised. But BLOs and BLAs reported significant irregularities, the panel claimed. Nearly 2.2 million on the rolls were deceased, 3.2 million had migrated permanently, 700,000 registrations were duplicate and another 100,000 were untraceable voters. Despite door-to-door verification, roughly 700,000 electors were yet to submit their forms – the deadline for which was set for July 25. The Commission shared booth-level lists of problematic entries with all political parties on July 20, allowing claims and objections until September 1, 2025. The draft electoral roll will be published on August 1 and distributed to all 12 recognised parties in digital and printed formats. An ECI spokesperson dismissed Gandhi's Karnataka allegations as 'unwarranted' and 'baseless,' noting that Congress had filed no appeals with the District Magistrate or Chief Electoral Officer under Section 24 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950. Of 10 election petitions filed in Karnataka, none came from losing Congress candidates despite available legal remedies under Section 80 of the RP Act, 1951. 'ECI is wondering as to why such baseless and threatening allegations are being made against the CEC—and that too now?' the spokesperson questioned. Kumar advised that if an election petition had been filed, Gandhi should 'wait for the verdict of Hon'ble High Court,' otherwise refrain from making 'baseless allegations.'

Over 2.06 lakh Indians gave up their citizenship in 2024, says Centre
Over 2.06 lakh Indians gave up their citizenship in 2024, says Centre

Scroll.in

time26 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Over 2.06 lakh Indians gave up their citizenship in 2024, says Centre

More than 2.06 lakh persons relinquished their Indian citizenship in 2024, the Union government told Parliament on Thursday. Kirti Vardhan Singh, the minister of state for external affairs, told Rajya Sabha that 2.16 lakh Indians had given up their citizenship in 2023. In 2022, more than 2.25 lakh Indians had given up their citizenship. The number was 1.6 lakh in 2021, 85,256 in 2020 and 1.4 lakh in 2019. The minister provided the data in response to a question by Congress MP Anil Kumar Yadav Mandadi, who had sought to know if the Union government undertakes a 'thorough checkup/survey/inspection before acceding to the request of relinquishment of Indian Citizenship'. Singh said that a person looking to renounce their Indian citizenship is required to apply online, following which, either a district collector or a consular officer verifies the original passport. Documents are uploaded and made available to all government departments for their inputs that are to be provided within 30 days, said the minister, adding that a renunciation certificate is issued after this period. In March, the Union government told Parliament that the number of Indians who gave up their citizenship stood at 1.34 lakh in 2018 and 1.33 lakh in 2017. 'The reasons for renouncing Indian citizenship or taking foreign citizenship are personal and known only to the individual,' the Union government had said. It added that it recognised the 'potential of the global workplace in an era of knowledge economy', which had brought about a 'transformational change in its engagement with Indian diaspora'. 'A successful, prosperous, and influential diaspora is an asset for India,' said the government. 'India stands to gain a lot from tapping its diaspora networks and productive utilisation of the soft power that comes from having such a flourishing diaspora.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store