logo
Tiny UK airport on island 'frozen in the 1970's' earmarked for £24m overhaul

Tiny UK airport on island 'frozen in the 1970's' earmarked for £24m overhaul

Daily Mirror27-04-2025
This diminutive airport on a Channel Island captures the charm of a bygone era, but without urgent upgrades it could soon result in a 'tailspin' for Alderney's economy
Alderney is the northernmost of the inhabited Channel Islands, with direct flights from the British mainland and a neighbouring isle serving as its primary economic lifeline.
Part of the Bailiwick of Guernsey, the tiny island's only airport is often described as being 'frozen in the 1970s', but it faces an uncertain future — plans for a much-needed £24 million overhaul have been put on hold due to spiraling costs and political wrangling.

With its 1960s-era terminal and ageing runway, Alderney Airport currently handles around seven flights a day, with Aurigny Air Services connecting its 2,000 residents to Guernsey and Southampton in 10 and 40 minutes respectively.

It was the first airport to be built in the Channel Islands, and to this day offers just a single café and solitary shop where passengers can stock up on refreshments and supplies. However, decades of temporary repairs, costing an estimated £400,000 a year, are no longer enough to keep the runway up to the required safety standards.
Recent warnings from the Civil Aviation Authority, as well as Alderney representatives Alex Snowdon and Edward Hill, have highlighted the 'very high risk' that the runway could soon fail to meet licensing conditions, potentially forcing a long-term closure. Such a scenario, the deputies warn, would quickly trigger a 'serious downturn' in Alderney's social and economic wellbeing.
They told the Guernsey Press: 'Despite the twice-yearly significant patching and repair work undertaken by specialist contractors in recent years, Alderney Airport now faces a very high risk in the near future that it will not meet the necessary licensing conditions – primarily relating to safety factors — resulting at best in the introduction of more stringent and restrictive operating limitations, or perhaps more realistically a long-term closure of the airstrip.
'We cannot stress enough that any long term closure of Alderney Airport would rapidly lead to a serious tailspin of both Alderney's social and economic well-being — neither of which would be acceptable to the States.'
Work due to start in 2028
The States of Guernsey approved an ambitious £24 million redevelopment in 2022, aiming to extend the runway for larger aircraft and replace the outdated terminal and fire station. But when the project went to tender, the lowest bid came in at £37 million — far above the agreed budget.

As a result, the project has been paused while officials scramble to find a more affordable solution, with some estimates for even a 'do-minimum' option now ranging from £25 million to £55 million.
This delay means work that was supposed to start in the spring of 2024 may not begin until as late as 2028, leaving Alderney's only airstrip in limbo. The States of Guernsey have committed to urgently reassess the project, with a new plan expected by the end of 2025, but the focus may shift to a more modest upgrade suitable for smaller planes.
Long celebrated for its blend of charm and tranquility, Alderney's unique character is part of its appeal. Just three miles long and one and a half wide, it is known for its safe and peaceful atmosphere, where children can roam free and life moves at a slower, friendlier pace.
But without a functioning airport, Alderney risks isolation, especially in winter when ferry services are unreliable. As the States of Guernsey debate the future of the isle's airport, the outcome will determine whether this time-capsule island can remain connected to the outside world, or whether it risks being frozen in time for all the wrong reasons.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Racing tax: What is it and why is the sport going on strike
Racing tax: What is it and why is the sport going on strike

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Racing tax: What is it and why is the sport going on strike

For the first time in the modern history of the sport in Britain, its participants will voluntarily go on strike for a day. A day of protest will be held in Westminster. What does that mean? It means there will be no racing in Britain on September 10. The meetings scheduled for Lingfield, Carlisle, Uttoxeter and Kempton that day will not take place. They have been rescheduled to other dates. And why has all this come about? The strike announcement has come as part of British racing's 'Axe the Racing Tax' campaign, which is urging the Government to axe the Treasury's proposal to bring existing online betting duties into one single rate. Why would tax rises be so bad? Economic analysis commissioned by the British Horseracing Authority has shown that aligning the current tax rate paid by bookmakers on racing with that of online games of chance could see a £330 million revenue hit to the industry in the first five years, putting 2,752 jobs at risk in the first year alone. Strike action will surely cost the sport money? It will, it is estimated it will cost around £200,000 in lost revenue on the day. So does the racing industry support the strike move? In a word, yes. Racecourses, owners and trainers are all in agreement. The National Trainers Federation said cancelling fixtures was 'a huge sacrifice' which 'should serve as a stark reminder to the Government of the impact its tax raid will have on our sport'. Is this is a one-off, or will there be more strikes? No more strikes are planned, as things stand. Can I still have a bet anywhere that day? Yes, there will actually be one meeting in Ireland, at Cork. Irish racing is run completely separately to British racing.

Racing tax: What is it and why is the sport going on strike
Racing tax: What is it and why is the sport going on strike

North Wales Chronicle

time2 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Racing tax: What is it and why is the sport going on strike

For the first time in the modern history of the sport in Britain, its participants will voluntarily go on strike for a day. A day of protest will be held in Westminster. What does that mean? It means there will be no racing in Britain on September 10. The meetings scheduled for Lingfield, Carlisle, Uttoxeter and Kempton that day will not take place. They have been rescheduled to other dates. And why has all this come about? The strike announcement has come as part of British racing's 'Axe the Racing Tax' campaign, which is urging the Government to axe the Treasury's proposal to bring existing online betting duties into one single rate. Why would tax rises be so bad? Economic analysis commissioned by the British Horseracing Authority has shown that aligning the current tax rate paid by bookmakers on racing with that of online games of chance could see a £330 million revenue hit to the industry in the first five years, putting 2,752 jobs at risk in the first year alone. Strike action will surely cost the sport money? It will, it is estimated it will cost around £200,000 in lost revenue on the day. So does the racing industry support the strike move? In a word, yes. Racecourses, owners and trainers are all in agreement. The National Trainers Federation said cancelling fixtures was 'a huge sacrifice' which 'should serve as a stark reminder to the Government of the impact its tax raid will have on our sport'. Is this is a one-off, or will there be more strikes? No more strikes are planned, as things stand. Can I still have a bet anywhere that day? Yes, there will actually be one meeting in Ireland, at Cork. Irish racing is run completely separately to British racing.

Racing calls one-day strike over proposed betting tax rise
Racing calls one-day strike over proposed betting tax rise

North Wales Chronicle

time2 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Racing calls one-day strike over proposed betting tax rise

The four scheduled fixtures at Carlisle, Uttoxeter, Lingfield and Kempton will not take place after agreements between the owners of the courses and the British Horseracing Authority, making it the first time the sport has voluntarily refused to race in modern history. The BHA set up the 'Axe the Racing Tax' campaign in response to proposals to replace the existing three-tax structure of online gambling duties with a single tax, with fears the current 15 per cent duty on racing could be increased to the 21 per cent levied on games of chance. Brant Dunshea, chief executive at the British Horseracing Authority, said: 'We have decided to take the unprecedented decision to cancel our planned racing fixtures on September 10 to highlight to Government the serious consequences of the Treasury's tax proposals which threaten the very future of our sport. 'British racing is already in a precarious financial position and research has shown that a tax rise on racing could be catastrophic for the sport and the thousands of jobs that rely on it in towns and communities across the country. 'This is the first time that British racing has chosen not to race due to Government proposals. We haven't taken this decision lightly but in doing so we are urging the Government to rethink this tax proposal to protect the future of our sport which is a cherished part of Britain's heritage and culture. 'Our message to Government is clear: axe the racing tax and back British racing.' The four tracks involved are operated by the Jockey Club and the Arena Racing Company, with both backing the move. Jim Mullen, CEO at the Jockey Club, said: 'We hope this pause for reflection will enable the Government to truly understand the economic impact of horseracing and its cultural significance to communities across the UK, as well as the world-class racing festivals we host. 'After this period of reflection, we hope the full implications will be understood, and we can prevent the irreparable damage that threatens a sport the nation is, and should be, proud of.' Martin Cruddace, CEO at ARC, added: 'We have always been taxed and regulated differently, and it is imperative for our future that we continue to be so. 'If the Government wants Britain to be a world leader in online casino and a world pauper in a sport at the heart of its culture, then tax harmonisation will achieve that aim.' While the four meetings will be rescheduled, Paul Johnson, chief executive of the National Trainers Federation, underlined the 'sacrifice' in calling a halt to the sport for a day. He said: 'Cancelling fixtures is a huge sacrifice by racing and should serve as a stark reminder to the Government of the impact its tax raid will have on our sport. 'Thousands of jobs are at stake alongside the loss of millions of pounds to the British economy.' A Treasury spokesperson said: 'We are consulting on bringing the treatment of online betting in line with other forms of online gambling to cut down bureaucracy – it is not about increasing or decreasing rates, and we welcome views from all stakeholders including businesses, trade bodies, the third sector and individuals.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store