logo
Defence review to say UK must be ready to fight a war in Europe or Atlantic

Defence review to say UK must be ready to fight a war in Europe or Atlantic

Yahoo3 days ago

Britain needs to be ready to fight a war in Europe or the Atlantic, a strategic defence review will conclude, though it is not expected to promise immediate increases in the size of the armed forces to deal with the threat.
The 130-page document will call for a move to 'war-fighting readiness' to deter Russian aggression in Europe and increases in stockpiles of arms and support equipment, some of which may only last days in a crisis.
Keir Starmer, the prime minister, will launch the review on Monday, saying the exercise 'will ensure the UK rises to the challenge and our armed forces have the equipment they need' in what ministers say is an increasingly unstable world.
Related: Labour pushes 'military Keynesianism' to win support for defence spending
But it is not expected to contain any additional spending commitments and the defence secretary, John Healey, acknowledged on Sunday that any plans to increase the size of the British army, at its smallest for 300 years, will have to wait until after the election.
Speaking to the BBC, Healey said there had been '15 years of a recruitment and retention crisis in our armed forces' as he acknowledged that the size of the army had fallen to a low 70,860 – below the government's current target of 73,000.
The minister conceded that Labour had so far failed to turn the situation around, despite talk that Britain is prepared to participate in a peacekeeping deployment in Ukraine. 'We've still got more people leaving than joining,' he said.
'The first job is to reverse that trend, and then I want to see in the next parliament our ability to start to increase the number [of soldiers],' Healey continued, apparently deferring any increase until after an election due in 2029.
There had been speculation that Healey had been seeking to secure a commitment to increase the target size of the army to 76,000, though defence sources said that could have cost up to £2.5bn in pay, accommodation and equipment.
Though Russia is heavily embroiled in the war in Ukraine, experts believe that if the Kremlin agreed to a ceasefire, it could allow time for a country with an army of more than 600,000 and a militarised economy to threaten other parts of Nato's eastern flank.
Related: Drones, AI and new technology will dramatically change nature of war, UK defence review to warn
The three-strong review team, led by Lord Robertson, a former Nato secretary general, has made 62 recommendations, in response to what the team has concluded is 'a new era of threat' from aggressive states such as Russia and drones, artificial intelligence and other new technologies.
On Sunday, Ukraine said that it had attacked 40 Russian bombers at airfields deep inside Russia, using remotely piloted one-way attack drones that were hidden in trucks inside Russia until ready to use. Operation Spider's Web was in preparation for 18 months, with relatively cheap drones targeting strategic Russian aviation.
It is also expected to conclude:
The UK will commit to building 12 nuclear-powered attack submarines at Barrow in Cumbria and Raynesway, Derby, as part of the three-country Aukus programme with the US and Australia. The first submarines will launch in the late 2030s, replacing seven Astute-class submarines, tasked to operate around the world.
A total of £15bn will be invested in modernising the production of nuclear weapons at Aldermaston in Berkshire, supporting more than 9,000 jobs as part of a programme to supply bombs for the Dreadnought submarines that will replace the ageing Vanguard boats that carry the Trident deterrent.
That Russia poses an 'immediate and pressing' danger while China is a 'sophisticated and persistent challenge' to British interests. Iran and North Korea will be described as 'regional disruptors' and potentially hostile to the UK, with each of the four showing growing signs of being willing to work together.
A new volunteer-led Home Guard be created to help protect airports, communications nodes and other parts of Britain's critical national infrastructure from drone and other surprise attacks, freeing up the time of soldiers and specialist police who guard such locations at present.
Ministers are also considering whether to restore an air-launched nuclear deterrent by buying F-35A aircraft which have been certified to carry the US B61-12 gravity bomb, which has a maximum explosive yield of 50 kilotons, more than three times the size of the 15kT bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima in 1945.
A report in the Sunday Times said the UK was considering buying the F-35A, though any arrangement to deploy B61 nuclear bombs in addition would probably be similar to existing situations in the Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Turkey, where nuclear weapons belonging to the US are stored in bunkers in those countries.
Britain is the only big nuclear power that has only one method of delivering a nuclear weapon, from a submarine at sea. But engaging in 'nuclear sharing' with the US would be complex, and would require sensitive negotiations with the Trump administration if it were the path chosen.
In Europe, B61 bombs remain US property until there is a deemed to be war. At that point, because non-proliferation rules are then deemed not to apply, 'the host country puts the weapons on their planes and sets off with them,' according to Dave Cullen, a nuclear expert at the Basic thinktank.
Healey declined to comment on air-launched nuclear weapons on Sunday, and no announcement is expected on the issue shortly. The minister instead reiterated the value of Trident. 'For over 70 years, our UK nuclear deterrent has been the ultimate guarantee of security in this country. It's what Putin fears most,' he told the BBC.
The defence review is not expected to announce any immediate increase in defence budgets, beyond a commitment to lift spending by about £5bn to 2.5% of GDP in 2027 and to 3% in the next parliament.
But Starmer and other Nato leaders are expected to discuss and agree fresh spending targets at a summit in The Hague later this month, of about 5% of GDP, of which 3.5% will be on military spending and the rest on cyberdefence and other infrastructure.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The UFOs Are Ukrainian
The UFOs Are Ukrainian

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

The UFOs Are Ukrainian

'Hoo boy' was my first reaction to the outpouring of commentary treating a Ukrainian drone attack on parked Russian aircraft as the greatest military revelation since the Trojan horse. The U.S. had been warned, warned, warned and warned by events on its own shores of this turn in military tactics. In February, I cadged assurances from the leadership of Barksdale Air Force Base, home to many of America's irreplaceable B-52s, that it was employing countermeasures against the drone threat. My second reaction was to wish the revelation had been of intimate U.S. and allied involvement in planning and executing the attack, along with a second Ukrainian attack a day later on Russia's vital Crimea bridge. A truly transformative prospect would be a deliberate signal from the U.S. and its allies to Vladimir Putin that his gains are at an end, his costs will be going up and he should settle.

Zia Yusuf's departure is a blow to Reform
Zia Yusuf's departure is a blow to Reform

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Zia Yusuf's departure is a blow to Reform

Zia Yusuf's resignation has cast further doubt over Reform's viability as a serious political party, rather than a vehicle for protest votes. In the 11 months since the General Election, Nigel Farage's party lost one MP to a defection, and now seen its Chairman resign in obvious exasperation after publicly criticising the party's newest MP. This will come as a welcome reprieve for Kemi Badenoch and the Conservative party as they attempt to redefine themselves in the wake of last year's election defeat. Sir Keir Starmer, too, will be relieved by the easing of pressure to his Right. For Reform, however, this is a serious blow. The party styles itself as the de facto Opposition and the government in waiting, yet its track record to date suggested that it could struggle to make the transition from protest to power. The question mark hanging over Reform was whether it could professionalise itself, find message discipline, bring in a lot more top level talent, contain the large personalities it has attracted, and present voters with a fully fleshed-out vision for governing Britain. Over the last year, the party has made stunning progress at the polls and appeared to be making strides towards meeting these developmental milestones. Yet yesterday's drama at the top of the organisation has underlined just how much work there is still to do. This may not matter too much in the short run, where Reform's status as repository for protest votes appears assured regardless of personnel turnover. Over the next four years, however, a reputation for infighting and turmoil could put a hard ceiling on Reform's ambitions. Mr Farage's statement on Mr Yusuf's resignation appeared to indicate that he recognised this; the Reform leader was conciliatory and credited Mr Yusuf's work as being a 'huge factor' in the party's local election success. His task is now to rapidly find a competent successor to continue the development of his party, and to show that he is capable of building and retaining a team which can maintain a united front. While there is a long wait for the next election, the public is crying out for change which Sir Keir's Labour party is evidently incapable of delivering. Ms Badenoch must use this window to demonstrate that she has the radical ideas necessary to fundamentally reshape Britain; Mr Farage, that he can build a professional team which can turn a protest party into one capable of governing. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

WorldPride speaker says she was denied entry to US after Cuba visit
WorldPride speaker says she was denied entry to US after Cuba visit

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

WorldPride speaker says she was denied entry to US after Cuba visit

Phyll Opoku-Gyimah, a British political and LGBTQ rights activist, said she was denied entry to the U.S. over a recent trip to Cuba. Opoku-Gyimah, also known as Lady Phyll, had been scheduled to deliver opening remarks at WorldPride's human rights conference, which runs June 4-6 in Washington. Speaking over a livestream Wednesday afternoon, Opoku-Gyimah said U.S. officials revoked her visa waiver under the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), an automated system determining whether visitors from participating countries may enter the U.S. without a visa. Travel to Cuba, which the U.S. designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 2021, is grounds for having an ESTA revoked, according to the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) website. The Caribbean nation's terror designation was briefly rescinded under former President Biden and reinstated by President Trump in January. Opoku-Gyimah said she was notified of the revocation of her travel authorization days before she was set to fly to the U.S. for WorldPride. She applied for a temporary visa, she said, but was told the earliest she could enter the country was September. 'I've called. I've written. I've pleaded,' said Opoku-Gyimah, the co-founder and CEO of UK Black Pride. 'And the answer was a cold, bureaucratic 'No.'' The DHS did not immediately return a request for comment. Opoku-Gyimah's virtual remarks Wednesday highlighted the LGBTQ community's diversity, and she encouraged WorldPride gatherers to embrace the group's intersectional identities. 'Enjoy the Pride, walk together, walk proudly and talk proudly,' she said. 'Be bold and brave in our fight for justice.' The U.K. issued a travel warning for the U.S. in March, cautioning British passport holders that 'authorities in the U.S. set and enforce entry rules strictly' and 'you may be liable to arrest or detention if you break the rules.' Other countries, including Denmark and Finland, have issued travel advisories for transgender visitors to the U.S., referencing policies instituted by the Trump administration targeting trans rights. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store