logo
Car companies are paying tariffs so you don't have to

Car companies are paying tariffs so you don't have to

Miami Herald6 days ago
So far President Donald Trump's trade polices have had almost no effect on new car prices. But almost no one expects that to last.
By the end of the year, if not sooner, tariffs as much as 27.5% on cars and car parts will force sticker prices to rise significantly, analysts say, pushing new vehicle purchases out of the reach of many Americans.
Tariffs have already chopped billions of dollars from carmakers' bottom lines. That is because the companies, fearful of losing sales, have absorbed most of the burden of Trump's new duties rather than passing it on to car buyers. The carmakers also haven't been hit by the full force of tariffs yet. Many dealers and manufacturers stockpiled cars and parts before the tariffs took effect.
'We haven't raised prices due to tariffs, and that's still our mantra,' Randy Parker, chief executive of Hyundai and Genesis Motor North America, said in an interview this month.
That is good news for Trump and Republicans in Congress because it insulates them from the political consequences of higher sticker prices, which would also contribute to inflation.
Carmakers 'will try to hold prices and focus on cost reduction for as long as they can,' said Lenny LaRocca, a partner at KPMG who leads the consulting firm's work with the auto industry.
But, LaRocca said, 'clearly it's not sustainable.' He predicted that automakers would start raising prices significantly early next year.
No car company is immune. Even those that make most of their vehicles in the United States use imported parts that can amount to more than half the value of some cars. In recent weeks General Motors, Toyota, Ford Motor, Stellantis, Tesla, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen have all blamed tariffs for declines in profit.
Ford, which makes most of its cars in the United States, expects retail prices for its vehicles to rise just 1% this year, Sherry House, the chief financial officer, said last month during a conference call with reporters.
But that's not because the tariffs aren't having an effect. Import duties subtracted $800 million from Ford's profit in the second quarter, leading to a slight loss for the period. For the whole year, Ford estimated that tariffs would cost the company $2 billion.
General Motors, the largest U.S. carmaker, said last month that tariffs would cost the company as much as $5 billion for the full year, although it hoped to offset about a third of that amount by cutting costs and moving some manufacturing to the United States. Still, the company expects retail prices to rise 1% or less this year, Paul Jacobson, chief financial officer of GM, told investors last month.
Toyota, which makes many cars in the United States but also imports them from Japan, Mexico and Canada, said Thursday that tariffs would cost it $9.5 billion. A day earlier, Honda pegged its tariff cost at $3 billion.
Tariffs and sinking profits could make it harder for carmakers to do what Trump wants them to do -- relocate assembly lines to the United States from other countries. Companies will have less money to invest in new factories and equipment.
The Trump administration maintains that deregulation, tax deductions for equipment purchasing and other measures will be positive for the industry.
'Two things can be accomplished at once: We can lower costs for everyday Americans while restoring American auto dominance,' Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson, said in an email. 'The administration is working closely with the auto industry to deliver on both fronts.'
Car prices as measured by U.S. officials declined slightly in June, Desai pointed out, 'despite months of autos, auto parts, steel and aluminum tariffs being in place.'
Others see signs that prices are beginning to creep higher. Cox Automotive estimates that tariffs will add at least $5,000 to the cost of imported cars on an annual basis. Even for cars manufactured in the United States, tariffs on components add about $1,000, not including the 50% duties that Trump has imposed on imported steel and aluminum.
By the end of the year, prices could be 8% higher, Cox says, pushing the average selling price of a new car above $50,000.
Higher prices would fall hardest on less affluent consumers. Many of the least expensive cars are imported, like the Chevrolet Trax made in South Korea or the Nissan Versa made in Mexico.
Some car buyers will be able to afford only used models. And higher demand for pre-owned vehicles will push up their prices, too. Adding to the pain, buyers of used cars often pay much higher interest on loans, which can exceed 20% for people with less-than-stellar credit records.
The cost of repairs and parts will also rise. So far the price increases have been modest, said Michael Holmes, co-chief executive of Virginia Tire and Auto. The chain of auto repair and maintenance shops adds a tariff surcharge to prices to reflect the additional cost. That can range from 50 cents or so for an air filter to around $5 for a tire.
But the surcharges could rise depending on where tariffs on parts from Mexico and Canada end up, he said.
His biggest problem, Holmes said, is staying abreast of shifting trade policy. 'You get exhausted trying to figure out where all these tariffs are,' he said.
Trump policies have some financial benefits for carmakers. The Republican domestic policy bill passed last month eliminated penalties for violating clean air standards. That angered environmental groups but allows carmakers to build more big SUVs and pickups, which tend to have the highest profit margins.
The end of those penalties has also freed established carmakers from having to buy clean air credits if they fall short of emissions targets. That will save GM and others hundreds of millions of dollars, but comes at the expense of companies that have lots of credits to sell, like Tesla and Rivian, because they make only electric vehicles that emit nothing from tailpipes.
Car executives are hopeful that the Trump administration will take further steps to ease the impact of tariffs. 'We're having very constructive conversations with them to ensure a more level playing field,' House, the Ford chief financial officer, told reporters this month.
But Trump continues to threaten substantial tariffs on Mexico and Canada and has yet to reach a permanent trade deal with either. Both countries are critical suppliers of vehicles and parts and are important destinations for parts and vehicles made in the United States.
The policy bill also contained a measure designed to stimulate demand for cars. The provision lets taxpayers deduct from their taxes the interest they pay on loans used to buy cars assembled in the United States. But the value of the deduction will be relatively small, in the hundreds of dollars for most people.
'We don't think it's really going to drive demand,' said Erin Keating, executive analyst at Cox Automotive.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Copyright 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stock Market News Review: SPY, QQQ Stumble on Souring Consumer Sentiment as Trump-Putin Summit Kicks Off
Stock Market News Review: SPY, QQQ Stumble on Souring Consumer Sentiment as Trump-Putin Summit Kicks Off

Business Insider

time28 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Stock Market News Review: SPY, QQQ Stumble on Souring Consumer Sentiment as Trump-Putin Summit Kicks Off

Both the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) closed in negative territory as investors await updates from a high-stakes summit between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Both leaders have already touched down at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base in Anchorage, Alaska, with discussions underway to end the Russia-Ukraine war. The meeting, initially planned to be a one-on-one event, now consists of three participants from each side. Trump is joined by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff, while Putin is accompanied by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov. 'All I want to do is set the table for the next meeting, which should happen shortly,' Trump said before taking off to Alaska. Earlier this week, he explained that a second meeting could include Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders. Meanwhile, the market received a shock after the University of Michigan's preliminary August Index of Consumer Sentiment showed a reading of 58.6, below the expectation for 62.0 and falling from 61.7 in July. If the reading holds, it would mark the first decline following four consecutive months of increases. 'Overall, consumers are no longer bracing for the worst-case scenario for the economy feared in April when reciprocal tariffs were announced and then paused,' said Surveys of Consumers Director Joanne Hsu. 'However, consumers continue to expect both inflation and unemployment to deteriorate in the future.' In addition, consumers now expect year-ahead inflation of 4.9% compared to 4.5% in July. Long-term inflation expectations jumped to 3.9% from 3.4%. July's elevated Producer Price Index (PPI) and core Consumer Price Index (CPI) add to the evidence that inflation could be mounting a comeback as consumers face higher prices from the Trump administration's tariffs. Import prices are also on the rise, signaling that U.S. trading partners aren't lowering prices in order to offset higher domestic prices. July's import prices rose by 0.4% month-over-month, ahead of the expectation for prices to remain unchanged. Import prices fell by 0.2% year-over-year. On the tariff front, Trump said he would announce the rate for semiconductor imports in the coming weeks, adding that it could be as high as 200% or 300%. That's much higher than the 100% figure he suggested during a White House event with Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook earlier this month.

Trump to Hold Off Hiking China Tariffs Over Russia Oil Purchases
Trump to Hold Off Hiking China Tariffs Over Russia Oil Purchases

Bloomberg

time32 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump to Hold Off Hiking China Tariffs Over Russia Oil Purchases

US President Donald Trump said he will hold off on raising tariffs on Chinese goods over the country's purchases of Russian oil, citing progress he said was made with Vladimir Putin toward ending the war in Ukraine. 'Because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that,' Trump said Friday in a Fox News interview with Sean Hannity after his summit with Putin. 'Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now.'

Wall Street Joins Consumer Advocates to Call for Edit to GENIUS Act on Stablecoins
Wall Street Joins Consumer Advocates to Call for Edit to GENIUS Act on Stablecoins

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Wall Street Joins Consumer Advocates to Call for Edit to GENIUS Act on Stablecoins

Wall Street bankers are hammering away at some provisions of the new U.S. stablecoin law that was hailed by President Donald Trump and the crypto sector as a huge first step toward establishing a fully regulated U.S. industry, and the banks are joined by unusual bedfellows from the consumer-advocate world in sounding alarms. Hoping to revise and cut provisions that might threaten aspects of the current financial system, the American Bankers Association and other bank lobbying groups aligned in a letter this week with Americans for Financial Reform — usually a staunch opponent of Wall Street's policy aims — and the National Consumer Law Center. One provision of the stablecoin law known as the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act lets a stablecoin-issuing subsidiary of a state-chartered uninsured depository institution run money-transmission and custody services nationwide, which the bankers argue bypasses existing state licensing and oversight. Their letter asked several key U.S. senators to insist that whole section be erased entirely. "Ignoring state law in this regard invites regulatory arbitrage, allowing certain uninsured depository institutions special privileges to operate across state lines as federally insured banks currently do, but without the panoply of regulatory and supervisory requirements, or limitations on preemption applicable to those institutions," the August 13 letter argued. The bank lobbyists, also cooperated in a separate effort to protect deposits and other core aspects of their businesses from the GENIUS Act, arguing in another letter to lawmakers this week that the law leaves an opening for crypto firms to offer returns on stablecoins. While the law bans stablecoin issuers themselves from offering interest or yield, it doesn't stop the issuers' affiliates or exchanges from doing so indirectly. The bankers fear a massive loss of deposits and money-market fund activity from the resulting rivalry stablecoins might offer. "Congress must protect the flow of credit to American businesses and families and the stability of the most important financial market by closing the stablecoin payment of interest loophole," according to the groups, including the ABA, Bank Policy Institute, Financial Services Forum and others. Banks turn deposits into loans, so the lack of deposits threatens necessary U.S. lending. Faryar Shirzad, the chief policy officer at U.S. crypto exchange Coinbase, criticized the banks' position in postings on social media site X. "Congress shouldn't be in the business of passing legislation that takes away consumer choice and the opportunity for the average person to earn returns on their hard-earned dollars," he wrote, additionally arguing that the $6 trillion figure on what desposits may be at stake is overblown. "Let's play along for a second," Shirzad added. "If customers really would move $6T away from banks into stablecoins, what does that say about what value consumers feel like they're getting from their banks?" The GENIUS Act was signed into law by President Trump, but the bigger and more complex legislation to regulate U.S. crypto markets is still pending. That future bill, which already passed the House of Representatives as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, could still overhaul provisions of the stablecoin law, even before that new law is converted into rules by the U.S. financial regulators. That's what the bankers are advocating, alongside their temporary customer-advocate allies. Adds comment from Coinbase's Faryar Shirzad. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store