South Africa's Freedom Day: A Celebration or a Reflection of Ongoing Struggles?
Image: File
Various organisations, including unions and civil rights groups, have refused to celebrate Freedom Day as socio-economic challenges 31 years later in democracy.
The organisations said the social backlogs that democracy promised to overcome have instead deepened.
Freedom Day is a day South Africa celebrates its first post-apartheid election.
On April 27, 1994, a new path for South Africa was paved and the idea of a rainbow nation was cemented. This was the first democratic national election held in the country where all people could vote irrespective of their skin colour.
The fight for liberation and an equal South Africa culminated in a single day that would change the trajectory of the country.
Despite this gain, South Africa faces multiple interconnected socio-economic challenges. These include high unemployment, inequality and poverty.
These are exacerbated by issues such as corruption, poor infrastructure and limited access to basic services.
The South African Federation of Trade Unions (Saftu) said while the political right to vote was achieved in 1994, economic liberation has been brutally deferred.
The federation said rural areas remain zones of abandonment. Informal settlements and townships are scenes of permanent degradation — where millions live without dignity, trapped in overcrowded, unsafe, filthy, and uninhabitable conditions.
'Now even small towns, once relatively livable, are decaying rapidly, racing to join the working-class residential areas in collapse. Potholes, broken water infrastructure, electricity blackouts, refuse piling up, crime, and environmental hazards are no longer exceptional — they are the new normal,' said general secretary Zwelinzima Vavi.
Climate change disasters are devastating communities, with thousands displaced by floods, droughts, and fires. Yet government planning remains reactive, uncoordinated, and wholly inadequate,' he said.
The sentiments were echoed by the General Industries Workers Union of SA (Giwusa), saying the promises of freedom, dignity, and equality have been shattered by the ruthless advance of capitalism. The union added that what millions fought and died for has been betrayed by a system that replaced apartheid with exploitation dressed in democratic robes.
Giwuss president Mametlwe Sebei said although the union acknowledged that the end of apartheid brought about the end of the daily racial humiliations of the black working class, they did not fight and die for mass unemployment, starving wages and casualised jobs, the continuation of land theft, sexual and gender-based violence to be rife and youth to be gunned down for daring to protest.
'This Freedom Day, we declare openly: There is no real freedom under capitalism. We owe this system nothing but its overthrow. We should not beg for crumbs. We must fight for everything they have stolen. We fight for socialism – a system where the wealth of South Africa belongs to those who produce it: the working class,' Sebei said.
The South African National Christian Forum (SANCF) said the Freedom Charter has not yet been implemented, saying poverty, unemployment and inequality have been on the rise since 1994.
The forum's president Bishop Marothi Mashashane said: 'We cannot celebrate the document which we are told is the best constitution in the world but it is never implemented, people will not eat or wear this piece of paper which is violated by the same politicians who wrote it,' he said, adding that there is nothing to be celebrated in the country where there is no justice for the poor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
South African banks face scrutiny over political account closures
SA's big banks' trade policies in the spotlight Image: IOL Regulators have been warned against approaching complaints about South African banks in the same way as US president Donald Trump, who this week issued an executive order after accusing financial institutions of unacceptably restricting law-abiding individuals and businesses' access to banking services based on political or religious beliefs. Mametlwe Sebei, president of the General Industries Workers Union of SA (Giwusa), an affiliate of the SA Federation of Trade Unions (Saftu), said Giwusa would not support merely implementing moves similar to Trump's as the situation required the same interventions but for different reasons. Sebei said moves against the banks for being reactionary and assaulting human rights must be supported. "We also know that banks are not accountable in this country, there are political parties, trade unions, community organisations whose bank accounts were closed without an adequate explanation," he said. Sebei described banks as untransformed and that there is not much to look into as far as the banking industry and its conduct are concerned as many South Africans have suffered a lot. He said even Giwusa recently had a dispute with one of the country's major banks, which gave some members access to the union's accounts without authorisation and there were no adequate explanations. According to Sebei, companies perceived to be close to certain public figures have had their bank accounts closed without explanation. "When they close bank accounts, they are effectively condemning workers in those companies to unemployment, retrenchments and job losses. You cannot destroy a company to punish the owners," he said. Sebei said the idea that private banking institutions can take political decisions is extremely dangerous and that is why this should be strongly regulated. In addition, he said the law already provides for instances where there is suspicion of misuse of banking facilities by a client that is able to be reported to the authorities as provided for in the Financial Intelligence Commission Act. Sebei added that the current laws can be implemented without jeopardising jobs and the livelihoods of workers. "Financial services are a lubricant by which the economy is working, it has enormous power in society and in the economy that can destroy not only individuals but also companies and whole industries. These people are wielding enormous public power that has been privatised into institutions that are guided by profiteering and nothing else and want to exercise this power without transparency, accountability and even pass political judgment and that for me is deeply troubling," he said.
The Citizen
22-07-2025
- The Citizen
Corruption claims lives and sparks protest in Ekurhuleni
The suspected assassination of a corruption buster has reignited protests and public outrage in Ekurhuleni. City of Ekurhuleni forensic audit head Mpho Mafole was shot and killed on the R23 highway near Esselen Park. Picture: Facebook On Monday, 30 June, City of Ekurhuleni forensic audit head Mpho Mafole was shot and killed on the R23 highway near Esselen Park. It did not take long before his death was labelled an assassination. Rumour has it that the forensic investigator had discovered what caused a R2 billion shortfall in the city's budget. In fact, it was not what, but who was responsible for the shortfall because of their illegal actions of deleting electricity charges on just over 1 600 municipal accounts. And for identifying the culprits, he was killed. The South African Federation of Trade Unions did not beat about the bush in describing Mafole's death an assassination: 'Mpho Mafole was assassinated. This was no robbery or random act of violence.' Ekurhuleni's biggest township, Tembisa, mobilised for a shutdown of the area yesterday. ALSO READ: Ekurhuleni mayor to suspend electricity tariff hike after protests in Thembisa The reason for the protest? An electricity surcharge ranging from R110 to R204 per month for all households and businesses in the municipality – except for indigent households. Is there a link between the R2 billion budget shortfall that led to the suspected assassination of the auditor and the introduction of the electricity surcharge? No-one has officially made that link, but it does not take a rocket scientist to connect those dots. The last time Tembisa went on what was then called a total shutdown, it resulted in severe destruction of municipal properties and infrastructure. There was even a change in leadership at mayoral level because the then DA mayor Tania Campbell was accused of responding too slowly to the frustrations of residents, especially with regards to electricity tariffs. ALSO READ: Thembisa protest turns violent: Ekurhuleni mayor calls urgent meeting as residents and police clash Some of the municipal buildings and infrastructure that was burnt down because of those protests has not even been repaired and the city is back in the same standoff. There is a reason a lot of people accused President Cyril Ramaphosa of being his usual self in appointing a commission of inquiry to investigate the alleged corruption in the ranks of the South African Police Service. His usual self in that he wants a prolonged investigation, which is preceded by a period of inaction such as the one the country is in right now as it awaits the finalisation of the terms of reference for Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga to begin his investigations and, even then, the outcome isn't guaranteed to root out corruption. There is nothing more dire and more pressing than the assassination of the lead corruption buster in a metropolitan municipality. If Ramaphosa and his Cabinet are serious about fighting corruption, a R2 billion shortfall that results in the assassination of a top government official should warrant a response so immediate and severe that the country is left in no doubt about the seriousness of government in fighting corruption. Residents can be blamed for using violence in ensuring that they are heard, but the truth is the people with all the power in the equation are those in charge. ALSO READ: Soccer star's 'special treatment' after deadly crash concerns grieving mom [VIDEO] The shortfall in the budget – due to corrupt officials writing off electricity bills on accounts – is within the control of government. Passing that on to residents as a surcharge is not only disingenuous, but it also simply gives criminals behind government desks the right to continue with their corrupt acts. It is only when there are direct responses to the deaths of people like Mafole and Babita Deokaran that those who continue to loot government funds will think twice before doing it. Justice for residents isn't only when killers are convicted, it is ensuring that they do not suffer for the corruption of government officials.
The Star
27-06-2025
- The Star
Claims that 'ANC politicians are behind' Zwelinzima Vavi's Standard Bank woes
Sources close to South African Federation of Trade Unions (Saftu) General Secretary Zwelinzima Vavi have alleged that ANC politicians are targeting him through Standard Bank. The allegations stem from the bank's failed attempt to foreclose on Vavi's Sandton home, despite him consistently paying off arrears on his home loan. According to insiders, Vavi's vocal criticism of the ANC, particularly regarding corruption and policy direction, has made him a target. "Vavi has been too critical of the ANC in recent years and was outspoken about President Cyril Ramaphosa's Phala Phala scandal... He has also been critical of the corruption that has been taking place within the ANC in recent years, making him a target," a source revealed. The High Court in Johannesburg, last week, ruled in favour of Vavi, dismissing Standard Bank's bid to foreclose on his home. Judge Stuart Wilson slammed the bank for its "disproportionate" attempt, stating that Vavi had shown "an apparently perfect adherence" to paying his monthly installments. The judge also criticised the bank for demanding over R160,000 in legal costs, almost double the outstanding arrears. Vavi's history with the ANC and Cosatu has been marked by controversy and criticism. He was previously fired from Cosatu due to escalating tensions and disagreements with the federation's leadership. His criticism of the ANC's corruption and policy direction further strained his relationship with the party. ANC spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu did not respond to questions sent to her. Cosatu's spokesperson Matthew Parks said the Federation was aware of the matter but were not buying into claims that there was a political controversy around the issue. "We don't buy the story that he (Vavi) was targeted political party owns a bank or can influenece a bank. "We obviously sympathise with the judge was scathing towards Standard Bank in his ruling. We always say that there should be a better way to resolve these issues, other than going to court," Parks said. The Vavi case is not an isolated incident. Standard Bank has faced criticism for handling mortgage arrears and foreclosure proceedings. A R60-billion class-action lawsuit against major South African banks, including Standard Bank, highlights systemic issues with how banks handle mortgage arrears. Advocate Douglas Shaw, leading the lawsuit, alleges that banks frequently proceed with sales even when foreclosure is not a last resort, and often impose excessive legal costs. "We often see banks act in a manner we consider irresponsible. You cannot trust them to do what most people would see as 'the right thing',' Shaw said. In another case the bank was again accused of using underhanded tactics to short change its clients, claiming that a couple had defaulted in their bond repayments after they were allegedly overcharged by the bank. Shamilla Pather and her husband Roman, of Pinetown, said at the time that they were overcharged by the bank which, they say, has also prolonged court processes intended to resolve the matter. They accused the bank of expecting her and her husband to pay R600,000 or more over a 10-year period in lieu of one month of arrears of R8,800. In another case in 2023, a couple Patrick and Polin Anthony from Gauteng, defaulted on their mortgage payments for their home in Forest Hill, Gauteng. However, Standard Bank debited an amount of R124,047,34 from Anthony's family bank account allegedly after increasing the interest rate from prime -1% to prime +1% from August 1, 2009. This allegedly resulted in an overpayment of R135,301,30, according to financial investigator Emerald van Zyl, who said the overpayment was revealed by an independent actuary as he accused the bank of having allegedly increased the prime rate through internal policy. Standard Bank did not respond to the claims that political interference had led to banking action against Vavi, but responded to other questions. The bank's spokesperson Ron Derby said the bank wished to clarify that on 12 June 2025, Vavi's matter was postponed, and no final court order was granted dismissing the bank's application. 'Regarding this matter, the home loan account has been in arrears since 2015. Over the years, the bank has extended multiple opportunities to the homeowner to get the account up to date. Legal proceedings were only initiated in 2022, after all other avenues to resolve the matter amicably had been exhausted…Legal action is never our first course of action — it is a measure of last resort. 'With regards to the matter of Mark Rowan and Shamilla Pather, Standard Bank has engaged directly with the clients to discuss an amicable resolution. Any resolution arrived at is subject to confidentiality agreements and therefore the details cannot be made publicly available. "We are committed to supporting our clients through financial challenges and strongly encourage clients to engage with us at the earliest signs of financial distress. Early engagement enables us to work collaboratively to find solutions that are sustainable and mutually beneficial,' Derby said. [email protected]
