Florida man spent $43K on windows, but the installation caused leaks. What to do if a home reno goes wrong
In November 2024, Florida resident Dominic Lampos paid $43,000 for 22 windows and a sliding glass door from Home Depot for a home renovation. He told Tampa's WFLA News Channel 8 that, aside from his house, it's the largest purchase he's ever made.
Home Depot sent subcontractors to install the windows — but, unfortunately, they botched the job, resulting in damage to the interior trim and water leakage around the windows. Lampos believes the situation was made worse by a second set of subcontractors who were sent out to fix the shoddy work.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
Pinellas County inspectors then failed the project, according to Channel 8. There were reportedly a number of issues, including nail holes that didn't look like they could hold the windows in place.
A few days later, things went from bad to worse. During a period of light rain, Lampos told Channel 8 'it barely rained and it [the water] poured in, there was a puddle on my windowsill.'
But Lampos' story is not unique. Each year, a number of Americans deal with botched home renovations and repair projects. In a recent survey, 22% of homeowners said they found it challenging to find a reliable contractor, while 15% of those who remodeled their homes cited poor workmanship.
Taking the time to carefully vet a contractor doesn't guarantee there won't be any problems, but it does reduce your risk a fair bit. Almost all large projects will involve some hiccups along the way, but working with a reputable contractor can make it easier to resolve any issues that might arise.
A good place to start is by asking for recommendations from reliable sources such as family, friends, neighbors or co-workers who've had reno work done. You can also check various referral and rating websites, as well as professional organizations such as the National Association of the Remodeling Industry.
It's also helpful to speak to more than one contractor since you'll be working with them for a decent period of time and — similar to hiring a new employee at work — getting the right fit can be a factor in how the relationship and the project progresses.
Once you've landed on a few potential contractors, check with your local Better Business Bureau (BBB) and local or state consumer protection agencies to ensure there are no glaring issues. Then call the contractors to see if they have experience with your type of project, whether they have the time to devote to your reno, and whether they'd be willing to provide references.
The next thing you should do is call their references and ask about their work. You should also investigate the contrators to verify that they're licensed for the type of work you need and make sure they have liability and workers' compensation insurance. Also, ask if they offer a workmanship warranty — also known as a craftsmanship or contractor warranty — which means defects will be addressed without any additional cost.
Before the work starts, make sure to draw up a written contract to ensure both parties understand and agree upon the timeline, quality standards and payment schedules. The contract should also outline how changes will be handled and how disputes will be resolved, as well as tackle legal issues such as lien releases and building permits.
Read more: The US stock market's 'fear gauge' has exploded — but this 1 'shockproof' asset is up 14% and helping American retirees stay calm. Here's how to own it ASAP
Many issues between contractors and homeowners boil down to poor communication, so be sure you are getting frequent updates on progress and potential problems from your contractor.
If you do run into issues, getting angry and straining the relationship further won't help the situation. And if the relationship is deteriorating, communicate in writing, document all communications and try to work out a plan for moving forward.
If the situation still doesn't improve, you could withhold payment until the problems are resolved or file a complaint with the BBB. You also may need to seek legal counsel, especially if a lot of money is on the line.
Depending on the nature of the issue, your state consumer protection laws may be of help. While they tend to deal more with fraud and financing issues, some states — such as Illinois — have laws specifically governing home contractors. If it comes down to it, you may be able to sue for breach of contract, breach of warranty or negligence.
Home insurance could also cover some of the costs if the renovation causes damage to your home or belongings. It's a good idea to contact your insurer before any work begins to understand what your policy will cover and to add any additional coverages that may be deemed prudent.
As for Lampos, Channel 8 contacted Home Depot, which then sent out a crew to fix the issue, assuring Lampos that a 'comprehensive checklist' will be used to address and resolve the situation.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Ted Cruz proposes withholding broadband funding from states that regulate AI
The Brief Senator Ted Cruz proposed that states attempting to regulate AI should lose federal broadband funding. This proposal is an addition to a House-passed bill aiming for a 10-year ban on state AI regulation. Critics argue Cruz's plan is "undemocratic and cruel," forcing states to choose between broadband access and AI consumer protection. WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) proposed on Thursday an alternative punishment for planned legislation that would set a 10-year ban on state regulation of Artificial Intelligence model learning. Under Cruz's budget reconciliation proposal, an attempt to regulate AI would be prohibited from collecting federal funding provided by the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program. The Proposal The U.S. House of Representatives passed their version of House Resolution 1, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," on May 22. In part, the budget bill would ban state regulation on AI for 10 years. As chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Cruz authored a budget reconciliation that he says is intended to "fulfill President Trump's agenda." In a summary of the proposal, he refers to state regulation as "strangling AI deployment," comparing it to EU precautions against tech development. Cruz's proposal adds $500 million to the BEAD program, which has already administered $42.45 billion to the states in order to expand high-speed internet access across the country. It also prevents states from receiving any of that funding if they attempt to regulate AI. Dig deeper Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) has recently spoken out against HR 1, saying the anti-regulatory section alone will cost Congress her vote. Greene explained that she discovered the controversial provision, located on pages 278-279 of the bill, only after the House had already passed the legislation. Once the bill returns to the House following Senate deliberations, Greene says she will change sides based on the matter of AI. What they're saying Advocacy group Public Citizen released a commentary on Cruz's proposal, referring to it as a "display of corporate appeasement." In the article, J.B. Branch, a Big Tech accountability advocate, included the following statement: "This is a senatorial temper tantrum masquerading as policy. Americans have loudly rejected Senator Cruz's dangerous proposal to give tech giants a decade of immunity from state regulation. State legislatures, attorneys general, and citizens across all 50 states have demanded that Congress step away from overhauling consumer protections put in place in the absence of federal leadership. But instead of listening to the American people, Senate Republicans threw a fit and tied vital digital funding to corporate impunity. "With this move, Republicans are telling millions of Americans: 'You can have broadband but only if your state gives up the right to protect you from AI abuses.' It's undemocratic and cruel. Republicans would rather give Big Tech a 10-year hall pass to experiment on the American people unchecked, rather than give underserved rural and urban communities the ability to compete in the digital economy. Congress must reject this corporate giveaway and refocus their energy on representing the public interest." In her statements criticizing the anti-regulation portion of HR 1, Greene expressed concerns about developing rapidly evolving tech without checks and balances. "No one can predict what AI will be in one year, let alone 10," Greene said. "But I can tell you this: I'm pro-humanity, not pro-transhumanity. And I will be voting NO on any bill that strips states of their right to protect American jobs and families." What's next HR 1 is expected to continue undergoing changes in the Senate before returning to the House for another vote. Cruz's proposal has yet to be officially added to the legislation. The Source Information in this article comes from public U.S. Congress filings, Public Citizen, and previous FOX 4 coverage.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
HVAC prices rise over refrigerant shortage
(NewsNation) — Anyone hoping to repair or replace their air conditioning units this summer may face higher prices. New federal rules are contributing to a nationwide refrigerant shortage, meaning getting cool could cost you just as it's about to get hot. Starting this year, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is mandating a switch to more climate friendly refrigerants, but the rush to roll out new coolants has set off a supply crisis. 'During the Biden administration, the EPA enacted an HVAC management rule,' said Jorge Alvarez, co-founder of iGas USA. 'And why it was done, nobody knows. It was simply done in order to speed up the process, the EPA said. Let's speed it up. Let's bring this change to happen within 15 months in lieu of 10 years or 20 years.' That fast-track shift means short supply and skyrocketing costs. Hiring is cooling but not in freefall yet 'Refrigerant cost, because there is no refrigerant available, is up 600%,' Alvarez said. 'A 5-ton air conditioning system a year ago installed used to cost roughly $8000 today. That exact same system is a minimum of $11,000.' The shortage is driven by regulation, global supply issues and surging demand, and a big chunk of the coolant supply now comes from China. 'Eighty percent of the refrigerant gas we need today is now coming from China. That's 100% against Trump's initiative,' he said. So what can homeowners do? Experts say if your unit is more than 10 years old, it may be time to replace but act quickly. Waiting could mean paying even more or sweating it out. 'Americans in 2025 will pay in excess of $25 billion extra for… air conditioning simply because of this management rule,' Alvarez said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nearly 25% of Americans are now ‘functionally unemployed' — here's what that ‘harsh reality' really means
A low unemployment rate typically signals that an economy is generally healthy. The unemployment rate in the U.S. remained near a 50-year-low in April 2025 at 4.2% — plus, American employers added 177,000 jobs in April despite the uncertainty of Trump's tariffs and trade wars. This all sounds good, right? Not so fast. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) The 'true' rate of unemployment in April, according to the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP), was 24.3%, up 0.03% from the previous month. LISEP's True Rate of Unemployment (TRU) includes the unemployed, as well as workers who are employed but still struggling. 'We are facing a job market where nearly one-in-four workers are functionally unemployed, and current trends show little sign of improvement,' said LISEP Chair Gene Ludwig in a statement published on PR Newswire. 'The harsh reality is that far too many Americans are still struggling to make ends meet, and absent an influx of dependable, good-paying jobs, the economic opportunity gap will widen.' That could help explain why, despite the supposedly healthy employment rate, consumer confidence in the American economy has been plunging. So, why is there a 20-point difference between the LISEP and Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) unemployment numbers? The BLS collects a massive amount of data on unemployment, but some of that data is excluded from the official unemployment rate. For example, BLS found that 5.7 million people who aren't employed do, in fact, want a job — but they weren't counted as unemployed because 'they were not actively looking for work during the four weeks preceding the survey or were unavailable to take a job,' according to BLS. LISEP uses data compiled by BLS, but instead of simply measuring unemployment, LISEP measures what it calls the 'functionally unemployed.' This is defined as the portion of the U.S. labor force that 'does not have a full-time job (35+ hours a week) but wants one, has no job, or does not earn a living wage, conservatively pegged at $25,000 annually before taxes.' Its metrics capture not only unemployed workers, but also those stuck in poverty-wage jobs and those working part-time but can't get full-time work. LISEP's measurements aim to include these functionally unemployed Americans to provide a more complete picture of unemployment across the country, including the nuances that other economic indicators miss. This, in turn, can help 'provide policymakers and the public with a more transparent view of the economic situation of all Americans, particularly low- and middle-income households, compared with misleading headline statistics,' according to LISEP. 'Amid an already uncertain economic outlook, the rise in functional unemployment is a concerning development,' Ludwig said. 'This uncertainty comes at a price, and unfortunately, the low- and middle-income wage earners ultimately end up paying the bill.' Ludwig says the public would be 'well served by a commitment from economic policymakers to adopt a stable course of action' based on real-world metrics. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it LISEP uses two important differentiators in its metrics. First, to be considered fully employed, an individual must have a part-time job (with no desire to work full time, such as students) or have a full-time job working at least 35 hours per week. Second, the individual must earn at least $20,000 annually, adjusted for inflation and calculated in January 2020 dollars, as per the Department of Health and Human Services' U.S. poverty guidelines. While 'not technically false,' LISEP says the rate reported by the BLS is 'deceiving,' considering the number of Americans in the workforce who are 'employed on poverty-like wages' or 'on a reduced workweek that they do not want.' 'For example, it [BLS' unemployment rate] counts you as employed if you've worked as little as one hour over the prior two weeks,' Ludwig told CBS MoneyWatch. 'So you can be homeless and in a tent community and have worked one hour and be counted, irrespective of how poorly-paid that hour may be.' TRU also paints a bleak picture for certain demographics, with Hispanic and Black workers faring worse than white workers and women faring worse than men. For example, 27% of Black workers and about 28% of Hispanic workers are functionally unemployed compared to 23% of white workers. Every month since 1995, black Americans have had a 'meaningfully higher' TRU than caucasian Americans, according to LISEP. The TRU numbers suggest the U.S. economy is much weaker than the BLS unemployment rate would have you believe — particularly for lower- and middle-income Americans — and that there's a need for policy solutions that reflect this more nuanced reality. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
