Kerala: Officials race to tow burning ship away from India coast to prevent 'ecological disaster'
It added that five salvage team members and an aircrew diver have been sent to help with the towing operation. "The situation remains critical and is being monitored continuously."The vessel, which was heading to Mumbai city on India's western coast from Sri Lanka's capital Colombo, caught fire after an internal container explosion. Eighteen crew members have been rescued so far but four others are still missing and a massive rescue operation has been launched to find them. The Indian Coast Guard said that conditions at sea remain unfavourable and that their priority was to extinguish the fire and prevent a marine disaster.It has deployed five ships, two aircraft and a helicopter to help douse the fire. A separate salvage team appointed by the ship owner, along with two vessels from the shipping ministry, are also helping with the efforts. This is the second shipping incident to have happened off Kerala's coast in less than three weeks.Last month, a Liberian-flagged vessel carrying oil and hazardous cargo leaked and sank in the Arabian Sea, triggering an environmental emergency.The Kerala state government swiftly banned fishing within a 20-nautical mile radius of the shipwreck and announced compensation for families from fishing communities in four affected districts.An underwater operation has been launched to cap the ship's oil tank and salvage its fuel.Manorama News reported that on Wednesday, the Indian Ministry of Ports issued a formal notice to the vessel's management company, warning of legal action if extraction of oil from the ship is not started by Friday."The progress made in this operation is grossly inadequate and continues to fall short of the timelines and operational commitments previously provided by the salvors and owners," it said.Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Fire at illegal oil well in Indonesia kills three, hundreds evacuated
JAKARTA, Aug 19 (Reuters) - Firefighters in Indonesia are struggling to contain a three-day-old fire at an illegal oil well that has killed at least three people and injured two others, a disaster relief official said on Tuesday. Some 750 people have been evacuated from the densely populated areas around the site, located in Central Java province's Blora region, Agung Tri, a member of the provincial disaster mitigation agency's rapid response team, told Reuters. The oil well was being operated without a permit by local residents when it caught fire on Sunday. Authorities are still investigating the cause of the blaze, but residents living near the well said they heard an explosion before the fire broke out, Agung said. The relief agency has deployed four excavators in an attempt to use soil to extinguish the fire, he added, but firefighters were still battling massive flames on Tuesday and facing difficulties moving equipment into the hilly terrain surrounding the site. Evacuated residents have, meanwhile, been moved to temporary shelters and local government buildings nearby. Local communities in the mineral-rich Indonesian archipelago have taken over hundreds of oil wells abandoned by companies after they proved to no longer be economically viable. Many are illegally operated with lax safety standards. Indonesian authorities have recently moved to legalise those operations, issuing a regulation in June that allows small companies to partner with residents. The policy is intended to boost the country's oil production while improving safety standards and protecting the welfare of communities.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Kingswear marina fire damages two boats and causes one to sink
A boat has sunk and two vessels have been damaged in a fire at a and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service said the blaze started in the marina at Kingswear at about 04:40 BST on Tuesday.A spokesperson said four fire engines, the coastguard and lifeboat had been sent to the blaze that involved three wooden two damaged vessels have been recovered by the harbour-master, the service said. It added the cause of the fire was thought to be accidental.
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Our barbecue from John Lewis burst into flames at a family party
Four years ago my husband and I bought an Everdure gas barbecue from John Lewis for £649, which came with a five-year warranty. We also bought a cover for it from another company for £79. During a family gathering my husband was cooking dinner on the barbecue when the whole thing suddenly went up in flames and the plastic surrounding the grill started melting. It was so shocking. Our family had been milling around having a drink and a few of us quickly formed a line with buckets of water and we managed to put out the fire. My husband also managed to disconnect the gas cylinder from the barbecue. In retrospect we ought to have called the fire brigade because it was so dangerous. We are so grateful that no one was injured, but our three-year old granddaughter was particularly upset. This was the first time we had a problem with the barbecue. My husband is the one who uses it and he is very experienced. He emailed John Lewis to explain what had happened and after many weeks we were eventually offered a refund. We pointed out that we had also bought a special cover for the barbecue so we wanted to be reimbursed for that too, but we didn't get a response. After weeks of chasing, the company changed its mind and said it wouldn't give us any money back; it said the fire was our fault because we left grease in the barbecue. This isn't true; we are careful people who take care of our things. We have always cleaned it after use and removed any fat. No one came to inspect the barbecue and we were shocked that the company was now claiming that we had caused the fire. John Lewis has never acknowledged the seriousness of the situation which could have had fatal consequences, so we feel very let down. My husband and I have bought all our appliances from John Lewis, but we are left feeling like we can't rely on the company to help when things go address supplied I was pleased to hear that no one was hurt in this incident, but it could have easily been a very different story. It was worrying that the flames had melted the plastic of the barbecue, and made me question whether there could be a design fault with this model. I spoke to the product manufacturer, an Australian company called Shriro, which said it had not identified any inherent defects in the Everdure Force 2 model that could lead to a fire. It said: 'Shriro takes customer complaints seriously and is committed to the quality and safety of our products. All Everdure brands are safety tested and comply with applicable safety standards.' The company said that because the barbecue had not been inspected by an expert, it wasn't in a position to determine the cause of the fire. • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts Under UK consumer law, you are entitled to a refund, repair or replacement if an item you have bought is faulty. But because you had owned the barbecue for more than six months, the onus was on you to prove that it was defective when you bought it. But your barbecue was also under warranty, which supplements your consumer rights, so you wanted to claim under that. A warranty would typically cover repairs or replacements, but given your justified concerns about the safety of the barbecue you just wanted a refund. Companies would normally inspect items to decide whether the issue was covered under warranty, but this had not happened in your case. Warranty claims are managed by Shriro's distributors, one of which had supplied the barbecue to John Lewis. It was unfair that you had initially been promised a refund only for the company to change its mind without ever inspecting the barbecue. Eventually, John Lewis agreed to give you the refund. It said: 'We serve millions of happy customers every year and recognise that we don't always get it right the first time. We're really sorry that this hasn't been the case for this customer. We recognise the severity of the fire safety concerns and we have ensured that the case is being thoroughly investigated by our supplier.' It also gave you a £350 John Lewis gift card. You said: 'We would like to say a big thank you for your involvement, without which I'm certain we would still be being stonewalled.' In preparation for attending the Royal Garden Party in Edinburgh, I ordered three dresses from the retailer Karen Millen. I paid £328, plus £9 for delivery. The dresses arrived swiftly but sadly none were suitable. On Karen Millen's website it gives the option to be refunded back to your original payment method or to get a voucher, so I selected the former. This was my first time buying anything from Karen Millen and I found the returns process quite tricky to navigate. Once the dresses had been sent back, I had an email saying that my refund was on its way and also giving me an extra £32 as a 'gift card uplift'. I didn't know what this meant. That same day I received a gift voucher from Karen Millen for £358. I was confused because I had asked for a refund and not a voucher. This figure also didn't correspond to what I had paid. I immediately contacted the company and after lots of back and forth with various agents, I was eventually told that I had selected the voucher option so it wasn't possible to refund me in cash. I am convinced that I had not opted for a voucher. Each item had to be returned separately, so even if I had mistakenly opted for a voucher on one occasion, I'm certain that I didn't on the other two items. I have been in constant communication with Karen Millen since then but it won't resolve my complaint. I have become very frustrated by this situation and just want my money Stirling When returning items to Karen Millen the default option is to get the money refunded as a voucher, which also gives you an extra 10 per cent on top — in your case that would have been an extra £32.80, or £32 if they didn't round up. It didn't make sense that your voucher only added £30 on top and it seemed strange to me that a voucher was the default option. I wondered if shoppers could be caught out by this. The company said it makes the two options clear. It also said that the choice you make with your first return will apply to the other items from the same order. You were adamant that you had selected the refund option. Karen Millen has now agreed to cancel the voucher and send £328 back to your credit card and has also given you a £30 gift voucher as an apology for the inconvenience. I spoke to Karen Millen's parent company, Debenhams Group, which said: 'We offer customers the choice between a gift card or a refund to their original payment method to provide greater flexibility and benefits for our regular shoppers. We encourage customers to check their refund selection carefully to ensure it meets their needs.' • £1,523,404 — the amount Your Money Matters has saved readers so far this year If you have a money problem you would like Katherine Denham to investigate email yourmoneymatters@ Please include a phone number
