Global finance officials gloss over trade tensions at G-7 Summit
BANFF, Alberta—Finance officials from some of the world's most powerful nations glossed over simmering tensions triggered by President Trump's far-reaching tariffs during an economic summit in this small ski town.
At the close of the three-day meeting, the Group of Seven finance and central bank chiefs issued a vague joint statement that offered few details about what was discussed at the meetings and the commitments countries were prepared to make on trade. The joint statement mentioned the word 'trade" once and made no mention of tariffs, despite the topic being a focal point in private discussions at the conference.
'We are committed to working together to achieve a balanced and growth-oriented macroeconomic policy mix that supports our economic security and resilience and ensures that all of our citizens can benefit from that growth," the joint statement said. 'We acknowledge that economic policy uncertainty has declined from its peak, and we will work together to achieve further progress."
The meeting featured U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and finance officials representing Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the U.K., as well as those from the European Union.
Canada was hit with 25% tariffs on its steel, aluminum, assembled vehicles and other goods not compliant with the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade pact. Imports from Europe, meanwhile, face an across-the-board 10% tariff and a heftier 25% levy on its cars, steel and aluminum.
Behind closed doors, the G-7 finance officials discussed working together to counter the effect of what the U.S. has called China's unfair trade practices, according to a U.S. official.
One option that has been discussed privately by Bessent and other U.S. officials is a 'unified tariff policy," in which American allies would work to impose a new joint trade policy on China to increase pressure on Beijing, the U.S. official said. The nascent idea is still being considered by Trump administration officials and wasn't discussed during the summit, the official said.
A Treasury Department spokeswoman declined to comment on the idea of a unified tariff policy.
In a briefing with reporters, Canadian Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne declined to offer specifics on how the G-7 intends to address global trade imbalances, especially related to China. He said the inclusion of a reference to trade imbalances in the joint statement and the G-7's commitment to joint action 'sends a strong signal."
As for the scant references to trade in the joint statement, which is often referred to as a communiqué, Champagne said, 'The choice of words in a communiqué is an art. What matters is that we came out with a common position." He called the document 'focused and action-oriented."
A European official in attendance for the summit told The Wall Street Journal that many of the G-7 officials scheduled time to talk to Bessent about the tariffs.
While talks were largely cordial, the EU privately pushed for stronger language in the final G-7 statement to reflect the negative impact that U.S. trade policy is having on the global economy, according to Valdis Dombrovskis, the EU's commissioner for economy and productivity.
Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank, and Kazuo Ueda, governor of the Bank of Japan, during a working lunch at the G-7 meeting in Banff, Canada.
This week's summit came after the U.S. imposed tariffs on a range of nations, only to later pare some of them back. Bessent and his U.S. team recently agreed in private meetings in Switzerland with their Chinese counterparts to reduce baseline tariffs on China from 145% to 30%.
The U.S. official told The Wall Street Journal that the talks on trade were 'convivial." The official was surprised at the constructiveness of the conversations after tense meetings between Bessent and world leaders about the tariffs in Washington in April during the World Bank Group and International Monetary Fund spring gathering.
Bessent privately encouraged EU officials to significantly pare back and work to remove digital-services tax levied by some European countries if there is to be expeditious trade deals with the U.S., the U.S. official said. France, Italy and the U.K. each have such a tax on revenue earned by foreign technology companies selling services in the countries. The U.S. has criticized the taxes, arguing they amount to unfair trade practices.
Bessent told EU officials they have a 'collective action problem," warning that progress on reaching a trade deal with Europe has slowed because each nation has different priorities for an agreement.
Canada also has a digital-services tax, and that levy is a source of contention between Washington and Ottawa dating back to the Biden administration. In February, the White House declared that Canada's digital levy is an unfair trade practice that could lead to stiffer U.S. tariffs.
The war between Ukraine and Russia was also a central topic at the G-7 finance summit.
Bessent privately told European officials that the U.S. is willing to increase sanctions on Russia to pressure President Vladimir Putin to come to the negotiating table with Ukraine, according to the U.S. official. Ukraine's finance minister Sergii Marchenko was in Banff for the G-7 finance meeting.
At the meetings, G-7 representatives agreed that new sanctions against Russia must be on the table, including sanctions targeting Russia's energy industry, according to U.S. and European officials.
Any U.S. sanctions on Russia would have to be approved by Trump, who has threatened to impose new sanctions, but hasn't yet taken action. Trump told reporters on Monday that he might 'back away" from negotiations if they don't make progress.
Write to Brian Schwartz at brian.schwartz@wsj.com and Paul Vieira at Paul.Vieira@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
12 minutes ago
- Business Standard
200 Marines moved into Los Angeles to protect federal property, personnel
After a week of tense protests over the federal immigration raids, about 200 Marines have moved into Los Angeles and will protect federal property and personnel, a military commander said Friday. Maj Gen Scott Sherman, commander of Task Force 51 who is overseeing the 4,700 troops deployed, said Friday that the Marines have finished training on civil disturbance. Sherman said the Marines would take over operations at noon local time at the federal building in downtown Los Angeles. 'I would like to emphasize that the soldiers will not participate in law enforcement activities. Rather, they'll be focused on protecting federal law enforcement personnel,' Sherman said. The development comes a day after the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that had directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California, shortly after a federal judge had ruled the Guard deployment was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded Trump's statutory authority. The Marines will join some 2,000 National Guard troops that have been on the streets of the city since last week when immigration raids set off protests. Over the past three nights the demonstrations have been largely peaceful with only a handful of arrests mostly due to people failing to disperse. California Gov Gavin Newsom has called the troop deployment a 'serious breach of state sovereignty' and a power grab by Trump, and he has gone to court to stop it. The president has cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilise federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States'. Under the Posse Comitatus Act, active-duty forces are prohibited by law from conducting law enforcement. Sherman said the National Guard soldiers at that location will transition to provide protection to federal law enforcement agents but not participate in law enforcement activities. Sherman said the US Marine Corps is responsible for guarding US embassies overseas so they are well-trained on how to defend a federal building. Some National Guard troops have protected immigration agents making arrests but Sherman said 'we have had no soldier or Marine detain anyone'. The National Guard troops that were protecting federal property will transition to providing protection to more federal law enforcement officials, Sherman said. States face questions on deploying troops With more demonstrations expected over the weekend, and the possibility that Trump could send troops to other states for immigration enforcement, governors are weighing what to do. Texas Gov Greg Abbott, a Republican, has put 5,000 National Guard members on standby in cities where demonstrations are planned. In other Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they may deploy troops. A group of Democratic governors earlier signed a statement this week calling Trump's deployments 'an alarming abuse of power'. Hundreds arrested in LA protests There have been about 470 arrests since Saturday, the vast majority of which were for failing to leave the area at the request of law enforcement, according to the police department. There have been a handful of more serious charges, including for assault against officers and for possession of a Molotov cocktail and a gun. Nine officers have been hurt, mostly with minor injuries.


Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US Marines deployed to Los Angeles after Trump wins court battle
LOS ANGELES -U.S. Marines were deployed to Los Angeles on Friday, the military said, a rare domestic use of its forces as protests over President Donald Trump's immigration raids spread nationwide. On Thursday, a court ruled in favor of Trump's bid to retain the National Guard in L.A. in reaction to the growing backlash against his immigration policy since his return to power in January. About 200 Marines will be protecting a federal building in Los Angeles, Army Major General Scott Sherman, said on Friday. The administration has authorized a total of 700 Marines to be deployed in the city. Neither the Marines nor the National Guard troops in the city had temporarily detained anyone, he added. "I would like to emphasize that the soldiers will not participate in law enforcement activities," he said during a briefing. It is uncommon for active duty troops to be used domestically during civil disturbances. The last time the military was used for direct police action under the Insurrection Act was in 1992, when the California governor at the time asked then President George H.W. Bush to help respond to Los Angeles riots over the acquittal of police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King. A court ruled on Thursday that Trump can keep his deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' decision temporarily paused a lower court ruling that blocked the mobilization, although it does not mean that the court will ultimately agree to side with him. "We saved L.A. Thank you for the Decision!!!" Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. Cities across the U.S. were bracing for demonstrations on Saturday, when those also opposed to a weekend military parade in Washington are expected to take to the streets. "They've defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services," the group No Kings, which is behind the day of action, wrote on its website. SOLDIERS ON THE STREETS In Los Angeles, troops have stood guard at a federal detention center in the city's downtown where many of the protests have taken place in a show of solidarity for immigrants detained inside. The Guard had accompanied Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents on operations to detain immigrants. City officials in Los Angeles and state officials in California have opposed the ramping up of federal immigration enforcement since it began last Friday. "Peace begins with ICE leaving Los Angeles," Mayor Karen Bass, who has imposed a nighttime curfew over one square mile of downtown Los Angeles, said on Thursday. Protests so far have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence, and restricted to a few city blocks. Demonstrations have also taken place in other U.S. cities this week including New York and Chicago, and there have been some disturbances. Four men escaped from a privately run immigration detention center in Newark, New Jersey, on Thursday amid unrest from inmates over conditions inside the facility, the New York Times reported, citing a law enforcement official and a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security. Spokespeople for DHS and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not respond to inquiries about the incident at the center or the escapes. Video posted to social media by the New Jersey Alliance for Immigrant Justice, an advocacy group, showed protesters outside the facility attempting to block law enforcement vehicles from entering. Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice. Democrats including California Governor Gavin Newsom have said the use of military force was unnecessary and an example of Trump's authoritarianism. Americans are divided over Trump's decision to activate the military. A Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Thursday showed 48% of respondents agreed with a statement that the president should "deploy the military to bring order to the streets" when protests turned violent, while 41% disagreed.


Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
West Asia again on boil: How Israel's Operation Rising Lion unfolded
Israel has been threatening to strike Iran's nuclear facilities for years. It finally did on Friday morning, also hitting ballistic missile sites and taking out Iran's top military brass and several nuclear scientists. Dubbed 'Operation Rising Lion,' the attack reportedly came in waves, involved over 200 Israeli Air Force aircraft that dropped over 330 munitions on around 100 targets across Iran. Here's the lowdown on how the unprecedented strikes unfolded. Timing: The strikes came just after the IAEA published a resolution that declared Iran wasn't complying with its nuclear non proliferation obligations. Israel has long advocated a military solution for what it says is Iran's determination to acquire a nuclear bomb – something Tehran denies vehemently. The strikes were also preceded by US pulling out some personnel from the region. Therefore, everyone, including Tehran, knew something was coming. But the scope and nature were unknown. The feint: There were some doubts whether the strikes would happen this week, thanks to some misdirection. First, US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said Israel won't attack Iran without a US greenlight. And since Washington was negotiating with Tehran over the latter's nuclear programme, this was taken to mean that the possibility of a strike was remote. Second, Trump himself played along and indicated that he was against Israeli strikes at this point. However, all of this was a feint as Trump, after the strikes, threatened Iran with further Israeli attacks – with American weapons – should Tehran refuse a fresh deal over its nuclear programme. The sucker punch: What seems to have caught Iranian authorities by surprise is that Israel's Mossad appeared to have struck the first blow in the strikes by launching attacks from within Iran on Tehran's air defence and ballistic missile launchers. Mossad reportedly set up a covert drone base inside Iranian territory for the purpose and smuggled in equipment. The tactic appears to be similar to what the Ukrainians recently did with their Operation Spiderweb where drones were smuggled deep into Russia and used to wreak havoc on Moscow's strategic bomber fleet at four different airbases. Once Iran's air defence and ballistic launchers were crippled from within, it allowed the Israeli Air Force to easily establish aerial dominance. It came in waves: The strikes were unprecedented in scale. IRGC commander-in-chief Major General Hossein Salami was killed alongside armed forces chief General Mohammad Bagheri. Strikes took place on Iran's Natanz nuclear enrichment facility, Parchin military complex and the Khorramabad ballistic missile base. Six Iranian nuclear scientists have also been killed in the attacks. Iranian response: Iran has vowed a harsh response and said that the attack on its nuclear facilities is a declaration of war. Hitherto, Iran launched around 100 drones against Israel in retaliation for the strikes. But there is little indication of any damage to Israel. However, this is likely to be just the opening salvo. A stronger response from Iran is expected, which in turn could lead to escalatory military exchanges, putting the entire region on edge. Both Tel Aviv and Tehran have been signalling this round of conflict is unlikely to wind up quickly. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.