Darwin uni's inaugural TEDx event welcomes regional expertise to global stage
Ten experts from various fields are gearing up to speak on the global TED stage for the first time, and the ABC has been given an insight into how it all works.
This Saturday's sold-out TEDx Charles Darwin University (CDU) show will hear from wildlife gurus, tech experts, environmental academics, social thought-leaders and more.
PhD candidate and crocodile expert Brandon Sideleau said preparing for the big event was "very much a team effort" between the university and its academics.
"I sent my script to the team and they said 'that's not going to work' because I was using some [technical] terminology," he said.
Mr Sideleau ditched the jargon in favour of storytelling, using real-life examples and photos to help the audience understand why crocodile attacks happen and how interactions with the predator can be limited without culling.
It's a timely reminder since the reptile has already been hunted to extinction in six countries and remains "critically endangered" in others.
"I'm nervous for sure, being on a stage of that scale and impact, but I'm also looking forward to getting the information out there," he said.
Mr Sideleau said it was important he pointed out "just how rare saltwater crocodile attacks are" locally.
Despite the fact at least a quarter of the global saltwater crocodile population lives in the Top End, Mr Sideleau's work exploring "the true extent" of fatal attacks found most of them happened overseas.
He discovered, across 14 countries, there were almost 300 crocodile attacks each year — about 150 of them proving fatal.
"I was noticing that that there were a lot of incidents in Indonesia especially," he said.
The NT researcher found "massive differences" in attack numbers due to the need for people in developing nations to bathe, fish and collect water around crocodile habitat.
"Here in Australia, almost all victims are attacked while engaging in leisure activities … compared to middle-income countries in general, 30 per cent of people are attacked while engaging in activities related to sanitation," he said.
Mr Sideleau said work needed to happen to help developing nations access plumbing, water pumps and wells.
CDU research fellow Sharna Motlap, who is presenting this weekend, has spoken at conferences in the past but never on the TED stage.
She's also feeling nervous ahead of the big show, but has a similar story-led strategy to Mr Sideleau that she hopes will engage the audience.
Ms Motlap said academic papers were "just love letters to other researchers", so she'll use storytelling to unpack complex ideas in a way the average viewer can understand.
"There's this great analogy in this book [which] discusses the concept of 'the best story wins,'" she said.
Ms Motlap's work, which looks to safeguard traditional dance by creating digital replicas, will be framed in an entertaining way — so the audience can expect to see video snippets from her lab and references to the famous Macarena.
She said it was important to help the crowd understand the research because "it's not about the technology, it's about what it can do".
In the same way Mr Sideleau's TED talk hopes to influence a better future, Ms Motlap wants to explain the benefits her project can have on future generations.
She's studying the same kind of technology that was used to produce the movie Avatar but, rather than creating for entertainment's sake, her work is protecting traditional culture and knowledge.
While director James Cameron's team used motion capture to make Na'vi movements reflect the actors playing the fictional blue characters, Ms Motlap has used the technology to digitise Indigenous dance.
"We place reflective markers on the dancer's body and then we use the system of cameras to track the reflective markers," she said.
It's a significant step forward from standard video recordings, with computer models able to calculate the angles of a dancer's joints and how force is applied to parts of their body.
Beyond immortalising the movements, her research protects the Indigenous culture and knowledge associated with those dances from being lost over time.
She described the territory as "a unique part of the world" and said there was plenty of excitement about the chance to share local research with a global audience.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
6 hours ago
- The Australian
Nuclear power: Expert reveals hidden cost of Australia's energy path
A leading British nuclear scientist has issued a warning to Australia that 'there are consequences' in rejecting nuclear energy as an energy source. Former chief scientific adviser to the UK Ministry of Defence Sir Robin Grimes said such a stance would likely put Australia in a weaker position to take advantage of the AI boom and invest in data centres. Sir Robin said the issue of nuclear energy was something Australia needed to 'debate', with the Coalition vowing to pursue it as part of its energy policy. 'Yes, you don't have to go nuclear, but there are consequences of deciding to use it and not use it,' he told NewsWire. 'It means that Australia will not be in as strong a position to do certain types of industrial processes. As a consequence, data centres, (AI and robotics) are much more difficult to have if you don't have that base-load capacity available to you.' A leading British nuclear scientist said there would be consequences if Australia chose to reject the use of nuclear energy in its grid. Picture: NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Sir Robin said while Australia was 'blessed with fantastic sunshine', nuclear should be considered as an alternative to costly batteries. In comparison, the UK generates about 15 per cent of its electricity from nuclear sources, with wind and gas also key players in its grid, accounting for 30 per cent of energy input. 'If you want energy security, and if you want a really robust system, then you're going to have to invest in phenomenal amounts of storage if you don't go nuclear,' Sir Robin said. 'Batteries don't generate energy. They're a tax on the energy that you're produced because you've having to store it … and the more energy you produce from intermittent renewables, the more storage you need and the greater the cost.' Australia's abundant supplies of uranium, which make up about 8 per cent of global production and are estimated to be about one-third of the world's uranium supply, could also be refined onshore, leading to new job markets, Sir Robin added. This could involve processing the uranium ore, refining it into yellowcake and converting it to uranium hexafluoride, steps that come before the compounds are enriched to create nuclear fuel. 'The question is, do you just dig the ore out the ground and shove it on a train and export it to somewhere that's going to do something with it, or do you go through some of the processes and retain more of the jobs associated with that in Australia,' Sir Robin said. Earlier this year, the Dutton-led Coalition took a nuclear policy to build seven reactors by 2050 to the federal election. Picture: NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Sir Robin's comments follow an Australia-first conference on nuclear energy hosted by the University of NSW in Sydney this week. The event featured talks from world-leading nuclear scientists, including Nuclear Energy Agency director-general William Magwood, US Department of Energy deputy assistant secretary Aleshia Duncan and Sir Robin. It follows the launch of Australia's first undergraduate honours degree in nuclear engineering, slated to start in 2026. UNSW's Nuclear Innovation Centre director Ed Obbard said he believed the nuclear debate would likely grow as Australia developed a domestic nuclear engineering workforce and through existing initiatives like the AUKUS submarine program and Sydney's OPAL reactor, which produces radioisotopes for medical imaging, cancer treatment and research. 'As the nuclear sector grows, both in Australia and worldwide, discussions on civilian nuclear energy will become increasingly realistic,' Dr Obbard said. 'Assuming that we still care about decarbonisation, nuclear is never going to go away.' However, Dr Obbard said Australia having a nuclear workforce was welcomed by both sides of politics. 'It doesn't matter whether you're Liberal and you think we need a workforce for a future nuclear workforce, or if you're Labor and you're desperate to find a workforce to show the Americans that we're doing OK with AUKUS,' he said. 'Or if you're a university where you have international students coming from around the world to study engineering at UNSW. 'You've got this tripling of capacity happening everywhere, and there's a huge nuclear skills shortage wherever you go, and everyone agrees on that.' The Coalition's energy spokesman Dan Tehan welcomed the conference and said 'having a conversation about zero emissions nuclear energy continues to be incredibly important for Australia and the world'. 'More and more countries are adopting nuclear energy as they seek energy abundance and to reduce their emissions, and this is something that should be on the agenda for discussion here in Australia,' he said. 'We've committed to the removal of the moratorium (on nuclear energy) and further policy is under review.' Jessica Wang NewsWire Federal Politics Reporter Jessica Wang is a federal politics reporter for NewsWire based in the Canberra Press Gallery. She previously covered NSW state politics for the Wire and has also worked at and Mamamia covering breaking news, entertainment, and lifestyle. @imjesswang_ Jessica Wang
News.com.au
12 hours ago
- News.com.au
Leading British nuclear scientist Sir Robin Grimes says Australia will face consequences if it rejects nuclear energy
A leading British nuclear scientist has issued a warning to Australia that 'there are consequences' in rejecting nuclear energy as an energy source. Former chief scientific adviser to the UK Ministry of Defence Sir Robin Grimes said such a stance would likely put Australia in a weaker position to take advantage of the AI boom and invest in data centres. Sir Robin said the issue of nuclear energy was something Australia needed to 'debate', with the Coalition vowing to pursue it as part of its energy policy. 'Yes, you don't have to go nuclear, but there are consequences of deciding to use it and not use it,' he told NewsWire. 'It means that Australia will not be in as strong a position to do certain types of industrial processes. As a consequence, data centres, (AI and robotics) are much more difficult to have if you don't have that base-load capacity available to you.' Sir Robin said while Australia was 'blessed with fantastic sunshine', nuclear should be considered as an alternative to costly batteries. In comparison, the UK generates about 15 per cent of its electricity from nuclear sources, with wind and gas also key players in its grid, accounting for 30 per cent of energy input. 'If you want energy security, and if you want a really robust system, then you're going to have to invest in phenomenal amounts of storage if you don't go nuclear,' Sir Robin said. 'Batteries don't generate energy. They're a tax on the energy that you're produced because you've having to store it … and the more energy you produce from intermittent renewables, the more storage you need and the greater the cost.' Australia's abundant supplies of uranium, which make up about 8 per cent of global production and are estimated to be about one-third of the world's uranium supply, could also be refined onshore, leading to new job markets, Sir Robin added. This could involve processing the uranium ore, refining it into yellowcake and converting it to uranium hexafluoride, steps that come before the compounds are enriched to create nuclear fuel. 'The question is, do you just dig the ore out the ground and shove it on a train and export it to somewhere that's going to do something with it, or do you go through some of the processes and retain more of the jobs associated with that in Australia,' Sir Robin said. Sir Robin's comments follow an Australia-first conference on nuclear energy hosted by the University of NSW in Sydney this week. The event featured talks from world-leading nuclear scientists, including Nuclear Energy Agency director-general William Magwood, US Department of Energy deputy assistant secretary Aleshia Duncan and Sir Robin. It follows the launch of Australia's first undergraduate honours degree in nuclear engineering, slated to start in 2026. UNSW's Nuclear Innovation Centre director Ed Obbard said he believed the nuclear debate would likely grow as Australia developed a domestic nuclear engineering workforce and through existing initiatives like the AUKUS submarine program and Sydney's OPAL reactor, which produces radioisotopes for medical imaging, cancer treatment and research. 'As the nuclear sector grows, both in Australia and worldwide, discussions on civilian nuclear energy will become increasingly realistic,' Dr Obbard said. 'Assuming that we still care about decarbonisation, nuclear is never going to go away.' However, Dr Obbard said Australia having a nuclear workforce was welcomed by both sides of politics. 'It doesn't matter whether you're Liberal and you think we need a workforce for a future nuclear workforce, or if you're Labor and you're desperate to find a workforce to show the Americans that we're doing OK with AUKUS,' he said. 'Or if you're a university where you have international students coming from around the world to study engineering at UNSW. 'You've got this tripling of capacity happening everywhere, and there's a huge nuclear skills shortage wherever you go, and everyone agrees on that.' The Coalition's energy spokesman Dan Tehan welcomed the conference and said 'having a conversation about zero emissions nuclear energy continues to be incredibly important for Australia and the world'. 'More and more countries are adopting nuclear energy as they seek energy abundance and to reduce their emissions, and this is something that should be on the agenda for discussion here in Australia,' he said. 'We've committed to the removal of the moratorium (on nuclear energy) and further policy is under review.'
News.com.au
15 hours ago
- News.com.au
How common infection carried through cat faeces can affect daily human behaviour
A very common parasite found in billions of people around the world – including 20 per cent of Australians – can affect mental health and reaction times, even leading to more car crashes. Toxoplasmosis is often carried in faeces of cats after eating a mouse, as well as in contaminated raw meat, and can be easily passed onto humans. Once in the body, the parasite can then affect a person's daily behaviour. It does not cause serious health risks to the average healthy person, but previous research has shown the infection is creating 'havoc' on people's dopamine levels, leading to a reduction in self-control, making more impulsive and high-risk decisions, and being impatient. Dr Michele Garagnani from the University of Melbourne told those infected are two per cent more likely to be involved in a car crash. 'Our study suggests... people take more risks, are less patient, have less self-control and are more likely to start entrepreneurial decisions, like companies and start ups that turn out to be risky or not founded so they fail (or) are actually not successful,' the senior lecturer said. 'All the studies have shown that people with toxoplasmosis are more likely to feel anxious, to be depressed and have more mental health issues.' There is no cure for toxoplasmosis and was once only detectable by blood or saliva swabs. However, Dr Garagnani and his team – consisting of Carlos Alós-Ferrer from Lancaster University in the UK and Anja Achtziger from Zeppelin University in Germany – have created a new online test for people around the world to check if they are infected. The 'simple' test involves assessing a person's reaction time. A subject is placed in front of a computer or similar device where they are asked to focus on the screen for two minutes. In that time the person must respond, for example, to the changing of colours, by pushing a button as quickly as possible. 'What we measure is both how quickly they react and how much they can sustain attention to a task,' Dr Garagnani told To confirm the validity of the new testing tool, the research team carried out head-to-head clinical trials and compared it to blood tests. The study found just under 80 participants had their reaction times analysed with RhD-negative blood types, which can slow a person's response by less than one second. The online test has a 97 per cent accuracy rate, according to research published in April. A larger study was then completed with 1,010 subjects who were then asked questions about their life, as well as employment and income. The results showed 10 per cent of people 'deemed' with toxoplasmosis are more likely to be unemployed and on average earned less than those who were not infected. 'We also found that those who were deemed infected were more likely to smoke, drink alcohol and experience mental health problems,' Dr Garagnani said. The test is not aimed to replace medical testing of toxoplasmosis but is hoped to allow more people to check whether they have the infection on a larger and cheaper scale. The senior lecturer at the University of Melbourne stressed people infected with toxoplasmosis cannot feel it in their daily lives and the effects are 'very small'. Dr Garagnani added the infection is a concern for individuals with weak immune systems, those with HIV and pregnant women as it can lead to serious health problems for the baby. The World Health Organisation (WHO) had previously labelled it as 'one of the most neglected parasitic infections'. But WHO recently provided an update to be 'less cautious' of it due to the rise in tuberculosis, 'the world's top infectious killer', which claims 4,500 lives and sees 30,000 people fall ill each day. 'They are still considering it as a neglected parasitic infection. It's insidious and growing instead of going down in the world population, which is alarming,' Dr Garagnani said. 'But it's an infection which has no medical symptoms during the lifelong part of the patient so it's less prevalent and less concerning than other sicknesses.'
