Critics see hypocrisy in Fountain Square camp closure as new details emerge. Why the camp closed
But facing more than an hour of heated public comment at a community center, leaders had to contend with a choice that made the status quo seem firmly intact. Three days before, a half-mile away along Leonard Street, the city had ordered the first official homeless camp closure that was mainly due to public safety concerns since 2021. Displaced residents won't be housed through the new program because it's still ramping up.
Many neighbors and advocates denounced that decision as merely shifting the problem of unsheltered homelessness from one neighborhood to the next without addressing core needs for affordable housing and social services. With Streets to Home Indy — the new $8.1 million city-backed initiative to house and provide case management to more than 300 people sleeping outdoors by next June — starting in earnest next month, critics wondered why the closure couldn't wait until residents in about two dozen tents along Leonard Street could be housed.
But other Fountain Square residents and business owners believe the city waited far too long to close the Leonard Street camp, after months of complaints about human and animal waste, public intoxication and trespassing near a prime commercial district. The tension rose to a crescendo in recent weeks as neighbors, including a local business leader who rented a private dumpster to clean up the site, shared their concerns with the media.
Facing criticism Monday night, Office of Public Health and Safety Director Andrew Merkley cited an incident of apparent animal abuse at the camp in June and alleged gunfire that led to an arrest July 25 as major factors in the closure. He also feared that some tents set up right next to the road could be struck by errant drivers after a recent close call, he said.
"I and our agency have to protect the public health and safety of everyone in the city — not just the unhoused and not just the housed," Merkley said. "The decision to close the camp was not because people went to the media. It was not because of the constant emails that we received. ... Emergency services have been there multiple times, and we had serious public safety challenges."
Specifically, Merkley ordered the camp closure after learning that someone had shot a gun near Leonard Street the morning of July 25, he said. Around the prior weekend of July 19-20, he said, a driver had fallen asleep at the wheel and jumped the curb on Leonard Street.
Police arrested a man July 25 after he reportedly admitted to firing one shot into the ground near the tent of a man living at the Leonard Street encampment, according to a probable cause affidavit obtained by IndyStar.
The man pulled out a black handgun and threatened to shoot the camp resident because he was jealous that a certain woman was hanging around his tent, the camp resident and the woman both told police. Then the man allegedly fired one bullet into the ground next to the tent before walking off.
Police found the man nearby carrying a gun that matched the description. They also found a spent 9mm shell casing lying near the tent. The man faces five criminal charges including unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon and criminal recklessness with a deadly weapon.
Indianapolis police confirmed that a case number existed for an incident where a vehicle reportedly drove onto the curb. The case is under investigation by Indiana State Police, who did not return IndyStar's requests for more details July 29.
Later the same day as the reported shooting, camp residents received notice that the strip of lawn between Leonard Street and a fence bordering Interstate 65 will be permanently closed to camping and storage of personal property by Aug. 11. The city will provide storage bins to residents and hold items for up to 60 days, while working with service providers to help people find temporary or permanent housing.
Merkley said residents will be offered emergency shelter beds, as required by the city ordinance governing camp closures. But he conceded that those beds aren't good options for many people. Advocates say they force people into stressful group-living settings that often impose restrictions on substance use, couples and pets.
The city couldn't afford to wait for outreach teams with Streets to Home Indy to reach the encampment, officials said. The camp was too large. Social workers have visited only one site so far, where about a dozen households are staying.
"The initiative was not ready to take on the Leonard Street camp," said Aryn Schounce, a senior policy adviser to Mayor Joe Hogsett. "The staffing capacity was not there. The availability of housing was not there. But there were escalating public safety issues at the camp."
'Nowhere else to go': How months of debate led the city to shut down Fountain Square homeless camp
Advocates for homeless people have pushed the city to move away from police-led crackdowns on encampments, documented in a 2015 film called "Under the Bridge" that follows a large camp in Indianapolis.
The city's shift toward "Housing First" practices, which aim to house residents so they can seek health services and income from a place of stability, conflict with a new federal directive that urges governments to forcibly remove homeless people from the streets and place them in treatment facilities.
Chelsea Haring-Cozzi, who leads the city's top nonprofit working to reduce homelessness, was reserved in her criticism of the camp closure after sharing the stage with city officials to present Streets to Home Indy.
She told IndyStar the outcome wasn't what she had hoped, but "there's no good answer to Leonard Street right now." She vowed that social workers will find the residents at other camps in the coming months and offer them housing.
Other community leaders around the city, including faith leaders who are expected to help raise a third of the money to pay for the first year of Streets to Home Indy, were less diplomatic.
"Instead of investing in long-term transformation, the city continues to invest in short-term optics," the Rev. David Greene, president of the Concerned Clergy of Indianapolis, said in a written statement July 28. "We must ask: Where are people expected to go tonight? Next week? This winter? Homelessness is not a nuisance to be swept away. It is a crisis to be confronted."
A short walk from the community meeting, Angela Merrell, 55, cried tears of frustration outside her tent on Leonard Street.
She said she stormed out of the meeting after hearing a man speak derisively of her and others who are homeless — "Where are these people coming from?" he had asked of the roughly 1,800 people known to be homeless in Indianapolis.
"'Those people' were born and raised here and are being kicked out of our own neighborhood," Merrell said, mentioning that she grew up in Fountain Square near Hoyt Avenue.
Now her family is left to find housing with less than $2,000 a month in disability payments, she said. She doesn't want her brother, who is gaunt from what she says is stomach cancer, to die on the streets. Her husband is hobbled after he was hit by a truck earlier this year, he told IndyStar, gesturing to a large red scar on his leg that he said was from a surgery after the crash.
Since that crash, the three of them have been homeless for nearly six months, Merrell said. Finding an apartment has felt next to impossible because of requirements to earn income that's three or more times higher than the rent, she said, a rule of thumb for landlords.
She can't blame the Fountain Square neighbors who look across their street and see an "eyesore," she said. That's why for months she has anxiously awaited the apartment that social workers were promising to offer her through Streets to Home Indy.
"Everybody kind of had their hopes up," she said, "just to be crushed."
IndyStar Public Safety Reporter Jade Jackson contributed to this story.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Murder case dismissed. Family blames IMPD detectives' lack of evidence
There is no doubt who fatally shot D'Lon Edwards in 2021, but the woman who stood trial in his killing is now free. Her case was dismissed after a jury was left unconvinced she committed murder. Now his mother and the Marion County Prosecutor's Office are laying blame for that dismissal, at least partly, at the feet of the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department's homicide detectives. Edwards, 34, was a father of four who had just started a trucking company a month before he was shot and killed. "I got a call from prosecutor (Joseph) Cermak yesterday," Chryrisse Edwards told IndyStar on Aug. 19, 2025. "He said he would not be pushing for a second trial. There were gaps in the evidence by IMPD, and a witness was unreliable." Edwards said she stayed on top of the investigation involving her only child, but throughout, she was let down, first by a detective who eventually was removed from the case. Then by a second detective who offered no new evidence and provided no motive before handing the case to prosecutors. The case left the jury unable to agree upon a verdict. IndyStar is not naming the woman since her case was dismissed. Woman arrested for the killing of D'Lon Edwards At 1:46 a.m., Dec. 20, 2021, Indianapolis Metropolitan Police were called about a person shot in the 3900 block of North Lawndale Avenue. Officers found Edwards mortally wounded outside a home. Officers noticed a vehicle with windshield wipers still activated nearby with the driver's window broken. Shell casings were found in the passenger compartment. When police knocked on the door of the home where the vehicle was found, a woman answered. According to court records, when asked about someone being shot outside her home, she said she didn't know anything. When she was asked her name, she wouldn't answer and shut the door. Officers then surrounded the home and made commands for anyone inside to come out for 30 minutes before the woman exited. Her mother and young daughter also came outside. A search warrant for the home found a firearm on the living room floor at the end of a couch in plain view. There were also cameras around the outside of the home, but video footage wasn't found of the shooting. When officers attempted to interview the woman at the department's homicide office, she requested an attorney. 'Please, I don't wanna die,' man cries to 911 dispatch 2021 homicide 'Please don't let me die': Man's call to 911 gave police clues to shooter When detectives reviewed the 911 calls in the case, Edwards was revealed to be the original caller. He's heard saying, 'I've been shot, I'm on someone's front porch, I ran for help.' Later, he says, 'please don't let me die." 'She took off in my car. She took off in a Volkswagen Passat 2021 rental." 'Please, I don't wanna die.' The operator asks if he knows who shot him, but he says he doesn't. A short time later, officers are heard responding and rendering aid. The court documents don't specify if the woman knew Edwards or what the motive would have been for his killing. A neighbor told detectives he woke up when a bullet struck a window in his daughter's room. After instructing his children to take cover, the neighbor went to his front window and looked outside, according to an affidavit. The neighbor said he saw a woman get out of a car with a gun in her hand. The woman then went inside a home. Investigators found fingerprints from Edwards and the woman on the Volkswagen. They also found DNA likely belonging to the woman on a pistol recovered from the living room of her home. Police determined that a bullet recovered from Edwards' body was fired by that same pistol, according to the affidavit. Here's why the case the dismissed The Marion County Prosecutor's Office told IndyStar the defendant testified at trial that the shooting was self-defense, and jurors were receptive of her testimony. After the jury came back with no verdict, it was revealed that one juror held out for a lesser charge of voluntary manslaughter while the remaining jurors would have voting to acquit. After the hung jury, prosecutors said they would not be able to overcome the deficiencies from the initial investigation at a subsequent trial and filed a motion to dismiss the charges. The case originally went to trial on July 15, 2025, nearly four years after the shooting took place in December of 2021. The original homicide detective assigned to the case, Andrew McKalips, became unavailable after the homicide and has since left the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department. A new detective was not assigned to the case until September 2022. "McKalips started slacking on the case and letting too much time pass by," Edwards said. "So, I reached out to his superior, and he was demoted. A new detective took over his case, with no new evidence to push the case forward. They just packaged what they had and presented it to prosecutors. Then, when they summoned McKalips to court, IMPD said they wouldn't allow him to because of his mental state. He has since retired or resigned." Woman walks free, while four children are left without dad IndyStar reached out to Indianapolis Metropolitan Police but had not received a response at the time of this article's publication. Edwards said that at the time of her son's killing, he left behind four children who were 17, 14, 13, and a 1-year-old. The children not having their father has been a struggle. He was shot and killed right before Christmas of 2021. "His youngest is asking questions about a man they'll never know," Edwards said. "Three teenagers who are growing into young adults don't have the guidance they need from their father." She worries now about her or any of her family seeing the woman in and around Indianapolis now that woman's able to walk free. Edwards thinks the prosecutors should've continued to pursue the case against her son's killer and that the incomplete investigation presented for trial wasted taxpayer money and time. "I want people to be aware of who they elect as officials and how police practices and policy work," Edwards said. "I feel the ball was dropped by both of them. They had no emotion. It felt like my child's life didn't matter." Jade Jackson is a Public Safety Reporter for the Indianapolis Star. You can email her at and follow her on X, formerly Twitter @IAMJADEJACKSON. Former reporter Sarah Nelson contributed to this article with previous coverage. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Indianapolis murder case dismissed. Family blames shoddy police work

Indianapolis Star
6 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Murder case dismissed. Family blames IMPD detectives' lack of evidence
There is no doubt who fatally shot D'Lon Edwards in 2021, but the woman who stood trial in his killing is now free. Her case was dismissed after a jury was left unconvinced she committed murder. Now his mother and the Marion County Prosecutors Office are laying blame for that dismissal, at least partly, at the feet of the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department's homicide detectives. Edwards, 34, was a father of four who had just started a trucking company a month before he was shot and killed. "I got a call from prosecutor (Joseph) Cermak yesterday," Chryrisse Edwards told IndyStar on Aug. 19, 2025. "He said he would not be pushing for a second trial. There were gaps in the evidence by IMPD, and a witness was unreliable." Edwards said she stayed on top of the investigation involving her only child, but throughout, she was let down, first by a detective who eventually was removed from the case. Then by a second detective who offered no new evidence and provided no motive before handing the case to prosecutors. The case left the jury unable to agree upon a verdict. IndyStar is not naming the woman since her case was dismissed. At 1:46 a.m., Dec. 20, 2021, Indianapolis Metropolitan Police were called about a person shot in the 3900 block of North Lawndale Avenue. Officers found Edwards mortally wounded outside a home. Officers noticed a vehicle with windshield wipers still activated nearby with the driver's window broken. Shell casings were found in the passenger compartment. When police knocked on the door of the home where the vehicle was found, a woman answered. According to court records, when asked about someone being shot outside her home, she said she didn't know anything. When she was asked her name, she wouldn't answer and shut the door. Officers then surrounded the home and made commands for anyone inside to come out for 30 minutes before the woman exited. Her mother and young daughter also came outside. A search warrant for the home found a firearm on the living room floor at the end of a couch in plain view. There were also cameras around the outside of the home, but video footage wasn't found of the shooting. When officers attempted to interview the woman at the department's homicide office, she requested an attorney. 2021 homicide 'Please don't let me die': Man's call to 911 gave police clues to shooter When detectives reviewed the 911 calls in the case, Edwards was revealed to be the original caller. He's heard saying, 'I've been shot, I'm on someone's front porch, I ran for help.' Later, he says, 'please don't let me die." 'She took off in my car. She took off in a Volkswagen Passat 2021 rental." 'Please, I don't wanna die.' The operator asks if he knows who shot him, but he says he doesn't. A short time later, officers are heard responding and rendering aid. The court documents don't specify if the woman knew Edwards or what the motive would have been for his killing. A neighbor told detectives he woke up when a bullet struck a window in his daughter's room. After instructing his children to take cover, the neighbor went to his front window and looked outside, according to an affidavit. The neighbor said he saw a woman get out of a car with a gun in her hand. The woman then went inside a home. Investigators found fingerprints from Edwards and the woman on the Volkswagen. They also found DNA likely belonging to the woman on a pistol recovered from the living room of her home. Police determined that a bullet recovered from Edwards' body was fired by that same pistol, according to the affidavit. The Marion County Prosecutor's Office told IndyStar the defendant testified at trial that the shooting was self-defense, and jurors were receptive of her testimony. After the jury came back with no verdict, it was revealed that one juror held out for a lesser charge of voluntary manslaughter while the remaining jurors would have voting to acquit. After the hung jury, prosecutors said they would not be able to overcome the deficiencies from the initial investigation at a subsequent trial and filed a motion to dismiss the charges. The case originally went to trial on July 15, 2025, nearly four years after the shooting took place in December of 2021. The original homicide detective assigned to the case, Andrew McKalips, became unavailable after the homicide and has since left the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department. A new detective was not assigned to the case until September 2022. "McKalips started slacking on the case and letting too much time pass by," Edwards said. "So, I reached out to his superior, and he was demoted. A new detective took over his case, with no new evidence to push the case forward. They just packaged what they had and presented it to prosecutors. Then, when they summoned McKalips to court, IMPD said they wouldn't allow him to because of his mental state. He has since retired or resigned." IndyStar reached out to Indianapolis Metropolitan Police but had not received a response at the time of this article's publication. Edwards said that at the time of her son's killing, he left behind four children who were 17, 14, 13, and a 1-year-old. The children not having their father has been a struggle. He was shot and killed right before Christmas of 2021. "His youngest is asking questions about a man they'll never know," Edwards said. "Three teenagers who are growing into young adults don't have the guidance they need from their father." She worries now about her or any of her family seeing the woman in and around Indianapolis now that woman's able to walk free. Edwards thinks the prosecutors should've continued to pursue the case against her son's killer and that the incomplete investigation presented for trial wasted taxpayer money and time. "I want people to be aware of who they elect as officials and how police practices and policy work," Edwards said. "I feel the ball was dropped by both of them. They had no emotion. It felt like my child's life didn't matter."


Indianapolis Star
9 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana school's recording ban is an assault on parents' rights
It's back-to-school season, and parents and kids around the country are prepping for the inevitable transition from summer fun to the fall grind. For one Indiana mom, the stakes are higher than normal. Nicole Graves has sued her school district, Whitley County Consolidated Schools in Columbia City, Indiana, in federal court with help from the Arizona-based Goldwater Institute. She alleges that her First and 14th Amendment rights were violated in a series of interactions with school administrators. All four of Graves' children still attend district schools, and she's rightly concerned – given how she's been treated – about potential retaliation from the administration. Here's what happened: According to the Goldwater Institute, in April 2024, Graves' seventh-grade daughter 'filmed her school bus driver walking up and down the aisle, smacking his belt against his hand with his pants falling and his underwear visible.' After that incident on her daughter's school bus, Graves set up a meeting with the school principal. She recorded the meeting because she wanted an accurate record of what transpired. When Graves wasn't satisfied with what the principal said, she posted the recording on social media. That angered school administrators, who contacted her via letter and told her she broke school policy by recording the meeting without permission. Even though Graves had been unaware of the policy, she was banned from school grounds and restricted in her communication with staff, unless she got written permission from the superintendent's office. While that absurd punishment has expired, the lawsuit seeks to overturn the ban on recording, which remains in place. 'This is not fun for me,' Graves told IndyStar. 'This is not something I ever thought I would have to fight for. But I am more than happy to stand up and fight and talk to who I need to talk to to get things to change because I think it's important for all the families in this school district.' Opinion: School choice wars miss the point. Data can't dictate our values. The complaint argues that the school's recording policy and the no-trespass and communication orders violate the First Amendment, 'which protects the right to record government officials in the performance of their duties.' Adam Shelton, the Goldwater staff attorney working with Graves, says these kinds of recordings fall squarely under the First Amendment. 'The First Amendment protects more than just speech, it also protects conduct that is inherently expressive and conduct that cannot be divorced from the speech creation process, like recording,' Shelton observed on X. 'This is especially true in situations involving parents and school officials.' While Democrats and teachers unions may think they know what's best for children, that's simply false. Parents do. This lawsuit also alleges that the school district violated Graves' constitutional right to direct her children's education. 'The orders also violate the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause, which protects the fundamental rights of parents to control and direct the education and upbringing of their children,' the complaint states. 'This right is the oldest right that the Supreme Court has recognized as one of the 'liberties' protected by the due process clause.' Hicks: Indiana's college crisis has nothing to do with woke campuses or high costs Graves' case reminded me of one I've written about before, regarding another Midwest mom who was shunned by her child's school district. Sandra Hernden of Michigan sued her school district in 2022 for violating her constitutional rights. She had complained to the school board about its COVID-19 policies in 2020, and board members responded by contacting her employer and then reporting her to the Biden administration's U.S. Department of Justice (remember how the DOJ went after parents as 'domestic terrorists'?). Hernden's case is ongoing. Steve Delie, an attorney with the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation that is representing Hernden, made oral arguments in June before the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 'Even if we assume there was no monetarily compensable injury, you're still talking about government officials taking advantage of their elected positions of power to silence opposition,' Delie told the court. 'That can't be the way society functions.' No, it can't. Kudos to these moms for their bravery and for standing up for parental rights everywhere.