Let's dispel any doubts now over Hong Kong's post-2047 future
Hong Kong could be in for another bout of 'what will happen to us in …', only with 2047 replacing 1997. I say this after attending
a farewell presentation by activist investor David Webb last week.
Advertisement
For
many years , Webb has worked on a pro bono basis to improve public knowledge of business issues. Towards the end of his fireside chat at the Foreign Correspondents' Club, Webb asked
which legal system would apply in Hong Kong after 2047 and whether our law students should continue to study the existing system or start to become proficient in mainland law. He referred in particular to contract law and land leases.
My immediate reaction was: let's please not go through all this again. Half a century ago, I was an alarmist. Now I urge everyone to keep calm.
When I first arrived in Hong Kong in the early 1970s, almost nobody expressed concern about 1997. Received wisdom then was that the date was irrelevant as Beijing had expressly disowned all
the unequal treaties signed with foreign powers in the 19th century. China was ignoring the deadline, so it was safe for Hongkongers to do the same.
I was never really convinced by that argument, for two reasons. The first concerned the relevant treaties. Britain was sticking to the terms of the two which gave it control over Hong Kong Island and urban Kowloon in perpetuity. It followed that, for consistency's sake, it had to abide by the terms of the 1898
lease of the New Territories . The British would have to offer it up when the 99-year lease expired.
Advertisement
The second reason concerned borrowing for property purchases. Hong Kong was moving towards 20-year mortgages, which simply did not work for properties north of Boundary Street (which used to mark the border between the colony of Hong Kong and the New Territories). Bank managers are by nature cautious, and I couldn't see them making big loans to buy on land where ultimate control would shortly be in question. I urged anyone who would listen to address the issue, but there were few takers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Privilege or merit? Harvard speech ignites China debate on elite education access
Emotional remarks by a Chinese student who delivered this year's Harvard University commencement speech have sparked a debate in China about barriers to elite education. Advertisement The speech by Yurong 'Luanna' Jiang, the first Chinese woman chosen as Harvard's student commencement speaker, called for global unity amid US President Donald Trump's plan to 'aggressively' revoke Chinese student visas Internet users have since raised questions about a lack of access for many ordinary students who have struggled to be considered for prestigious universities, citing an uneven distribution of financial and educational resources. While some praised her message of 'a shared humanity', which echoed Beijing's diplomatic vision of 'a community with a shared future for mankind', others criticised her 'privileged' background and questioned whether she truly represented the broader Chinese student population. According to Harvard Magazine, Jiang, originally from Qingdao in eastern China, attended high school in the United Kingdom . She completed her undergraduate degree at Duke University before enrolling at the Harvard Kennedy School for a master's degree. Advertisement Internet users also questioned her volunteer experience in the China Biodiversity Conservation and Green Development Foundation – where her father reportedly worked as a director, and which played a role in securing a recommendation letter for her Harvard application in 2022.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Triangular diplomacy a tricky tightrope to walk for Asia-Pacific leaders
Middle and major powers are using trade, investment and technology as weapons of influence in pursuit of triangular diplomacy, a stratagem of Cold War realpolitik. However, the strengths of this approach – agility, ambiguity and tactical scope – hide the dangers of entanglements that escalate instability. A nation triangulates by balancing and manoeuvring between two other powers , building leverage, reducing dependency and becoming indispensable to multiple sides without fully committing to any. Triangular diplomacy is now a prominent approach for leaders negotiating a world where post-war institutions are in decline, autarkic capitalism is emerging, military budgets are soaring and multilateral commitments are being reassessed by US President Donald Trump. President Richard Nixon's emissary, Henry Kissinger , orchestrated this statecraft in the 1970s by using the Sino-Soviet rivalry to bolster America's power. He fostered closer ties with Beijing and Moscow individually as he kept both unsure of Washington's commitment to either.
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Shangri-La Dialogue a place to ease tensions, not inflame China threat
The Shangri-La Dialogue, held annually in Singapore, has long provided a useful platform for discussion of Asia's security issues. Advertisement But the United States used the region's premier security conference last weekend to launch a provocative attack on China, a move that fanned flames, rather than easing concerns. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth accused China of wanting to 'fundamentally alter the region's status quo'. The threat, he said, was 'real' and 'could be imminent'. He referred to the South China Sea and Taiwan. Hegseth urged US partners and allies to join it in countering what he described as China's aggression. Beijing could not let the strongly worded allegations go unanswered. Hu Gangfeng, a People's Liberation Army major general, dismissed them as 'groundless'. Advertisement Hegseth's comments, Hu said, aimed to stir up trouble and incite confrontation, destabilising the region. China's defence and foreign ministries issued statements condemning the US accusations.
