Kashmir: What's the way out of the India and Pakistan crisis?
Now passions are running high and the nationalist rhetoric has reached a crescendo on both sides. The neighbours are closer to war than in recent decades.Kashmir: Why India and Pakistan fight over itWhat we know about India's strikes on Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir'The World community is keeping quiet; that's dangerous,' Ayesha Siddiqa, a Pakistani academic who is a senior fellow at King's College London. 'Though the flare up has been happening for decades, this is the first time the two countries find themselves in a conflict without anyone monitoring them or forcefully telling them to stop,' she said.Unless Washington gets more involved, Islamabad and Delhi may continue with their accusations and counter-accusations.Although US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been telling the senior leaders of India and Pakistan to de-escalate, the message from other American leaders is different.US Vice-President JD Vance has said that a potential war between India and Pakistan would be "none of our business" during an interview with Fox News."We want this thing to de-escalate as quickly as possible. We can't control these countries, though," Vance said.Vance was on a visit to India when the militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians, took place.US President Donald Trump had earlier called rising tension between India and Pakistan a "shame".
During previous India-Pakistan skirmishes, for example in 2019, tension was defused quickly after India carried out what it called 'surgical strikes' on what it called terrorist camps inside Pakistan.One Indian military jet was shot down in the aftermath of the crisis and the pilot was captured by Pakistan. He was released two days later after reported intervention from Washington and other world powers. But the intensity of the current conflict is different and passions are running high on both sides.While the Trump administration's priorities are more about tariffs, China and Ukraine-Russia, it may require a concerted attempt by the international community to lower tension between the two nuclear-armed rivals.The other world power which has a stake in South Asia is China. Beijing has close economic and military ties with Islamabad. It has invested more than $50bn (£37.5bn) in Pakistan as parts of its China-Pakistan Economic Corridor to boost trade.China also has unresolved border issues with India and the two countries recently had a border clash in the Himalayan region 2020. Despite the tension, China is the second largest trading partner of India."If the US is uninterested [in resolving India-Pakistan tension] then other permanent members of the UN Security Council – P5 - should get involved. It is their responsibility as well," Shen Dingli, a Shanghai-based international affairs expert tells the BBC.As India accuses Pakistan of supporting the Kashmiri separatist rebels, who carried out the deadly attack on tourists last month, the Chinese academic says "the P-5 members can launch a credible investigation into the incident", to address India's concerns.
Gulf states like Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which have close ties to both the countries, could step up their mediation efforts.Saudi Arabian Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Adel Al-Jubeir arrived in Delhi on 7 May in what was seen as a surprise visit amid the backdrop of a spike in tensions between India and Pakistan. 'A good meeting with Adel Al-Jubeir," Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said, adding that his counterpart 'shared India's perspective on firmly countering terrorism'.The Saudi minister arrived in Islamabad on Friday for talks with Pakistan's leaders.There are an estimated 2.6 million Pakistanis living and working in the Gulf Kingdom. Riyadh has considerable influence in Pakistan.Saudi Arabia has loaned billions of dollars to Pakistan to bail out the country during economic crises over the years.One way out of the current crisis could be a situation where both sides can claim victory to satisfy their audience.Delhi says the missile strikes on suspected militant hideouts inside Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir were part of a commitment to hold 'accountable' those responsible for the last month's attack in Pahalgam. 'India has already said it has achieved its objectives. Now, the ball is in Pakistan's court. If they wish to retaliate then that would elicit a strong response from India,' retired Indian Lt Gen D S Hooda said. For Pakistan, especially for its powerful military, it would want to show its people that it can stand up against India and teach it a lesson once again by downing five of the Indian air force jets during a dog fight. India has not acknowledged the loss of any of its fighter jets in the current skirmish.But according to Pakistani academic Siddiqa, how the current crisis ends depends on what India's stated objectives are.'India's goal posts keep changing day by day – from punishing Pakistan to attaining something more,' she said.
You may also be interested in:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
10 minutes ago
- Reuters
France's Macron says he coordinated position on Ukraine crisis with India's Modi
PARIS, Aug 21 (Reuters) - French President Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday that he had spoken with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, with the two leaders coordinating their positions on the war in Ukraine. Macron added that on trade issues, the two leaders agreed to strengthen economic exchanges and strategic partnerships. India has come under pressure from the United States over its purchases of Russian oil and goods from the country are facing additional tariffs of up to 50%, among the highest imposed by Washington, over the issue.
Reuters
42 minutes ago
- Reuters
India, Russia agree to boost trade ties after foreign ministers meet in Moscow
MOSCOW, Aug 21 (Reuters) - India and Russia agreed to boost trade ties on Thursday as their foreign ministers met in Moscow, giving little indication that U.S. President Donald Trump's hefty tariffs on India for buying Russian oil would disrupt their relations. Indian goods face additional U.S. tariffs of up to 50%, among the highest imposed by Washington, due to New Delhi's increased purchases of Russian oil. Western countries boycotting Russian crude say India's purchases are helping to fund Moscow's war in Ukraine. But New Delhi says its purchases are purely commercial transactions, and accuses the U.S. and European Union of double standards, noting that they continue significant trade with Moscow themselves. "We have good results in cooperation in the hydrocarbon sector, in the supply of Russian oil to the Indian market. And we have a mutual interest in implementing joint projects for the extraction of energy resources, including in the Russian Federation - in the Far East and on the Arctic shelf," Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said at a joint news conference with Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar. Jaishankar said that relations between the two countries had been among the steadiest of major nations in the world since World War Two, referring to a close friendship going back to the days of the Soviet Union. The two countries reaffirmed their ambition to expand bilateral trade, including by increasing India's exports to Russia, Jaishankar said, according to a statement from India's foreign ministry. "This (trade expansion) requires swiftly addressing non-tariff barriers and regulatory impediments," Jaishankar said. "Enhancing Indian exports to Russia in sectors like pharmaceuticals, agriculture and textiles will certainly help to correct the current imbalance." Russia was able to divert its exports of oil, a significant source of state revenue, away from Europe and mainly to China and India after the West imposed sanctions on Moscow over its conflict in Ukraine. India and China are the biggest buyers of Russia's oil. Russian embassy officials in New Delhi said on Wednesday that Russia expected to continue supplying oil to India despite pressure from the United States, adding that Moscow hoped trilateral talks with India and China would soon take place.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
India's flight safety systems face ‘existential threat' from staff shortage, committee warns
Indian MPs have raised alarm over staff shortages at the air safety regulator, describing it as an 'existential threat' to flight safety systems in the country. The parliamentary committee was tasked with reviewing the workings of the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) after the devastating crash of an Air India plane that killed 260 people in June, the world's worst aviation disaster for a decade. The committee warned that the regulator was grappling "with a profound and persistent shortage of technical and regulatory personnel," with almost half of its posts unfilled. Staffing shortages at the DGCA were "an existential threat to the integrity of India's aviation safety system," said the transport, tourism and culture committee report that also followed several helicopter accidents in northern India. Days before the Ahmedabad crash in June, prime minister Narendra Modi had spoken about how India is banking on its booming aviation sector to support wider development goals. Wednesday's report warned that the rapid pace at which new aircraft are being acquired by India's airlines, outpacing the development of airport infrastructure, is straining facilities to their limits, compromising service quality and narrowing safety margins. 'This deficit is not a mere administrative statistic; it is a critical vulnerability that exists at the very heart of India's safety oversight system, occurring precisely at a time when the sector's unprecedented growth demands more, not less, regulatory vigilance and capacity,' the report warned. It said the root of the crisis lay in an outdated recruitment model under which an agency hires personnel on behalf of the DGCA. It said the civil aviation ministry, which houses the regulator, had described the process as 'slow and inflexible', and that the DGCA struggles to attract and retain highly skilled professionals as a result. Civil aviation minister Ram Mohan Naidu told lawmakers last month that the government would fill 190 of the more than 500 unfilled positions in the DGCA by October. The parliamentary committee recommended launching a focused recruitment campaign and suggested a new regulatory authority could be created to replace the DGCA. The committee also said India's air traffic controllers were under immense pressure due to staffing shortages caused by failures in workforce planning. Some air traffic controllers were not adequately trained, the committee added. The report criticised the Airports Authority of India and the DGCA for a "deeply troubling practice" of not following duty time limitations for the controllers, saying that raised the risk of fatigue and increased the chances of a controller error. Pointing to recent helicopter crashes, the committee proposed a unified national regulatory framework for all state-operated services, supported by mandatory pilot training tailored to specific terrains. It noted that fragmented state-level oversight has led to 'unacceptable safety gaps' in high-risk areas and urged stronger central intervention.
