Stop eating ultraprocessed food if you don't want an early death
With their poor diet, Americans face the highest increased risk of death among eight countries. — TNS
People eating ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) might be snacking their way to an earlier death, says research published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine .
From white bread to soda, the hallmark features of UPFs include added sugar, salt, hydrogenated fats, artificial colours, preservatives and starches.
UPFs make up roughly 58% of American diets, the most out of any country.
According to lead study investigator Eduardo Nilson, as far as diets go, it's a potentially deadly one.
'We first estimated a linear association between the dietary share of UPFs and all-cause mortality, so that each 10% increase in the participation of UPFs in the diet increases the risk of death from all causes by 3%,' he said in a news release.
Nilson and his team of researchers pooled data on UPFs from eight countries, including the United States.
Worldwide, the US outranked every other featured country for having the highest concentration of UPFs in its diets.
Americans consequently faced the highest increased risk of death – nearly 14%.
The study estimated 124,000 premature deaths within the US were attributable to UPF consumption in 2018 alone.
UPF consumption has previously been linked to 32 health conditions, including cancers, obesity and high blood pressure.
Nilson and his team's work, however, has given researchers a better understanding of precisely how all of those different influences may be putting consumers at risk.
'UPFs affect health beyond the individual impact of high content of critical nutrients (sodium, trans fats and sugar) because of the changes in the foods during industrial processing and the use of artificial ingredients, including colourants, artificial flavours and sweeteners, emulsifiers and many other additives and processing aids.
'So, assessing deaths from all-causes associated with UPF consumption allows an overall estimate of the effect of industrial food processing on health,' Nilson explained.
While the US is facing the highest rate of attributable premature deaths, UPFs are becoming an expanding issue in many other countries.
'It is concerning that, while in high-income countries UPF consumption is already high but relatively stable for over a decade, in low- and middle-income countries the consumption has continuously increased, meaning that while the attributable burden in high-income countries is currently higher, it is growing in the other countries,' Nilson said.
'This shows that policies that disincentivise the consumption of UPFs are urgently needed globally, promoting traditional dietary patterns based on local fresh and minimally processed foods.'
For this study, Nilson's team processed data on UPF consumption in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, the United Kingdom and the US. – The Atlanta Journal-Constitution/Tribune News Service
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Stop eating ultraprocessed food if you don't want an early death
With their poor diet, Americans face the highest increased risk of death among eight countries. — TNS People eating ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) might be snacking their way to an earlier death, says research published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine . From white bread to soda, the hallmark features of UPFs include added sugar, salt, hydrogenated fats, artificial colours, preservatives and starches. UPFs make up roughly 58% of American diets, the most out of any country. According to lead study investigator Eduardo Nilson, as far as diets go, it's a potentially deadly one. 'We first estimated a linear association between the dietary share of UPFs and all-cause mortality, so that each 10% increase in the participation of UPFs in the diet increases the risk of death from all causes by 3%,' he said in a news release. Nilson and his team of researchers pooled data on UPFs from eight countries, including the United States. Worldwide, the US outranked every other featured country for having the highest concentration of UPFs in its diets. Americans consequently faced the highest increased risk of death – nearly 14%. The study estimated 124,000 premature deaths within the US were attributable to UPF consumption in 2018 alone. UPF consumption has previously been linked to 32 health conditions, including cancers, obesity and high blood pressure. Nilson and his team's work, however, has given researchers a better understanding of precisely how all of those different influences may be putting consumers at risk. 'UPFs affect health beyond the individual impact of high content of critical nutrients (sodium, trans fats and sugar) because of the changes in the foods during industrial processing and the use of artificial ingredients, including colourants, artificial flavours and sweeteners, emulsifiers and many other additives and processing aids. 'So, assessing deaths from all-causes associated with UPF consumption allows an overall estimate of the effect of industrial food processing on health,' Nilson explained. While the US is facing the highest rate of attributable premature deaths, UPFs are becoming an expanding issue in many other countries. 'It is concerning that, while in high-income countries UPF consumption is already high but relatively stable for over a decade, in low- and middle-income countries the consumption has continuously increased, meaning that while the attributable burden in high-income countries is currently higher, it is growing in the other countries,' Nilson said. 'This shows that policies that disincentivise the consumption of UPFs are urgently needed globally, promoting traditional dietary patterns based on local fresh and minimally processed foods.' For this study, Nilson's team processed data on UPF consumption in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, the United Kingdom and the US. – The Atlanta Journal-Constitution/Tribune News Service
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Rural hospitals in the US are closing maternity wards, reducing medical access
Rural hospitals across the United States are shuttering their labour and delivery units, leaving rural Americans with less access to necessary medical care. Across the country since 2020, 101 rural hospitals have stopped delivering babies or announced they soon will, according to a recent report from the Center for Healthcare Quality & Payment Reform. That includes three hospitals in Texas, bringing the state to a total of 93 rural hospitals that do not provide labour and delivery services. Across the state, well over half of rural hospitals do not deliver babies. State organisations are sounding the alarm. The Rural Texas Maternal Health Assembly reported in November that 47% of Texas counties are "maternity care deserts." That's 14% higher than the national average, the assembly wrote. Rural hospitals are a lifeline to their communities, which may be located many miles from the next nearest medical facility. In medical emergencies, minutes matter – and long travel time leaves rural residents with lower odds of surviving. "Travel burden is real, and geography of Texas can be very challenging," said John Henderson, the president and chief executive of the Texas Organization of Rural & Community Hospitals. "That's okay for certain things. ... It's not okay if you're having a heart attack or a stroke or delivering a baby." For some rural Texans, labour and delivery department closures could be the difference between life and death. 'Canary in the coal mine' It's not just about maternal health – across the board, many rural hospitals are struggling financially. Half of rural Texas hospitals are at risk of closure, according to the Center for Healthcare Quality & Payment Reform. For some hospitals, the threat has already become a Coast Medical Center Trinity, north of Houston, announced in April that it was closing before the end of the month. "It kind of feels like a death in the family," Henderson said of the closure. For a struggling rural hospital, closing the labour and delivery unit may be an alternative to closing the entire hospital. That's in part because labour and delivery units can be costly to operate. They must be staffed around the clock, since births can't always be scheduled or sequestered to regular business hours. In rural hospitals, which often have low patient volume, the unit could go long stretches without seeing any births at all. "You're basically paying people to sit in the hospital waiting for births that are very unlikely to happen on the majority of days," said Harold Miller, the chief executive of the Center for Healthcare Quality & Payment Reform. Labour and delivery is also not a required service – unlike other services such as emergency medical care - which makes those units more likely to be chopped. "In some ways, it's the canary in the coal mine on these things," Miller said. "If they're in trouble, where are they going to look first? That's where they're going to look first." Exacerbating maternal health issues As an immediate impact of labour and delivery closures, rural residents are forced to drive further to access travel time means worse outcomes for women who are pregnant or in labour, according to the assembly's November report. "The lack of local services harms the health of mothers and babies," the Assembly wrote. The impact of travel time means that "rurality in and of itself is a factor in the maternal health crisis," the assembly wrote. Long travel time also exacerbates an existing problem: Texas as a whole already falls short on maternal health outcomes. The state's infant mortality rate is about on par with the national average, according to data from The Commonwealth Fund. The maternal death rate, however, is 34.7 per 100,000 live births, the data shows, compared to the national average of 26.3 per 100,000 births. Overall, the organisation ranked Texas as second to last in the country on women's health and reproductive care. A 'long-term issue' Advocates say there are potential solutions to rural hospitals' struggles. Miller said the country as a whole should pay rural hospitals for their standby costs, so they can afford to keep the doors open no matter how many patients walk through. In the meantime, he said, individual states and the federal government should take steps to protect rural hospitals. In his view, those efforts can't only be one-time grants or other short-term assistance. "The problem is, this is a long-term issue," Miller said. "There has to be some stream of money that is adequate on an ongoing basis, year after year." In Texas, Henderson pointed to a proposed bill from Representative Gary VanDeaver, R-New Boston. House Bill 18 aims to stabilize rural hospitals' and clinics' finances through grant programmes, training and a new state office focused on rural hospital finance. "There are Texans who do not currently have access to hospitals and health care services that the majority of us take for granted," VanDeaver said at a public hearing for the bill in March. "We have the opportunity this session to change that." House Bill 18 was passed by the Texas House in April and is now in the Senate. Outside of legislation, Henderson said he sees promise in telemedicine. In order to survive, he said, rural hospitals and advocates need to look at unconventional solutions. "It's not going to get easier. Rural hospitals aren't going to be less vulnerable in the near term," Henderson said. "We need to be working on innovative projects and finding ways for them to work together better." – The Dallas Morning News/Tribune News Service
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Toxic pesticide found in tampons, say British NGOs
A report co-authored by several British non-governmental organisations (NGOs) warns of the presence of glyphosate in over a dozen brands of menstrual tampons. This finding is all the more worrying given that glyphosate is far from being the only harmful substance found in women's sanitary protection products. Manufacturers of tampons, pads and other menstrual protection products still have a long way to go to protect the health of menstruating people. The new report has revealed the presence of glyphosate in around 15 brands of tampons sold in the United Kingdom. According to their investigation, concentrations of this pesticide (considered a probable human carcinogen) can be as high as 0.004 mg/kg ... 40 times the legal limit for drinking water in the UK! One of the hypotheses put forward to explain how these substances end up in products designed for period protection is that glyphosate may have been present in certain weedkillers used in cotton fields. In light of these findings, the NGOs behind the survey recommend that a regulatory system be put in place, along with a testing process to ensure that menstrual hygiene products are free of pesticides. 'Women, girls and people who menstruate use an average of 11,000 disposable menstrual products throughout their life. 'Despite the prolific use of these products, the potential health impacts of the chemicals and pesticides that they can contain remains largely unexamined,' says the executive summary, available on the website of Pesticide Action Network, a UK NGO that co-authored the report. NGOs and scientists have been warning us about the toxic composition of menstrual products for several years now. In July 2024, an American study revealed the presence of several heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead and vanadium) in 24 brands of tampons sold in Europe and the United States. Other studies were previously conducted, particularly in France. In 2019, the magazine 60 Millions de Consommateurs sounded the alarm in a comparative test carried out to check for the presence of chemical compounds in menstrual products. The results reported the presence of residues of several harmful substances, such as phthalates, dioxins and ... glyphosate. – AFP Relaxnews
