DR Congo conflict: M23 rebels killed at least140 civilians, Human Rights Watch says
It did not respond to a request to comment on the report, the rights group said.The alleged massacre appears to have taken place during an M23 campaign against an armed Hutu group, the FDLR, formed by perpetrators of the 1994 genocide in neighbouring Rwanda.HRW said the total killings in July may exceed 300, corroborating similar findings by the UN earlier this month.Fighting between government troops and the M23 rebels escalated in January, when the rebels captured large parts of the mineral-rich east, including the regional capital Goma.Thousands of people have been killed and hundreds of thousands of civilians forced from their homes in the ongoing conflict, the UN says.How Trump wants the US to cash in on mineral-rich DR Congo's peace dealWhat's the fighting in DR Congo all about?In the report released on Wednesday, HRW said the M23 used machetes and gunfire to attack people in at least 14 villages and farming areas near Virunga National Park between 10 - 30 July. The M23 fighters surrounded and blocked off all roads into the area to prevent people from leaving, witnesses said. "We woke up on 11 July and [the M23] were there in large numbers.… [T]hey were already on our doorstep.… [T]hey killed people with guns and machetes," a man narrated, saying that five members of his family were killed in Katanga area. A woman who saw M23 fighters kill her husband with a machete on 11 July 11 said that M23 fighters that day rounded up 70 the women and children."They told us to sit on the edge of the riverbank, and then they started shooting at us," the woman was quoted as saying, adding that she survived after falling into the river without being shot.Another man said that he watched as the rebels killed his wife and four children aged nine months to 10 years from afar, according to the report.Locals said that M23 fighters told them to immediately bury the bodies in the fields or leave them unburied, preventing families from organising funerals. "M23 fighters also threw bodies, including of women and children, into the Rutshuru River," the report added. Citing 25 witness accounts plus medical workers, military and UN personnel, the report said that members of the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF), were backing the M23 operation.Earlier this month, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights also reported that the RDF had support the M23 killings of "at least 319 between 9 and 21 July in four villages in Rutshuru."Kigali has not responded to the HRW claim, but it has angrily denied the UN accusations, calling them "gratuitous" and "sensational allegations," saying they risked undermining the peace process, and claiming that an armed group opposed to the M23 carried out the killings.Rwanda denies persistent and widespread allegations that it provides military support to the M23, which is largely made up of the Tutsi ethnic group that was targeted by Hutu militias in the genocide.But Kigali does see eastern Congo as a security threat, primarily because of the continued existence of the armed Hutu group, the FDLR, which fights alongside the army.The killings occur amid stalled regional and international peace efforts to end the prolonged deadly conflict, including an agreement between Rwanda and the DRC with provisions for Kinshasa to "neutralize" the FDLR.Separately in Qatar last month, the M23 and the DR Congo government also signed a ceasefire deal, intended as a step towards a permanent peace.But last week, as negotiations were set to resume, the M23 walked away from the peace talks, saying Kinshasa had failed to meet commitments outlined in the declaration of principles.The Congolese army has also accused the M23 of violating the ceasefire.HRW has urged the UN Security Council, the European Union, and governments to condemn grave abuses witnessed in east DR Congo, impose further sanctions on those responsible and press for the arrest and appropriate prosecution of commanders implicated in the conflict.
More stories from DR Congo:
Listen: Why DR Congo is sponsoring FC BarcelonaThe would-be saint murdered 'mafia-style' for refusing bribesInside the Congolese mine vital to mobile phones, as rebels give BBC rare access
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Human rights group to seek to appeal against Israel jet parts export ruling
Palestinian human rights organisation Al-Haq has said it is seeking to appeal against a High Court ruling that found the Government's export of fighter jet parts that can be used by Israel amid the conflict in Gaza is lawful. Al-Haq took legal action against the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) over its decision to continue licensing exports of components for F-35 fighter jets, claiming it was unlawful and 'gives rise to a significant risk of facilitating crime'. In September last year, the Government suspended export licences for weapons and military equipment following a review of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law in the conflict. But an exemption was made for some licences related to parts for F-35s, which are part of an international defence programme. In a ruling in June, Lord Justice Males and Mrs Justice Steyn dismissed the challenge, finding that 'the conduct of international relations' is a matter for the executive, rather than the courts, and that it would be unnecessary to decide whether there was a 'significant risk' that the carve-out could facilitate crimes. On Thursday, Al-Haq and the Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) said that they were seeking to appeal against the ruling at the Court of Appeal, with a hearing to decide whether they can proceed with the latest challenge due to be held on October 9. Shawan Jabarin, director of Al-Haq, said: 'Israel is blatantly and openly starving, killing and forcibly displacing Palestinians in Gaza, in conditions it has manufactured to be unfit for human survival. 'If the UK courts are unwilling to hold the Government accountable for arming Israel during the deadliest phase of its genocide to date, who will? 'The United Kingdom is bound by both domestic and international law, including the Genocide Convention, not to provide arms where there is a clear risk they could contribute to serious breaches of international humanitarian law or enable genocide. 'The court's findings set a dangerous precedent and risk undermining the legal mechanisms designed to ensure government accountability. 'We must appeal to stop states arming the genocide, for justice for the Palestinian people.' F-35 jets are part of an international defence programme which produces and maintains the fighter jets, with the UK contributing components for both assembly lines and an international pool. The High Court previously heard that Israel is not one of the 'partner nations' of the programme, but is a customer and can order new F-35 aircraft and draw on a pool for spare parts. The court was also told that the decision to 'carve out' licences related to F-35 components followed advice from Defence Secretary John Healey, who said a suspension would impact the 'whole F-35 programme' and have a 'profound impact on international peace and security'. Lord Justice Males and Mrs Justice Steyn said in June that they agreed with barristers for the DBT, which opposed the legal challenge, who said it was not possible for the UK to 'unilaterally' ensure that UK-made parts did not reach Israel. On Thursday, Al-Haq and GLAN said that they sought to challenge the ruling on three grounds, including that the High Court 'erred' in finding that the carve-out complied with UK law. It also said that the High Court was wrong to find that it could not decide whether the carve-out complied with international law, which GLAN said created a 'glaring gap in accountability'. Gearoid O Cuinn, director of GLAN, said: 'We are proud to be supporting Al-Haq in their appeal. 'The UK Government's arming of Israel as it violates international law daily, before our eyes, cannot go unchallenged. 'The hearing on whether our appeal can proceed will be held in October, but Palestinians cannot wait a moment longer, the leaders of Israel have openly stated their intent to erase them from their land. 'The UK Government is hiding behind the global F-35 parts pool, putting contracts with US weapons manufacturers ahead of fundamental obligations under international law to keep arming Israel. This must end. 'Tracing British parts, to stop them reaching Israel, is possible, and it must be done urgently.'
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Rwanda-backed rebel group M23 denies role in Congo massacres
The Rwanda-backed rebel group M23 has denied involvement in a series of massacres in eastern Congo which were detailed in a report published by a rights group Wednesday. Lawrence Kanyuka, spokesperson for the M23 military, called the Human Rights Watch report 'fake and a falsification of reality' and accused the group of spreading 'extremist propaganda' in a statement late Wednesday. M23 is the most prominent of more than 100 armed groups fighting for control in Congo's mineral-rich east. Both M23 and the Congolese military have previously been accused of violence against civilians. Earlier this year, Congolese authorities accused M23 of extrajudicial killings during its seizure of major cities. In the report, Human Rights Watch accused M23 of killing over 140 civilians as part of a military campaign against the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group made up mostly of ethnic Hutu fighters. Nearly 2 million Hutus from Rwanda fled to Congo after the 1994 Rwandan genocide that killed 800,000 Tutsis, moderate Hutus and others. Rwandan authorities have accused Hutus who fled of participating in the genocide, alleging that the Congolese army protected them. Bertrand Bisimwa, an M23 leader, said on social platform X that the report was intended to influence the United Nations Security Council and was not based on evidence. A separate report by another rights group, Amnesty International, also published Wednesday, found that both M23 and Congolese government-sponsored militias regularly committed mass atrocities and sexual violence against civilians. With 7 million people displaced in Congo, the U.N. has called the conflict in eastern Congo 'one of the most protracted, complex, serious humanitarian crises on Earth.' The United States and others have been trying to achieve a permanent ceasefire since fighting between M23 and Congolese forces escalated in January. The Congolese and Rwandan foreign ministers signed a peace deal at the White House in July. But M23 was not directly involved in the negotiations and said it could not abide by the terms of the agreement. The final step was meant to be a separate deal between Congo and M23, facilitated by the Gulf state of Qatar, that would bring about a permanent ceasefire. However, a deadline for the deal was missed and there have been no public signs of major talks between Congo and M23 on the final terms. The U.S. Bureau of African affairs, in a statement late Wednesday on X, called for an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council to discuss the 'horrific abuses perpetrated against civilians, including by M23.'
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Met Police's live facial recognition policy is ‘unlawful', watchdog warns
The Metropolitan Police's live facial recognition (LFR) policy is 'unlawful' because it is 'incompatible' with human rights laws, the equalities watchdog has warned. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has said the UK's biggest police force's rules and safeguards over using the tool 'fall short' and could have a 'chilling effect' on individuals' rights when used at protests. The concerns come as the Met is set to deploy LFR, which captures people's faces in real-time CCTV cameras, at this year's Notting Hill Carnival over the August bank holiday weekend. Metropolitan Police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has already sought to reassure campaign groups that the technology will be used without bias. A Met spokesperson said the force believes its use of the tool is 'both lawful and proportionate, playing a key role in keeping Londoners safe'. The EHRC has been given permission to intervene in an upcoming judicial review over LFR, brought by privacy campaigner Big Brother Watch director Silkie Carlo and anti-knife crime community worker Shaun Thompson. They are seeking the legal challenge claiming Mr Thompson was 'grossly mistreated' after LFR wrongly identified him as a criminal last year. EHRC chief executive John Kirkpatrick said the technology, when used responsibly, can help combat serious crime and keep people safe, but the biometric data being processed is 'deeply personal'. 'The law is clear: everyone has the right to privacy, to freedom of expression and to freedom of assembly. These rights are vital for any democratic society,' he said. 'As such, there must be clear rules which guarantee that live facial recognition technology is used only where necessary, proportionate and constrained by appropriate safeguards. 'We believe that the Metropolitan Police 's current policy falls short of this standard. The Met, and other forces using this technology, need to ensure they deploy it in ways which are consistent with the law and with human rights.' The watchdog said it believes the Met's policy is 'unlawful' because it is 'incompatible' with Articles 8, right to privacy, 10, freedom of expression, and 11, freedom of assembly and association of the European Convention on Human Rights. Big Brother Watch interim director Rebecca Vincent said the involvement of EHRC in the judicial review was hugely welcome in the 'landmark legal challenge'. 'The rapid proliferation of invasive live facial recognition technology without any legislation governing its use is one of the most pressing human rights concerns in the UK today,' she said. 'Live facial recognition surveillance turns our faces into barcodes and makes us a nation of suspects who, as we've seen in Shaun's case, can be falsely accused, grossly mistreated and forced to prove our innocence to authorities.' 'Given this crucial ongoing legal action, the Home Office and police's investment in this dangerous and discriminatory technology is wholly inappropriate and must stop.' It comes as Home Secretary Yvette Cooper defended plans to expand LFR across the country to catch 'high-harm' offenders last week. Last month, the Metropolitan Police announced plans to expand its use of the technology across the capital. Police bosses said LFR will now be used up to 10 times per week across five days, up from the current four times per week across two days. A Met spokeswoman said the force welcomes the EHRC's recognition of the technology's potential in policing, and that the Court of Appeal has confirmed police can use LFR under common law powers. 'As part of this model, we have strong safeguards in place, with biometric data automatically deleted unless there is a match,' she said. 'Independent research from the National Physical Laboratory has also helped us configure the technology in a way that avoids discrimination.'
