Larissa Waters Elected as New Leader of the Greens Party
Queensland Senator Larissa Waters has been elected the new leader of the Australian Greens, following a party room meeting in Melbourne on May 15.
The leadership change comes after the party's former leader, Adam Bandt, unexpectedly lost his seat of Melbourne in the May 3 election.
Waters, who has served in the Senate since 2010, was selected from a field that included Senators Mehreen Faruqi and Sarah Hanson-Young.
The decision makes her the fifth person to lead the Greens in federal parliament, following in the footsteps of Bob Brown, Christine Milne, Richard Di Natale, and Bandt.
Greens Lose Ground in Lower House, Hold Power in Senate
The party's leadership reshuffle follows a disappointing federal election campaign, in which the Greens lost three of their four seats in the House of Representatives.
While their overall national primary vote only fell slightly, the losses were a significant blow for the party's ambitions in the lower house.
Despite the setbacks, the Greens continues to wield considerable power in the Senate, where they have maintained their 11 seats.
Related Stories
5/13/2025
5/14/2025
With Labor potentially needing crossbench support to pass legislation, the Greens are again expected to play a key role in shaping policy—particularly in areas like climate and housing.
Waters is well-known for her work across a range of portfolios, including women's rights, democracy, and environmental policy. She previously served as the party's Senate leader and was a co-deputy leader alongside Bandt for several years.
Focus Back on Environment
Following the Greens' heavy losses, party co-founder Drew Hutton called for a return to the Greens' environmental roots and a more pragmatic political strategy.
Hutton, who helped establish the Queensland Greens and co-founded the national party with former Senator Bob Brown in the early 1990s, is currently suspended from the party over his opposition to the inclusion of male-to-female transgender individuals in women's activities and sports.
'It wasn't a disaster for the Greens. But the Greens have plateaued in their support,' Hutton told The Epoch Times, adding that preferences contributed to the end result.
'My concern is that they are not pursuing strategies which allow them to talk to ordinary Australians,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
37 minutes ago
- Axios
Musk cash becomes liability in Democratic primaries
Cash from Elon Musk 's companies has prompted finger-pointing in Democratic primaries, with candidates targeting donations their opponents received in some cases years before Musk's full embrace of the MAGA movement. Why it matters: It has turned into a de facto purity test, with Democratic candidates in New Jersey, Michigan, Illinois and Minnesota facing questions about donations from Musk's SpaceX's political arm and its lobbyists. Many of the Democrats under fire are responding by washing their hands of Musk's money, saying their campaigns gave away the contributions, which span from this year to before President Biden's election. Driving the news: The donations from Musk's company and lobbyists have spawned attack ads ahead of Tuesday's contentious New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial primary. Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.) donated the $24,000 her campaign received from SpaceX's political action committee to a food bank in New Jersey, according to campaign finance reports. Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), one of Sherrill's primary opponents, also donated the $2,500 he received from the PAC last year, according to his campaign. Between the lines: But Musk's company PAC has donated widely to Democrats over the years, setting up a clash over the cash elsewhere. Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.), who is running for an open Senate seat, received over $73,000 from SpaceX's PAC and lobbyists starting in 2018. Stevens' campaign declined to comment for this story. In Illinois, Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), donated Space X PAC money his campaign received to charity before launching his Senate bid, according to his campaign. Rep. Robin Kelly (D-Ill.), who is running for the same Senate seat, also received money from the company's PAC. Another Senate aspirant, Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.) donated money she received from SpaceX's PAC to a veterans organization. What they're saying: "These are false, desperate attacks from candidates who've spent millions and have failed to garner support," said Sean Higgins, a spokesman for Sherrill.
San Francisco Chronicle
40 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Senate Republicans revise ban on state AI regulations in bid to preserve controversial provision
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Republicans have made changes to their party's sweeping tax bill in hopes of preserving a new policy that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. In legislative text unveiled Thursday night, Senate Republicans proposed denying states federal funding for broadband projects if they regulate AI. That's a change from a provision in the House-passed version of the tax overhaul that simply banned any current or future AI regulations by the states for 10 years. 'These provisions fulfill the mandate given to President Trump and Congressional Republicans by the voters: to unleash America's full economic potential and keep her safe from enemies,' Sen. Ted Cruz, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said in a statement announcing the changes. The proposed ban has angered state lawmakers in Democratic and Republican-led states and alarmed some digital safety advocates concerned about how AI will develop as the technology rapidly advances. But leading AI executives, including OpenAI's Sam Altman, have made the case to senators that a 'patchwork' of state AI regulations would cripple innovation. Some House Republicans are also uneasy with the provision. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., came out against the AI regulatory moratorium in the House bill after voting for it. She said she had not read that section of the bill. 'We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power. Not the other way around,' Greene wrote on social media. Senate Republicans made their change in an attempt to follow the special process being used to pass the tax bill with a simple majority vote. To comply with those rules, any provision needs to deal primarily with the federal budget and not government policy. Republican leaders argue, essentially, that by setting conditions for states to receive certain federal appropriations — in this instance, funding for broadband internet infrastructure — they would meet the Senate's standard for using a majority vote. Cruz told reporters Thursday that he will make his case next week to Senate parliamentarian on why the revised ban satisfies the rules. The parliamentarian is the chamber's advisor on its proper rules and procedures. While the parliamentarian's ruling are not binding, senators of both parties have adhered to their findings in the past. Senators generally argue that Congress should take the lead on regulating AI but so far the two parties have been unable to broker a deal that is acceptable to Republicans' and Democrats' divergent concerns. The GOP legislation also includes significant changes to how the federal government auctions commercial spectrum ranges. Those new provisions expand the range of spectrum available for commercial use, an issue that has divided lawmakers over how to balance questions of national security alongside providing telecommunications firms access to more frequencies for commercial wireless use. Senators are aiming to pass the tax package, which extends the 2017 rate cuts and other breaks from President Donald Trump's first term along with new tax breaks and steep cuts to social programs, later this month.
Newsweek
41 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Medicaid Cuts: New York Governor Issues Warning to Republicans
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New York Governor Kathy Hochul on Friday issued a plea to Senate Republicans to reject the House-passed "big beautiful bill" because of concerns that it could severely impact the most vulnerable Americans as a result of changes and cuts to programs such as Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the nation's largest nutrition aid program. Why It Matters The House budget proposal, which is the centerpiece of President Donald Trump's economic agenda nicknamed "One Big Beautiful Bill," aims to trim federal spending while offering significant tax cuts. The bill calls for hundreds of billions of dollars in Medicaid reductions, expanded work requirements for health and nutrition programs, and cost shifts to states. With nearly 1.5 million New Yorkers potentially losing health coverage, safety net hospital closures on the horizon and millions at risk of increased food insecurity, the bill's fate in the Senate holds high stakes for New Yorkers and recipients of these services nationwide. The bill advanced to the Senate after passing in the House 215-214, with two Republicans siding with Democrats in voting against the bill while two others didn't vote at all and one voted "present." New York Governor Kathy Hochul holds a press conference following a roundtable discussion about federal DOGE layoffs on March 3, 2025, in New York City. New York Governor Kathy Hochul holds a press conference following a roundtable discussion about federal DOGE layoffs on March 3, 2025, in New York To Know Among her various concerns, Hochul highlighted the restriction of health care access as a result of Medicaid and Affordable Care Act (ACA) cuts and the reduction in food security because of SNAP benefit cuts as the chief concerns among her many objections to the bill. She also pointed to the risks to the "safety and reliability" of the state's power grid and the significant challenges to education with cuts to the federal loan program and the reduction of Pell Grants. "Taken together, these provisions represent a regressive shift that threatens to widen educational disparities, destabilize community colleges and minority-serving institutions and undermine national efforts to promote affordable higher education," Hochul wrote. New York's seven GOP representatives turned their backs on their constituents by passing a budget that guts Medicaid and takes a sledgehammer to our health care system. I've worked hard to expand health care access, and I'm not backing down — Kathy Hochul (@KathyHochul) June 2, 2025 Hochul also hit out at the decision to merely increase the State and Local Tax (SALT) cap rather than entirely scrap it. She said it hurts higher-income states that end up benefitting relatively less than smaller states across the country. She criticized New York Republicans in the House who voted in support of Trump's bill, saying they refused to "advocate for the best interests of their state." Among the seven Republican representatives from New York, only Andrew Garbarino did not support the bill, choosing not to vote. The bill would slash $13.5 billion annually from New York's health care sector, primarily through reductions in Medicaid and Affordable Care Act marketplace funding, according to official state figures. Nearly 1.5 million New Yorkers face the loss of health insurance, and rural and safety net hospitals may be forced to close as a result of the cuts. Representative Andrew Garbarino, a New York Republican, leaves a House Ethics Committee closed-door meeting in the Longworth House Office Building on November 20, 2024, in Washington. Representative Andrew Garbarino, a New York Republican, leaves a House Ethics Committee closed-door meeting in the Longworth House Office Building on November 20, 2024, in bill also seeks to shrink SNAP benefits by $267 billion over a decade, tightening eligibility and shifting more costs to states beginning in 2028. Nearly 3 million New Yorkers could see reduced food aid, and the administrative burden on the state could exceed $2.1 billion per year. New requirements would mandate that parents of children age 7 and older work to maintain benefits, a significant change from the previous exemption for parents of children under 18. These are also just some of the concerns a handful of Republican senators have raised as the chamber prepares to vote on the House-passed version of the bill. Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Josh Hawley of Missouri have voiced opposition to Medicaid cuts. Other skeptical Republicans, such as Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, have voiced concerns about economic aspects of the bill, including the potential to increase the country's debt limit by $5 trillion, which also set off Elon Musk and inspired the tech mogul to initiate a war of words with the president on Thursday. What People Are Saying New York Governor Kathy Hochul, in a letter to Senate Republicans: "As Governor of New York, I am writing to you ahead of the Senate's consideration of the House reconciliation legislative package to underscore the detrimental impact this bill would have on my state. If enacted, the proposed bill would gut New York's healthcare system, strip families of crucial nutrition benefits, trigger billions in economic losses through the removal of clean energy tax credits, stagnate growth in education and critical technology sectors, and continue to unfairly tax hard-working New Yorkers by failing to fully repeal the SALT cap. Passage of this legislation would worsen the affordability crisis and inject further instability into an already fragile economy. "If New York Republicans in the House refuse to advocate for the best interests of their state, I will. As Governor, I must stand up for middle-class New Yorkers who cannot afford the consequences of this budget. I urge you to reject the House proposal and instead work with Leader Schumer on a bipartisan reconciliation package that delivers for working families, invests in the future, and reflects the real needs of the people we serve." Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, in an op-ed for The New York Times: "If Congress cuts funding for Medicaid benefits, Missouri workers and their children will lose their health care. And hospitals will close. It's that simple. And that pattern will replicate in states across the country." House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat: [The bill is a] "reckless, regressive and reprehensible GOP tax scam." House Speaker Mike Johnson, on the passage of the bill: "Today, the House has passed generational, nation-shaping legislation that reduces spending, permanently lowers taxes for families and job creators, secures the border, unleashes American energy dominance, restores peace through strength, and makes government work more efficiently and effectively for all Americans." What Happens Next The Senate is scheduled to debate the bill before July 4, aiming to meet that deadline at the president's insistence despite having until the end of September to pass the bill. The final legislation is expected to reflect alterations from ongoing negotiations.
