
Hamas facing financial and administrative crisis as revenue dries up
Nor can the Hamas Administration meet the payroll of police and ministry employees in Gaza, where the group has been the governing authority since 2007, or continue to pay death benefits to the families of fighters killed, according to Ailam, a local Palestinian policeman, and two other Gazans.
Ibrahim Madhoun, a Gazan analyst close to Hamas, said that the group had not prepared for more than a year of war and has been forced to adopt austerity measures, such as cutting administrative costs and salaries, while trying to maintain some basic services and thus some semblance of governing authority.
For instance, it set up emergency committees that provide basic local services such as garbage collection and management of generator fuel.
To pick up some of the slack, Madhoun said, Hamas also relies on efforts of the local community and the 'strong social network that helps absorb the shocks'.
Hamas officials did not respond to requests for comment about the group's financial health.
Hamas and Israel are currently negotiating over a possible 60-day ceasefire, with Israel seeking to ensure that it can maintain pressure on Hamas and the militant group looking for a lifeline. All sides say the talks are making progress, but an agreement remains elusive.
Earlier in the war, Hamas relied on taxes imposed on commercial shipments and the seizure of humanitarian goods, according to Gazans and current and former Israeli and foreign officials.
According to a Gazan who has worked at the border, plainclothes Hamas personnel routinely took inventory of goods at the Rafah crossing, until it closed last year, and at the Kerem Shalom crossing, though it was under IDF control.
They also surveyed warehouses and markets.
Most of the Palestinians interviewed for this story spoke either on the condition of anonymity or that only their first name be used, for fear of reprisal by Hamas.
The United Nations, the European Commission and major international aid organisations have said they have no evidence that Hamas has systematically stolen their aid, and the Israeli Government has not provided proof.
Hamas profited 'especially off the aid that had cost them nothing but whose prices they hike up', said a Gazan contractor who has worked at Gaza's border crossings during the war.
Over nearly two years, he said, he saw Hamas routinely collect 20,000 shekels (about US$6000) from local merchants, threatening to confiscate their trucks if they did not pay.
He recalled that civil servants for the Hamas-led government said several times that they would kill him or call him a collaborator with Israel if he did not co-operate with their demands to divert aid. He said he refused. But he added that he knew at least two aid truck drivers who he said were killed by Hamas for refusing to pay.
When Israel imposed a siege on Gaza in March, shortly before breaking a two-month ceasefire with Hamas, most of those shipments came to a halt.
Hamas officials did not respond to requests for comment about accounts that it has taxed or impounded commercial shipments, stolen humanitarian aid, or extorted local businessmen.
Aid trucks pass through the Egyptian side of the Rafah crossing into Gaza on the day the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas came into force, on January 19. Photo / Loay Ayyoub, for the Washington Post
Hamas under pressure
Hamas triggered the devastating war in Gaza by attacking Israel on October 7, 2023, killing some 1200 people and taking about 250 others back into Gaza as hostages.
Since then, the Israeli military campaign has killed more than 58,000 people, mostly women and children, Gazan health authorities say.
An Israeli military official said Hamas has lost 90% of its leadership and 90% of its weapons stockpiles over the course of the conflict. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to talk to the news media.
In the early phase of the war, Hamas had rushed to stash cash and supplies underground, but those have run short.
In March 2024, the Israeli Army said that it confiscated more than US$3 million from the tunnels beneath al-Shifa Hospital, in northern Gaza, according to a statement in the IDF's WhatsApp group.
But Hamas has profited off commercial trade and humanitarian aid, netting hundreds of millions of dollars, according to two Israeli military officials and an Israeli intelligence official, who all spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive findings.
For instance, the officials said, Hamas seized at least 15% of some goods, like flour, and aid vouchers that international agencies had intended to provide to hungry Gazans. These officials said some of that was given to Hamas personnel and supporters while the rest was sold to make money.
Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib, a Palestinian American who leads the advocacy group Realign for Palestine, said that Hamas repeatedly modified its strategy for profiting off aid and commerce while counting on the humanitarian crisis to bring the war to an end.
'Hamas's strategy relied on the suffering of Gazans,' said Alkhatib. 'But when this strategy failed, it foolishly doubled down on this approach, in large part because it had nothing else in its toolbox to deal with Israel's ferocious reaction to October 7 and the world's inability to stop it.'
'Hamas sees aid as its most important currency,' said a man from Deir al-Balah, in central Gaza, who helps manage the distribution of aid.
He said that while most of the population had to scrape for water and food, people affiliated with Hamas had been gifted boxes of aid meant for wider distribution.
The IDF, citing intelligence, says the aid organisations targeted by Hamas have included UN agencies and NGOs.
The Israeli Government has used allegations of widespread Hamas theft to justify draconian restrictions on humanitarian assistance entering Gaza and to justify bombing aid depots.
Some far-right members of the Israeli Government have said these restrictions are useful in pressuring Hamas into making negotiating concessions and in turning Gaza's population against Hamas.
Israel has not provided public proof that Hamas has systematically stolen aid brought into Gaza under the UN system, and despite requests from the Washington Post to officials in the IDF, the Israeli Foreign Ministry and the prime minister's office, no evidence has been provided to substantiate reports of widespread diversion of UN food aid.
Nor has Israel privately presented proof to humanitarian organisations or Western government officials, even when they have pressed for evidence, according to interviews with more than a dozen aid officials and several current and former Western officials.
Carl Skau, deputy executive director for the UN's World Food Programme, one of the main providers of flour in Gaza throughout the war, said in an interview that systematic aid diversion by Hamas 'has not been an issue for us so far in the conflict'.
WFP previously reported three instances of looting of its supplies during 21 months of war.
'We have mitigating measures that we have drawn lessons from over the past 40 years operating in these kinds of complex environments with armed groups,' he said. 'We are putting all those mitigating measures in place.'
Officials from several major international aid organisations have also said that there has been no systematic diversion of their aid by Hamas and that they have robust procedures for tracking aid as it enters Gaza and is distributed.
An Egyptian official briefed on intelligence, however, said that Hamas had indeed stolen some of this food aid.
'Hamas is trying to use the aid to survive. It's happening,' said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to talk to the news media.
Thousands of displaced Palestinians evacuate shortly before the Israeli warplanes targeted a building in the Al-Nasr neighbourhood in central Gaza on July 21. Photo / Getty Images
Push for old system
Among the group's demands in negotiations with Israel over a new ceasefire deal is the reopening of Gaza's borders and the surging of humanitarian aid - partly to alleviate the severe shortage of food that has turned public opinion against Hamas, but also to revive its cash flow, said an official familiar with the talks who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive deliberations.
'One of the reasons that Hamas is pushing for a return to the old system is that they have guys in all of the warehouses,' said a Western official.
The presence of employees of the Gaza government allows Hamas to regulate and monitor market activities, as well as tax or seize some of the supplies at times, said a high-level Israeli official.
Until commercial shipments into Gaza were suspended in October, Hamas taxed these imports at the border and, if traders refused, commandeered a portion of their trucks and sold their contents to Gazan merchants, according to a Gazan economic reporter.
He said that before the war, 'fuel and cigarettes were the highest taxed and most profitable items for the Hamas government in Gaza', adding that revenue data has been difficult to access.
A Gazan businessman said Hamas had imposed a tax of a least 20% on many goods.
But the group also would take control of trucks carrying high-demand goods like flour, which could sell for up to US$30 for a kilogram, and steal fuel meant for aid groups.
Fuel supplies have produced high revenue for Hamas during the war, with the group both taxing and seizing fuel stored at service stations for sale, said an Israeli military official.
In addition to taxing goods, Hamas also made money by allowing associated merchants to sell imported staples like sugar and flour at inflated prices without fear of being punished for price gouging, according to the IDF, which cited an internal Hamas document obtained by the military.
The Gazan economic reporter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation, confirmed that these merchants are allowed to sell goods at inflated prices.
He said Hamas would at times constrain supply on the market by ordering others to withhold distribution for several days, thus forcing up prices.
When Israel resumed the war in March, Hamas saw its revenue tumble as imports and aid shipments into Gaza largely were reduced to a trickle.
The establishment in May of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation - a food assistance programme backed by the US and Israel whose operations have been overshadowed by the repeated fatal shooting of Palestinians seeking aid at its centres - has deprived Hamas of earlier revenue, the Israeli military official said.
Palestinians carry sacks of food aid in Gaza City on July 20. Last weekend Israeli soldiers shot Palestinians near an Israeli-backed aid site and a UN convoy. Photo / Saher Alghorra, the New York Times
Mounting repression
As Hamas has come under growing military and financial pressures, it has become increasingly repressive in a bid to show it is still in control.
Gazans interviewed for this story spoke of growing fear of retribution. In videos posted since this northern spring on social media by a Hamas-linked unit formed to dole out punishments, masked gunmen are shown beating up and shooting the legs of men accused of stealing aid.
Gazans said Hamas is also seeking to intimidate those critical of the group.
Last month, for instance, Mowafeq Khdour, 31, was robbed and brutally beaten by dozens of armed Hamas men after he spoke out publicly against Hamas, his brother Mahmoud said over WhatsApp.
As Hamas adopts harsher policies, the group's popularity is falling, said Rami, a 40-year-old employee of the Hamas-run government who spoke on the condition that only his first name be used out of concern for his safety.
He said the anger on Gaza's streets is markedly different from the optimism earlier in the conflict, when 'we believed we were on the brink of liberating Palestine or achieving a major victory in the war', especially with Hamas and its allies holding about 250 people hostage.
'Israel's actions are undeniably criminal, but Hamas's poor judgment and failure to account for the war's aftermath have also contributed significantly to this disaster,' Rami said.
- Miriam Berger and Lior Soroka contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
British Prime Minister expected to set out proposals in what insiders envisage as public ‘moment'
Emmanuel Macron, the French President, last week became the first leader of a G7 nation to announce that he would take the step , with the formal change coming at the United Nations General Assembly in September. It came after weeks of private discussions with the United Kingdom and other allies about how and when to announce the recognition of Palestine. British officials have long favoured attaching conditions to the move to deliver tangible changes in the stance taken by Hamas, the terror group that rules Gaza and was responsible for the October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel. Macron argued that the announcement alone could trigger progress towards peace. Today Donald Trump, the United States President, appeared to clear the way for Starmer to change the UK's stance on recognition, saying the Prime Minister was free to take a new position. But No 10 will still be carefully calibrating Washington's reaction to any new declaration after Marco Rubio, the US Secretary of State, last week accused Macron of serving 'Hamas propaganda'. Today a US State Department spokesman described a United Nations conference to discuss recognition of Palestine – being attended by David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary – as 'unproductive and ill-timed'. The spokesman said: 'This is a publicity stunt that comes in the middle of delicate diplomatic efforts to end the conflict'. Around 150 of the countries that are members of the UN, some three-quarters of the total, have already recognised Palestine as a state – but not the UK, the US or the biggest European economies. Britain's long-standing position has been that the step will be taken but only when it can help the peace process in the Middle East. The images of malnutrition in Gaza, including of starving children, that have made the front pages as Israel limits access to aid have fuelled renewed debate within the UK about recognition. Behind the scenes, Cabinet ministers including Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, and Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, are pushing Sir Keir to take the step. Last week, 135 Labour MPs signed a letter calling for the recognition of Palestinian statehood, while Labour mayors and the party's Scottish leadership are also piling on the pressure. Starmer has recalled his Cabinet from the northern summer parliamentary recess for a discussion about Gaza at 2am Wednesday NZT which is expected to include the approach on statehood and increased delivery of aid. Speaking to reporters during his meeting with Trump in Scotland today, the Prime Minister made clear his shock at the photographs of starvation coming from Gaza. He said: 'Certainly, speaking for the British public and myself, those images of starving children in particular are revolting and there's a sense of revulsion in the British public at what they're seeing. And they know and we know that humanitarian aid needs to get in at speed, at volume.' Trump also publicly pressed Israel to do more to get food to the Palestinians, saying there was 'real starvation' in Gaza and that the US would be setting up places with 'no boundaries' that people could reach by walking. Starmer has been hardening his rhetoric on recognising Palestine in recent days, when he also has been talking to both Macron and Friedrich Merz, the German Chancellor, about Gaza. On Friday NZT, he said it was the 'inalienable right' of Palestinians to have their own state. The following day he said he was 'unequivocal' that recognition was necessary for 'lasting peace'. But placing caveats on the declaration when he unveils his plan later this week, rather than announcing the move immediately, would risk a backlash from some in Labour. Labour MPs have expressed concerns to the Telegraph that delays could benefit the new hard-left party being set up by Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader, which is championing Palestine. One Labour MP said: 'There are millions of voters deeply worried about Gaza. I think the Government are in deep trouble on the issue. 'They need to move fast but it may be too late to win voters back … This is why so many Labour MPs are so worried about their own seats.' Sir Keir is taking part in discussions, led by Jordan, about whether aid can be dropped into Gaza to help ease malnutrition. At the weekend, Israel announced that it would suspend fighting in three areas of Gaza for 10 hours a day and open secure routes for aid delivery. Starmer's official spokesman said the plan coming later this week would build 'on the collaboration to date that paves the way to a long-term solution on security in the region'. He added: 'The Prime Minister will be presenting that plan to other key allies, including the US and Arab states, over the coming days, and indeed convening Cabinet this week. You can expect to see more coming out of that.'


Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
When Israelis Call It Out: Finding Genocide In Gaza
It's been almost an article of faith among Israeli officials: the state they represent is incapable of genocide, their actions always spurred by the noblest, necessary motivations of self-defence against satanic enemies who wish genocide upon Jews. Over time, as Holocaust scholar Omer Bartov writes, 'Ethical concerns and moral qualms were brushed aside as either marginal or distracting in the face of the ultimate cataclysm that is the genocide of the Jews.' This form of reasoning, known otherwise as 'Holocaust-ism' or 'Shoah-tiyut', is a moral conceit left bare in the war of annihilation being waged in Gaza against the Palestinian populace. Israeli human rights groups have taken note of this, despite the drained reserves of empathy evident in the Israel proper. (A Pew Research Center poll conducted last month found that a mere 16% of Jewish Israelis thought peaceful coexistence with Palestinians was possible.) In its latest report pointedly titled Our Genocide, the Israeli human rights organisation B'Tselem offers a blunt assessment: 'Israel's policy in the Gaza Strip and its horrific outcomes, together with statements by senior Israeli politicians and military commanders about the goals of the attack, leads us to the unequivocal conclusion that Israel is taking coordinated action to intentionally destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza Strip. In other words: Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.' The infliction of genocide, the organisation acknowledges, is a matter of 'multiple and parallel practices' applied over a period of time, with killing being merely one component. Living conditions can be destroyed, concentration camps and zones created, populations expelled and policies to systematically prevent reproduction enacted. 'Accordingly, genocidal acts are various actions intended to bring about the destruction of a distinct group, as part of a deliberate, coordinated effort by a ruling authority.' Our Genocide suggests that certain conditions often precede the sparking of a genocide. Israel's relations with Palestinians had been characterised by 'broader patterns of settler-colonialism', with the intention of ensuring 'Jewish supremacy over Palestinians – economically, politically, socially, and culturally.' B'Tselem draws upon three crucial elements centred on ensuring 'Jewish supremacy over Palestinians': 'life under an apartheid regime that imposes separation, demographic engineering, and ethnic cleansing; systemic and institutionalized use of violence against Palestinians, while the perpetrators enjoy impunity; and institutionalized mechanisms of dehumanization and framing Palestinians as an existential threat.' The attacks on Israel by Hamas and other militant groups on October 7, 2023 was a violent event that created a 'sense of existential threat among the perpetrating group' enabling the 'ruling system to carry out genocide.' As B'Tselem Executive Director Yuli Novak notes, this sense of threat was promoted by an 'extremist, far-right messianic government' to pursue 'an agenda of destruction and expulsion.' Israeli policy in the Strip since October 2023 could not be rationalised as a focused, targeted attempt to destroy the rule of Hamas or its military efficacy. 'Statements by senior Israeli decision-makers about the nature and assault in Gaza have expressed genocidal intent throughout.' Ditto Israeli military officers of all ranks. Gaza's residents had been dehumanised, with many Jewish-Israelis believing 'that their lives are of negligible value compared to Israel's national goals, if not worthless altogether.' The report also notes the use of certain terminology that haunts the literature of genocidal euphemism: the creation of 'humanitarian zones' that would still be bombed despite supposedly providing protection for displaced civilians; the use of 'kill zones' by the Israeli military and the absence of any standardised rules of engagement through the Strip, often 'determined at the discretion of commanders on the ground or based on arbitrary criteria.' Wishing to be comprehensive, the authors of the report do not ignore Israel's actions in the West Bank and occupied East Jerusalem. Airstrikes regularly take place against refugee camps in the northern part of the territory since October 2023. Even more lethal open-fire policies have been used in the West Bank, with the use of kill zones suggesting 'the broader 'Gazafication' of Israel's methods of warfare.' Another group, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel (PHRI), has also published a legal-medical appraisal on the intentional destruction of Gaza's healthcare system, finding that the Israeli campaign in Gaza 'constitutes genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention.' The evidence examined by the group 'shows a deliberate and systematic dismantling of Gaza's healthcare system and other vital systems necessary for the population's survival.' The evolving nature of the campaign suggested a 'deliberate progression' from the initial bombing and forced evacuation of hospitals in the northern part of the Strip to calculated collapse of the healthcare system across the entire enclave. The dismantling of the health system involved rendering hospitals 'non-functional', the blocking of medical evaluations and the elimination of such vital services as trauma care, surgery, dialysis and maternal health. Added to this has been the direct targeting of health care workers, involving the death and detention of over 1,800 members 'including many senior specialists' and the deliberate restriction of humanitarian relief through militarised distribution points that pose lethal risks to aid recipients. 'This coordinated assault has produced a cascading failure of health and humanitarian infrastructure, compounded by policies leading to starvation, disease and the breakdown of sanitation, housing, and education systems.' PHRI contends that, at the very least, three core elements of Article II of the Genocide Convention are met: the killing of members of a group (identified by nationality, ethnicity, race or religion); causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of that group and deliberately inflicting on the group those conditions of life to bring about its destruction in whole or in part. In accepting that genocide is being perpetrated against the Palestinians, Our Genocide makes that most pertinent of points: the dry legal analysis of genocide tends to be distanced from a historical perspective. 'The legal definition is narrow, having been shaped in large part by the political interests of the states whose representatives drafted it.' The high threshold of identifying genocide, and the international jurisprudence on the subject, had produced a disturbing paradox: genocide tends to be recognised 'only after a significant portion of the targeted group has already been destroyed and the group as such has suffered irreparable harm.' The thrust of these clarion calls from B'Tselem and PHRI is urgently clear: end this state of affairs before the Palestinians become yet another historical victim of such harm.


Otago Daily Times
15 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Two Israeli human rights groups accuse Israel of genocide
Two Israeli human rights organisations said on Monday Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, the first major voices in Israeli society to level the strongest possible accusation against the state, which vehemently denies it. Rights group B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel released their reports at a press conference in Jerusalem, saying Israel was carrying out "coordinated, deliberate action to destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza strip". "The report we are publishing today is one we never imagined we would have to write," said Yuli Novak, B'Tselem's executive director. "The people of Gaza have been displaced, bombed and starved, left completely stripped of their humanity and rights." Physicians for Human Rights Israel focused on damage to Gaza's healthcare system, saying: "Israel's actions have destroyed Gaza's healthcare infrastructure in a manner that is both calculated and systematic". Israel has fended off accusations of genocide since the early days of the Gaza war, including a case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice in the Hague that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned as "outrageous". Israel has consistently said its actions are justified as self-defence, and Hamas is to blame for harm to civilians, for refusing to release hostages and surrender, and for operating in civilian areas, which the militant group denies. A spokesperson for the Israeli government called the allegation made by the rights groups on Monday "baseless". "There is no intent, (which is) key for the charge of genocide ... it simply doesn't make sense for a country to send in 1.9 million tons of aid, most of that being food, if there is an intent of genocide," said spokesperson David Mencer. Israel's military also rejected the reports' findings as "baseless". It said it abides by international law and takes unprecedented measures to prevent harm to civilians while Hamas uses them as "human shields". Israel launched its war in Gaza after Hamas-led fighters attacked Israeli communities across the border on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostages back to Gaza. Israel has often described that attack, the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust, as genocidal. Since then, Israel's offensive has killed nearly 60,000 people in Gaza, mostly civilians, according to Gaza health officials, reduced much of the enclave to ruins, and displaced nearly the entire population of more than two million. Accusations of genocide have particular gravity in Israel because of the origins of the concept in the work of Jewish legal scholars in the wake of the Nazi Holocaust. Israeli officials have in the past said using the word against Israel was libellous and antisemitic. When Amnesty International said in December that Israel had committed genocidal acts, Israel's foreign ministry called the global rights group a "deplorable and fanatical organisation". The 1948 Genocide Convention, adopted globally after the mass murder of Jews by the Nazis, defines genocide as "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group". PALESTINIAN PLIGHT GAINING ATTENTION At a Jerusalem cafe, Carmella, a 48-year-old teacher whose grandparents survived the Holocaust, said she was distressed over the suffering an hour's drive away, inside Gaza. "It feels difficult to me as an Israeli, as a Jew, to watch those images and feel anything but tremendous compassion and horror, to be honest. I feel horror." International attention to the plight of the Palestinians in Gaza has intensified in recent weeks, with UN agencies saying the territory is running out of food. Israel, which controls all supplies in to Gaza, says it has let enough food in, and blames the UN for failing to distribute it. Israel shut off all supplies in March for nearly three months, reopening the territory in May but with restrictions it says are needed to prevent aid from ending up in the hands of fighters. Since then, its forces have shot dead hundreds of Gazans trying to reach food distribution sites, according to the United Nations. Israel has announced measures in recent days to increase aid supplies, including pausing fighting in some locations, allowing airlifts of food and safer corridors for aid. Throughout the conflict, Israeli media have tended to focus mainly on the plight of Israeli hostages in Gaza. Footage widely broadcast in other countries of destruction and casualties in Gaza is rarely shown on Israeli TV. That has been changing, with recent images of starving children having a little more impact, said Oren Persico from The Seventh Eye, a group that tracks trends in Israeli media. "It's very slowly evolving," he said. "You see cracks." But he did not expect the genocide allegation would spark a major shift in attitudes: "The Israeli perception is: 'what do you want from us? It's Hamas' fault, if it would only put down its weapons and (release) the hostages this could all be over'." In an editorial in the Jerusalem Post on Sunday, Dani Dayan, the chairman of Israel's Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial, said it was not accurate to accuse Israel of committing genocide. "But that does not mean we should not acknowledge the suffering of civilians in Gaza. There are many men, women, and children with no connection to terrorism who are experiencing devastation, displacement, and loss," he wrote. "Their anguish is real, and our moral tradition obligates us not to turn away from it."