Gov. Josh Stein vetoes controversial immigration bills amid public outcry in North Carolina
Both Senate Bill 153 and House Bill 318 have left some North Carolinians to organize and protest, seeking Governor Josh Stein to use his power to veto. 'People across the state have been calling for this veto organizing extensively over the past ten days,' said Sammy Salkin with the ACLU North Carolina.
Senate Bill 153 would have forced state agencies to 'cooperate to the fullest extent of the law' with Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
On his veto of SB153 the Governor said, 'Senate Bill 153 would also make us less safe, so I am vetoing this legislation. At a time when our law enforcement is already stretched thin, this bill takes state law enforcement officers away from their existing state duties and forces them to act as federal immigration agents. Furthermore, under current law, people without lawful immigration status already are prevented from receiving Medicaid, SNAP, Section 8, and other benefits.'
House Bill 318 would have compelled law enforcement agencies to honor detainer requests from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
On his veto of HB318 he said, 'I am vetoing House Bill 318 because it is unconstitutional. I support the bill's efforts to require sheriffs to contact federal immigration authorities about people in their custody charged with sexual battery, armed robbery, arson, assault on public officials and court personnel, and other dangerous crimes. People who commit these crimes should be held accountable, whether or not they are here without legal authorization, and those charged with serious offenses ought to receive increased scrutiny from federal immigration officials.
'My oath of office requires that I uphold the Constitution of the United States. Therefore, I cannot sign this bill because it would require sheriffs to unconstitutionally detain people for up to 48 hours after they would otherwise be released. The Fourth Circuit is clear that local law enforcement officers cannot keep people in custody solely based on a suspected immigration violation. But let me be clear: anyone who commits a serious crime in North Carolina must be prosecuted and held accountable regardless of their immigration status.'
Sammy Salkin with the ACLU of North Carolina was at the Executive Residence for a Pride event Friday evening and expressed her gratitude to him in person. 'He appreciated that we had made our voices heard and he was happy to be responsive of what his constituents had asked of him,' she said.
North Carolina State Representative Marcia Morey for District 30 is also grateful for the governor's action. 'It was a sigh of relief; we weren't quite sure, but I think the governor thought long and hard about these bills,' said Morey.
The North Carolina GOP says, 'It's disappointing, but not surprising that Gov. Stein vetoed legislation to complement the efforts of President Trump to secure the Southern border.'
It will take a 3/5 vote in each chamber to override the governor's veto. 'In the house, we have a one-vote advantage: if everyone sticks together and 3/5 stick together and are present, you have to be present at the time of the vote,' said Morey.
As for the Senate, they have to have 30 votes to override the veto, and Morey says if they vote along party lines, they could override the governor's veto. But advocates say they're hopeful lawmakers will uphold the governor's veto. 'We are hopeful that those folks will continue to vote against these harmful bills and uphold them the governor's veto,' said Salkin.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Labubus located: Police track down $30,000 worth of popular collectibles stolen from warehouse
The Labubu craze culminated this week after California police recovered roughly $30,000 worth of Labubu dolls that were stolen from a warehouse. The fluffy, fang-toothed plush dolls have become all the rage, dangling from handbags and backpacks. The collectible dolls, mainly sold by Pop Mart, have grown to be a coveted commodity, frequently out of stock due to the surge in demand. The Labubus were stolen in a series of trips that spanned multiple days, the Chino Police Department said in a social media post Tuesday. Law enforcement found the items at a home in Upland, next to Los Angeles. There, a suspect attempted to flee but ultimately surrendered without incident, police said. The suspect has not been identified. Investigators found 14 boxes of stolen items and evidence indicating the suspects were planning to resell and ship the collectibles across the country, the department said. The recovery comes days after a group of masked thieves stole about $7,000 worth of Labubus from One Stop Sales, a store in La Puente known for selling the toothy monsters. One Stop Sales said in an Instagram post that the thieves took all of the store's inventory and ransacked the store. Surveillance video captured a group of people wearing hoodies and masks breaking in to the shop in the wee hours of August 6 before shuffling through items and leaving with boxes. 'We are still in shock,' the store said in its post, urging people to help find the burglars. The grinning dolls have really sunk their teeth into society since they were created in 2015 by Hong Kong artist Kasing Lung. The collectible figurines are often sold in 'blind boxes' – sealed containers holding a surprise item from a themed collection. The dolls' popularity seems to have stemmed from Lisa, from the K-pop band BlackPink, who shared her Labubu on her Instagram stories and even referred to Labubu as her 'baby' during an interview with Teen Vogue. Other celebrities have also jumped on the trend. Rihanna has been seen with a Labubu attached to her Louis Vuitton bag while Emma Roberts took to Instagram to open a blind box. Given the surge in demand, last month, Pop Mart said it expects at least a 350 percent profit and about a 200 percent jump in revenue for the first six months of the year.


New York Times
5 minutes ago
- New York Times
Quote of the Day: Ex-Trump Officials Warn Of Manipulation by Putin
'I think he believes he should reel Trump back in, and believes his K.G.B. skills will do that.' JOHN R. BOLTON, who served as national security adviser in the first Trump administration, speaking about the upcoming meeting with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia.


CBS News
7 minutes ago
- CBS News
Colorado mayors, business leaders warn of dangers if Xcel Energy expansion isn't approved
Xcel Energy filed a proposal for approval with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission in October of 2024, but interest in the topic is quickly garnering attention. Following a report on opposition to the plan, dozens of community and business leaders have gathered in support of it. "Thirty-eight mayors representing over half the state's population are really in favor of expanding the electric capacity for Excel Energy because of the long-term and long-range impacts it has on the state," said Heigh Williams, the executive director of the Metro Mayors Caucus and the former mayor of Thornton. The caucus sent a letter to the Public Utilities Commission strongly urging them to approve Xcel's capacity increase request. "I did have a couple of mayors who said, look, we have projects ready to go, but Xcel can't power these projects right now because we don't have the electrical capacity to do that," she said. Williams believes Colorado's statewide issue of affordable housing simply can't and won't be addressed without increased access to power. "The state legislature has been very clear the last couple of years, along with the governor, that they want more housing, and they want more housing around transit-oriented development," said Williams. "Guess what? We need the electric grid capacity to do all of those things." And as for businesses, Williams believes a denial from the PUC would send a loud message to the business world. "I think it puts a 'we're closed' sign out, you know, like Colorado can't provide the energy for a new business," she said. That's something Chris Fellows, a long-time Colorado land developer, is an expert on. "Xcel is really a government-sanctioned monopoly for providing power, and then if the PUC limits their ability to deliver the power, it sterilizes the growth," said Fellows. "It's a catch-22." Fellows is a member of the East Metro Area Business Coalition, composed of dozens of property owners who, combined, own around 40,000 acres in the eastern portion of the Denver metro area. "Everybody put together a forecast that showed how much property they owned, what it was zoned for, what the expected growth and demand would be for that project," said Fellows. "Then we provided that to Xcel so they could see our demands. We also submitted an intervener petition in the PUC process that's going right now to say that, hey, this is something we're concerned about." And concerns among different leaders stem from the same place. "We need to make sure there's enough energy to provide for the growth," said Fellows. The public was originally anticipating a vote on the plan Wednesday, but folks at the PUC have indicated there could be several more discussions in the coming weeks.