Walking on an escalator
Suppose you walk up a escalator that is itself moving up. Do you count more steps or fewer compared to moving up a stationary staircase of the same length? What happens if you walk down while the escalator moves up, or vice versa? How does the number of steps you walk change as you vary your walking speed, or the number of steps you cover with each stride?
Puzzles with escalator steps offer a number of variations. As far as I can remember, they have been used only once in Problematics, and that was in the early days of this column in its current form in HT, close to two-and-a-half years ago. So here's a selection for you, picked up from various published sources and adapted to Problematics-like situations.
#Puzzle 139.1
#139.1A: Professor Pandit walks up a small escalator that is also moving up. Walking one step at a time, she takes 16 steps to reach the top. As an experiment, she walks downstairs on a regular staircase. She then takes the upward-moving escalator again. This time, she walks up two steps at a time, and reaches the top with 12 steps. She takes the staircase down again, but unfortunately cannot continue the experiment because a power failure results in the escalator shutting down.
#139.1B: In a mall not far away, Professor Pandit's colleague Lecturer Lalaji is conducting his own experiment on another escalator, this one moving downward. Like his colleague, Lecturer Lalaji begins by walking in the same direction as the escalator. Walking slowly downward, he reaches the bottom in 50 steps. The next step of his experiment is different, though. From the bottom, he runs up the down-moving escalator. His upward speed now is 5 times his previous downward speed, but he still maintains the discipline of travelling only one step at a time. To accelerate so much without increasing his stride length, indeed, tells us volumes about Lecturer Lalaji's fitness, even though he is not getting any younger. But to come back to more relevant details, he takes 125 steps to reach the top. He would have loved to continue his experiment, but the manager of the mall has observed him on CCTV. 'These professors!' the manager mutters, and switches off the escalator, much to Lecturer Lalaji's disappointment.
#139.1C: In yet another location, two students are conducting an escalator experiment assigned by their teachers Professor Pandit and Lecturer Lalaji. Young Ms Ahmed and her classmate Mr Basu are both walking up an upward escalator. In the time that Mr Basu takes one step, Ms Ahmed takes three. She counts 150 steps, he counts 75. 'How many steps will we see if the escalator's switched off?' the young man wonders. 'That's easily calculated,' his classmate says.
#Puzzle 139.2
The two professors we met on the above escalators, incidentally, are both family persons and have two children each. Each child is either a boy or a girl, and all four are friends, we are told.
MAILBOX: LAST WEEK'S SOLVERS
#Puzzle 138.1
There are several ways that you can avoid relying on longitudes and still explain why any traveller, like Phileas Fogg, will see the sun rise 80 times if they go around the Earth in 79 days, travelling eastward. It was a pleasure going through the various approaches that readers took:
Hi Kabir,
Here is a simple way to explain why a traveller going around the globe in 79 days, travelling eastward, will see the sun rise 80 times. The sun's angular speed with respect to the Earth is 1 rotation per day, westwards, and the traveller's angular speed with respect to the Earth is 1 rotation per 79 days or 1/79 rotations per day, eastwards. Since the two are rotating in opposite directions, their relative angular speed with respect to each other is the sum of their individual speeds = (1 + 1/79) rotations per day = 80/79 rotations per day. Therefore, in the 79 days that the traveller takes for one round, he will see the sun going around 79 x (80/79) = 80 times.
— Professor Anshul Kumar, Delhi
***
One rotation of the Earth involves one sunrise. When a traveller is also moving in the easterly direction, he adds one rotation by coming back to the starting point. Hence one extra sunrise. Anybody travelling east and covering the distance in N days will see N + 1 sunrises.
— Kanwarjit Singh, Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, retired
***
Think of an experiment where you are on a merry-go-round, and your friend is standing outside and watching you. You are running in the same direction as the platform, say clockwise. Now if you move a distance of x and the platform travels a distance of y, the effective distance travelled is (x + y). This gives an analogy of our Problematics puzzle. The traveller and the Earth are rotating in the same direction. So for an outside observer (sun), the total distance covered by the traveller is the sum of the distances by the traveller and the Earth = (1 round by the traveller) + (79 rounds by Earth in 79 days) = 80 rounds in total.
— Sampath Kumar V, Coimbatore
***
Imagine you're on a 12-hour analog clock, and each full revolution is a day. If you move one hour on the clock face each day, you'll complete the circle in 12 days, but you'll have seen the hour hand 13 times. Apply the same idea to Fogg's travel.
— Vinod Mahajan, Delhi
[In Vinod Mahajan's analogy, the Earth is presumed to be stationary while the sun rotates around it. The clock face represents the stationary Earth. The sun (hour hand) and the traveller (you on the clock) must move in opposite directions for this analogy to work. — KF]
#Puzzle 138.2
Hi Kabir,
Other than 3-4-5 (all three sides single digits), the only Pythagoras triple with two integer sides of single digits is 6-8-10. To prove that the solution is unique, we can check all possible combinations with two or all three sides being single digits. This shows that (3, 4, 5) and (6, 8, 10) are unique.
— Shishir Gupta, Indore
To make it clear, a rigorous proof does exist. My sincere thanks to Professor Anshul Kumar and Sampath Kumar V, who have satisfied my curiosity by sending two different proofs to show that the solution is unique. These are, however, too lengthy to present in this column. As Shishir Gupta and a couple of other readers have pointed out, merely examining at the finite number of possibilities is as good a method as any.
Solved both puzzles: Professor Anshul Kumar (Delhi), Kanwarjit Singh (Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, retired), Sampath Kumar V (Coimbatore), Vinod Mahajan (Delhi), Shishir Gupta (Indore), Dr Sunita Gupta (Delhi) Yadvendra Somra (Sonipat), Dr Sunita Gupta (Delhi), Shri Ram Aggarwal (Delhi), Aishwarya Rajarathinam (Coimbatore), Ajay Ashok (Delhi)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
2 days ago
- NDTV
Are We Alone? Breakthrough Study Reveals New Way To Find Alien Life
A team of scientists, led by astrophysicist Daniel Apai from the University of Arizona, has developed a novel framework to assess the habitability of exoplanets-planets orbiting stars beyond our solar system. Traditionally, the search for extraterrestrial life has focused on the presence of water. However, Apai's team introduces a more comprehensive model that considers various factors, including temperature and metabolic viability, to determine if known or hypothetical organisms could survive on distant worlds. This new approach, detailed in their recent publication, emphasizes evaluating specific environmental conditions of exoplanets to assess their potential to support life. By moving beyond the simplistic criteria of water presence, the model aims to provide a more accurate assessment of a planet's habitability. According to The Metro, Apai's work is part of the broader "Alien Earths" project, funded by NASA's Astrobiology Program. This interdisciplinary initiative seeks to identify and characterize potentially habitable planets around nearby stars, guiding future missions in the search for life beyond Earth. He wrote in The Conversation. "Even on Earth, organisms require different conditions to survive - there are no camels in Antarctica. By talking about specific organisms, we made the question easier to answer." "Second, the quantitative habitability framework does not insist on black-or-white answers. It compares computer models to calculate a probabilistic answer. Instead of assuming that liquid water is a key limiting factor, we compare our understanding of the conditions an organism requires (the "organism model") with our understanding of the conditions present in the environment (the "habitat model")." Apai's team developed a model to assess habitability by evaluating an organism's needs beyond water. For example, camels require hot, dry climates, so the model correctly rates icy Antarctica as unsuitable. Testing the model on TRAPPIST-1e-like exoplanets, they assessed methanogens-ancient microbes-and found a 69% habitat suitability. This indicates such planets may support simple life forms and are strong candidates for further study.
NDTV
3 days ago
- NDTV
James Webb Telescope Detects Frozen Water In Young Star System For The First Time
For decades, scientists have been fascinated by the mystery of how life originated on Earth and where our water came from. One long-standing theory suggests that water was present around our star, particularly in the outer reaches of the solar system in its early days. Recently, NASA researchers using the James Webb Space Telescope made a groundbreaking discovery that lends credence to this theory. They've found water ice in the debris disk that orbits HD 181327, a Sun-like star 155 light-years from Earth. According to Science Alert, the star system, just 23 million years old, is significantly younger than our 4.6-billion-year-old Solar System. This youthful system is still in its formative stages, with a protoplanetary disk surrounding the star that hasn't yet coalesced into planets. Chen Xie, an assistant research scientist at JHU and the study's lead author, said in a recent NASA press release, "Webb unambiguously detected not just water ice, but crystalline water ice, which is also found in locations like Saturn's rings and icy bodies in our Solar System's Kuiper Belt. The presence of water ice helps facilitate planet formation. Icy materials may also ultimately be 'delivered' to terrestrial planets that may form over a couple of hundred million years in systems like this." Using the James Webb Space Telescope's near-infrared spectrograph (NIRSpec), researchers detected water ice in the debris disk surrounding HD 181327. The water ice was predominantly found in the outer debris ring, making up over 20% of its mass, in the form of "dirty snowballs", a combination of ice and fine dust particles. The amount of water ice decreased closer to the star, with only 8% of the material consisting of ice halfway in from the disk's edge, and virtually none near the centre. This decrease is likely due to vaporisation from the star's ultraviolet radiation or potentially locked up in rocks and planetesimals. "When I was a graduate student 25 years ago, my advisor told me there should be ice in debris disks, but before Webb, we didn't have instruments sensitive enough to make these observations. What's most striking is that this data looks similar to the telescope's other recent observations of Kuiper Belt objects in our own Solar System," said Christine Chen, an associate astronomer at the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) and co-author on the study. Analysing these actively forming planetary systems will enhance our understanding of planet formation models and provide fresh insights into the origins of our own Solar System.
NDTV
4 days ago
- NDTV
Earth Will Lose Its Oxygen: Scientists Warn Of A Rapid Countdown
A recent study reveals that Earth's oxygen-rich atmosphere, vital for complex life, is expected to last approximately one billion more years. Increasing solar radiation will reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide, impairing photosynthesis and leading to a sharp decline in oxygen levels. The study that was published in Nature Geoscience said that this deoxygenation could occur rapidly, rendering Earth inhospitable to most life forms. The findings also suggest oxygen may not be a permanent biosignature on habitable planets, impacting the search for extraterrestrial life. "For many years, the lifespan of Earth's biosphere has been discussed based on scientific knowledge about the steady brightening of the sun and the global carbonate-silicate geochemical cycle. One of the corollaries of such a theoretical framework is a continuous decline in atmospheric CO2 levels and global warming on geological timescales. Indeed, it is generally thought that Earth's biosphere will come to an end in the next 2 billion years due to the combination of overheating and CO2 scarcity for photosynthesis. If true, one can expect that atmospheric O2 levels will also eventually decrease in the distant future. However, it remains unclear exactly when and how this will occur," environmental scientist Kazumi Ozaki from Toho University in Japan said when the study was published. To examine how Earth's atmosphere will evolve in the future, Ozaki and Christopher Reinhard, Associate Professor at Georgia Institute of Technology, constructed an Earth system model which simulates climate and biogeochemical processes. Because modelling future Earth evolution intrinsically has uncertainties in geological and biological evolutions, a stochastic approach was adopted, enabling the researchers to obtain a probabilistic assessment of the lifespan of an oxygenated atmosphere. Ozaki ran the model more than 400 thousand times, varying the model parameters, and found that Earth's oxygen-rich atmosphere will probably persist for another one billion years before rapid deoxygenation renders the atmosphere reminiscent of early Earth before the Great Oxidation Event around 2.5 billion years ago. "The atmosphere after the great deoxygenation is characterised by elevated methane, low levels of CO2, and no ozone layer. The Earth system will probably be a world of anaerobic life forms," says Ozaki. Earth's oxygen-rich atmosphere represents an important sign of life that can be remotely detected. However, this study suggests that Earth's oxygenated atmosphere would not be a permanent feature and that the oxygen-rich atmosphere might only be possible for 20-30% of the Earth's entire history as an inhabited planet. Oxygen (and photochemical byproduct, ozone) is the most accepted biosignature for the search for life on exoplanets, but if we can generalise this insight to Earth-like planets, then scientists need to consider additional biosignatures applicable to weakly oxygenated and anoxic worlds in the search for life beyond our solar system.
