Billboard camera footage used by transport agency to spot cars and trucks
'The ANPR donor cameras in the trial are not being used 'to spy on mechanics issuing warrants', nor would they be capable of being used for that purpose,' NZTA told RNZ.
'These cameras are typically located in billboards at urban intersections.
'The trial is simply looking at the potential for using images gathered by these cameras to be used as proof of the location of a particular vehicle at a point in time.'
An inspector who claimed they had checked a car in Auckland at a certain time could be exposed if the car was spotted at a Christchurch intersection at that time, it said.
It 'could be of benefit in supporting investigations into specific cases where fraudulent or illegal activity is suspected'.
A well-connected industry source told RNZ: 'Yeah, that has been a bit secret.'
NZTA might not have wanted to tip people off, the source said.
'For the purpose the agency is stating, I don't have much issue with that, but the way they have gone about it is what alarms me. Especially because it's third-party [cameras and ANPR system].
'What else might they use them for?'
NZTA Waka Kotahi said it was not using the images in any actual fraud investigations, but only as a test for potential future use.
The test is separate from how the agency is taking over many speed and red-light-runner cameras from police, and replacing some with higher-tech models, which it will own or lease.
A second source active in the industry was appalled by the move.
'Oh my god,' they said.
'It is part of your right to know the audit process you go through. You can't sabotage your process because of a trial.'
Months of inquiries by RNZ in 2018 showed up mass deficiencies in NZTA's oversight of how truck certificates of fitness were being issued. The systems were reviewed and changed.
There have been further reports of inspectors anonymously recounting examples of how they feel they have been subject to unfair targeting by the agency.
'You have got layers and layers of issues here,' said the second source.
'What's the limit [of surveillance]?'
They questioned why the camera sting was even needed when fraud would 'show up in paperwork. There will be tons of other evidence that can be used against people'.
Many supermarkets, petrol stations, other businesses and councils have a total of thousands of cameras that link into ANPR software systems run by two Auckland companies – Auror and SaferCities.
The new trial uses SaferCities vGrid system, NZTA said.
Its system covered electronic billboard operators such as LUMO, which had built-in cameras with ANPR software, and CCTV operators including councils, individual businesses and car park operators, the agency said.
Police accessed the vGrid system more than 400,000 times last year.
'NZTA only has access to still images from ANPR donor cameras whose owners have specifically agreed to our usage,' Waka Kotahi told RNZ in the OIA response.
'Currently, this only includes LUMO and more recently, Hamilton City Council.'
RNZ approached Lumo for comment.
As of 2022, the country had at least 1400 digital billboards and screen-posters, many of them with smart technology and ANPR cameras.
The police tapped the ANPR systems 700,000 times last year.
In October, two District Court judges dismissed legal challenges to the police using them so much without a warrant, though it is expected there will be at least one appeal against that finding.
The fraud camera trial comes at the same time Waka Kotahi is reviewing the WoF-CoF system to reduce how often collectors of old vehicles, and motorhome users, have to get a warrant.
The agency has been increasing a lot of the fees it charges motorists since 2023. Another batch of rises is due next January that are expected to push up total fees collected by $10m to $264m.
How the camera trial works
Camera footage could be used where it was suspected that WoFs or CoFs had been issued to vehicles which had not been inspected at the time or place recorded by a vehicle inspector, the transport agency said.
It gave a hypothetical scenario to RNZ:
'If NZTA was investigating a vehicle inspector suspected of fraud, and if the inspector had issued a WoF to a vehicle which was recorded as having been inspected at a WoF garage in Auckland at 2pm on July 1, 2025, and we were able to access a still image from a donor camera of the same vehicle driving past a billboard located in Christchurch at 3.30pm on July 1, 2025, this could potentially be used as evidence to prove that the WoF had been issued fraudulently, because the vehicle was not in Auckland at the time of the recorded inspection.'
This would not be a part of regular compliance monitoring, it said.
Regular compliance monitoring included scheduled reviews where compliance officers visited inspection sites, as well as 'mystery shopper' activity.
-RNZ
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
4 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Cheaper petrol on its way under new system – but will drivers end up paying more?
While Chris Bishop calls it the biggest change to road funding in 50 years, details on how the new system will work remain scarce for now, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Major shift from fuel tax to pay-per-km The government has announced it will scrap fuel excise duty and move all vehicles to a system of road user charges (RUCs), in what transport minister Chris Bishop called 'the biggest change to how we fund our roading network in 50 years'. He said the surge in fuel-efficient, hybrid and full electric vehicles had eroded the longstanding connection between petrol consumption and kilometres driven. Under the new system, charges would be based on distance travelled, vehicle type, time and location. The timeline is still vague: Bishop expects legislation to pass in 2026, with the system 'open for business' by 2027. But a full transition date for light vehicles remains deliberately unannounced, with Bishop explaining the government is 'focused on getting the system right rather than rushing its rollout', reports the Herald's Jamie Ensor. Privatised and digitised Alongside the policy shift comes a sweeping modernisation of the road charging system. Gone will be the paper labels stuck to windscreens, replaced by a fully digital e-RUC system. The NZTA's dual role as both regulator and RUC retailer will be split, with private firms taking over the collection and administration of charges. The idea is that this will drive innovation and reduce compliance costs by allowing the market to offer high-tech solutions, such as integrations with in-car computers. 'Instead of expanding a clunky government system, we will reform the rules to allow the market to deliver innovative, user-friendly services for drivers,' Bishop said. Flexible payment options like monthly billing and post-pay models are being considered, and RUCs could be bundled with tolls and congestion charges in a single bill. As Luke Malpass writes this morning in The Post (paywalled), the new system is being designed with one eye firmly on a future where our most expensive roads are funded with tolls, and ease of payment will be key to getting people to use them. 'Roads have to be paid for somehow,' he notes. A pattern of reform The transport minister's announcement came as a surprise to many, but the move had been clearly signalled for years. National ran on eliminating fuel taxes and the policy was part of the National-Act coalition agreement. Last year the government scrapped the Auckland regional fuel tax and oversaw the imposition of RUCs on electric vehicles, ending a long-standing exemption. These earlier moves laid the groundwork for yesterday's grand shift. As the number of petrol hybrids on the roads climbs – from 12,000 in 2015 to 350,000 today – there's a growing mismatch between fuel tax contributions and actual road usage, Bishop said, adding that lower-income drivers of older cars are effectively subsidising wealthier owners of hybrids and EVs. The missing details While the move has been widely framed as a step toward fairness and future-proofing, many of the key details remain unresolved, writes Stuff's Michael Daly. One key question: how much drivers will pay. Bishop gave no indication as to how much the government is planning to charge different vehicle types under the new system. Currently, light diesel vehicles pay $76 per 1000km, but that figure may not translate directly to petrol vehicles. Owners of small, fuel-efficient cars could be forgiven for worrying they'll end up paying more under a RUC system, regardless of the weight class tiers. There are also concerns about the cost of privatising tax collection. 'The only people who will see any benefit from this scheme are the corporates who take their cut to gather the tax,' said Fleur Fitzsimons of the Public Service Association, whose members include NZTA employees. As the legislation progresses and the 2027 rollout approaches, the government will need to spell out what motorists are actually signing up for – and how much they'll be paying.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Police too loose with number plate recognition system, review finds
An example of a thumbnail photo from an ANPR camera. Photo: Supplied The police have been too loose using systems that identify vehicle number plates and must tighten up, a new review has found. Police use of two privately-run automated number-plate recognition (ANPR) systems, Auror and SaferCities, has soared. The review by police only covered Auror. It found anyone with a police email could use the system, even many who had no reason to, and they did not have to say why they were accessing it. "With the limited controls on who can log into the platform and no system requirement to enter the lawful basis on which the information is being obtained, there is a risk of misuse by staff (intentional or unintentional)," the 35-page review said. The public would lose trust if police went too far in accessing personal information using Auror, it warned. "Police are working on restricting access." Auror was set up with help from police a decade ago and had grown internationally, as well as to the extent New Zealand officers used it at least 250,000 times - and probably 380,000 times - last year. The review did not set out to uncover any misuse; that was out of scope. An earlier general review of ANPR found a few isolated instances of misuse. Auror's software can make sense of retailers' CCTV footage of vehicles and people. Crime reports via Auror have doubled to 12,000 a month since 2022. In addition, police can use it to tell where a vehicle has been spotted over the past 60 days. Overall, the system boosted crime fighting and had a wide number of uses, the review found. But there had been limited internal audit of police use of it. "Improved information storage systems would enable safer use of information with greater transparency. "As many police employees have no operational requirement to access Auror (or other Police systems such as NIA [national intelligence application]), the reviewers consider access should be limited to those with an operational need." Auror supported this, it said. Police had been told to fix the loose controls before but "issues associated with access and insufficient recording of information about the nature of the searches identified in this review persist". The review several times linked Auror to facial recognition, though Auror has previously said it does not use that technology. Its application called Connect the Dots "is a form of facial recognition technology, however the only source of images [of suspects] for comparison are those provided by retailers into the platform". Auror said it had been transparent about the use of image matching, as RNZ has previously reported . "It is also clear on our website ," it said. The website calls it "face matching". RNZ reported earlier this week on a surge of theft and shoplifting reports to police via Auror, after it taught retailers how to provide better footage and details, like names, to make it past the police system that vetted reports for "solvability". The new review underscored how the ANPR was a doubled-edged sword. "Trust and confidence in police is negatively affected where personal information is used beyond the mandate provided to police in legislation." This problem was at the heart of several failed legal challenges last year against police use of ANPR evidence in court. The review added: "Additionally, where offences are reported to police with clear details of offending and information providing lines of enquiry to identify suspects, inaction by police will also impact trust and confidence." Auror had been generating more information than police knew what to do with. "The volume of offences processed and reported through Auror will always outpace police's ability to investigate them," it said. Too much poor quality information would just jam up any data storage. "Police will need to consider how best to prioritise who is held to account within the available resources while maintaining trust and confidence." The trend is upwards; a data review in March showed retailers had improved their crime reports. Police were now moving to change the way they assessed reports, including through a new initial assessment team that would be trialled. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Road user charges: AA backs shake-up but wants low admin costs
Photo: RNZ Private companies will need to keep the costs of running the government's new road user charges scheme as low as possible, the AA says. The government is inching closer to replacing petrol tax with electronic road user charges on all light vehicles, in what Transport Minister Chris Bishop calls [ the biggest shake-up of road funding in half a century]. He says it'll be fairer and will be like paying a power bill or Netflix each month and will be in place by 2027. The changes will put an end to the existing two-tier system, where petrol users pay a fuel excise duty of about 70 cents a litre at the pump, while diesel, electric and heavy vehicles pay paper-based road user charges based on distance travelled. However, Labour says the timing of the coalition's transition to a universal road user charges system risks "clobbering" motorists with more costs. AA's policy director Martin Glynn said his organisation is also worried about how much motorists would have to pay under the new scheme. He told Morning Report he was unsure if it would be more expensive. At present the minimum road user charge kicked in once a light vehicle had travelled 1000km. That was $76 and $12-$13 for an administration fee. With private providers being brought in to run the revised scheme they would need to be making money, Glynn said. "We really want to see the administration costs be as low as possible." He agreed with the Minister that with more vehicles becoming more fuel efficient, the current petrol tax penalised those with older vehicles. "It's become more unfair over time and it's going to become more unfair if we don't change." The current system of buying RUCs was "a bit clunky", he said. Those using diesel or a heavy vehicle purchased RUCs online from the NZ Transport Agency or they could go to an agent. Motorists needed to keep an eye on their odometer to ensure they stayed up to date. The other problem was the the RUC came in the mail and needed to be displayed on the dashboard. AA supported Bishop's plan to make the system fully electronic. Annual warrant of fitness checks were the main way to ensure compliance at present. "But it's fair to say it's difficult to enforce being an annual system so there's a fair degree of evasion and avoidance and that's something that will have to be addressed in the transition." Heavy vehicles already have an ERUC, a device in the trucks that monitors kilometres and location.
