Here's what comes next in the Texas redistricting battle
After a Texas House committee advanced new congressional lines during their special session last week, Democrats left the Lone Star State to deny Republicans a quorum, or the minimum number of lawmakers needed to conduct business.
In response, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) has called for the Democrats' arrest and has ordered the Texas Rangers to launch a probe into the lawmakers for possible bribery and other violations.
Meanwhile, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) declared he would 'seek judicial orders declaring that runaway Democrats who fail to appear by the Speaker's deadline have vacated their office.' But for now, the two parties are locked in a standoff.
Here's a look at what comes next in the Texas redistricting battle:
How long can Democrats stay out?
Essentially, they can stay out of the state as long as they want.
Texas Democrats have broken quorum before. In 2003, they fled the state to try to stop Republicans from passing GOP-friendly maps. They also left the state in 2021 when Republicans worked on largely restrictive voting and election legislation.
Both times, Democrats eventually returned to the state, and Republicans passed their priorities each time. Democrats are likely on a similar trajectory because Republicans control the state Legislature and the governor's mansion, and there's a conservative majority on the Texas Supreme Court.
The question this time is how long will Democrats remain away from the state. Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston, said he expects Democrats to at least run out the clock of the first special session.
Rottinghaus noted the key to Democrats' endurance is about 'stamina, resources and unity.'
If 'they can hold all those things, then they can be successful. If not, then they'll start to see some dribbling of support from the members who've fled the quorum and they'll ultimately kind of lose that support,' he said.
What other means of pressure can Republicans exert?
Republicans don't have many options in terms of forcing Democrats to return to the state for their special session, though Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who's in a competitive reelection battle against Paxton, has pressed the FBI to help Republicans bring the lawmakers who fled back to their state.
Rottinghaus noted that Democrats could face some pressure from their constituents who want to see them back in the state; they might also face pressure to return to the state to deal with some of the more pressing issues, including disaster relief following the deadly Texas Hill Country flooding.
Republicans face the same kind of pressure to deal with disaster relief and other agenda items, meaning the situation is not tenable long term for either party.
How are both sides trying to win the situation?
Republicans are trying to oust the Democrats who fled the state from their House seats.
Paxton announced Tuesday he would seek 'judicial orders declaring that runaway Democrats who fail to appear by the Speaker's deadline have vacated their office.'
While Texas Republicans will almost certainly pass their new House map, vacating state Democrats' seats would be problematic for Republicans because the state House still wouldn't have a quorum and would then need to wait to fill those seats in an election.
Even if this is legally allowed, there's nothing to stop newly elected Democrats from breaking quorum and doing the same thing.
'The courts basically have been sort of been unwilling to intervene in other quorum breaks to require wayward members to come back,' Rottinghaus said. 'Basically, what they said in these rulings was that the House needs to police itself, so it actually doesn't say anything about what the governor or attorney general can do.'
Texas Democrats, meanwhile, are trying to stall Republican efforts as long as possible. They've traveled to New York, Massachusetts, California and Illinois and appeared alongside some of those governors and Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin to bring national attention to the issue.
In the long term, Texas Democrats will have to return to their state, so it's not a lasting solution.
Democratic governors have also said they're exploring their options over how to redraw their own maps in response to Texas.
What does Trump do?
In his first remarks addressing the situation in Texas where Democrats have fled the state, he criticized the lawmakers for leaving the Lone Star State while acknowledging they've done it before.
'Well, I think they've abandoned the state, nobody's seen anything like it. Even though they've done it twice before,' Trump said. 'And, in a certain way, it almost looks like they've abandoned the state, it looks very bad.'
Trump suggested that the FBI 'may have to' get involved in bringing those lawmakers back.
'No, I know they want them back, not only the attorney general, the governor wants them back,' Trump said. 'If you look, I mean, the governor of Texas is demanding they come back. So, a lot of people are demanding they come back.'
Other states could move forward with redistricting
Several governors and top state officials have said they're exploring their options or signaling they'd like to redraw their House maps.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said last month it would be 'appropriate' for the state to consider mid-decade redistricting based off the Florida Supreme Court's analysis of the state's more recent battle with its congressional maps.
Missouri Lt. Gov. David Wasinger (R) also signaled in a statement the state may redraw its map.
'Missouri is a solidly conservative state, consistently electing Republicans to every statewide office and sending strong supermajorities to Jefferson City. Despite this, our current congressional map still sends two progressive Democrats to push a liberal agenda in D.C., misrepresenting the will of Missouri voters,' he said.
'We missed the chance to secure a 7-1 map in 2022, a mistake President Trump rightly calls on us to fix,' he continued. 'Missouri's next congressional map must protect Missouri values and ensure our representatives in Congress are as conservative as the voters who send them.'
In California, it appears that lawmakers are leaning toward redrawing their map and putting it before voters for a vote. The new map would reportedly hurt five House Republicans in the state.
New York and Illinois leaders this week also said they were exploring their options over how to proceed.
Updated at 7:34 p.m. EDT
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gardner Preliminary Election Guide: What you need to know, from deadlines to early voting
Before Gardner residents vote for the next mayor in November, voters will have to cast a ballot at the preliminary election on Tuesday, Sept. 16. The preliminary election will determine which two candidates will move on to the general city election ballot for mayor on Tuesday, Nov. 4. Voters will also elect five city councilors for wards 1-5, six city councilors at large, and three school committee members during this year's general city election. All candidates running for the city councilor and school committee positions are uncontested, which means no preliminary election is required. All candidates are current city officials seeking re-election. Here's what to know about the upcoming preliminary election next month and the general election in November, as well as deadlines and where to register to vote. What's a preliminary election? If there are more than two candidates for a position, a preliminary election will be held automatically in September. The two candidates with the highest total votes will be placed on the general city election ballot in November. A primary election is held for political parties to decide who will run for their party if there is more than one candidate running for office. This year, three candidates running for mayor will be on the preliminary election ballot on Sept. 16: Kimberly Blake, Ann Debarros, and Michael Nicholson. When is the deadline to register to vote Residents who haven't registered to vote must do so by the registration deadline before they can cast a ballot at either the preliminary or general mayoral election. The last day to register to vote for the preliminary election is Saturday, Sept. 6 by 5 p.m. If you don't plan to vote in the preliminary election but want to vote in the city's general election in November, you need to register by Saturday, Oct. 25 at 5 p.m. To check your voter registration status and register to vote, go to the Secretary of State's website. Residents can also register to vote at the City Clerk's Office during operating hours: Monday to Thursday from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Friday from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. How do I vote early or through absentee or mail-in ballots? Mail-in and absentee ballots are available for both the preliminary election and the general city election. The last day to request a mail-in ballot for the preliminary election is Tuesday, Sept. 9 by 5 p.m. Mail-in ballot requests for the general city election in November are due Tuesday, Oct. 28 at 5 p.m. Gardner City Clerk Titi Siriphan said that the reason for not offering in-person early voting is that it has not been well-attended in the past, with more voters opting for mail-in voting. There is a key difference between an absentee ballot and a mail-in ballot. Siriphan said voters request an absentee ballot when they will not be in the city during the election. She said that mail-in ballots are intended for voters who aren't leaving the city but are unable to reach their polling location on election day. When are polls open for the preliminary election in Gardner? All polls are open from 7 a.m. until 8 p.m. in Gardner. Anyone standing in line at 8 p.m. will be permitted to vote. What if I have specific questions about my voter registration status or polling location Siriphan said the Secretary of State's website is the place where residents can get their basic election day questions answered about voter registration, vote by mail, absentee ballots, and where to vote. Siriphan said on both election days, signs will be posted all over the city to guide voters to the polls. "Of course, people can always give the Clerk's Office a call if they can't find what they are looking for on the website," she said. "We also have city election information posted on our website, but people can always give us a call." Voters can call the City Clerk's Office at 978-630-4058 or email Siriphan at tsiriphan@ This article originally appeared on Gardner News: Election 2025: Gardner preliminary vote for mayor is Sept. 16 Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Guilty Conscience': Trump's Raw Confession About 'Heaven' Has People Wondering
President Donald Trump surprised his critics on Tuesday by revealing that he's worried about what will happen to him after he dies. 'I want to try and get to heaven if possible,' Trump confessed during a Fox News interview. 'I'm hearing I'm not doing well. I hear I'm really at the bottom of the totem pole.' Trump made the unexpected comments while he spoke about efforts to end the war in Ukraine. Doing so, he said, would save lives and give him a better chance of passing through the Pearly Gates. 'If I can get to heaven, this will be one of the reasons,' he said. Trump met last week with Russian President Vladimir Putin, and this week met with European leaders as well as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to discuss ending a conflict he once said he could solve in 24 hours. However, he has so far received no commitments from Putin, who launched the war by invading Ukraine in early 2022. But for Trump's critics, it was his sudden concern about a potential afterlife and how he'll spend it that caught their attention. Emmanuel Macron Reacts To Trump's Hot Mic Comment On Vladimir Putin Texas Democrat Sues After Republicans Lock Her In Capitol 'Yikes': GOP Lawmaker Jeered Relentlessly As Voters Give Her An Earful


CNN
25 minutes ago
- CNN
Corporate America is silent as Trump abandons free-market principles
Donald TrumpFacebookTweetLink Follow A version of this story appeared in CNN Business' Nightcap newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here. Not long ago, American conservative orthodoxy held that when it comes to doing business, the government that governs least governs best. The orthodoxy manifested itself in familiar ways. Groups that claimed the mantle of individual liberties would decry new legislation. Talk radio and podcasts would mock unnamed bureaucrats for ham-fisted overreach. And powerful business lobbies were quick to denounce — in press releases and even lawsuits — regulations or taxes they saw as government overreach. But when faced with President Donald Trump's efforts to seize control of private enterprise — such as his recent arrangement to have the US pocket a portion of Nvidia's sales to China, his social media outbursts at individual executives, his moves to take a stake in Intel, and his use of executive powers to cajole banks and law firms he perceives as insufficiently loyal — those same groups have gone quiet. Take the US Chamber of Commerce, the largest business advocacy group in the country. Last year, the Chamber sued a federal consumer watchdog group for attempting to cap credit card late fees at $8 a month, claiming the agency 'exceeded its statutory authority.' In 2023, it sued the Biden administration over provisions for Medicare price negotiations in the Inflation Reduction Act, claiming the move would consolidate 'unfettered and unchecked power' to the department of Health and Human Services. But under Trump's second term, the Chamber has had little to say publicly about Trump's aggressive meddling in the private sector. Similarly, the Business Roundtable, another DC-based lobbying group that represents hundreds of chief executives, has rarely been shy about denouncing what it sees as presidential overreach in the form of taxes and environmental regulations. This year, though, the group has been largely MIA on the MAGA shift toward a style of capitalism that more closely resembles the autocratic regimes of Russia and China. Both groups have criticized Trump's trade war, warning that tariffs hurt American businesses. But neither has spoken out about the president's more direct assault on free enterprise. Neither the Chamber of Commerce nor the Business Roundtable responded to multiple requests for comment. The president, a self-styled dealmaker, has thrown out the standard free-market playbook in ways that have alarmed lawmakers, investors and legal experts. And suddenly, the legal protections businesses have long counted on appear shaky, said Philip M. Nichols, a professor of legal studies and business ethics at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. 'Any business that sticks its head up, or any business person that sticks their head up, is taking a risk that can't be calculated,' Nichols said in an interview. 'What's the smart thing to do — what do the wildebeest do when they get to the crocodile-infected river? They wait for the other wildebeest to jump in, and then follow.' Several trade groups have privately drafted plans to push back against the Trump administration in defense of their business interests, people familiar with the matter told CNN. But those plans were shelved at the request of members that are worried about drawing White House ire. 'There's an 'Eye of Sauron' element here that everyone is very aware of,' one manufacturing CEO told CNN, referring to the 'Lord of the Rings' character that brought all subjects to heel. 'But there's also a recognition that this is an administration that is transactional if they believe you're on board with their agenda.' When it comes to exerting his influence over Corporate America, no matter appears too small or too large for Trump's input. Last month, the president took credit for Coca-Cola's decision to roll out a cane-sugar-sweetened product that aligns with his allies' 'Make America Healthy Again' philosophy. He regularly criticizes CEOs in public for perceived slights, demanded that Intel's boss resign over unspecified conflicts, and urged Goldman Sachs to fire its top economist after the bank said tariffs would raise consumer prices (a fact virtually all economists agree to be true, and which we are now seeing borne out in reality). While much of that bluster is run-of-the-mill Trump rhetoric, the president shocked trade experts when he announced an unorthodox (and potentially illegal) arrangement with chipmakers Nvidia and AMD earlier this month. In exchange for export licenses that allow them to sell their products in China, the companies agreed to funnel 15% of their China sales to the US government — a setup that some analysts called a 'shakedown' of private enterprise. The White House's push into private businesses took another turn Tuesday when officials confirmed the administration was considering using taxpayer money to acquire a stake in struggling chipmaker Intel. The primary reason for such a move, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said, was the president's desire to reduce US dependence on Taiwan for chip production. But he also said Trump believes the government should have 'equity' in tech giants. The silence from Corporate America to Trump's incursion into private businesses isn't entirely unexpected. Businesses have lost their appetite for the kind of socially progressive rhetoric many adopted in response to the 2020 murder of George Floyd. At the same time, Trump's return to the White House came with a cost-benefit analysis for any business leaders thinking of speaking out: Make yourself a target, or fall in line and wait for the massive tax cuts the president has promised. 'Corporate citizens are harmed just like flesh and blood citizens are harmed when you have a leader who… actively seeks to monetize public office and actively seeks to use the power of the presidency to harm perceived enemies or anyone who doesn't appropriately capitulate,' Donald Sherman, executive director of the Center for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, told CNN. 'In some ways, this is the natural and predictable result of failing to appropriately stand up to President Trump's anti-democratic and authoritarian tendencies during his first term.'