Kashmir: What's the way out of the India and Pakistan crisis?
As the continuing India-Pakistan crisis takes a dangerous turn, nations around the world are urging calm.The initial thinking was that after India launched air strikes, and with Pakistan claiming to have shot down several Indian jets - a claim Delhi has not confirmed - both sides could claim "victory" and de-escalate.But there's a danger that any protracted tit-for-tat attacks could lead them to a far more damaging prospect.During past conflicts, such as in 2019 and 2016, it was the United States and a few other global powers that put pressure on Delhi and Islamabad to bring the situation under control and de-escalate.
Now passions are running high and the nationalist rhetoric has reached a crescendo on both sides. The neighbours are closer to war than in recent decades.Kashmir: Why India and Pakistan fight over itWhat we know about India's strikes on Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir'The World community is keeping quiet; that's dangerous,' Ayesha Siddiqa, a Pakistani academic who is a senior fellow at King's College London. 'Though the flare up has been happening for decades, this is the first time the two countries find themselves in a conflict without anyone monitoring them or forcefully telling them to stop,' she said.Unless Washington gets more involved, Islamabad and Delhi may continue with their accusations and counter-accusations.Although US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been telling the senior leaders of India and Pakistan to de-escalate, the message from other American leaders is different.US Vice-President JD Vance has said that a potential war between India and Pakistan would be "none of our business" during an interview with Fox News."We want this thing to de-escalate as quickly as possible. We can't control these countries, though," Vance said.Vance was on a visit to India when the militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians, took place.US President Donald Trump had earlier called rising tension between India and Pakistan a "shame".
During previous India-Pakistan skirmishes, for example in 2019, tension was defused quickly after India carried out what it called 'surgical strikes' on what it called terrorist camps inside Pakistan.One Indian military jet was shot down in the aftermath of the crisis and the pilot was captured by Pakistan. He was released two days later after reported intervention from Washington and other world powers. But the intensity of the current conflict is different and passions are running high on both sides.While the Trump administration's priorities are more about tariffs, China and Ukraine-Russia, it may require a concerted attempt by the international community to lower tension between the two nuclear-armed rivals.The other world power which has a stake in South Asia is China. Beijing has close economic and military ties with Islamabad. It has invested more than $50bn (£37.5bn) in Pakistan as parts of its China-Pakistan Economic Corridor to boost trade.China also has unresolved border issues with India and the two countries recently had a border clash in the Himalayan region 2020. Despite the tension, China is the second largest trading partner of India."If the US is uninterested [in resolving India-Pakistan tension] then other permanent members of the UN Security Council – P5 - should get involved. It is their responsibility as well," Shen Dingli, a Shanghai-based international affairs expert tells the BBC.As India accuses Pakistan of supporting the Kashmiri separatist rebels, who carried out the deadly attack on tourists last month, the Chinese academic says "the P-5 members can launch a credible investigation into the incident", to address India's concerns.
Gulf states like Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which have close ties to both the countries, could step up their mediation efforts.Saudi Arabian Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Adel Al-Jubeir arrived in Delhi on 7 May in what was seen as a surprise visit amid the backdrop of a spike in tensions between India and Pakistan. 'A good meeting with Adel Al-Jubeir," Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said, adding that his counterpart 'shared India's perspective on firmly countering terrorism'.The Saudi minister arrived in Islamabad on Friday for talks with Pakistan's leaders.There are an estimated 2.6 million Pakistanis living and working in the Gulf Kingdom. Riyadh has considerable influence in Pakistan.Saudi Arabia has loaned billions of dollars to Pakistan to bail out the country during economic crises over the years.One way out of the current crisis could be a situation where both sides can claim victory to satisfy their audience.Delhi says the missile strikes on suspected militant hideouts inside Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir were part of a commitment to hold 'accountable' those responsible for the last month's attack in Pahalgam. 'India has already said it has achieved its objectives. Now, the ball is in Pakistan's court. If they wish to retaliate then that would elicit a strong response from India,' retired Indian Lt Gen D S Hooda said. For Pakistan, especially for its powerful military, it would want to show its people that it can stand up against India and teach it a lesson once again by downing five of the Indian air force jets during a dog fight. India has not acknowledged the loss of any of its fighter jets in the current skirmish.But according to Pakistani academic Siddiqa, how the current crisis ends depends on what India's stated objectives are.'India's goal posts keep changing day by day – from punishing Pakistan to attaining something more,' she said.
You may also be interested in:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Boeing rebuilding trust as airline bosses see improved jet quality
NEW DELHI, June 5 (Reuters) - Airline bosses are tentatively voicing greater confidence in Boeing's (BA.N), opens new tab ability to deliver jets at the right quality in a step towards ending years of reputational damage for the embattled planemaker. An annual summit of airline leaders in New Delhi this week struck a more optimistic tone about Boeing's recovery from overlapping safety, regulatory and industrial crises, though executives stressed Boeing still had much work left to do. "What we've seen quarter to quarter is an improvement in safety, an improvement in quality," Seattle-based Alaska Airlines (ALK.N), opens new tab CEO Ben Minicucci told Reuters at the International Air Transport Association's annual meeting. "Are they yet there? No, there's still a lot of work." In January last year, a door missing four bolts blew off a new Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 MAX jet at 16,000 feet. The ripple effect from the incident caused a crisis throughout the aviation industry, hitting suppliers, carriers and passengers. Planemakers often have to run the gauntlet of airline criticism at IATA's annual meeting, where IATA head Willie Walsh last year urged Boeing to learn from errors that fuelled a crisis beginning with fatal crashes of two MAX jets in 2018 and 2019. One of Boeing's most vocal recent critics has been Tim Clark, president of Emirates, the largest customer for big jets like the Boeing 777 and its long-delayed successor the 777X. At his annual sit-down with reporters at the summit this year, Clark spoke more positively about getting "clearer messages" from Boeing's recently appointed leadership. He welcomed a change of style under CEO Kelly Ortberg, revealing he had never met Ortberg's ousted predecessor Dave Calhoun. "It was nice to meet the head of Boeing," he said. Clark, whose airline has 205 of the still uncertified 777X on order, suggested growing confidence from Boeing in private. "When I talk about cautious optimism, in the last few years I had seen none of that" he said. Ortberg, who took the helm last August, has said he will address safety and quality concerns and repair trust with regulators, staff and customers. Boeing customers said the measures are showing some results. While Boeing is still trying to ramp up production, there have been improvements in quality and visibility of deliveries. "There is still further to go but it is definitely an improving story," said Peter Barrett, CEO of lessor SMBC Aviation, a major leasing company and Boeing customer. Few are taking Boeing's recovery solely on trust. Alaska Airlines has sent its own quality inspectors to Boeing's production lines and commissioned a quarterly audit. Alaska's Minicucci said Boeing had put in a "very diligent, deliberate process" to reduce out-of-sequence work, a disruption to normal factory flows blamed in part for the oversight of the missing bolts. He noted that Ortberg, who has moved to Seattle to be closer to the biggest jet plants, and Boeing Commercial Airplanes CEO Stephanie Pope, appointed last March, regularly tour factories. "They're getting out there, they're walking the floor, they're feeling what's going on," Minicucci said. "I think that's different to what happened in the past." Other customers have noted progress, despite a bruising strike last year which halted most of Boeing's jet production. United Airlines (UAL.O), opens new tab CEO Scott Kirby, who took part in a revolt by U.S. airlines that triggered Calhoun's exit after the Alaska incident, said last week Boeing had "turned the corner". Still, few airline chiefs have any illusions about the scale of turnaround needed to restore the status of Boeing factories. "When I was there last year... I thought this is going nowhere at this rate," Clark said, adding he would return this year to see for himself the progress made since then. Boeing declined to comment on specific airline opinions. Nor does the brighter public tone mean airlines will necessarily ease pressure in private as they wait for new jets. But several airline executives at the IATA event acknowledged that Boeing had passed one key test of support at the industry's biggest annual podium, as it slowly stabilises production. "We have got a lot of work still to do (but) there is a lot of positivity from customers on our performance in the first five months of the year," Boeing Senior Vice President of Commercial Sales Brad McMullen said. It now faces a decisive test as regulators review higher output after Boeing hit a temporary ceiling of 38 MAX jets a month. It also seeks certification of models including the 777X. The acting head of the Federal Aviation Administration said on Wednesday higher output would not happen straightaway. Originally due to receive the 777X in 2020, Clark held out little hope of getting the upgraded jet before IATA meets again in June next year. Boeing has said it is now due in 2026. "The important thing is they get it out and it's certified to the rigours of the new Boeing: the new approach to building aircraft, safety of operation and all the quality controls that they were having difficulties with prior to that," Clark said.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
MP repeats calls for inquiry into British role in 1984 storming of Golden Temple
A Labour MP has called for an independent, judge-led public inquiry into the British involvement in the storming of the Golden Temple at Amritsar more than 40 years ago which saw hundreds of people killed. Warinder Juss (Wolverhampton West) referred to official documents released by the government in 2014 which showed the UK was aware of the plans by then- Indian president Indira Gandhi for troops to storm the temple to break up a protest by Sikh separatists who wanted an independent homeland to be formed, called Khalistan. The documents indicated Margaret Thatcher's government sent an SAS officer to help the Indian government plan the attack in 1984. Thousands of protesters gathered in central London on Sunday to call on the Government to honour previous manifesto commitments, and pledges by Sir Keir Starmer, to hold an independent inquiry. Speaking at business questions in the Commons, Mr Juss said: 'I was in the House during business questions on January 9 when (Tan Singh Dhesi) referred to the storming of the Golden Temple in Amritsar in June 1984, ordered by the then-Indian government. 'Documents revealed in 2014 said that the Thatcher government had helped their Indian counterpart by providing advice for Operation Blue Star. Since 2014, there have been many calls made and assurances given to establish the extent of the British government's involvement. 'So will the leader of the House please now agree for a statement to be given to the House for an independent, judge-led public inquiry, to get to the bottom of what happened, in her own words.' After the protest on Sunday, Mr Dhesi, a Labour MP, told Sky News he had been informed by ministers and Downing Street that an inquiry was 'under consideration'. After the release of documents in 2014, an internal government review found the UK's role was 'purely advisory' and given months beforehand. Then-foreign secretary William Hague said British military advice was given to India ahead of the deadly attack but said it had only 'limited impact'. Official Indian figures put the death toll at 575 according to the former Tory leader, who now sits as Lord Hague of Richmond in the House of Lords. Commons leader Lucy Powell said: 'It was raised with me previously a few months ago and I made clear what I hope would happen on that occasion. I absolutely understand the concerns of members across this House and from those from the Sikh community and many of those he represents as well. 'I did follow up when I was asked that previously, I have followed up these issues with the Foreign Office. I'm sorry to say I'm still waiting to hear about that from them, but I will ensure that when I do, he and other members are made fully aware of that and the House is updated.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Strip baby penguins of English names, demand Indian nationalists
Three baby penguins in a Mumbai zoo must be stripped of their English names and given local ones instead, India's ruling BJP party has demanded. Leaders of the Right-wing Hindu nationalist party, led by Narendra Modi, the prime minister, said three-month-old Noddy, Tom and Pingu were born in the state of Maharashtra and should therefore have Marathi names. 'These chicks were born here, on our soil. They should reflect the Marathi identity. So why can't the penguins have a Marathi name?' Atul Shah, a BJP spokesman, told The Telegraph. He said the party had suggested three alternative names to zoo authorities – Adu, Sanju and Teju – and added: 'It's a reasonable demand, and we are confident that they will accept it.' Nitin Bankar, a local BJP leader, said he had written to authorities at the Byculla zoo where the penguins are kept at least twice a week since they were named in April. This week, he led a protest outside the zoo, where demonstrators were seen holding penguin cutouts with red crosses over their disputed names. Mr Bankar warned that the protests could continue and said he would try to have the zoo shut down if the chicks were not given Marathi names within 10 days. Despite initial concerns that penguins would not survive India's heat, the birds have become a major attraction since the zoo acquired eight Humboldt penguins from South Korea in 2016. Zoo authorities have received praise for successfully breeding penguin chicks, which have so far been given English names such as Flipper, Daisy, Bubble, Mr Molt and Dory. The birds are monogamous and known for their lifelong pair bond with Mr Molt, the youngest male, and Flipper, the oldest female, becoming the zoo's most celebrated couple. The penguins are kept within a climate-controlled 1,800 sq ft enclosure fitted with surveillance cameras, rocky terrain, synthetic ponds, and ice features. Most other animals at the zoo have been given names of Indian origin. The penguin controversy comes as political parties gear up for the upcoming municipal elections in Mumbai, which have often been fought over cultural identity issues.
