logo
‘It's a calling… someone has to do it' — NSPCA inspector on why she endures the danger and the heartbreak

‘It's a calling… someone has to do it' — NSPCA inspector on why she endures the danger and the heartbreak

Daily Maverick22-05-2025
Being an NSPCA inspector is a calling and not for the faint-hearted, as Sparky Moseki can attest, working in a landscape of legal loopholes, cultural clashes and sometimes dangerous confrontations.
It's 6am and Sparky Moseki is somewhere between a city and the dustier edges of South Africa, heading to a property no one wants to see, to deal with something no one wants to face. 'You never really know what's waiting for you when you arrive,' she says. 'People think the NSPCA is just cats and dogs, but you'd be amazed. We deal with everything. Dogs, snakes, seals, livestock on ships, smuggled animals at borders, you name it.'
Moseki is a senior inspector in the NSPCA's Special Projects Unit and with every rescue, every raid, every inspection, she carries something heavy: the look in an animal's eyes. 'You know when you see a dog that's been starved so long it can't stand up? And it looks at you like… please. Please help me. That's what stays with you.'
For Moseki, this isn't a job. It's a mission. It's a calling. And it's heartbreak, over and over again.
'It's the law and it's people'
Moseki's journey began at the University of Northwest, where she studied animal health. 'I always knew I wanted to work with animals,' she says. After a short stint at a vet practice in Johannesburg, fate nudged her towards the SPCA movement. 'That was 15 years ago, and here I am.'
She's now a key figure in the Special Projects Unit – a team that operates in some of the most legally and ethically complex parts of animal welfare. 'We're the unit that deals with border control, checking for illegal animal trafficking. We inspect police dogs, prison dogs, private security dogs. We respond to cruelty reports. We monitor live exports. We handle dog fighting, illegal hunting, even tail docking.'
She pauses. 'Every day is different. And some days it's overwhelming.'
You're sitting there rewinding a video of someone stabbing a zebra, trying to spot a landmark, a licence plate. It wears you down.
Unlike a vet's clean, clinical space, Moseki works in a landscape of legal loopholes, cultural clashes and sometimes dangerous confrontations. 'People don't always welcome you. You show up and it's 'why are you here? Who sent you? Get off my property.''
But the law is clear. 'Every animal in South Africa is protected under the Animal Protection Act. We're authorised to ensure their welfare. But if we're denied access? We have to go to court for a warrant. And I've never had a magistrate refuse us.'
Still, paperwork is one thing. Reality is another. 'Sometimes you sit waiting hours for a police escort because the station has no vehicle, or you're walking into hostile situations, people threatening you. You have to stay calm. You have to stay focused on why you're there.'
Asked what keeps her going, Moseki doesn't hesitate. 'It's a calling. You don't do this for money. You do it because you care, because someone has to.'
People think we show up and take animals away and that's it. But they don't see the mental load, the emotional toll.
It's a philosophy that's been tested, especially when she faces cruelty so severe it feels impossible to process. She tells the story of inspecting a live export ship in the Eastern Cape. 'That morning, we arrived and the rams' horns had been cut off too close to their heads. Blood everywhere. Animals were trapped. Crushed. It was a nightmare. We'd left them the night before and came back the next morning to this horror.'
She shakes her head. 'You never forget that. Never.'
And then there are the decisions. The impossible ones. The ones that tear you up no matter how many times you've made them. 'Sometimes the kindest thing you can do is euthanise,' she says quietly. 'When you look at an animal and know: nothing can save you. You've suffered enough. You deserve peace.'
It's a burden few outsiders understand. 'People think we show up and take animals away and that's it,' she says. 'But they don't see the mental load, the emotional toll.'
We're here to make sure no animal suffers in silence. That's why I wake up every morning.
Even fear hasn't stopped Moseki. 'I was scared of snakes,' she admits, laughing. 'Couldn't even touch one. Then I got a call about a python, and I thought, I have to do this.' So afterwards she learnt and even completed a snake-handling course. 'Now? I can handle them no problem.'
It's a theme in her work: confronting what others avoid. Whether it's snakes, smuggling operations or cruelty cases, Moseki faces it head-on. 'Someone has to. Someone has to be there for the animals.'
Social media makes it worse – and better
One thing that's changed in recent years is the rise of cruelty shared online. 'We get videos sent to us – WhatsApp, Facebook – people torturing animals, animals forced to fight, killing wildlife. And we have to watch them, over and over, to identify places, people.'
She sighs. 'That's the part people don't think about. You're sitting there rewinding a video of someone stabbing a zebra, trying to spot a landmark, a licence plate. It wears you down.'
But it also helps. 'People are sharing more, reporting more. So in a way, social media's made it harder for us, but also better for animals.'
After 15 years, Moseki has complicated feelings about people. 'Some are cruel for fun. Some do it for clicks. Some do it because they've fallen on hard times and can't care for their animals anymore.' She pauses. 'But then you see the other side. People who rescue. People who care. People who feed stray animals from their own empty pockets.'
She believes education is key. 'The more we're out there, the more people understand what cruelty really is. And maybe that means less cruelty in the long run.'
At home, Moseki's world is quieter. She has a dog – a cross-breed border collie with heart. 'When I look into her eyes, I think, how could anyone hurt something that trusts you like this?'
Her children share her passion. 'My youngest wants to be an inspector too. The older one wants to be a lawyer to advocate for animals. They see what I do. They've grown up knowing this is important.'
She's lasted. And she'll keep lasting. 'At the end of the day,' she says, 'we're here to make sure no animal suffers in silence. That's why I wake up every morning. That's why I go out there. Even when it's hard. Even when it breaks me a little.' DM
This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NSPCA dismayed over NPA declining to prosecute Julius Malema for cruelty
NSPCA dismayed over NPA declining to prosecute Julius Malema for cruelty

The Herald

timea day ago

  • The Herald

NSPCA dismayed over NPA declining to prosecute Julius Malema for cruelty

The National Council of SPCAs (NSPCA) on Wednesday expressed disappointment at the National Prosecuting Authority's (NPA) decision not to prosecute EFF leader Julius Malema for cruelty regarding an incident in 2023. 'The case stems from a widely circulated video depicting Malema attempting to slaughter a cow in a manner the NSPCA believes violated the Animals Protection Act and inflicted unnecessary suffering,' said the NSPCA which opened a formal case in September 2023. The organisation said it had supplied supplementary video evidence, affidavits and secured a key eyewitness who captured further footage at the scene. 'Yet, in a letter to the NSPCA, the NPA stated 'the prosecution will not be in a position to adduce sufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt' that a contravention of the act occurred. The letter further cited the 'authenticity' of the video footage as a concern.' The case faced numerous challenges and was escalated by the NSPCA. 'While we acknowledge and respect the independence of the prosecutorial process, we are disheartened by this outcome. We believed the available evidence merited judicial consideration. This decision will no doubt be dismaying to many South Africans who care deeply about the humane treatment of animals. 'This matter also underscores a broader issue: the continued struggle for animals to achieve visibility and protection in the justice system. The law must be applied consistently,' said the NSPCA. TimesLIVE

NPA declines to prosecute Julius Malema in animal cruelty case
NPA declines to prosecute Julius Malema in animal cruelty case

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

NPA declines to prosecute Julius Malema in animal cruelty case

The National Prosecuting Authority has declined to prosecute EFF leader Julius Malema for animal cruelty. Image: Ayanda Ndamane / Independent Newspapers The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has declined to pursue criminal charges in an animal cruelty case involving EFF leader Julius Malema. The case relates to a widely circulated 2023 video in which Malema was seen attempting to slaughter a cow. The National Council of SPCAs (NSPCA). alleges that the act contravened the Animals Protection Act, citing 'unnecessary suffering' inflicted on the animal. The NSPCA confirmed it opened a formal case in September 2023, submitting video evidence, affidavits, and the testimony of a key eyewitness who had captured additional footage of the incident. The NSPCA said the NPA informed them that 'the prosecution would not be able to adduce sufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt' that the law had been broken. The NPA also cited concerns regarding the 'authenticity' of the video evidence. The NSPCA described the outcome as a serious setback for animal welfare. 'While we acknowledge and respect the independence of the prosecutorial process, we are deeply disheartened by this outcome,' the organisation said. 'We believed the available evidence merited judicial consideration.' According to the NSPCA, the matter was escalated through several tiers of the prosecutorial hierarchy, from the Public Prosecutor to the Chief Public Prosecutor, Director of Public Prosecutions, and ultimately the National Director of Public Prosecutions, but all declined to proceed with a prosecution. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'This decision will no doubt be dismaying to many South Africans who care deeply about the humane treatment of animals,' the NSPCA stated. The organisation also said the case highlighted systemic issues in the legal protection of animals. 'This matter also underscores a broader issue: the continued struggle for animals to achieve visibility and protection within the justice system. The law must be applied consistently.' THE MERCURY

NPA won't prosecute Malema over 'cruel' cattle slaughter video
NPA won't prosecute Malema over 'cruel' cattle slaughter video

The South African

timea day ago

  • The South African

NPA won't prosecute Malema over 'cruel' cattle slaughter video

The SPCA has strongly condemned a decision by the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) not to take action against Julius Malema over a disturbing video of him slaughtering a cow with a blunt knife. In 2023, the leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) courted controversy at the party's ceremonial slaughter event. The incident occurred days before the EFF's 10th birthday celebrations at the FNB Stadium. This week, the NPA confirmed that it would not be prosecuting Julius Malema over a viral video of him slaughtering a cow with a small knife that failed to kill the animal quickly. According to the authority, the NPA stated that 'the prosecution will not be in a position to adduce sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt' that the video contravened the Animal Protection Act. It also cited the 'authenticity' of the video footage as a concern. In July 2023, Julius Malema participated in the EFF's ceremonial slaughter event, which took place in Magaliesberg. In a disturbing clip that went viral, Malema attempted to slaughter the cow but struggled at length after using a somewhat blunt knife that caused the animal deep distress. Malema stuck the small knife into the cow's poll [area between the head and ears], stabbing it and twisting the knife in it several times. The video evoked a strong reaction from the public, who called on the NSPCA to intervene. At the time, animal activists objected that the animal had not been afforded a quick and humane death. A few months after the video was made public, the SPCA formally charged Julius Malema with animal cruelty under the Animal Protection Act. The organisation believes the politician inflicted 'unimaginable suffering, pain and distress' on the animal. It aided the investigation by providing video evidence, affidavits, and even a key eyewitness who captured further footage at the scene. A video of Malema slaughtering a cow went viral in 2023. He was later charged with animal cruelty. Image via EFF Reacting to the NPA's decision, it said in a statement: 'While we acknowledge and respect the independence of the prosecutorial process, we are deeply disheartened by this outcome. We believed the available evidence merited judicial consideration. This decision will no doubt be dismaying to many South Africans who care deeply about the humane treatment of animals. 'This matter also underscores a broader issue: the continued struggle for animals to achieve visibility and protection within the justice system. 'The law must be applied consistently'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store