Maharashtra proposes doing away with attendants in heavy vehicles
Mumbai: Maharashtra's transport department has proposed doing away with the mandatory requirement of having attendants on heavy vehicles, goods carriers and passenger buses, saying it's an outdated concept given the technological upgrades that have come through in the last few years, according to officials.
However, the state's law and judiciary department and a section of the transport department itself, along with experts, have opposed the proposal, saying it goes against the existing rules and could lead to a rise in accidents on highways, according to officials. The move, if cleared, would affect millions of people employed as cleaners and helpers in over 1.2 million heavy vehicles in the state.
The transport department moved the proposal last month, citing similar moves by other states like Gujarat, and sought opinions from various state departments and officials. The proposal stated that although most other states require an attendant in heavy vehicles, Maharashtra can amend the rules for vehicles less than 18 metres in length by making a 360-degree vision camera mandatory.
However, the law and judiciary department, along with officials from the transport department and the office of the transport commissioner, have opposed the proposal, saying there needs to be a study of other potential effects of this rule change, including the loss of jobs and potential litigations. The law and judiciary department also said that amending the rules on the basis of vehicle length cannot be done, said officials from the transport department, requesting anonymity.
Rule 249 of the Maharashtra Motor Vehicle Rules 1989 makes it mandatory for a driver of a heavy goods and passenger motor vehicle to be accompanied by an attendant. 'The attendant shall be in a position to give warning of any traffic approaching from the rear and shall assist the driver by giving signals when the motor vehicle is being taken in reverse,' the rule states. On a national level, the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, does not specifically require attendants to be present in heavy vehicles or buses, except in certain cases, like school buses.
Maharashtra's transport department decided to move the proposal following a presentation by associations representing heavy vehicles. Bal Malkit Singh, former president of the All India Motor Transport Congress, who was involved in the discussions, said that the compulsion of having cleaners is an outdated concept that does not exist in other states and across the globe.
'The rules framed by the government making the cleaner mandatory are age-old and no longer required,' he said. 'The technology has changed—vehicles have dashboards, dash cameras, and GPS technology. Apart from this, the clutches, brakes, and wheels are so smooth that they do not give any fatigue to the driver like in the past. Road conditions have improved, and they are equipped with CCTV cameras. As such, the concept has been outdated and does not exist anywhere in the world. After our discussion and presentation, the state transport department has moved the proposal to do away with the cleaners,' he added.
Singh also said that attendants are unlikely to go jobless if the proposal is cleared, as there is a 22% shortage of drivers for heavy vehicles in the country. 'Vehicles have not been able to ply because of the shortage. The cleaners could be provided with driver training to enable them to take up the job of a driver,' he added. In April, Union transport minister Nitin Gadkari said in the Lok Sabha that India is facing a shortage of 2.2 million skilled drivers. The country has over 10 million trucks and lorries.
However, AV Shenoy, transport expert and member of the Mumbai Mobility Forum, said that such a decision would be suicidal at a time when India's road accident rate is among the highest in the world.
'If there is no concept of cleaners in other countries, [that's because] there are enough roadside facilities at a specific distance on highways for the rest and refreshment of drivers. The roads are in good condition and the technology of vehicles is much advanced. Cleaners provide physical assistance and psychological support to the drivers who drive for hours and mostly during the night because of the restrictions during daytime. Most of the time, the drivers of goods carriers are alone on highways, and in such a scenario, the cleaners play crucial roles,' he said.
According to a 2021 World Bank report, India accounts for 11% of global road accident deaths despite having only 1% of the world's vehicles. India records around 450,000 road accidents annually, leading to 150,000 deaths, the report said. Gadkari had said last month that about 180,000 people die in India every year due to road accidents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
12 hours ago
- Mint
Behind ICICI Lombard's recent surge: What the headlines won't tell you
General insurance has caught investors' attention over the last few days. Reports indicate that the ministry of road transport and highways is considering an 18-25% hike in third-party motor insurance premiums. On cue, ICICI Lombard General Insurance, which claims 10.8% share of India's motor insurance market, surged 7% in a single day on Friday. Investor enthusiasm around the stock is not new. The stock has been outperforming over the last three years. While disappointing Q4 earnings had dampened sentiment in recent months, the latest development has breathed fresh life into the counter. Can this take the stock to new heights? Motor insurance is the mainstay For general insurers, automotive insurance constitutes a major chunk, around 30% of the business. About 60% of that is for insuring damages to third parties. Third-party insurance is compulsory according to the Motor Vehicles Act. The regulator has held premiums steady in the segment for the last four years. But with more vehicles on the road, claims and loss ratios have been on the rise. In the first half of FY25, the loss ratio for motor insurance stood at 124.8%, while that for the broader general insurance sector was much lower, at 113.2%. So, higher premiums promise to bring some much-needed relief to insurers. ICICI Lombard is a well-diversified multi-line insurer. But motor insurance constitutes 40% of its business, which is split equally between own damage and third-party damage. Health, travel, and personal accident insurance comprise the next largest segment at 29%, picking up pace over the last few years. Industry slowdown weighed on business The company has seen a robust 13.1% CAGR growth in its GDPI (gross direct premium income) over the last 17 years. In fact, FY23 and FY24 reported even faster expansion at 17-18%. But growth slowed down sharply to 8.3% in FY25. Q4 numbers were even worse, with weak investment income contributing to a 1.9% year-on-year decline in profit for the quarter. It is important to note, however, that this was an industry-wide phenomenon driven primarily by a slowdown in the sales of new vehicles during the year. With a muted 8% growth in the mainstay segment of motor insurance, the non-life insurance sector reported just 6.2% growth during the year. The new rules by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Irdai) mandating deferred accounting of long-term policies instead of billing them upfront also played a role. Adjusted for the new accounting norms, the industry reported 8.6% growth. Even as competition weighed on ICICI Lombard's group health insurance segment, it surpassed industry growth in other segments. The company's focused efforts on older vehicles and commercial vehicles, as well as its improved portfolio segmentation, have worked in its favour. Removing the impact of the new accounting norms, the company's GDPI outpaced the industry with 11% year-on-year growth. The lower loss ratio in motor insurance negated the rising losses in health and crop insurance. Overall loss ratio remained largely stable at 70.6% in FY25 versus 70.8% in FY24. Lower expense ratio continued the business' moderation in combined ratio (loss ratio + expense ratio) to 102.8%. Excluding the impact of catastrophic (CAT) losses, the ratio stood even lower at 102.4%. Its bottom line expanded by 30.7% to ₹2,508 crore during the year. Still, bogged down by the topline slowdown and brokerage downgrades, the counter corrected by as much as 4% following the earnings announcement. Also Read: United Spirits is on a high after RCB's IPL win, JP Morgan upgrade and UK FTA. Can it keep buzzing? Long-term industry prospects remain promising India is the fourth-largest non-life insurance market in Asia. But the premiums constitute only 1% of GDP, against a global average of 4%. Even compared to emerging economies, India's general insurance is underpenetrated. The total addressable market stands at $36 billion, and it has ample room for growth. Premiumization in automobiles and increasing EV adoption should support growth in motor insurance. Meanwhile, improving penetration in health, property and casualty insurance is expected to drive growth in these segments. Increasing penetration of digital insurance is also expected to push growth. Over the last three years, online motor insurance has seen much faster adoption in lower-tier cities. Against a 35% growth in online motor insurance in tier-1 cities, tier-2 and tier-3 cities have seen significantly higher growths at 70% and 110%, respectively. Also Read: These three large-cap stocks are trouncing the Sensex in 2025—so far Robust fundamentals ICICI Lombard is one of India's leading non-life insurers with 8.7% share of industry GDPI. While it commands barely 3% share of the health insurance segment, its expansive distribution through its promoter bank, 1.4 lakh individual agents and almost 1,000 virtual offices have helped it outpace the industry in other segments. It leads the property and casualty insurance segment with 13% share in fire insurance and 20% in marine insurance. It also has high double-digit shares of India's engineering and liability insurance segments. Since FY23, ICICI Lombard has outrun the industry with consistently superior fundamentals. The stock's outperformance over the last 3 years reflects this optimism. With a data analytics-driven approach, the company has been able to balance growth and risk management. Its focus on profitable growth through conservative underwriting has been bearing fruit. The combined ratio has improved over the years and is significantly ahead of the competition. Its reserves are also robust. Incurred but not reported (IBNR) utilization continued to improve during the year, indicating the robustness of reserves. The solvency ratio of 2.69x is comfortably ahead of the regulatory minimum of 1.5x and its peers. Also Read: Analysts and investors have soured on Asian Paints. Can it prove them wrong? Strong outlook despite risks Anticipating a sustained slowdown in auto sales, the non-life insurance industry is likely to continue in the slow lane over the next couple of years. ICICI Lombard faces an additional risk from its health insurance segment, which has lagged the industry amid intense competition. Any further pickup in competition, spike in claims, or drop in investment income can weigh on the business. But the stiff pricing competition faced lately from public insurers in retail-focused segments should abate over the next few years, as players gradually conform to the regulatory cap of 30% on expenses of management (EOM), including commissions and promotional expenses. The company also stands to benefit from investments made in recent years towards the expansion of products and distribution in its health insurance segment. Any relief on GST in health insurance can also benefit the company. It is targeting a double-digit growth in the segment. Over the longer term, industry tailwinds should help support growth, while increasing digital penetration can improve profitability. ICICI Lombard's focus on enhancing penetration in tier-3 and tier-4 cities can be expected to drive growth for the company. Meanwhile, its conservative underwriting should support margins. Management has guided for its combined ratio to continue down the glide path to around 101.5% by FY27. Its target price has been pegged at ₹2,200 apiece, valuing the business at 32 times its FY27 earnings. This reflects an upside of 8% over current levels. For more such analysis, read Profit Pulse. Ananya Roy is the founder ofCredibull Capital, a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Disclosure: The author does not hold shares of the companies discussed. The views expressed are for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.
Hindustan Times
3 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Chandigarh: Dealer fined ₹25k for not steering exchanged car's transfer
For failing to transfer the ownership of a city resident's old car, exchanged for a new one, which led to a speeding challan landing at his address, a car dealership will be coughing up ₹25,000 as compensation. Terming them guilty of deficiency in service, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-DF 1 has directed the dealership, Lally Motors, to pay the complainant ₹15,000 for mental agony and ₹10,000 as costs of litigation. Further, the dealership has also been told to clear the pending challan and transfer the exchanged car's ownership to either themselves or the new owner to whom they have sold the vehicle. In 2019, the complainant, Dr Swaran Singh, a resident of Sector 18, had walked into Lally Motors in Industrial Area to purchase a Volkswagen Vento car. Under a scheme, he agreed to exchange his old vehicle, valued around ₹2 lakh, which was adjusted against the price of the new vehicle. After the deal, the dealership had issued a delivery letter-cum-undertaking, dated October 23, 2019, promising that they will be responsible for all future taxes, challans and accidents related to the old car. But three years later, Dr Singh received a challan from the Chandigarh Traffic Police in December 2022, much to his surprise. The photograph attached to the challan showed his old car, which had supposedly been sold to someone else by the dealership. On inspecting further, to his shock, Dr Singh learned that the dealership had failed to transfer the car's ownership to its new owner after the exchange. Approaching the consumer commission, the complainant alleged that the car dealership sold his old car further without transferring its ownership, a violation of the Motor Vehicles Act. The dealership was summoned by the commission but they didn't turn up and were proceeded against ex parte on October 21 2024. Skoda Auto Volkswagen India contested the complaint, taking preliminary objections of maintainability, cause of action, jurisdiction and non-joinder of the necessary party. They alleged that so far as selling of the car went, they had nothing to do with it, and it was a matter between the dealership and the complainant. The commission accepted that the company had no role in the dispute and dismissed the complaint against them. However, it observed that the complainant had submitted documentary proof against the dealership, which was not rebutted in any way. Disposing of the complaint, the commission slapped a ₹25,000 penalty on the dealership, including the compensation and litigation costs.
The Hindu
3 days ago
- The Hindu
Make appropriate changes in MV Act to avoid mismatch of vehicles during toll collection: Karnataka HC advises MoRTH
The High Court of Karnataka has advised the Union Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) to review the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and make appropriate changes to address the issue of mismatch of vehicle type that crops up during collection of toll due to variance in vehicular classifications, particularly buses, under the MV Act, and the rules framed under the National Highways Act, 1956. Justice M. Nagaprasanna passed the order while dismissing a petition filed by Karavali Bus Owners' Association, Udupi, and several individual owners of private buses. The petitioners had questioned deduction of extra toll amount later in addition to the amount deducted from FASTag account instantly when their buses pass through two plazas between Mangaluru and Kundapur due to mismatch in vehicle type. The Court noted that the variance in classification of vehicles in the MV Act and the National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008 framed under the NH Act is the cause for this litigation and hence the MV Act requires statutory refinement. Background of case The petitioners had registered information of their vehicles in FASTag system as 'minibus' even though the registration certificate of the vehicles issued by the Regional Transport Officer (RTO) classified their vehicles as 'bus' with seating capacity of 38. The argument of the petitioner was that the provision of the MV Act states that vehicles with unladen weight of less than 12,000 kgs are classified as Light Motor Commercial Vehicles (LMCVs), which include 'minibus'. However, toll collecting authorities were collecting extra amount, which applicable for 'bus/truck' later as FASTag was deducting lower toll applicable to LMCVs at toll plazas. The toll collecting had relied on the RTO data of the vehicles belonging to the petitioners as the norms framed under the fee collection rules of 2008 describes a light motor commercial passenger vehicle with seating capacity up to 32 as a 'minibus' and as 'bus/truck' if the seating capacity is more than 32 and/or unladen weight of the vehicle is above 12,000 kg. The court pointed out that MV Act describes a vehicle with unladen weight up to 7,500 kg as a light motor vehicle and beyond 12,000 kg as a heavy passenger motor vehicle but there is 'vacuum' in the Act with respect to classification of vehicles between 7,500 kg and 12,000 kg. Registering as minibus The bus owners were registering their vehicle under the category of 'minibus' in FASTag by taking advantage of the MV Act as many of their buses were under 12,000 kg even though the seating capacity exceeded 32, the court noted while pointing out that base rate of toll for LMVCs/minibus is ₹1.05 per km and for bus/truck is ₹2.2 per km. Though the MV Act defines a medium passenger vehicle, the weight of such vehicles is left undefined, and the definition of a 'bus' is nowhere found in the MV Act, the court said. Also, the court noted a clarification given by the RTO to the petitioner-association that irrespective of the unladen weight of the vehicles, all stage carriage vehicles are mentioned as 'bus' in the registration certificates. Since the toll collection is governed by the NH Act and the fee collection rules, and not under the MV Act, the court upheld the action of the authorities in recovering differential toll amount from the FASTag accounts.
