logo
Abdullah bin Zayed welcomes France's announcement on intention to recognise State of Palestine, reaffirms commitment to supporting legitimate rights of Palestinian People

Abdullah bin Zayed welcomes France's announcement on intention to recognise State of Palestine, reaffirms commitment to supporting legitimate rights of Palestinian People

Emirates 24/73 days ago
H.H. Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, welcomed the announcement by Emmanuel Macron, President of the French Republic, regarding France's intention to recognise the State of Palestine.
H.H. Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed believes this step reinforces efforts by the international community to advance the two-state solution and establish a just and lasting peace in the region.
H.H. Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed expressed the UAE's appreciation for this significant decision, which comes at a critical juncture and underscores the need for the international community to uphold its responsibilities and work collectively to revive the political process and bring an end to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Such efforts would contribute to enhancing regional security and stability, while supporting the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people, including the establishment of an independent, sovereign state in accordance with relevant United Nations resolutions and international law.
H.H. Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan also reaffirmed the UAE's unwavering commitment to the aspirations and rights of the Palestinian people, and to continued cooperation with regional and international partners to achieve a just and sustainable solution that ends the conflict and lays the groundwork for a more stable and prosperous future for the peoples of the region.
Follow Emirates 24|7 on Google News.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'No alternative' to two-state solution, says France
'No alternative' to two-state solution, says France

The National

time17 minutes ago

  • The National

'No alternative' to two-state solution, says France

There is 'no alternative' to a two-state solution between Israelis and the Palestinians, France told a UN conference co-chaired with Saudi Arabia on Monday. 'Only a political, two-state solution will help respond to the legitimate aspirations of Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security,' French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said at the start of the three-day meeting. The conference comes days after French President Emmanuel Macron announced plans to formally recognise a Palestinian state in September, and as international outrage over the humanitarian situation in Gaza mounts. Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan told reporters in New York that US President Donald Trump is an 'essential' actor that could act as a 'catalyst' to end the Gaza war. 'President Trump has in fact had success already in this regard, he was able to facilitate the first and only ceasefire so far in this conflict,' said Prince Faisal. 'We, as strong partners of the United States, continue to work closely with the US on many issues, and we hope that the US will continue to lead in the efforts for peace.' He also stressed Riyadh would not normalise ties with Israel without an end to the Gaza war. Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa told the high-level conference that the push for a two-state solution was a message to Israelis that peace and regional integration were still possible. 'It will be achieved through our independence, not our destruction,' Mr Mustafa said. 'Israelis are not doomed to be at eternal war. There is another way, a better way, that leads to shared peace, shared security and shared prosperity in our region, not for one at the expense of the other, but for all." Mr Mustafa called on Hamas to relinquish control of Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority. The US State Department condemned the high-profile conference, calling it 'unproductive' and 'ill-timed'. 'This effort is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7 and a reward for terrorism,' Ms Bruce said. 'It keeps hostages trapped in tunnels. The United States will not participate in this insult but will continue to lead real-world efforts to end the fighting and deliver a permanent peace.' The UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said this week's summit must not become another 'exercise in well-meaning rhetoric". 'It must serve as a decisive turning point, and it is the sine qua non for peace across the wider Middle East,' he asserted. Mr Guterres stressed that the devastation in the coastal enclave has reached an intolerable level and 'nothing can justify the obliteration of Gaza that has unfolded before the eyes of the world'. The UN chief criticised Israel's policies, including a Knesset declaration last week supporting the annexation of the occupied West Bank calling it 'illegal'. 'The wholesale destruction of Gaza is intolerable, it must stop.' he said.

US calls Saudi and French-led conference on two-state solution a 'publicity stunt'
US calls Saudi and French-led conference on two-state solution a 'publicity stunt'

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

US calls Saudi and French-led conference on two-state solution a 'publicity stunt'

The United States on Monday lashed out at a United Nations conference promoting a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict that was hosted by its close allies France and Saudi Arabia. The US State Department labelled the three-day event "unproductive and ill-timed", as well as a "publicity stunt" that would make finding peace harder. The diplomatic push is a "reward for terrorism", the statement said. The US deployed even harsher words against French President Emmanuel Macron, calling his decision to recognise a Palestinian state last week 'counterproductive', saying its Nato ally's decision 'undercuts our diplomatic efforts'. France is hoping that the UK will follow its lead. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters More than 200 British members of parliament voiced support for the idea on Friday, but Prime Minister Keir Starmer has resisted. Middle East Eye has revealed that the US pressured both the UK and France against recognising Palestine earlier this year. The conference kicked off on Monday in New York City, with participants reaffirming that there is "no alternative" to the conflict besides a two-state solution. France and Saudi Arabia's leadership of the event underscores how the US's unchecked support for Israel's war on Gaza is putting its diplomacy at odds with key partners. "Only a political, two-state solution will help respond to the legitimate aspirations of Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security. There is no alternative," French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said at the start of the three-day meeting. UN secretary general Antonio Guterres said at the meeting that "the two-state solution is farther than ever before", decrying Israel's "creeping annexation" of the occupied West Bank and "the wholesale destruction of Gaza". The meeting comes as Gaza descends into famine as a result of Israel's siege of the enclave. Hundreds of starving Palestinians have been killed trying to obtain food from the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation that is backed by the US and Israel. Deaths from famine and malnutrition have soared in recent days. US asked Saudi Arabia to send missile interceptors to Israel during Iran conflict. Riyadh refused Read More » US President Donald Trump was asked about the famine on Monday and did not dispute it. 'That's real starvation stuff,' Trump said. 'I see it, you can't fake that.' 'Those children look very hungry,' he said. 'We have to get the kids fed.' But Trump has continued to fault Hamas for the crisis, claiming the group is stealing aid despite a US government assessment contradicting that accusation. More than two dozen of the US's allies - including countries traditionally close to Israel - have accused it of 'drip feeding' aid into Gaza. The Trump administration has clashed with Israel on several issues - including striking an independent ceasefire with the Houthis in Yemen and condemning Israeli strikes on Syria - but has given it full backing for Israel to wage war on Gaza. Last week, Trump announced that the US was pulling out of ceasefire talks. He blamed Hamas for the impasse, a move analysts say was in keeping with more than two years of US messaging to provide cover to Israel for acts of genocide in Gaza, according to two major Israeli human rights groups and scores of western organisations. "It's widely understood that there are no real strategic objectives to fulfill militarily unless the ultimate goal is displacement," Michael Hanna, a Middle East expert at the International Crisis Group, told MEE previously. "In the meantime, it appears the US is willing to stand by as famine deepens throughout Gaza." Even as the US criticised the UN summit, its top participants tried to entice Trump back to talks. Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan al-Saud said Trump could be a "catalyst" to ending the war in Gaza and jump-starting the two-state solution. Trump has regularly said he wants to strike a normalisation deal with Saudi Arabia and Israel, building on the 2020 Abraham Accords, which he considers a signature foreign policy achievement. Riyadh says to achieve that goal, Israel would need to take irreversible steps towards the creation of a Palestinian state, with a ceasefire in Gaza the first precondition. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has said publicly that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Beyond facilitating conditions for the recognition of a Palestinian state, the three days of meeting will focus on three other issues, including the reform of the Palestinian Authority, disarmament of Hamas and normalisation of relations with Israel by Arab states as part of a two-state solution.

Tunisia: Mass convictions in ‘Conspiracy Case 2' deepen rule of law crisis
Tunisia: Mass convictions in ‘Conspiracy Case 2' deepen rule of law crisis

Zawya

timean hour ago

  • Zawya

Tunisia: Mass convictions in ‘Conspiracy Case 2' deepen rule of law crisis

The mass conviction of opposition figures in Tunisia's 'Conspiracy Case 2' is a new example of the Tunisian authorities' ongoing restrictions on civic space and erosion of judicial independence and fair trial guarantees, Amnesty International said today. The case, based on vague terrorism and state security charges, is the latest in a series of politically motivated prosecutions that appear designed to silence peaceful dissent and intimidate and crackdown on critics of President Kais Saied's government. 'This case illustrates how Tunisia's criminal justice system is being misused to suppress peaceful dissent and persecute people simply for exercising their human rights. The expanding use of counter-terrorism legislation to punish peaceful dissent is a deeply troubling pattern that Amnesty International has been documenting since 2023,' said Sara Hashash, Amnesty International's Deputy Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa. 'The convictions in 'Conspiracy Case 2' are a grave injustice and a blatant assault on Tunisia's human rights obligations. All individuals detained solely for peacefully exercising their rights to freedom of expression, association, and political activity must be immediately released. 'Authorities must immediately end the ongoing crackdown on human rights including the targeting of critics under the guise of national security and restore judicial independence and the rule of law and put in place effective safeguards to prevent the abuse of counter-terrorism and national security laws as tools of repression.' Amnesty International calls on the Tunisian authorities to quash all sentences issued in 'Conspiracy Case 2' and immediately release those arbitrarily detained. Authorities must ensure that any new trials are held in full compliance with international human rights law. This includes ensuring that future trials are open to the public, with full access granted to family members, lawyers, journalists, and independent monitors. Tunisia is a state party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and is legally bound to uphold the rights to a fair trial, freedom of expression, association and liberty. The trial took place amid an ongoing rule of law crisis in Tunisia. Since President Saied's power grab in July 2021, the country has witnessed an erosion of the rule of law, including through the dismantlement of judicial independence guarantees that have resulted in increased interference by the executive in the judiciary and a wave of prosecutions targeting opposition figures, journalists, civil society activists, and former officials, further constricting the space for fundamental human rights and freedoms. Mass sentences following a politically motivated trial The trial opened on 24 June 2025 and concluded with mass conviction on 8 July of 21 out of 24 individuals including senior political leaders from Ennahdha Party, former government and security officials, lawyers, and other opposition party members. Sentences ranged from 12 to 35 years imposed on 21 individuals. Only one defendant was acquitted while two others are still waiting on the decision to appeal their indictment. Among those convicted was Rached Ghannouchi, the leader of the Ennahda party, who received a 14-year sentence in absentia after refusing to participate in the trial. Other Ennahdha senior members, including Habib Ellouz, Samir Hanachi and Fathi Elbedoui, were sentenced to 12 years, while exiled Ennahdha members Mouadh Kheriji, Lotfi Zitoun, were among those sentenced in absentia to 35 years. Flawed evidence and due process violations The investigation originated in May 2023, following a report from an anonymous informant who claimed the existence of a covert network led by Ghannouchi aimed at 'changing the structure of the state,' with the assistance of former Ministry of Interior official Kamel Ben El Bedoui. The informant also alleged the recruitment of security personnel and coordination with other defendants. These allegations were later supplemented by additional statements from security officials, one of whom was also anonymous. The charges were based on allegations of 'conspiracy against state security,' largely relying on anonymous witness testimony, intercepted communications, and documents seized during police raids. Much of the material consisted of political criticism and private communications critical of President Saied dating back to between 2011 and 2022, but with no concrete evidence of criminal conduct. The authorities' central claim that certain opposition politicians operated a clandestine 'security apparatus' remains unsubstantiated by any independently verifiable evidence. The prosecution relied heavily on anonymous allegations amplified by state-aligned media and security unions, yet failed to present material documentation, institutional investigation, or independent verification to back this claim. No formal inquiry into alleged wrongdoing has been presented, including during the cross examinations of the defendants. Trial marred by serious due process violations The trial was marred by serious violations of due process and fair trial rights. In late February, the Tunis Court of First Instance decided that upcoming terrorism trials would proceed with detainees attending online from prison, citing the existence of unspecified 'real dangers.' The court proceeded to later renew the decision, without further elaboration. Hence, the defendants held in pre-trial detention were forced to participate via remote video link, severely limiting their ability to communicate with legal counsel or engage with the court, according to their lawyers. Similar to other high-profile cases, access to the courtrooms was tightly restricted under security pretexts, with independent journalists, families, and independent observers barred from attending the proceedings, severely undermining the transparency of the trial. 'These trials lack fairness, credibility and transparency. The heavy reliance on anonymous sources and secretive procedures makes the trials a sham and the convictions and sentences a travesty of justice,' said Sara Hashash. 'The Tunisian authorities must end their misuse of the judiciary to target political opponents, respect the rule of law and uphold the human rights of everyone in the country.' Broader crackdown on peaceful dissent The trial took place amid an ongoing rule of law crisis in Tunisia. Since President Saied's power grab in July 2021, the country has witnessed an erosion of the rule of law, including through the dismantlement of judicial independence guarantees that have resulted in increased interference by the executive in the judiciary and a wave of prosecutions targeting opposition figures, journalists, civil society activists, and former officials, further constricting the space for fundamental human rights and freedoms. Background Since July 2021, when President Kais Saied consolidated power, Amnesty International has consistently documented an escalating crackdown on dissent in Tunisia. The organization has previously documented how authorities have abused the justice system, including their reliance on vague charges, and severe fair trial violations in cases against opposition figures. This includes a series of politically motivated prosecutions, arbitrary detentions, and harassment targeting political opponents, independent journalists, lawyers, activists and human rights defenders. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Amnesty International.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store