
Dramatic moment British killer drone fires laser guided missile in incredible world-first that could change warfighting
T150, a heavy-lifter quadcopter, was seen firing precision rockets - obliterating targets on the ground and in the air.
6
6
6
6
Footage shared by Malloy Aeronautics - a Brit aviation company which manufactured the drone - shows the drone successfully shooting a winged drone during a trial in the US.
It marks the first time a precision munition was fired from a rotary drone to blast another airborne target, according to British defence giant BAE Systems, which owns Malloy.
The clip also showed a quadcopter launching missiles and blasting a van during trials this summer over a desert in Utah.
Engineers said the trials marked a 'game-changing moment for the modern battlefield'.
It is being seen as a breakthrough in modern warfare tactics that could help thwart cheap kamikaze drone attacks without having to deploy expensive defence systems - like the US patriot missiles.
The drone can be equipped with with APKWS laser-guidance kit that fires 70-millimetre rockets up to 6.5 kilometres.
Initially, the drone system was designed to act as a heavy lifter for the military.
Each one can carry loads of up to 68kg each - allowing them to take over cargo jobs that are currently carried out using manned helicopters.
The weapon system can be removed from the drone within an hour, enabling the drone to be repurposed to supply cargo or to perform reconnaissance
It is already used by the US Marines and Britain's Royal Navy to move equipment between ships at sea, replacing some helicopter lifts.
China & Russia will use drones 'the size of insects' to spy on UK & commit untraceable murders, ex-Google futurist warns
Anthony Gregory, of BAE Systems Air, said: 'Everybody can see what's going on in the world with drone technology.
"So the counter-[drone] piece is on everybody's lips, and therefore trying to do that sustainably and affordably.
'At the moment, people are having to fire patriot missiles and all that kind of stuff.
"That's an expensive way of countering a very low-cost threat. So that's the genesis of why we've gone down this avenue.'
Cheap drones have been touted as the future of modern warfare after Ukraine took the world by surprise with its advanced drone technology.
6
6
And the best example of Kyiv 's pioneering work on aerial warfare has to be Operation Spiderweb - a mass drone attack which inflicted $7billion worth of damage and left Russia 's precious fleet of bombers in tatters.
The T150 drones currently cost tens of thousands of pounds each to produce.
But BAE Systems said it was developing a new weaponised drone, aiming to offer military customers a lower-cost option for countering unmanned aircraft.
Given anticipated demand from Western militaries, BAE said it was aiming to start manufacturing the electric motors that power the drone in Britain, instead of buying them from China.
"We're trying to what we would call onshore, or friend shore, all elements in the value chain of the supply chain," Gregory said.
Inside Operation Spiderweb
By James Halpin, Foreign News Reporter
UKRAINE'S shock sleeper drone blitz on Russia's bomber fleet has delivered a hammer blow to Vladimir Putin's nuclear arsenal.
The SAS-style strike against four airfields deep inside Russia is reminiscent of the most daring raids of the WW2 that turned the tide against the Nazis.
Volodymyr Zelensky oversaw Operation Spiderweb - much like Winston Churchill did as Britain struck deep behind enemy lines.
Putin's doomsday bomber fleet is now crippled with 41, or a third, of his most prized aircraft lying in smouldering wrecks on tarmac.
Ukraine said the sneak attack was worth $7bn (£5.2bn) in damage to Russia - caused by only 117 cheaply made drones.
Ukraine's spies spent 18 months putting the plan into action and struck on the eve of fresh peace talks in Istanbul.
The drones and the containers were smuggled into Russia separately and were pieced together right under Vlad's nose.
Clueless lorry drivers then parked the containers next to Russian airbases - where they sat and waited in plain sight.
Then, on the morning of June 1, the fleet of flying bombs rose over the far reaches of Russia - and the most daring military operation of the war began.
Nondescript shipping containers parked in laybys and verges had attracted little attention - before their lids blew open and the drone swarms poured out.
The craft buzzed as they took off into the air and only had to travel a short distance to their valuable targets.
Each of the 117 drones had their own dedicated pilot and Russia had little defences to protect their bases and stop them.
Drones with cameras sent video back to HQ in Ukraine of the moment craft struck their targets and explosions ripped into the sky.
Thick black smoke climbed high, with civilians near the bases sending video of Ukraine's successes around the world.
The furthest strike was Belaya Air Base - so far inside Russia that the closest neighbouring country is Mongolia.
Olenya Air Base near Finland and Ivanovo and Dyagilevo near Moscow were also struck in the country's west.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
M&S shoppers divided as 'rare' £3 'hybrid' summer item is back
Marks and Spencer fans are divided over this one Some people shopping in Marks and Spencer this week might have had a double-take in the fruit section over an item that isn't seen very often in British supermarkets. Fusing two unlikely items together into one 'rare' fruit has shoppers divided. It was spotted in an M&S Food Hall by Facebook user Daniel who runs the Snack Reviews group. He wrote: "New from M&S, the Limelon. Looks like a melon and tastes like a lime had a tropical holiday." Due to its popularity, the melon was available last summer (2024) has returned once again in 2025. The £3 fruit can be bought in-store or added to online orders through Ocado. The store claimed the fruit was "deliciously refreshing and tangy" with "a zesty touch of lime". M&S bosses suggested it would be "perfect for snacking on or serving with yoghurt for breakfast". People were torn over the fruit that had been fused together. Some felt like the fruity treat was "delicious" and were raving about its return. However, a handful refused to put it on their shopping list, claiming the crossbreed sounded "vile". One said: "Would love this. I eat lemons and limes like they are oranges!" Another added: "I'm intrigued!" A third wrote: "I love them! I got a pack of two from Costco a couple of weeks ago for £5.99 but they were tiny! Need to get to M&S!" Someone else put: "They are disgusting!" And, one more commented: "Tried this is Costco once - sour like a lime but tastes like a melon. Very strange, one bite was enough!" M&S is no stranger to releasing unusual types of produce like the Limelon. In recent years, the supermarket has given shoppers the Papple (a pear crossed with an apple) and white strawberries that were said to taste of pineapple. What exactly is a limelon? Limelon melons are small fruits with a uniform, round shape and a bright surface that hides a pale green, juicy flesh with tan seeds at the centre. They are currently grown in Murcia, Spain, and trials are taking place in other countries, including Israel and Costa Rica, to help achieve year-round production. According to Speciality Produce, the limelon has a "complex flavour". Describing what shoppers could expect when cutting into the fusion fruit, a spokesperson wrote that the initial taste is "sweet, floral, and subtly fruity". They add: "In combination with the sweet taste, the melon's flavour also encompasses acidic, zesty, and tangy notes with lime undertones, creating a balanced, bright flavour profile".


North Wales Chronicle
28 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
‘Never again': Regulatory reform pledged to prevent repeat of water bill hikes
Steve Reed announced in a speech alongside the River Thames that regulator Ofwat would be scrapped, as part of measures to pull overlapping water regulation by four different bodies into one 'single powerful' regulator responsible for the whole sector. He made the announcement in response to an independent review by Sir Jon Cunliffe which called for the move, as one of 88 measures to tackle problems in the water sector. The review was commissioned by the Government to answer public fury over pollution in rivers, lakes and seas, soaring bills, shareholder payouts and bosses' bonuses. Mr Reed pledged the new regulator would 'stand firmly on the side of customers, investors and the environment', as he said the Government would cut sewage pollution by half by 2030 – based on a new, higher baseline of pollution in 2024 compared with previous targets relating to 2021. And it would oversee maintenance and investment in water infrastructure so that 'hard-working British families are never again hit by the shocking bill hikes we saw last year'. Questioned by journalists after the speech about future bill hikes, Mr Reed insisted it was 'absolutely the intention' that the reforms would ensure there was adequate investment in the long term to prevent the kind of 30% increase seen in customer water bills last year at the next price review in five years. He also accused the Tories of failing to ensure sufficient investment in crumbling pipes and infrastructure that would have prevented the recent hikes. But in a separate speech, review author Sir Jon warned that costs and bills are likely to continue to rise, as he recommended the Government introduce a national social tariff to help households struggling to pay. 'The cost of producing water and wastewater services is likely to increase over the medium and longer term as the industry has to replace ageing assets, respond to higher environmental and public health standards and continue to adapt to the challenges of population growth and climate change,' he said. 'And against that likely background of rising costs and rising bills, there is a need for a stronger safety net for the most vulnerable when exposed to water poverty.' Asked if investor returns will need to rise to attract the capital needed and contribute to bill hikes, Sir Jon said: 'All the investors I talked to said we are happy to accept a lower return … if you can give us lower risk on the downside. 'Bills will have to reflect what investors need, the equity they need. 'That is part of the cost of building the infrastructure that we need but at the same time, a regulator needs to continue to maintain pressure and efficiency.' Sir Jon's review did not explore renationalising water companies; ministers have refused to entertain the possibility despite demands from campaigners to return them to public ownership. Mr Reed warned nationalisation would cost £100 billion and slow down efforts to cut pollution. He said it was not the answer, adding: 'The problems are to do with governance and regulation, and we are fixing those problems so we can fix the problem of sewage pollution and unacceptable bill hikes in the fastest time possible.' The reforms would see a single regulator replace Ofwat and take in functions related to the water sector from the Environment Agency, which currently investigates pollution incidents and licenses water abstraction from the environment, as well as the Drinking Water Inspectorate and Natural England. Sir Jon suggested a new water regulator would take two years to set up after looking at the time frame for setting up Ofcom, the communications regulator, in the early 2000s. The process could involve bringing the different organisations together as one before integrating the staff and working out where there may be duplication or gaps. Sir Jon also said the Government will have to tackle the issue of securing a 'very high level of leadership', adding that the current system does not have the skills and expertise that will be needed in the new set-up. Asked if ministers need to carry forward all of his 88 recommendations to ensure a full reset of the sector, he said: 'I don't think you're going to solve the fundamental problem unless you tackle all of those issues. 'I think you can get improvement on all those dimensions, but I do think you need to address it all in order to move us to a different place.'


Edinburgh Reporter
32 minutes ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Betmaster Casino Enters the UK: Behind the Scenes of the License Process
Have you ever wondered what it takes to get an online casino launched in the UK? It's a significant undertaking, with many steps that involve large financial commitments along the way. With Betmaster Casino recently launching as one the newest online gambling operators to hit British shores, studying how it has gone about getting up and running is an informative look behind the scenes of the UK gambling sector for both players and operators. Most fans of online gambling only see the end product. The flashy games, the lists of jackpot winners and the smooth user experience of a well designed online casino. But the reality is, getting it to that point is a whole lot of work from dozens or even hundreds of people. Who Are Betmaster and What Do They Offer? Betmaster Sportsbook and Online Casino is a Malta-based gambling operator that is newly-licenced to offer services in the UK. They offer all the bells and whistles you could want from a modern casino. That includes: A user-friendly mobile site built from the ground up A large selection of popular games from globally recognised developers Fast and secure payments Innovative rewards and bonuses Plus, a UK gambling license means they are duty bound to provide certain features for you the players. Responsible gambling tools, age verification and certified fair and secure games and banking options are all clear and present at Betmaster from launch. Which is not to say offshore gambling operators – of which there are many – can't and don't offer those features. But with a license to operate in Scotland, England and Wales, you're guaranteed by law to find safeguards that ensure everything is above board. Interestingly, Betmaster is a cryptocurrency-friendly casino in international markets. But under UK law, that isn't allowed. So, the operator has dropped crypto payment options for UK customers. Operators and crypto fans are busy campaigning against strict crypto regulations however, so who knows how that might change in the future. The Gatekeeper: The UK Gambling Commission All of the above regulation is overseen by the United Kingdom Gambling Commission, or UKGC. This Government body is widely recognised as one of the world's strongest gambling regulators, although operators have criticized them for being overly strict and increasing regulation in recent years. The list of documentation required for a UKGC license is lengthy, so any organization wishing to acquire one will no doubt have several people working on the process. The whole process takes about 16 weeks to complete. There are three types of gambling licenses in the UK: Remote – for online services not based in the country Non-remote – for operators offering gambling from physical locations in the UK, or providing services to them Ancillary – everything else including bingo, phone and email betting In the case of Betmaster, they would have applied and been granted a remote license suitable for online gambling operators. The list of requirements is long, and at each step of the way there are costs. Some of the requirements, such as enforced Know Your Customer (KYC) checks or enforced slot betting limits may not be popular with gamblers who want their winnings and deposits moved as quickly as possible. However, the UKGC is adamant these checks are required to prevent fraud, money laundering and underage gambling. Operators also have to pay a relatively hefty fee for a license, as well as a 21% yearly tax. The fees start at £5000 a year for operators under £500,000 in annual revenue and go up to £800,000 a year for companies with more than £1 billion in revenue. Betmaster and the Booming UK Market Despite the significant financial and time cost, Betmaster clearly considers the juice to be worth the squeeze when it comes to the UK market. In 2024, Britains spent some £3.6 billion on online gambling – more than most other European nations. That number was also up some £250 million compared to 2023, showing it is a growing market that has not yet saturated. Multibillion dollar gambling operator FanDuel was actually founded in Edinburgh in 2009, although they no longer operate in the UK. Meanwhile the market from all gambling sources combined was worth £16 billion in 2024, resulting in some £3 billion in taxes for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs. Licensing is Good for Businesses and Players So, there is clearly a demand for new online casinos like Betmaster in the UK. The UKGC license, although strict, is a gold standard and will also look good for Betmaster when attracting customers to its separate international online casino business. Although it limits player deposits, blocks crypto transactions and requires stringent ID checks – the UK market is just too big to miss out on for online casinos based in Europe. Which is all good for players in the long run. More competition also means casinos bringing out bigger and better bonuses, promotions and rewards to stand out in a crowded market. All from fully regulated, safe and certified fair operators providing a service Brits clearly want. Like this: Like Related