logo
Construction industry faces pressure from apprenticeship dropout rate

Construction industry faces pressure from apprenticeship dropout rate

The high dropout rate of apprentices in the built environment came under the microscope at an Edinburgh roundtable event bringing together key industry figures in Scotland.
The event was held at the National Museum of Scotland, where 13 industry professionals gathered to debate Scotland's construction skills crisis.
The event was chaired by Rachel Colgan, of PR agency Building Relations, and laid bare the impact of the number of construction-related apprentices leaving before completing their learning, as well as those who quit within 24 months of qualifying.
Recent figures from the British Association of Construction Heads (BACH) highlighted a 47% drop out rate for construction apprentices in the UK.
This means that only 8,620 construction apprentices reached End Point Assessment (EPA) in 2022/23. To put this into perspective, according to the Construction Industry Training Board (CITB), there were approximately 33,600 apprenticeship starts in construction in 2022/23.
The data also shows that significantly more construction apprentices drop out after 24 months compared to other apprenticeships (17% compared to just 6% in other sectors).
Responding to the question: 'Are existing qualifications and apprenticeships still fit for purpose' speakers shared their personal experiences around the issues of training and retaining apprentices, including an example of a young worker who left their trade-based apprenticeship in favour of a better-paying role in the hospitality sector.
Some of the reasons for a high drop out rate include:
Low pay
Demanding job with long hours
Young workers wanting the 'big job' before putting in the hard graft
Perceptions of working in construction being a job rather than a career
Lack of promotion of opportunities in school career advice
Post-covid generation seeking a better work/life balance
Recruitment drives not inspiring the next generation
Research by Skills Development Scotland, 2024, shows that just 8% of young people aged 16–18 in Scotland said they would seriously consider a construction career.
At the event some solutions to the crisis proposed included:
Outreach to schools, especially targeting underrepresented groups including girls and care-experienced youngsters
Provide real progression maps, from entry-level to higher technical or management roles – which many successful apprentices go on to
Shorter, focused, and hands-on learning wins over traditional full-time courses
Tie learning to real community projects to show purpose and local impact
Mike Pratt, Co-founder and Director of InverTay Homes and Timber Engineering UK, listed a number of reasons why he thought apprentices struggled in the construction industry, including: lower wages during training, apprentice courses taking too long to qualify, a growing desire from young people to work reduced hours in pursuit of a better work/life balance, as well as unrealistic wage growth expectations and a gap between industry need and college curriculum.
He said: 'Our industry is in desperate need of upskilling an aging workforce as well as a steady intake of young apprentices. We need radical change in the industry to reverse the downward trajectory of apprenticeships and the 'brain drain' from the construction industry.
'There are going to be massive labour shortages for the foreseeable future so we cannot afford to be training people up, just to see them leave the industry straight away. We need a targeted and progressive approach to plug the gaps and ensure the next generation of school leavers want to enter an industry that values them.'
The wider purpose of the roundtable was to examine the skills crisis Scotland's construction sector is currently facing amidst growing housing demand and net zero targets.
According to Skills Development Scotland, the construction industry must recruit over 48,000 people by 2034 to meet future demand.
Other topics discussed included how to prepare the workforce for net zero, new ways to attract people into construction trades and what is needed from Scottish Government, CITB, SDS, or others to unlock progress.
The general consensus of roundtable guest was that despite many challenges, the construction industry in Scotland offered a rewarding career path with strong job prospects, diverse opportunities, and the chance to contribute to the country's growing infrastructure and sustainable development.
Following the event Rachel Colgan said: 'The roundtable conversation highlighted a stark reality: Scotland's construction sector is grappling with a critical skills shortage, made worse by the high dropout rate among young apprentices. But it also made one thing clear, if we want lasting change, we need to create an environment where young people feel supported and valued. This way young people will be able to understand the amazing career opportunities available to them in this industry.'
Jocelyne Fleming, senior policy and public affairs officer for CIOB in Scotland said: 'Scotland's construction sector offers rewarding careers that make a positive difference to the country.
'Our recent survey revealed nearly 75 per cent of young people in Scotland view the construction industry positively, but nearly half were never introduced to it as a potential career path during education.
'We urgently need to strengthen the existing workforce and build a robust talent pipeline. That requires a government-led, strategic, and long-term plan, one that identifies the future demands of our built environment, defines the skills and expertise needed to meet them, and ensures we have the resources to attract, train, and retain the people who will deliver it.'
Guests at the roundtable included, Lauren Pennycook, Senior Policy and Government Relations Advisor, CITB, Mike Pratt, Co-founder & Director InverTay Homes, Timber Engineering UK, Steven Kiakowski, Director, The Verdancy Group, Colin Jack, Managing Director of Scotland, Places for People, Gordon Nelson, Director, Federation of Master Builders Scotland, Jim Baxter, Financial Director, Allanwater Homes, Laura McGuigan, Business Development Manager, Kier Construction, Chair of Women in Property, Matt Colgan, Founder, Sustainabuild, Frazer Walker, Head of School, School of Engineering, Construction & Technical Skills, Fife College, Mairi Murray, Head of Sustainability, BakerHicks, Jocelyne Fleming, Senior Policy & Public Affairs Officer for Scotland, Chartered Institute of Building, and Professor Robert Hairstans, Head, Centre for Offsite Construction and Innovative Structures at Edinburgh Napier University, Director, Centre for Advanced Timber Technology (CATT) at the New Model Institute of Technology and Engineering (NMITE), Skills and EDI Lead, Centre for Net Zero Carbon High Density Buildings.
Like this:
Like
Related
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US oil group challenges Trump plan to cut biofuel import credits
US oil group challenges Trump plan to cut biofuel import credits

Reuters

time6 days ago

  • Reuters

US oil group challenges Trump plan to cut biofuel import credits

NEW YORK, Aug 14 (Reuters) - A top U.S. oil trade group on Thursday joined a chorus of complaints against a new government proposal to slash incentives for biofuel imports, testing the Trump administration's resolve to keep the policy in the upcoming months. The mounting criticism puts the White House in the position of having to side with either farmers looking to prioritize domestic supply, or refiners seeking cheaper feedstock - both groups loyal to President Donald Trump. At issue is a proposal from the Environmental Protection Agency in June that would allocate only half as many tradable renewable fuel credits to imported biofuels and biofuel feedstocks as to domestic ones. The shift, which could be finalized before the year's end, has significant implications for bio-based diesel, which relies on imports to meet federal mandates. The U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) requires refiners to blend billions of gallons of biofuels into the fuel market, or buy credits known as RINs from those that do to demonstrate compliance with the program. The Farm Belt, specifically soybean farmers, hailed the proposed shift as a victory, arguing the RFS was always intended to boost domestic production and that countries like China were flooding the market with cheap supply. But the oil industry argues the U.S. lacks enough feedstock to meet the federal quotas without imports, tightening an already stretched domestic market and driving prices higher. "As proposed, it is unworkable and would have significant harmful effects on the overall RFS program and could place upward pressure on fuel costs," the American Petroleum Institute said in a letter to the EPA on Thursday seen by Reuters, urging the complete removal of the import proposal. The API also questioned the legality of the proposal in separate comments seen by Reuters, signaling the deep-pocketed trade group could be prepared to go to court to challenge the administration. Refiners and farm groups were earlier this year unified on bio-based diesel, with both arguing that federal quotas needed to be higher. However, the shift on imports caught both industries by surprise. Even within trade groups, sentiment around the imports proposal is divided. "There is not consensus among our members on the proposal to reduce the RIN value for fuels produced domestically from foreign feedstock," Clean Fuels Alliance America, a biodiesel group, said in comments submitted to the EPA.

USDA moves to end employee union contracts, documents show
USDA moves to end employee union contracts, documents show

Reuters

time7 days ago

  • Reuters

USDA moves to end employee union contracts, documents show

WASHINGTON, Aug 13 - The U.S. Department of Agriculture moved on Tuesday to terminate union contracts with thousands of employees of its animal health and food safety inspection agencies, according to documents seen by Reuters. The notices sent to union leaders at the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and Food Safety and Inspection Service said the move was aligned with President Donald Trump's March executive order to exclude some federal workers from collective bargaining because their agencies have national security missions, the documents show. The Trump administration has also moved to terminate union contracts at the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Veterans Affairs and other agencies under the executive order. The USDA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Four Volkswagen executives sentenced in latest Dieselgate ruling – Can you still claim compensation?
Four Volkswagen executives sentenced in latest Dieselgate ruling – Can you still claim compensation?

Scottish Sun

time12-08-2025

  • Scottish Sun

Four Volkswagen executives sentenced in latest Dieselgate ruling – Can you still claim compensation?

*If you click on a link in this article we will earn affiliate revenue NEW CLAIM Four Volkswagen executives sentenced in latest Dieselgate ruling – Can you still claim compensation? Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A four year trial concluded when a German court sentenced four former Volkswagen directors for their part in the diesel cheating emission scandal uncovered in 2015. Two defendants received prison sentences, with the former head of diesel motor development receiving the heaviest term of four years and six months. 1 Many other car brands in the UK are also offering compensation Credit: Alamy While the trial might have been brought to a close, prosecutors are still uncovering how widely the scandal was known around the company. According to the Financial Times, criminal proceedings against a total of 31 defendants are still pending. Volkswagen is also facing a separate civil case, where it may have to pay damages for the effects dieslgate had on the markets. Currently, the emission cheating scandal has cost Volkswagen billions, with some of this money owed to UK drivers as compensation. Check Diesel emissions claims eligibility What was Dieselgate? In September 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), an American environmental regulatory body, found a 'defeat device' in many US Volkswagens. This was a piece of software which would make the vehicle look less polluting than it was during emissions testing. Volkswagen later admitted that this software could be found in millions of vehicles worldwide - including models across the UK and Europe. In the UK, over 1.2 million diesels were recalled once the EPA found these devices. This included thousands of Volkswagens, Audis, and Skodas. However, Diesel Claim, a law firm, believes many other vehicle manufacturers are guilty of fitting these devices too. That includes Ford, BMW, Land Rover, Jaguar, Mercedes, Renault, and Nissan. Can I still claim compensation? Diesel Claim said UK drivers are due compensation for this scandal, and it is fighting the case for claimants in court. It believes it has affected the resale value of affected vehicles, led to higher fuel costs for consumers, and increased your carbon footprint - meaning drivers should receive a pay out. To be eligible to claim compensation through Diesel Claim, you need to have bought a diesel vehicle between 2009 and 2019. The vehicle must also have been manufactured between these dates. If you're unsure, you can type your vehicle's registration number into its claims checker. Claimants could receive up to £10,000 in compensation. Diesel Claim works on a no win no fee basis, meaning you won't need to pay any fees for joining. It's only if you're successfully awarded compensation that Diesel Claim will take a cut of your compensation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store