Massive Explosion Rocks Key Bomber Base Deep Inside Russia
A Ukrainian drone attack targeted Russia's Engels Air Base in the Saratov region, 300 miles from the Ukrainian border, according to Russian and Ukrainian officials. These claims are supported by an abundance of dramatic imagery footage. At this stage, it's unclear whether any Russian aircraft were damaged in the incident, although there are strong indications that the primary target may have been a weapons storage area at the base. Long-range bombers flying from the base regularly attack Ukraine and the airfield, and others like it, have long been high-priority targets for Kyiv.
Videos and photos posted to social media showed the attack and its aftermath, which occurred early this morning, local time. Some of these videos have since been independently verified. The strikes involved Ukrainian-made long-range one-way attack drones, with at least one video seemingly indicating the use of the twin-boom Lyutyy or the visually similar PD-2. Both these types have been used to attack targets deep inside Russia on multiple occasions.
"Lutyi" strike drones visited Engels this morning.
—
MAKS 24 (@maks23.bsky.social)
2025-03-20T09:16:58.500Z
The Ukrainian Ministry of Defense confirmed that its forces had struck the airfield and the attacks triggered secondary detonations of ammunition.
At least one video captured the moment that the shockwave from a massive explosion at Engels passed through the surrounding area. Such was the ferocity of the blast that areas outside of the base — including a settlement of dacha cottages — were severely damaged, with some structures being obliterated.
Near the Engels air base. pic.twitter.com/KPBboQw3O1
— 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝕯𝔢𝔞𝔡 𝕯𝔦𝔰𝔱𝔯𝔦𝔠𝔱△
(@TheDeadDistrict) March 20, 2025
Fantastic detonation in Engels
— The Ukrainian Review (@theukrainianreview.bsky.social) 2025-03-20T08:12:36.264Z
Roman Busargin, the governor of the Saratov region, confirmed there had been a Ukrainian drone attack that had left an unnamed airfield on fire, and that nearby residents had been evacuated. Other local officials said that 10 people had been injured in the attack and Engels district head Maxim Leonov confirmed that a local state of emergency had been declared.
The size of the blast, the subsequent intense fire, and the huge pall of smoke rising over the air base are certainly in line with the theory that a weapons storage area was struck. If that were the case, this could have eliminated a lot of weaponry, specifically the air-launched cruise missiles with which Russian bombers are mainly armed.
Russia: Ukraine struck the Engels Military Air Base in Saratov region.
— Igor Sushko (@igorsushko.bsky.social) 2025-03-20T04:09:14.037Z
Russia's Engels-2 airbase, having a rough morning.
— Jay in Kyiv (@jayinkyiv.bsky.social) 2025-03-20T06:10:39.866Z
More from Engels
—
MAKS 24 (@maks23.bsky.social)
2025-03-20T07:55:06.667Z
/1. Tonight drones targeted Russian military airfield in Engels, Saratov region of Russia. A strong explosion was reported.
—
Special Kherson Cat (@specialkhersoncat.bsky.social)
2025-03-20T07:19:10.749Z
Russian Engels is again attacked by unknown drones. What is going on?!
— Meanwhile in Ukraine (@meanwhileua.bsky.social) 2025-03-20T04:29:34.436Z
Russian Telegram channels report an ammunition warehouse might have been hit near Engels military airfield. Some say missiles might have been stored there.
— Anton Gerashchenko (@antongerashchenko.bsky.social) 2025-03-20T07:24:36.924Z
In addition, there are reports that secondary explosions continued throughout the morning, which would correspond with ammunition cooking off after the initial blast(s). Targeting munitions areas for their secondary effects as well as what they contain is a major tactic used by both sides in this war.
The scale of the destruction outside of the air base also suggests that there might be more extensive damage within the facility's perimeters. So far, TWZ has not been able to obtain relevant satellite imagery that isn't obscured by cloud cover.
According to unconfirmed Ukrainian accounts, there were three Tu-95MS Bear-H and two Tu-160 Blackjack strategic bombers at Engels this morning. There were further reports that an Il-76 Candid airlifter had also recently arrived, perhaps carrying additional munitions for the resident bombers, though this cannot be verified.
After doing a detailed geolocation of Ukraine's
strike on Engels air base, using the position of several buildings and the position of the sun at the time of the strikeThe target was located as an ammunition bunker at Engels Air Base, likely storing many missiles and bombs pic.twitter.com/Iqr87fd6c0
— Ukraine Battle Map (@ukraine_map) March 20, 2025
Regardless of what Russian aircraft were at the base this morning, the attack further underscores the ability of relatively slow and low-flying Ukrainian drones to fly deep into Russian territory and strike strategic military targets. Once again, this raises questions about local air defense capabilities, although Russian authorities typically claim that they successfully intercept almost all Ukrainian drones sent their way. On this occasion, Russian officials said that their air defenses had shot down 54 Ukrainian drones in the Saratov region overnight — from a total of 132 Ukrainian drones allegedly brought down across all Russian regions.
Low and slow-flying drones, especially those made of composite materials, are hard to detect, track, and engage, but Russia has been facing attacks of this kind for many months now.
In the past, Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian bomber bases have resulted in damage to aircraft.
For example, Engels was attacked three times in the month of December 2022 alone. On at least one of those occasions, the Russian Ministry of Defense said the air base was attacked by Soviet-made jet-powered unmanned aerial vehicles modified by Ukraine to carry explosives. Those attacks — which also targeted Dyagilevo Air Base — resulted in damage to at least one Tu-22M3 Backfire-C bomber and apparently also to a Tu-95MS.
More recently, in January of this year, we reported on a huge fire close to Engels Air Base, caused by what Russian officials described as a 'massive' Ukrainian drone attack. The strike was on the strategically important fuel storage tank farm for Engels and the fire raged for several days after, as seen in the image in the embedded tweet below:
Russia's Rosreserv fuel depot in Engels continued to burn today after a Ukrainian drone attack last night, with multiple additional storage tanks igniting throughout the day. Within the last hour, the regional governor of Saratov declared a state of emergency. pic.twitter.com/EzhoQTgqK0
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) January 8, 2025
Engels is home to the 22nd Heavy Bomber Aviation Division, which operates one squadron of Bear-Hs and another squadron of supersonic Blackjacks — this is the only permanent base for the Tu-160. Both types have been widely employed in the conflict in Ukraine and especially in the standoff strikes that have targeted Ukraine's energy infrastructure, among other objectives, civilian and military, across the country.
Meanwhile, repeated Ukrainian attacks have led to Russian air bases dispersing their aircraft for protection.
The Russian Aerospace Forces have also taken further precautions at their bases. Initially, they installed blast walls between active aircraft. This was an attempt to contain any damage to one aircraft in an attack, designed to prevent both fire and shrapnel from spreading. More recently, construction work at multiple bases has been adding many dozens of new hardened aircraft shelters to better shield aircraft from drone attacks and other indirect fire. However, the size of the bombers means they cannot be provided with the same kinds of protection.
As well as the physical hardening of airfields, Russia has arranged discarded aircraft as decoys. More unorthodox measures have included placing car tires on the upper surfaces of aircraft and painting aircraft silhouettes on concrete airfield surfaces. The tires, specifically, were intended to confuse image-matching seekers on Ukrainian-operated standoff weapons.
At the same time, anti-aircraft defenses have been set up at Russian airfields, although, as demonstrated today, their effectiveness has been mixed.
The latest attack on Engels Air Base comes as Ukraine and Russia trade strikes against the backdrop of the Trump administration's efforts to work out the details of a partial ceasefire. Hours before the drone strike, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine spoke to his U.S. counterpart Donald Trump, and accepted the Kremlin's offer to mutually pause attacks on energy targets for 30 days.
As for the effectiveness of today's Ukrainian drone attack on Engels Air Base, we will have to wait for satellite imagery to have a better idea of this. At the very least, however, the operation is a reminder of Ukraine's ability to target facilities of this kind as part of its long-range drone strategy. Among these targets, Engels, as Russia's master bomber base, remains a prized objective for Ukraine.
Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
6 minutes ago
- Fox News
Russia, China, North Korea condemn Trump's $175 billion Golden Dome missile shield
The U.S.'s chief adversaries, Russia, North Korea and China, all of which are nuclear-armed nations, have condemned President Donald Trump's space-based defensive plan he dubbed the "Golden Dome" as "dangerous" and a threat to global stability. The president discussed his $175 billion plan, which will use satellites and other technologies to detect and intercept a missile strike "even if they are launched from other sides of the world," Trump said last week. The defensive plan, though it is believed to be years away before being fully operational despite Trump's three-year goal mark, sparked stiff backlash from the U.S.'s top competitors, who took direct aim at what they called Trump's "arrogance." North Korea's foreign ministry, whose leader shared an uncommonly cordial relationship with Trump during his first term, called it the equivalent of an "outer space nuclear war scenario" that supports the administration's strategy for "uni-polar domination." According to local media outlets, the ministry on Tuesday said it was a "typical product of 'America first', the height of self-righteousness, arrogance, high-handed and arbitrary practice." The White House did not immediately respond to Fox News' Digital's questions regarding the reactions to the plan, intended to resemble Israel's "Iron Dome" defensive capability. But the North Korean foreign ministry claimed the defensive strategy was actually an "attempt to militarize outer space" and "preemptively attain military superiority in an all-round way." Similarly, on Tuesday, Russian foreign minister Maria Zakharova said the strategy would undermine the basis of strategic stability by creating a global missile defense system, reported Reuters. But her comments were not the first time Moscow aligned its condemnation of the "Golden Dome" as it issued a joint statement with China earlier this month after Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping met for formal talks in Russia. The duo called the plan "deeply destabilizing" and claimed it erodes the "inseparable interrelationship between strategic offensive arms and strategic defensive arms." They also argued that it would turn "outer space into an environment for placing weapons and an arena for armed confrontation." Russia has remained relatively muted in its response following Trump's Oval Office discussion on the Golden Dome, which came just two days after Trump held a two-hour phone call with Putin. But China reiterated its objection to the plan, and following Trump's announcement on it, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning said last week, "The project will heighten the risk of turning space into a war zone and creating a space arms race, and shake the international security and arms control system." Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has rejected the claims that the plan could be viewed as an "offensive" strategy and told Fox News Digital, "All we care about is protecting the homeland."
Associated Press
19 minutes ago
- Associated Press
The US and EU are in a showdown over trade. What does Trump want and what can Europe offer?
FRANKFURT, Germany (AP) — Top officials at the European Union's executive commission says they're pushing hard for a trade deal with the Trump administration to avoid a 50% tariff on imported goods. Trump had threatened to impose the tariffs on June 1, but has pushed back the deadline to July 9, repeating an oft-used tactic in his trade war. European negotiators are contending with Trump's everchanging and unpredictable tariff threats, but 'still, they have to come up with something to hopefully pacify him,' said Bruce Stokes, visiting senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States. Stokes also sees more at play than just a disagreement over trade deficits. Trump's threats 'are rooted in frustration with the EU that has little to do with trade,'' Stokes said. 'He doesn't like the EU. He doesn't like Germany.' What exactly does Trump want? What can Europe offer? Here are the key areas where the two side are squaring off. Buy our stuff Over and over, Trump has bemoaned the fact that Europe sells more things to Americans than it buys from Americans. The difference, or the trade deficit in goods, last year was 157 billion euros ($178 billion). But Europe says that when it comes to services — particularly digital services like online advertising and cloud computing — the U.S. sells more than it buys and that lowers the overall trade deficit to 48 billion euros, which is only about 3% of total trade. The European Commission says that means trade is 'balanced.' One way to shift the trade in goods would be for Europe to buy more liquefied natural gas by ship from the U.S. To do so, the EU could cut off the remaining imports of Russian pipeline gas and LNG. The commission is preparing legislation to force an end to those purchases -- last year, some 19% of imports — by the end of 2027. That would push European private companies to look for other sources of gas such as the U.S. However the shift away from Russia is already in motion and that 'has obviously not been enough to satisfy,' said Laurent Ruseckas, a natural gas markets expert at S&P Global Commodities Insights Research. The commission doesn't buy gas itself but can use 'moral suasion' to convince companies to turn to U.S. suppliers in coming years but 'this is no silver bullet and nothing that can yield immediate results,' said Simone Tagliapietra, an energy analyst at the Bruegel think tank in Brussels. Europe could buy more from U.S. defense contractors as part of its effort to deter further aggression from Russia after the invasion of Ukraine, says Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macro at ING bank. If European countries did increase their overall defense spending — another of Trump's demands — their voters are likely to insist that the purchases go to defense contractors in Europe, not America, said Stokes of the German Marshall Fund. One way around that political obstacle would be for U.S. defense companies to build factories in Europe, but 'that would take time,'' he said. The EU could also reduce its 10% tax on foreign cars— one of Trump's longstanding grievances against Europe. 'The United States is not going to export that many cars to Europe anyway ... The Germans would be most resistant, but I don't think they're terribly worried about competition from America,'' said Edward Alden, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. 'That would be a symbolic victory for the president.'' A beef over beef The U.S. has long complained about European regulations on food and agricultural products that keep out hormone-raised beef and chickens disinfected with chlorine. But experts aren't expecting EU trade negotiators to offer any concessions at the bargaining table. 'The EU is unwilling to capitulate,' said Mary Lovely, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. 'The EU has repeatedly said it will not change its sanitary rules, its rules on (genetically modified) crops, its rules on chlorinated chickens, things that have been longtime irritants for the U.S.'' Backing down on those issues, she said, would mean that 'the U.S. gets to set food safety (standards) for Europe.'' Value-added tax One of Trump's pet peeves has been the value-added taxes used by European governments, a tax he says is a burden on US companies. Economists say this kind of tax, used by some 170 countries, is trade-neutral because it applies equally to imports and exports. A value-added tax, or VAT, is paid by the end purchaser at the cash register but differs from sales taxes in that it is calculated at each stage of the production process. In both cases, VAT and sales tax, imports and exports get the same treatment. The U.S. is an outlier in that it doesn't use VAT. There's little chance countries will change their tax systems for Trump and the EU has ruled it out. Negotiating strategy Trump's approach to negotiations has involved threats of astronomical tariffs - up to 145% in the case of China - before striking a deal for far lower levels. In any case, however, the White House has taken the stance that it won't go below a 10% baseline. The threat of 50% for the EU is so high it means 'an effective trade embargo,' said Brzeski, since it would impose costs that would make it unprofitable to import goods or mean charging consumers prices so high the goods would be uncompetitive. Because the knottiest issues dividing the EU and U.S. — food safety standards, the VAT, regulation of tech companies — are so difficult 'it is impossible to imagine them being resolved by the deadline,'' Alden said. 'Possibly what you could have — and Trump has shown he is willing to do this — is a very small deal'' like the one he announced May 8 with the United Kingdom. Economists Oliver Rakau and Nicola Nobile of Oxford Economics wrote in a commentary Monday that if imposed, the 50% tariffs would reduce the collective economy of the 20 countries that use the euro currency by up to 1% next year and slash business investment by more than 6%. The EU has offered the US a 'zero for zero' outcome in which tariffs would be removed on both sides industrial goods including autos. Trump has dismissed that but EU officials have said it's still on the table. Lovely of the Peterson Institute sees the threats and bluster as Trump's way of negotiating. 'In the short run, I don't think 50% is going to be our reality.'' But she says Trump's strategy adds to the uncertainty around U.S. policy that is paralyzing business. 'It suggests that the U.S. is an unreliable trading partner, that it operates on whim and not on rule of law,'' Lovely said. 'Friend or foe, you're not going to be treated well by this administration.'' _____ Wiseman contributed to this report from Washington.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
King Charles Makes History as He Delivers Throne Speech in Canada
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." King Charles is in Canada—one of 15 nations he reigns over—for the first time since becoming king. Today, King Charles, as Canada's head of state, attended the State Opening of Parliament to deliver the 'Speech from the Throne,' or Throne Speech, which sets out the new government's priorities at the start of the parliamentary session. According to the BBC, the address 'would traditionally be given by the governor general, who is the monarch's top representative in Canada.' Per Buckingham Palace, 'This is just the second time in history that the Sovereign has opened a Parliament, following Queen Elizabeth II opening the twenty-third Canadian Parliament in October 1957, and the third time a Sovereign has delivered a Speech from the Throne, marking a significant moment between the Head of State and the Canadian people.' Queen Elizabeth delivered the address in 1957 and 1977. When she did so in 1957, she became the first reigning monarch to open the Canadian Parliament session. For the occasion, she wore her coronation dress and Queen Alexandra's Kokoshnik Tiara, created by Garrard. When she returned twenty years later to once again deliver the Throne Speech, Queen Elizabeth again opted for the Kokoshnik Tiara. Per Garrard, 'the idea for the design came from Alexandra herself. Inspired by a diamond kokoshnik tiara belonging to her sister, Empress Maria Feodorovna, that she had long admired, the classic halo shape borrowed from the style of a traditional Russian peasant headdress.' The tiara is made of 61 vertical bars, set with more than 400 perfectly matched diamonds. Today, Queen Camilla did not wear a tiara, instead opting for a wide-brimmed blue hat. You Might Also Like 12 Weekend Getaway Spas For Every Type of Occasion 13 Beauty Tools to Up Your At-Home Facial Game
