One Nation turns its back on Acknowledgement of Country
The four One Nation politicians took the action in the Senate chamber when the statement of respect was read out as part of the traditional ceremonial opening of parliament on Tuesday.
Cabinet minister Clare O'Neil lashed the Pauline Hanson-led party, saying it was disappointing their action became a point of focus, despite the shows of unity earlier in the day during Welcome to Country ceremonies.
This afternoon in the Senate, every One Nation senator stood with me to turn our backs on the divisive and increasingly forced Acknowledgement of Country.I've made this protest on my own for years, but today, our whole team made it clear: we've had enough of being told we don't… pic.twitter.com/iUoZbiDqn6
— Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 (@PaulineHansonOz) July 22, 2025
"It was disrespectful and rude and childish," she told Seven on Wednesday.
The opening of parliament was a day to celebrate the strength of Australia's democracy and recommit to working for Australia's citizens, Ms O'Neil added.
Nationals senator Bridge McKenzie said while it was up to the government to determine the ceremonies for the opening of parliament, and that she had listened respectfully to the acknowledgement, others had different perspectives.
She also compared the One Nation silent protest to politicians who walk out of the chamber during the morning prayers and those who don't support the monarchy.
"The problem in a liberal democracy like ours is when we can't express different views," she told Sunrise.
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has claimed Acknowledgement of Country is "divisive" and "increasingly forced".
But Ms O'Neil said the party still should have treated all Australians with respect.
"Whatever your views about the Welcome to Country - we've got First Nations people who have been invited to come to parliament, to extend that hand of friendship and invite us and talk about 65,000 years of heritage that they bring to our beautiful, great country," she said.
"To treat people that way on the first day of parliament, I think, it was absolutely appalling."
Welcome to Country ceremonies and land acknowledgements have been at the centre of a right-wing culture war after a group of neo-Nazis booed a Welcome to Country address during an Anzac Day dawn service in Melbourne earlier in 2025.
Labor has backed Welcome to Country ceremonies, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Tuesday celebrating the tradition as a powerful way to begin the new parliament and reflect on Australia's history.
Mr Albanese also took a veiled swipe at the stance of former opposition leader Peter Dutton and some coalition MPs who branded Welcome to Country and Acknowledgement of Country proclamations as divisive and overdone.
"Like a lot of the more positive things about our nation, we shouldn't take it for granted," Mr Albanese said, adding the ceremony was not controversial.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the ceremony "set the tone as we re-commit ourselves to the taking of practical action to improve lives and expand opportunity for Indigenous Australians in every part of our great country".
Welcome to Country is conducted by Traditional Owners, while Acknowledgement of Country is a statement of respect for Traditional Owners and connection to land, which can be given by an Indigenous or non-Indigenous person.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
IEEFA urges broader review of emissions reduction policies in Australia
An interim report by the Australian Government's Productivity Commission has identified gaps in the country's emissions reduction policies, particularly concerning the electricity sector post-2030, industrial facilities exempt from the Safeguard Mechanism, and heavy vehicles. The report, titled 'Investing in Cheaper, Cleaner Energy and the Net Zero Transformation', is part of an initiative aimed at bolstering Australia's productivity but has overlooked several potential levers for achieving net zero emissions at minimal cost, according to the Institute for Energy Economics & Financial Analysis (IEEFA). The overlooked areas include enhancing energy efficiency and flexibility, revising inefficient electricity network revenue regulation and pricing, reducing fugitive methane emissions from coal and gas extraction, and critically assessing the net economic cost-benefit of new coal and gas projects. IEEFA has calculated that more than 1.7 million inefficient gas and electric appliances are installed annually in Australia, costing households more than A$3bn ($1.9bn) in unnecessary energy expenses. There is a significant opportunity to improve national electric appliance efficiency, which could save more electricity per year than the amount required for the transition from gas to electric appliances. IEEFA's analysis indicates that electricity distribution and transmission networks have made supernormal profits of A$15bn over 2014-2023, in addition to "allowed" profits of A$17.6bn, resulting in higher consumer electricity bills and diminished economic productivity. With the rise of distributed energy resources, current monopoly-based electricity network regulations are outdated. The growth in household batteries offers a significant chance to reduce household bills and investment in large-scale electricity system assets. IEEFA's research suggests that rooftop solar and batteries could significantly reduce peak demand, often to zero or below, in most states during summer and winter. However, appropriate tariffs and incentives are necessary to encourage optimal outcomes for the energy system. At least 20% of Australia's emissions, and potentially up to 25% if methane emissions underreporting is accounted for, are attributable to coal and gas extraction. Methane emissions are projected to remain stable until 2035, with the Safeguard Mechanism proving insufficient for driving reductions. IEEFA estimates that approximately 76 petajoules of methane, valued at around A$950m, could be recovered annually from the coal and gas sector, which is more than double the anticipated gas demand for power generation in the National Electricity Market in 2025. IEEFA has also highlighted the economic risks of new coal and gas developments, especially those aimed at liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports. Eastern Australia's existing LNG projects have yielded disappointing financial outcomes and have tripled domestic gas prices, leading to industrial facility closures and reduced gas generation. LNG projects are also associated with significant gas use and emissions that cannot be sufficiently mitigated by carbon capture and storage. In conclusion, IEEFA urges the Productivity Commission to consider a wider array of opportunities that can advance Australia's emissions reduction goals while simultaneously reducing costs for Australians. "IEEFA urges broader review of emissions reduction policies in Australia" was originally created and published by Energy Monitor, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
CNN
7 hours ago
- CNN
Japan is selling top-of-the-line warships to another key US ally. What that means in the highly contested Pacific
Australia last week announced a $6.5 billion deal to buy advanced warships from Japan, a move that can go a long way to making Canberra a Pacific maritime power and Tokyo a major weapons exporter, analysts say. The Australian Defense Ministry said it will buy 11 of Japan's Mogami-class frigates, stealthy, state-of-the-art surface combatants that analysts say are equal to – or in some repects better than – anything China or even the United States is putting in the water. Announcing the deal with its fellow member of the the US-led Quad defense group, Australia's Minister for Defense Industry Pat Conroy called it 'another step towards delivering a much larger and more lethal navy, with stealth frigates that will reassure our allies and deter our adversaries.' Australia's main security concern is its growing neighborhood rivalry with China, which was stoked earlier this year when a Chinese naval task force circumnavigated the continent and held live-fire exercises off Australian shores, forcing dozens of passenger planes to divert from their usual flight paths. Canberra says the vessels will be 'upgraded' Mogami-class ships – bigger than a version already in service with Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force – giving them more firepower and a longer unrefueled range of approximately 11,500 miles (about half the length of the equator). Japan's Defense Minister Gen Nakatani echoed Conroy's sentiment, calling the deal a 'big step' that will boost Tokyo's security cooperation with a special strategic partner, Japanese public broadcaster NHK reported. The new warships, built by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, will have 32 Mk 41 vertical launch cells, capable of firing surface-to-air missiles and anti-ship missiles, the Defense Ministry said. These will enable the Mogamis to fire 128 air defense missiles, four times the number current Australian surface vessels can fire, Conroy said. Analysts noted the Lockheed Martin-made Mk 41 launch cells are big enough to carry Tomahawk cruise missiles – which, with a range of 1,000 miles, could greatly extend the warships' target area. The Mk 41 cells could also be used for long-range anti-submarine rockets, enabling them to better hunt down fleeing nuclear-powered submarines, said Sidharth Kaushal, a research fellow in sea power at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) in London. The Japanese-made frigates are also lauded for their lean manning, needing only a crew of 90, compared with 170 on Australia's current ANZAC-class frigates the Mogamis will replace. The smaller crew is important for countries like Japan and Australia that face military recruiting challenges. 'It's a much bigger ship, which is able to operate with a much smaller crew, and that's a reflection of how modern this ship is,' Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said at a press conference on Tuesday. The Mogami class compares favorably with other frigates in the region, analysts said, and they praised Australia's decision to go with the Japanese design, which was in competition with a German frigate. 'Its stealth, its reduced manning, its modularity – all at a relatively affordable price – make it an incredibly competitive product,' said Alessio Patalano, professor of war and strategy in East Asia at King's College, London. Carl Schuster, a former US Navy captain and former head of the US Pacific Command's Joint Intelligence Center, called it 'slightly superior' to China's Type 054B frigate, giving it especially high marks for its mid- to long-range air defense systems. 'Compared to a Chinese frigate this is an agile, more technologically advanced solution,' Patalano said. Kaushal, the RUSI analyst, said the unseen technology on the Japanese-made warship – its software – could make more of a difference than firepower when it comes to combat. For instance, it's possible that the sonar software on the Mogami could be superior to an adversary's in separating ocean noise from an actual hostile contact, he said. And the analysts noted Japanese industrial reliability. 'Japanese shipyards do outstanding work and deliver their products on time and within the assigned budget,' said Schuster. 'Mogami is state of the art. It builds on Japan's longstanding high-quality pipeline approach to shipbuilding, and clear access to advanced tech both domestic and from the US,' Patalano said, adding that current Mogami-class ships are powered by British engines. The Australian deal bodes well for what could be a nascent Japanese defense export industry, the analysts said. For most of the post-World War II era, Japan banned any export of weaponry. But in recent years that policy has been relaxed to allow items related to surveillance, reconnaissance and rescue to be sold abroad. The Philippines has been the early beneficiary of this change, getting air surveillance radars from Japan over the past two years, according to Tomohisa Takei, a senior fellow at the Sasakawa Peace Foundation. Last year, Japan sold its first lethal weaponry, Patriot missile interceptors to the US, built under license from Washington to replace Patriots it had sent to Ukraine. The frigate sale to Australia dwarfs that missile deal. The Australian Defense Ministry announcement said the first three warships will be built in Japan and the remaining eight in Australia. Patalano said exporting the warships, but also exporting the technology to build them, represents a challenge for the country's arms industry. Pulling it off 'would catapult Japan in the space of major defense industry exporters,' he said. When looking at the Japan-Australia deal, analysts noted that the two US allies may be more advanced and efficient in military shipbuilding than their American partner. The US Navy has no frigates in its fleet and hasn't had them since 2015 when the last of the Oliver Hazard Perry class, the USS Simpson, was decommissioned. Washington's effort to build new frigates, the Constellation class, which was authorized in 2020, is at least three years behind schedule as it undergoes design changes despite construction having already begun, according to the Government Accountability Office. And even then, it may not be able to deliver what the Mogami does, said Schuster, the former Navy captain. 'In my opinion, it is superior to the Constellation class,' he said. Patalano, too, noted the US naval shipbuilding woes. 'When it comes to shipbuilding the US is not in the innovation space of some of its closest allies, and compared to Italy, France, the UK, the ROK (South Korea), and now Japan, the US has a lot to learn,' said Patalano, from King's College. The government of Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the frigate deal is part of a greater investment in defense that will create 10,000 jobs at home. Another leg of that is the AUKUS agreement between Australia, the US and the United Kingdom, which will see Canberra acquire and later build its own nuclear-powered submarines. Australia said the agreement announced this week is non-binding, but the Albanese government expected to have contracts signed by next year. Canberra expects the first of the new warships to be operational by 2029, a Defense Ministry statement said. The deal marks a return to the global military market for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, a company with a rich naval history. It was a key force behind the buildup of the Imperial Japanese Navy leading up to World War II and is responsible for making the largest battleships in history, the Yamato and the Musashi, 69,000-ton behemoths with 18-inch main guns. They were state-of-the-art for battleships and entered the war only after Japan's December 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor, but the advent of aircraft carriers conveying torpedo bombers made them essentially obsolete before they could ever show their true power. The Musashi sank during the Battle of Leyte Gulf in October 1944 after being hit by dozens of torpedoes and bombs dropped by US planes. Yamato was sunk by US carrier-based planes in April 1945 while making a planned suicide run to the Battle of Okinawa. The plan was for the ship to be beached and become a Japanese fort against the US invasion.
CNN
8 hours ago
- CNN
Japan is selling top-of-the-line warships to another key US ally. What that means in the highly contested Pacific
Australia last week announced a $6.5 billion deal to buy advanced warships from Japan, a move that can go a long way to making Canberra a Pacific maritime power and Tokyo a major weapons exporter, analysts say. The Australian Defense Ministry said it will buy 11 of Japan's Mogami-class frigates, stealthy, state-of-the-art surface combatants that analysts say are equal to – or in some repects better than – anything China or even the United States is putting in the water. Announcing the deal with its fellow member of the the US-led Quad defense group, Australia's Minister for Defense Industry Pat Conroy called it 'another step towards delivering a much larger and more lethal navy, with stealth frigates that will reassure our allies and deter our adversaries.' Australia's main security concern is its growing neighborhood rivalry with China, which was stoked earlier this year when a Chinese naval task force circumnavigated the continent and held live-fire exercises off Australian shores, forcing dozens of passenger planes to divert from their usual flight paths. Canberra says the vessels will be 'upgraded' Mogami-class ships – bigger than a version already in service with Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force – giving them more firepower and a longer unrefueled range of approximately 11,500 miles (about half the length of the equator). Japan's Defense Minister Gen Nakatani echoed Conroy's sentiment, calling the deal a 'big step' that will boost Tokyo's security cooperation with a special strategic partner, Japanese public broadcaster NHK reported. The new warships, built by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, will have 32 Mk 41 vertical launch cells, capable of firing surface-to-air missiles and anti-ship missiles, the Defense Ministry said. These will enable the Mogamis to fire 128 air defense missiles, four times the number current Australian surface vessels can fire, Conroy said. Analysts noted the Lockheed Martin-made Mk 41 launch cells are big enough to carry Tomahawk cruise missiles – which, with a range of 1,000 miles, could greatly extend the warships' target area. The Mk 41 cells could also be used for long-range anti-submarine rockets, enabling them to better hunt down fleeing nuclear-powered submarines, said Sidharth Kaushal, a research fellow in sea power at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) in London. The Japanese-made frigates are also lauded for their lean manning, needing only a crew of 90, compared with 170 on Australia's current ANZAC-class frigates the Mogamis will replace. The smaller crew is important for countries like Japan and Australia that face military recruiting challenges. 'It's a much bigger ship, which is able to operate with a much smaller crew, and that's a reflection of how modern this ship is,' Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said at a press conference on Tuesday. The Mogami class compares favorably with other frigates in the region, analysts said, and they praised Australia's decision to go with the Japanese design, which was in competition with a German frigate. 'Its stealth, its reduced manning, its modularity – all at a relatively affordable price – make it an incredibly competitive product,' said Alessio Patalano, professor of war and strategy in East Asia at King's College, London. Carl Schuster, a former US Navy captain and former head of the US Pacific Command's Joint Intelligence Center, called it 'slightly superior' to China's Type 054B frigate, giving it especially high marks for its mid- to long-range air defense systems. 'Compared to a Chinese frigate this is an agile, more technologically advanced solution,' Patalano said. Kaushal, the RUSI analyst, said the unseen technology on the Japanese-made warship – its software – could make more of a difference than firepower when it comes to combat. For instance, it's possible that the sonar software on the Mogami could be superior to an adversary's in separating ocean noise from an actual hostile contact, he said. And the analysts noted Japanese industrial reliability. 'Japanese shipyards do outstanding work and deliver their products on time and within the assigned budget,' said Schuster. 'Mogami is state of the art. It builds on Japan's longstanding high-quality pipeline approach to shipbuilding, and clear access to advanced tech both domestic and from the US,' Patalano said, adding that current Mogami-class ships are powered by British engines. The Australian deal bodes well for what could be a nascent Japanese defense export industry, the analysts said. For most of the post-World War II era, Japan banned any export of weaponry. But in recent years that policy has been relaxed to allow items related to surveillance, reconnaissance and rescue to be sold abroad. The Philippines has been the early beneficiary of this change, getting air surveillance radars from Japan over the past two years, according to Tomohisa Takei, a senior fellow at the Sasakawa Peace Foundation. Last year, Japan sold its first lethal weaponry, Patriot missile interceptors to the US, built under license from Washington to replace Patriots it had sent to Ukraine. The frigate sale to Australia dwarfs that missile deal. The Australian Defense Ministry announcement said the first three warships will be built in Japan and the remaining eight in Australia. Patalano said exporting the warships, but also exporting the technology to build them, represents a challenge for the country's arms industry. Pulling it off 'would catapult Japan in the space of major defense industry exporters,' he said. When looking at the Japan-Australia deal, analysts noted that the two US allies may be more advanced and efficient in military shipbuilding than their American partner. The US Navy has no frigates in its fleet and hasn't had them since 2015 when the last of the Oliver Hazard Perry class, the USS Simpson, was decommissioned. Washington's effort to build new frigates, the Constellation class, which was authorized in 2020, is at least three years behind schedule as it undergoes design changes despite construction having already begun, according to the Government Accountability Office. And even then, it may not be able to deliver what the Mogami does, said Schuster, the former Navy captain. 'In my opinion, it is superior to the Constellation class,' he said. Patalano, too, noted the US naval shipbuilding woes. 'When it comes to shipbuilding the US is not in the innovation space of some of its closest allies, and compared to Italy, France, the UK, the ROK (South Korea), and now Japan, the US has a lot to learn,' said Patalano, from King's College. The government of Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the frigate deal is part of a greater investment in defense that will create 10,000 jobs at home. Another leg of that is the AUKUS agreement between Australia, the US and the United Kingdom, which will see Canberra acquire and later build its own nuclear-powered submarines. Australia said the agreement announced this week is non-binding, but the Albanese government expected to have contracts signed by next year. Canberra expects the first of the new warships to be operational by 2029, a Defense Ministry statement said. The deal marks a return to the global military market for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, a company with a rich naval history. It was a key force behind the buildup of the Imperial Japanese Navy leading up to World War II and is responsible for making the largest battleships in history, the Yamato and the Musashi, 69,000-ton behemoths with 18-inch main guns. They were state-of-the-art for battleships and entered the war only after Japan's December 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor, but the advent of aircraft carriers conveying torpedo bombers made them essentially obsolete before they could ever show their true power. The Musashi sank during the Battle of Leyte Gulf in October 1944 after being hit by dozens of torpedoes and bombs dropped by US planes. Yamato was sunk by US carrier-based planes in April 1945 while making a planned suicide run to the Battle of Okinawa. The plan was for the ship to be beached and become a Japanese fort against the US invasion.
